Trump orders immediate declassification of key documents in Russia hoax

[WTP]

Ha liar, we're still waiting?

Don’t pretend you GAF about National Security.

If it was Obama calling for the release of the texts and documents, you would be slurping his junk.

Obama would never in a million years, do it!

Releasing classified information of an on going investigation on himself and his campaign,

IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

Have at it, baby....

Obama had all his loyal cronies infesting the FBI and the DOJ. They are participating in this coup against Trump.

Declassifying those documents is in no way impeachable.

And you are lying, because there is no evidence Obama was infesting the FBI and DOJ. Care to prove me wrong? Of course not! That's why they are called lies. Thanks for your help liar. We need all we can get.

we will find out when the documents are released eh? why don't you want us to find that out? seems it is you who has the issue here.

That's already been explained dozens of times on this forum. Besides, if you can't figure that out for yourself, you're just wasting everyone's time. You'd have to be seriously retarded or pretending not to know to ask such a question.

 

[WTP]

question for the lefties on this thread. If the declassified documents have nothing new why are the DOJ, FBI, and dems slow rolling the release of them? Come on, tell us why they don't want them made public.

If you haven't figured that out for yourself by now, you are one some kind of ignoramus.

no I had it figured out long ago. they want to keep them hidden because they implicate high ups in the Obama administration in an illegal conspiracy to defraud the American people and overturn the results of a legal election.

Damn some of you are just so unbelievably stupid. If that were really true, it would have been exposed long before now. The FBI and DOJ would be investigating that, instead of supporting the FISA warrants that were approved by four judges. How brain dead do you have to be that you can't see that?

 

[WTP]

Papadopolous did. Did you forget crying like a little bitch about him for a year? Geez man, get your memory checked.

And Flynn has not been sentenced yet, because he is still snitching for Mueller.

No he didn't, moron. He went to jail because he got a date wrong.

He (Papadopoulos) went to jail for meeting with CIA asset Stephen Halper. Halper was directed by John Brennan to entrap Poppenfresh .

Halper was initially dispatched to entrap Carter Page, who Obama already had his FSB illegally spying on. The idea was for the foreign agent to get something that Obama could use against the Trump campaign.

But Page is a seasoned operative who has been exposed to CIA dirty tricks before, and he wouldn't bite. So Traitor Brennan turned his focus on a low level team member who had delusions of grandeur, George Popadopoulos, and set his CIA asset on entrapping the unwitting, junior level player. Within hours Brennan leaked the incident to the complicit corrupt press.

Isn't it amazing how the legal description of his crimes said nothing about what you are claiming? You of course are lying again. Lol! You make it so easy to expose your lies; https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

Isn't it amazing that you're too fucking stupid to read what you link to?

{Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed that his interactions with an overseas professor, who defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood to have substantial connections to Russian government officials, occurred before defendant PAP ADOPOULOS became a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign.}


That would be CIA asset Stephen Halper, you fucking retard.

Dumbfuck WTP denied that Popadopolous was indicted for getting a date wrong.

Damn, when do you ever stop lying? I never mentioned anything about dates. I said he was criminally charged for lying. And I linked the charges for you to read. Can you read idiot?

 

[Care4all]

Ha liar, we're still waiting?

Don’t pretend you GAF about National Security.

If it was Obama calling for the release of the texts and documents, you would be slurping his junk.

Obama would never in a million years, do it!

Releasing classified information of an on going investigation on himself and his campaign,

IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

Have at it, baby....

Obama had all his loyal cronies infesting the FBI and the DOJ. They are participating in this coup against Trump.

Declassifying those documents is in no way impeachable.

And you are lying, because there is no evidence Obama was infesting the FBI and DOJ. Care to prove me wrong? Of course not! That's why they are called lies. Thanks for your help liar. We need all we can get.

we will find out when the documents are released eh? why don't you want us to find that out? seems it is you who has the issue here.

Why be selective in what you want declassified from the Russia Investigation and not insist on it all being seen?

Are you going to support the President, when he replaces Rosenstein with a crony of his, who has promised Trump he will not release The Russia Investigation report of Mueller's to Congress or selectively cherry picks it, like he is considering doing now?

You said once before in another thread we were in, that you want to see everything...!!!

so if Trump stops that from happening, prevents the American people from seeing, at least through their Representatives, all that Mueller has been working because it implicates him or staff or campaign team, what will you do or say about it? Just be a sheep, and follow him?

 

[bripat9643]

I won the Ft Sumter debate, moron. They turned over the property rights. They retained legal jurisdiction. That was in the document you claimed supported your idiot theory. Tell us, oh great Anointed Idiot, is Annapolis Navel officer school part of Maryland? How about Fort Bragg? Is it part of NC?

"I won the Ft Sumter debate, moron."

LOLOLOL

You crack me up, fucking moron.

How'd they turn over property rights when there was no property when the territory was ceded?

The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory. The document you cited says they retained legal jurisdiction.

Now explain to us how Annapolis isn't really part of Maryland. Didn't the state cede that territory to the federal government as well?

”The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory.”

LOL

Resolved That this State do cede to the United States all the right title and claim of South Carolina to the site of Fort Sumter and the requisite quantity of adjacent territory

United States Military Reservations, National Cemeteries, and Military Parks

Are you ever not a fucking moron, ya fucking moron?

And no, South Carolina never retained legal jurisdiction over it either. You would understand that if you weren’t such a fucking moron. What they retained was the right to process serve criminals on that territory. The territory still belonged to the federal government despite your bizarre claim to the contrary. It still does to this day.

Don’t you ever tire of getting bitchslapped?

You left out this part, moron:

"provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state. or any officer thereof shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same and any person there being who may be implicated in law"​

In other words, the laws of South Carolina were still in force. It explicitly retained legal jurisdiction. You have to be retarded not to understand that. Also note that this section refers to "land," not territory. The two terms are used interchangeably.

You keep trying to get around that section, but there it is, plain as day.

LOLOL

You’re such a fucking moron. No, not in other words -- in those words. That is not retaining legal jurisdiction ... that is what it says, which I actually addressed in my last post ... the right to process serve criminals on that territory so that fugitives couldn’t escape the law by taking up refuge in the fort. No other South Carolina law was enforceable on the territory.

And that clause was standard among the states ceding land to the federal government.

Reservation of Power to Serve State Process

The reservation which has usually accompanied the consent of the states that civil and criminal process of the state courts may be served in the places purchased is not considered as interfering in any respect with the supremacy of the United States over them but is admitted to prevent them from becoming an asylum for fugitives from justice.

The federal statutes annotated by William Mark McKinney, Doctorate of Law​

You never feel stupid, do ya, you fucking moron?

This is why debating you is an utter waste of bandwitch. You can't understand basic English sentences. Even the dumbest members of this forum understand what "all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state" means. Those are the laws of South Carolina.

You lost the debate on this issue, and you still can't admit it. What some scumbag leftwing lawyer says is meaningless. We can all read English.

 

[bripat9643]

Don’t pretend you GAF about National Security.

If it was Obama calling for the release of the texts and documents, you would be slurping his junk.

Obama would never in a million years, do it!

Releasing classified information of an on going investigation on himself and his campaign,

IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

Have at it, baby....

Obama had all his loyal cronies infesting the FBI and the DOJ. They are participating in this coup against Trump.

Declassifying those documents is in no way impeachable.

And you are lying, because there is no evidence Obama was infesting the FBI and DOJ. Care to prove me wrong? Of course not! That's why they are called lies. Thanks for your help liar. We need all we can get.

we will find out when the documents are released eh? why don't you want us to find that out? seems it is you who has the issue here.

Why be selective in what you want declassified from the Russia Investigation and not insist on it all being seen?

Are you going to support the President, when he replaces Rosenstein with a crony of his, who has promised Trump he will not release The Russia Investigation report of Mueller's to Congress or selectively cherry picks it, like he is considering doing now?

You said once before in another thread we were in, that you want to see everything...!!!

so if Trump stops that from happening, prevents the American people from seeing, at least through their Representatives, all that Mueller has been working because it implicates him or staff or campaign team, what will you do or say about it? Just be a sheep, and follow him?

If the Dims want something declassified, they can ask the President to declassify it. They haven't done it because they want to keep the public from knowing the truth. You aren't fooling anyone with your bogus concern about national security. Since when have leftwingers ever given a damn about that?

 

[francoHFW]

Obama would never in a million years, do it!

Releasing classified information of an on going investigation on himself and his campaign,

IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

Have at it, baby....

Obama had all his loyal cronies infesting the FBI and the DOJ. They are participating in this coup against Trump.

Declassifying those documents is in no way impeachable.

And you are lying, because there is no evidence Obama was infesting the FBI and DOJ. Care to prove me wrong? Of course not! That's why they are called lies. Thanks for your help liar. We need all we can get.

we will find out when the documents are released eh? why don't you want us to find that out? seems it is you who has the issue here.

Why be selective in what you want declassified from the Russia Investigation and not insist on it all being seen?

Are you going to support the President, when he replaces Rosenstein with a crony of his, who has promised Trump he will not release The Russia Investigation report of Mueller's to Congress or selectively cherry picks it, like he is considering doing now?

You said once before in another thread we were in, that you want to see everything...!!!

so if Trump stops that from happening, prevents the American people from seeing, at least through their Representatives, all that Mueller has been working because it implicates him or staff or campaign team, what will you do or say about it? Just be a sheep, and follow him?

If the Dims want something declassified, they can ask the President to declassify it. They haven't done it because they want to keep the public from knowing the truth. You are fooling anyone with your bogus concern about national security. Since when have leftwingers ever given a damn about that?

No evidence of any such thing, excepting dupe world.

 

[francoHFW]

Obama had all his loyal cronies infesting the FBI and the DOJ. They are participating in this coup against Trump.

Declassifying those documents is in no way impeachable.

And you are lying, because there is no evidence Obama was infesting the FBI and DOJ. Care to prove me wrong? Of course not! That's why they are called lies. Thanks for your help liar. We need all we can get.

we will find out when the documents are released eh? why don't you want us to find that out? seems it is you who has the issue here.

Why be selective in what you want declassified from the Russia Investigation and not insist on it all being seen?

Are you going to support the President, when he replaces Rosenstein with a crony of his, who has promised Trump he will not release The Russia Investigation report of Mueller's to Congress or selectively cherry picks it, like he is considering doing now?

You said once before in another thread we were in, that you want to see everything...!!!

so if Trump stops that from happening, prevents the American people from seeing, at least through their Representatives, all that Mueller has been working because it implicates him or staff or campaign team, what will you do or say about it? Just be a sheep, and follow him?

If the Dims want something declassified, they can ask the President to declassify it. They haven't done it because they want to keep the public from knowing the truth. You are fooling anyone with your bogus concern about national security. Since when have leftwingers ever given a damn about that?

No evidence of any such thing, except in dupe world.

and all investigated already. Nothing. Idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

Don’t pretend you GAF about National Security.

If it was Obama calling for the release of the texts and documents, you would be slurping his junk.

Obama would never in a million years, do it!

Releasing classified information of an on going investigation on himself and his campaign,

IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

Have at it, baby....

Obama had all his loyal cronies infesting the FBI and the DOJ. They are participating in this coup against Trump.

Declassifying those documents is in no way impeachable.

And you are lying, because there is no evidence Obama was infesting the FBI and DOJ. Care to prove me wrong? Of course not! That's why they are called lies. Thanks for your help liar. We need all we can get.

we will find out when the documents are released eh? why don't you want us to find that out? seems it is you who has the issue here.

Why be selective in what you want declassified from the Russia Investigation and not insist on it all being seen?

Are you going to support the President, when he replaces Rosenstein with a crony of his, who has promised Trump he will not release The Russia Investigation report of Mueller's to Congress or selectively cherry picks it, like he is considering doing now?

You said once before in another thread we were in, that you want to see everything...!!!

so if Trump stops that from happening, prevents the American people from seeing, at least through their Representatives, all that Mueller has been working because it implicates him or staff or campaign team, what will you do or say about it? Just be a sheep, and follow him?

How many millions of documents do you think Trump should declassify? How can he declassify anything without being accused by douchebags like you of being "selective?" Dims are the ones who want to keep information hidden from the public. Trump has done nothing to keep Mueller from publishing whatever he wants.

Your post is the usual pile of horseshit.

 

[Faun]

"I won the Ft Sumter debate, moron."

LOLOLOL

You crack me up, fucking moron.

How'd they turn over property rights when there was no property when the territory was ceded?

The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory. The document you cited says they retained legal jurisdiction.

Now explain to us how Annapolis isn't really part of Maryland. Didn't the state cede that territory to the federal government as well?

”The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory.”

LOL

Resolved That this State do cede to the United States all the right title and claim of South Carolina to the site of Fort Sumter and the requisite quantity of adjacent territory

United States Military Reservations, National Cemeteries, and Military Parks

Are you ever not a fucking moron, ya fucking moron?

And no, South Carolina never retained legal jurisdiction over it either. You would understand that if you weren’t such a fucking moron. What they retained was the right to process serve criminals on that territory. The territory still belonged to the federal government despite your bizarre claim to the contrary. It still does to this day.

Don’t you ever tire of getting bitchslapped?

You left out this part, moron:

"provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state. or any officer thereof shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same and any person there being who may be implicated in law"​

In other words, the laws of South Carolina were still in force. It explicitly retained legal jurisdiction. You have to be retarded not to understand that. Also note that this section refers to "land," not territory. The two terms are used interchangeably.

You keep trying to get around that section, but there it is, plain as day.

LOLOL

You’re such a fucking moron. No, not in other words -- in those words. That is not retaining legal jurisdiction ... that is what it says, which I actually addressed in my last post ... the right to process serve criminals on that territory so that fugitives couldn’t escape the law by taking up refuge in the fort. No other South Carolina law was enforceable on the territory.

And that clause was standard among the states ceding land to the federal government.

Reservation of Power to Serve State Process

The reservation which has usually accompanied the consent of the states that civil and criminal process of the state courts may be served in the places purchased is not considered as interfering in any respect with the supremacy of the United States over them but is admitted to prevent them from becoming an asylum for fugitives from justice.

The federal statutes annotated by William Mark McKinney, Doctorate of Law​

You never feel stupid, do ya, you fucking moron?

This is why debating you is an utter waste of bandwitch. You can't understand basic English sentences. Even the dumbest members of this forum understand what "all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state" means. Those are the laws of South Carolina.

You lost the debate on this issue, and you still can't admit it. What some scumbag leftwing lawyer says is meaningless. We can all read English.

LOLOLOLOL

You literally had to cut that sentence in half to make it state something it doesn’t.

The whole provision reads ....

provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state, or any officer thereof, shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same, and any person there being who may be implicated in law;​

With the bolded text the part you left out. And I quoted from a book of legal annotations the meaning of that provision which explicitly clarifies the meaning is limited to process serving so fugitives can’t escape the law.

And here’s another saying the same thing...

https://www.civilwarhome.com/sumterownership.html

It is important to note that then - and now - the government refused to accept property where there was any other restriction. The state gave up all rights it might have in the property. Otherwise Congress would refuse to appropriate the necessary funds to build the installation. The States bent over backwards to make certain they got their share - and then some - of the Federal budget, including quickly removing impediments to the government acquiring title.
And it is important to note that the title given to the United States was fee simple, with specific notice that the property was exempt from any state or local taxes. Except for the qualification that the property could be entered to seize fugitives, the property passed in perpetuity to the Federal government.​

Now everyone here sees you’re a fucking moron AND a liar.

 

[bripat9643]

The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory. The document you cited says they retained legal jurisdiction.

Now explain to us how Annapolis isn't really part of Maryland. Didn't the state cede that territory to the federal government as well?

”The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory.”

LOL

Resolved That this State do cede to the United States all the right title and claim of South Carolina to the site of Fort Sumter and the requisite quantity of adjacent territory

United States Military Reservations, National Cemeteries, and Military Parks

Are you ever not a fucking moron, ya fucking moron?

And no, South Carolina never retained legal jurisdiction over it either. You would understand that if you weren’t such a fucking moron. What they retained was the right to process serve criminals on that territory. The territory still belonged to the federal government despite your bizarre claim to the contrary. It still does to this day.

Don’t you ever tire of getting bitchslapped?

You left out this part, moron:

"provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state. or any officer thereof shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same and any person there being who may be implicated in law"​

In other words, the laws of South Carolina were still in force. It explicitly retained legal jurisdiction. You have to be retarded not to understand that. Also note that this section refers to "land," not territory. The two terms are used interchangeably.

You keep trying to get around that section, but there it is, plain as day.

LOLOL

You’re such a fucking moron. No, not in other words -- in those words. That is not retaining legal jurisdiction ... that is what it says, which I actually addressed in my last post ... the right to process serve criminals on that territory so that fugitives couldn’t escape the law by taking up refuge in the fort. No other South Carolina law was enforceable on the territory.

And that clause was standard among the states ceding land to the federal government.

Reservation of Power to Serve State Process

The reservation which has usually accompanied the consent of the states that civil and criminal process of the state courts may be served in the places purchased is not considered as interfering in any respect with the supremacy of the United States over them but is admitted to prevent them from becoming an asylum for fugitives from justice.

The federal statutes annotated by William Mark McKinney, Doctorate of Law​

You never feel stupid, do ya, you fucking moron?

This is why debating you is an utter waste of bandwitch. You can't understand basic English sentences. Even the dumbest members of this forum understand what "all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state" means. Those are the laws of South Carolina.

You lost the debate on this issue, and you still can't admit it. What some scumbag leftwing lawyer says is meaningless. We can all read English.

LOLOLOLOL

You literally had to cut that sentence in half to make it state something it doesn’t.

The whole provision reads ....

provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state, or any officer thereof, shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same, and any person there being who may be implicated in law;​

With the bolded text the part you left out. And I quoted from a book of legal annotations the meaning of that provision which explicitly clarifies the meaning is limited to process serving so fugitives can’t escape the law.

And here’s another saying the same thing...

https://www.civilwarhome.com/sumterownership.html

It is important to note that then - and now - the government refused to accept property where there was any other restriction. The state gave up all rights it might have in the property. Otherwise Congress would refuse to appropriate the necessary funds to build the installation. The States bent over backwards to make certain they got their share - and then some - of the Federal budget, including quickly removing impediments to the government acquiring title.
And it is important to note that the title given to the United States was fee simple, with specific notice that the property was exempt from any state or local taxes. Except for the qualification that the property could be entered to seize fugitives, the property passed in perpetuity to the Federal government.​

Now everyone here sees you’re a fucking moron AND a liar.

Uh . . . . moron, I didn't leave out the part you claim I left out. You left it out. It doesn't matter what a couple of douchebag lawyers say about the provision, we can read it for ourselves, and it clearly says that South Carolina would retain legal jurisdiction over the property.

 

[Faun]

”The property was ceded, dumbass, not the territory.”

LOL

Resolved That this State do cede to the United States all the right title and claim of South Carolina to the site of Fort Sumter and the requisite quantity of adjacent territory

United States Military Reservations, National Cemeteries, and Military Parks

Are you ever not a fucking moron, ya fucking moron?

And no, South Carolina never retained legal jurisdiction over it either. You would understand that if you weren’t such a fucking moron. What they retained was the right to process serve criminals on that territory. The territory still belonged to the federal government despite your bizarre claim to the contrary. It still does to this day.

Don’t you ever tire of getting bitchslapped?

You left out this part, moron:

"provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state. or any officer thereof shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same and any person there being who may be implicated in law"​

In other words, the laws of South Carolina were still in force. It explicitly retained legal jurisdiction. You have to be retarded not to understand that. Also note that this section refers to "land," not territory. The two terms are used interchangeably.

You keep trying to get around that section, but there it is, plain as day.

LOLOL

You’re such a fucking moron. No, not in other words -- in those words. That is not retaining legal jurisdiction ... that is what it says, which I actually addressed in my last post ... the right to process serve criminals on that territory so that fugitives couldn’t escape the law by taking up refuge in the fort. No other South Carolina law was enforceable on the territory.

And that clause was standard among the states ceding land to the federal government.

Reservation of Power to Serve State Process

The reservation which has usually accompanied the consent of the states that civil and criminal process of the state courts may be served in the places purchased is not considered as interfering in any respect with the supremacy of the United States over them but is admitted to prevent them from becoming an asylum for fugitives from justice.

The federal statutes annotated by William Mark McKinney, Doctorate of Law​

You never feel stupid, do ya, you fucking moron?

This is why debating you is an utter waste of bandwitch. You can't understand basic English sentences. Even the dumbest members of this forum understand what "all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state" means. Those are the laws of South Carolina.

You lost the debate on this issue, and you still can't admit it. What some scumbag leftwing lawyer says is meaningless. We can all read English.

LOLOLOLOL

You literally had to cut that sentence in half to make it state something it doesn’t.

The whole provision reads ....

provided, that all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this state, or any officer thereof, shall and may be served and executed upon any of the land so ceded, or structures to be erected upon the same, and any person there being who may be implicated in law;​

With the bolded text the part you left out. And I quoted from a book of legal annotations the meaning of that provision which explicitly clarifies the meaning is limited to process serving so fugitives can’t escape the law.

And here’s another saying the same thing...

https://www.civilwarhome.com/sumterownership.html

It is important to note that then - and now - the government refused to accept property where there was any other restriction. The state gave up all rights it might have in the property. Otherwise Congress would refuse to appropriate the necessary funds to build the installation. The States bent over backwards to make certain they got their share - and then some - of the Federal budget, including quickly removing impediments to the government acquiring title.
And it is important to note that the title given to the United States was fee simple, with specific notice that the property was exempt from any state or local taxes. Except for the qualification that the property could be entered to seize fugitives, the property passed in perpetuity to the Federal government.​

Now everyone here sees you’re a fucking moron AND a liar.

Uh . . . . moron, I didn't leave out the part you claim I left out. You left it out. It doesn't matter what a couple of douchebag lawyers say about the provision, we can read it for ourselves, and it clearly says that South Carolina would retain legal jurisdiction over the property.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, you chopped up the sentence to change it’s meaning. Earlier, you added a period to end a sentence where no period existed in the actual resolution.

That you’re trying to change the meaning of that provision shows even you know you’re wrong, you’re just not man enough to admit it.

Not to mention, I’ve also posted two other sources saying that provision only allowed South Carolina to process serve fugitives from the law. You’re such a fucking moron, you’re actually getting bitchslapped again over the same points as last time, proving you’re ineducable.

Now everyone here sees you’re a fucking moron AND a liar.

 

[Redfish]

no one has been tried or convicted of anything related to Russia or the 2016 campaign

Well,except for three campaign officials pleading guilty to crimes involving ties with Russia.

name them and what they were "convicted" of.

No, you can look that up yourself. Or don't.

you made the claim, its on you to support it. bring it, or STFU

 

[Redfish]

[
What does he have to lose?

Well, he could end up like you fawn, the laughing stock of USMB...

Faun's attacks on meaningless trivialities are his greatest triumphs.

LOL

And by "meaningless trivialities," you mean bitch-slapping your arguments regularly.

What gets me is the short attention span of the Trump kins. They have already forgot that Paul Manafort, Mr Swamp himself has already spilled the beans on dotard and his entire criminal family.

It’s not a matter of if dotard and the kids are going to prison but when and for how long.

Which is why Trump is desperate to get rid of Rosenstein.

bullshit, since Rosenstein signed the FISA warrants he should not be involved in the investigation of the legality of the FISA warrants. He cannot be both witness and prosecutor, that's they way the justice system works in North Korea.

 

[Seawytch]

[
What does he have to lose?

Well, he could end up like you fawn, the laughing stock of USMB...

Faun's attacks on meaningless trivialities are his greatest triumphs.

LOL

And by "meaningless trivialities," you mean bitch-slapping your arguments regularly.

What gets me is the short attention span of the Trump kins. They have already forgot that Paul Manafort, Mr Swamp himself has already spilled the beans on dotard and his entire criminal family.

It’s not a matter of if dotard and the kids are going to prison but when and for how long.

Bigger even than Manifort being a cooperating witness is both Cohen and Weisselberg being cooperating witnesses.

 

[Redfish]

question for the lefties on this thread. If the declassified documents have nothing new why are the DOJ, FBI, and dems slow rolling the release of them? Come on, tell us why they don't want them made public.

If you haven't figured that out for yourself by now, you are one some kind of ignoramus.

no I had it figured out long ago. they want to keep them hidden because they implicate high ups in the Obama administration in an illegal conspiracy to defraud the American people and overturn the results of a legal election.

Damn some of you are just so unbelievably stupid. If that were really true, it would have been exposed long before now. The FBI and DOJ would be investigating that, instead of supporting the FISA warrants that were approved by four judges. How brain dead do you have to be that you can't see that?

the four judges that you keep mentioning were lied to. They approved the warrants based on fraudulent information. Those judges should be suing Rosenstein and everyone else involved in preparing and submitting those warrants to the FISA court.

 

[kyzr]

[
What does he have to lose?

Well, he could end up like you fawn, the laughing stock of USMB...

Faun's attacks on meaningless trivialities are his greatest triumphs.

LOL

And by "meaningless trivialities," you mean bitch-slapping your arguments regularly.

What gets me is the short attention span of the Trump kins. They have already forgot that Paul Manafort, Mr Swamp himself has already spilled the beans on dotard and his entire criminal family.

It’s not a matter of if dotard and the kids are going to prison but when and for how long.

Bigger even than Manifort being a cooperating witness is both Cohen and Weisselberg being cooperating witnesses.

Dershowitz said that Cohen has attorney-client privilege, so I'm not sure what he says about Trump counts??

 

[Faun]

Well, he could end up like you fawn, the laughing stock of USMB...

Faun's attacks on meaningless trivialities are his greatest triumphs.

LOL

And by "meaningless trivialities," you mean bitch-slapping your arguments regularly.

What gets me is the short attention span of the Trump kins. They have already forgot that Paul Manafort, Mr Swamp himself has already spilled the beans on dotard and his entire criminal family.

It’s not a matter of if dotard and the kids are going to prison but when and for how long.

Bigger even than Manifort being a cooperating witness is both Cohen and Weisselberg being cooperating witnesses.

Dershowitz said that Cohen has attorney-client privilege, so I'm not sure what he says about Trump counts??

Lawyers cannot hide behind attorney-client privilege to commit crimes.

 

[Seawytch]

Well, he could end up like you fawn, the laughing stock of USMB...

Faun's attacks on meaningless trivialities are his greatest triumphs.

LOL

And by "meaningless trivialities," you mean bitch-slapping your arguments regularly.

What gets me is the short attention span of the Trump kins. They have already forgot that Paul Manafort, Mr Swamp himself has already spilled the beans on dotard and his entire criminal family.

It’s not a matter of if dotard and the kids are going to prison but when and for how long.

Bigger even than Manifort being a cooperating witness is both Cohen and Weisselberg being cooperating witnesses.

Dershowitz said that Cohen has attorney-client privilege, so I'm not sure what he says about Trump counts??

Fox and Brietbart didn't cover this?

A retired federal judge ruled that less than 0.2% of all the Michael Cohen documents are privileged

 

[Seawytch]

question for the lefties on this thread. If the declassified documents have nothing new why are the DOJ, FBI, and dems slow rolling the release of them? Come on, tell us why they don't want them made public.

If you haven't figured that out for yourself by now, you are one some kind of ignoramus.

no I had it figured out long ago. they want to keep them hidden because they implicate high ups in the Obama administration in an illegal conspiracy to defraud the American people and overturn the results of a legal election.

Damn some of you are just so unbelievably stupid. If that were really true, it would have been exposed long before now. The FBI and DOJ would be investigating that, instead of supporting the FISA warrants that were approved by four judges. How brain dead do you have to be that you can't see that?

the four judges that you keep mentioning were lied to. They approved the warrants based on fraudulent information. Those judges should be suing Rosenstein and everyone else involved in preparing and submitting those warrants to the FISA court.

What was the lie? What fraudulent information?