Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The lousy EPA is a waste of time and money, full of corruption…Oh yeah, lmao..good idea. Have you seen the air and water and ground in china? You want that here? Just so the greedy corporations can profit off of ruining our water our land and our air?
There is NO EPA in china
link?
Gimmie a link or stfu
Oh yeah, lmao..good idea. Have you seen the air and water and ground in china? You want that here? Just so the greedy corporations can profit off of ruining our water our land and our air?
We make a mint over in China selling environmental designs that the companies demand for customer brand satisfaction....There is NO EPA in china
You have no fucking clue....
...and the IRSThe Dept of Education should be gone as well - turn education back over to the states.
I have a nephew that does [sic] works in china [sic] for the last 10 years and have seen the photos he has sent me. You need to take a trip to china [sic] .
.There is NO EPA in china
Yes there is. It's called the MEP (in translation).
Love Canal was a problem created by the County government. To solve environmental problem, we need to eliminate the government.Anyone ever heard of love canal?
Have I ever what?
ROFL! So you don't think our elected officials should have any oversight over the EPA? Really? How do you feel about elections? Should we dispense with those as well?I have no problem keeping the EPA, but they need to be stripped of enacting any regulations without an affirmative vote of Congress first. Nothing in the Constitution gives unelected bureaucrats authority to make law.
No. Lmao. It is our elected officials that give the corporations whatever they want and this is a dead giveaway to anyone seeking the truth. The EPA is by itself to distance themselves from the corruption that is rampid in our political system.
Currently, the richest 1% hold about 38% of all privately held wealth in the United States. while the bottom 90% held 73% of all debt. According to the New York Times, the "richest 1 percent in the United States now own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent".
« back to 99 to 1
- The 1 percent has 35.6 percent of all private wealth, more than the bottom 95 percent combined.
- The 400 wealthiest individuals on the Forbes 400 list have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans.
- In 2010, 25 of the 100 largest U.S. companies paid their CEO more than they paid in U.S. taxes. This is largely because corporations in the global 1 percent use off shore tax havens to dodge their U.S. taxes.
- Between 1983 and 2009, over 40 percent of all wealth gains flowed to the 1 percent and 82 percent of wealth gains went to the top 5 percent. The bottom 60 percent lost wealth over this same period.
- The world’s 1 percent, almost entirely billionaires, own $42.7 trillion dollars, more than the bottom 3 billion residents of earth.
- Between 2001 and 2010, the United States borrowed over $1 trillion to give wealthy taxpayers with incomes over $250,000 substantial tax breaks, including the 2001 Bush era tax cuts.
- The 99 percent has seen their national share of income decline from 91 percent in 1976 to 79 percent in 2010. The share of wealth owned by the bottom 90 percent declined from 19.1 percent in 1962 to 12.8 percent in 2009.
- The median net worth of white households in 2009 was $113,149, over 20 times the median net worth of African American households ($5,677) and 18 times that of Hispanic households ($6,325).
- In 2010, average CEO pay for an S&P 500 company was $10.8 million, a 27 percent increase over 2009. The gap between CEO and average U.S. worker pay is 325 to 1, up from 42 to 1 in 1980.
- The corporate 1 percent dominates the lobbying for federal and state policies. In the last 30 years, the ranks of official lobbyists have exploded. In 1970, there were 5 registered lobbyists for every one of the 535 members of Congress. Today there are 22 lobbyists for every member.
You tell me why they need more at the cost of our environment?