eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 69,388
- 34,434
The deterrent is the MAD principle. Always has been and always will be...............The question is should we allow our systems to remain degraded and prevent possible accidents as a result of neglect................If we have only 4800 warheads instead of 7300 warheads, no one is going to notice once Trump gives the command to launch and most of the large cities in both countries are piles of ashes.Donald Trump says he will dump the new fighter that Lockheed is working on & replace it with something cheaper.
Funny how the draft dodging POS Trump hid from war & wants out troops in war with inferior weapons.
Really Trumpettes? Is this what you voted for?
He's going to need that money to keep up with the arms race he has just started. Apparently our arsenal of 7300 nuclear warheads are not going to be enough for Trump. He will only be able to level and make unlivable all cities on earth over 100,000. The Good News for Trump is Putin has also expressed his desire to upgrade Russia's arsenal of 8,000 warheads, enough to take out all the medium sizes cities on earth. The other nuclear powers, France, UK, China, Pakistan, India, brings the current worldwide total of nuclear warheads to about 17,000 so there should be enough now to reduce the earth to a burning cinder fit for only insects. Does the idiot really see a need to wipe them out too?
It is now down to 4500..........so your numbers are wrong..........
The dangers of our aging nuclear arsenal
READ.............
The Chinese have only about 250 warheads, but as one Chinese military strategist said, ten times the number of warheads does not create ten times the deterrent.
Our systems are in need of an overhaul...........not only the silo's but the missiles themselves.............
And a SINGLE TWEET doesn't mean he's gonna build THOUSANDS OF THEM..........that is you just spouting guesses trying to make a LARGE STORY over a single line tweet.....................