So before there was Trump, apparently there was Obama--who may not have been doing that well In Utah, either(?). Obama 2008 in fact, mainly lost in a lot of the little States that Sanders seems to be winning, now in 2016(?). Likely something about that, "Ol' Time Religion," seems to carry so many through all kind of travails and troubles! No major commentators seem to have noticed. No major commentators have noticed that Sanders is likely to federally fund an elite aristocracy of public college and university teachers. No one even snickers that soon enough they will not all be Jewish, but likely Chinese and other Asian ethnics.
Obama is otherwise called the "Head Deporter in Charge," in the recent campaigns. More fundamentally, many Hispanics are voluntarily now leaving the USA, a net Emigration of about 140,000 in one recent year alone.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/20/u...aving-us-than-entering-report-finds.html?_r=0
Notably, Mormons did not turn out for Trump. People doing famous Mormon missions are recently included as bombing victims. The Bush Family is famously unable to find Weapons of Mass Destruction, especially in Iraq, or any friendly voters anywhere in USA. So they are on board with Cruz(?)!
The European Union is famously wanting to go back to a simpler, kinder, gentler time when borders were closed, and warfare was notably internecine--and more or less continuous, and normal.
And all this was lost on Arizona, which notably Secretary Clinton, discussed in no uncertain terms. Low Income workers in Arizona can in fact benefit from Mexican Emigration, a likely an outcome to be expected from NAFTA. That part never gets included(?).
Voting against Emigration is not likely even to resonate in Europe, and the right-wing factions. Republicans traditionally are for open borders and trade policies. Even The Russians finally left Syria. The Germans managed to get Turkey to take back exiles in Greece.
"Anarchy" is sometimes called, "Civilization Without Borders," needing mainly a concept of Widespread Wealth Worldwide. An anarchy clearly is about less government. The creation of economic opportunities for Hispanics, through the NAFTA implementation, should actually not be lost on Republicans, at a time like this.
There is no need to vote for a Bush again(?). . . or something(?)!
Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(As Hiawatha likely never said to Pocahontas, "You Win A Few, You Lose A Few, But it all evens out in the end!")
Obama is otherwise called the "Head Deporter in Charge," in the recent campaigns. More fundamentally, many Hispanics are voluntarily now leaving the USA, a net Emigration of about 140,000 in one recent year alone.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/20/u...aving-us-than-entering-report-finds.html?_r=0
Notably, Mormons did not turn out for Trump. People doing famous Mormon missions are recently included as bombing victims. The Bush Family is famously unable to find Weapons of Mass Destruction, especially in Iraq, or any friendly voters anywhere in USA. So they are on board with Cruz(?)!
The European Union is famously wanting to go back to a simpler, kinder, gentler time when borders were closed, and warfare was notably internecine--and more or less continuous, and normal.
And all this was lost on Arizona, which notably Secretary Clinton, discussed in no uncertain terms. Low Income workers in Arizona can in fact benefit from Mexican Emigration, a likely an outcome to be expected from NAFTA. That part never gets included(?).
Voting against Emigration is not likely even to resonate in Europe, and the right-wing factions. Republicans traditionally are for open borders and trade policies. Even The Russians finally left Syria. The Germans managed to get Turkey to take back exiles in Greece.
"Anarchy" is sometimes called, "Civilization Without Borders," needing mainly a concept of Widespread Wealth Worldwide. An anarchy clearly is about less government. The creation of economic opportunities for Hispanics, through the NAFTA implementation, should actually not be lost on Republicans, at a time like this.
There is no need to vote for a Bush again(?). . . or something(?)!
Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(As Hiawatha likely never said to Pocahontas, "You Win A Few, You Lose A Few, But it all evens out in the end!")