Trump was right: New study reveals up to 5.7 million illegals voted in election

[Syriusly]

LOL- this is #3 of your clear proof that you are either insane- or an idiot.
There is absolutely no evidence that there were millions of illegal votes cast in 2016.
Stop listening to the voices in your head.

There is absolutely NO evidence that absolutely proves the big bang...just theories.

What Is The Evidence For The Big Bang? - Universe Today

In an instant, everything expanded outward from that location, forming the energy, atoms and eventually the stars and galaxies we see today. But to call this concept merely a theory is to misjudge the overwhelming amount of evidence.

There are separate lines of evidence, each of which independently points towards this as the origin story for our Universe. The first came with the amazing discovery that almost all galaxies are moving away from us.

Next

 

[Syriusly]

LOL- this is #3 of your clear proof that you are either insane- or an idiot.
There is absolutely no evidence that there were millions of illegal votes cast in 2016.
Stop listening to the voices in your head.

Now...there IS evidence that the Dems fought to keep voter ID requirements out of elections......why?

Oppose Voter ID Legislation - Fact Sheet

Voter ID laws deprive many voters of their right to vote, reduce participation, and stand in direct opposition to our country’s trend of including more Americans in the democratic process. Many Americans do not have one of the forms of identification states acceptable for voting. These voters are disproportionately low-income, racial and ethnic minorities, the elderly, and people with disabilities. Such voters more frequently have difficulty obtaining ID, because they cannot afford or cannot obtain the underlying documents that are a prerequisite to obtaining government-issued photo ID card.

VOTER ID LAWS DEPRIVE MANY AMERICANS OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE

• Millions of Americans Lack ID. 11% of U.S. citizens – or more than 21 million Americans – do not have government-issued photo identification.1
• Obtaining ID Costs Money. Even if ID is offered for free, voters must incur numerous costs (such as paying for birth certificates) to apply for a government-issued ID.
  • Underlying documents required to obtain ID cost money, a significant expense for lower-income Americans. The combined cost of document fees, travel expenses and waiting time are estimated to range from $75 to $175.2
  • The travel required is often a major burden on people with disabilities, the elderly, or those in rural areas without access to a car or public transportation. In Texas, some people in rural areas must travel approximately 170 miles to reach the nearest ID office.3
• Voter ID Laws Reduce Voter Turnout. A 2014 GAO study found that strict photo ID laws reduce turnout by 2-3 percentage points,4 which can translate into tens of thousands of votes lost in a single state.5

VOTER ID LAWS ARE DISCRIMINATORY

• Minority voters disproportionately lack ID. Nationally, up to 25% of African-American citizens of voting age lack government-issued photo ID, compared to only 8% of whites.6
• States exclude forms of ID in a discriminatory manner. Texas allows concealed weapons permits for voting, but does not accept student ID cards. Until its voter ID law was struck down, North Carolina prohibited public assistance IDs and state employee ID cards, which are disproportionately held by Black voters. And until recently, Wisconsin permitted active duty military ID cards, but prohibited Veterans Affairs ID cards for voting.
• Voter ID laws are enforced in a discriminatory manner. A Caltech/MIT study found that minority voters are more frequently questioned about ID than are white voters.7
• Voter ID laws reduce turnout among minority voters. Several studies, including a 2014 GAO study, have found that photo ID laws have a particularly depressive effect on turnout among racial minorities and other vulnerable groups, worsening the participation gap between voters of color and whites.8

VOTER ID REQUIREMENTS ARE A SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF A PROBLEM

• In-person fraud is vanishingly rare. A recent study found that, since 2000, there were only 31 credible allegations of voter impersonation – the only type of fraud that photo IDs could prevent – during a period of time in which over 1 billion ballots were cast.9
• Identified instances of “fraud” are honest mistakes. So-called cases of in-person impersonation voter “fraud” are almost always the product of an elections worker or a voter making an honest mistake, and that even these mistakes are extremely infrequent.10
• Voter ID laws are a waste of taxpayer dollars. States incur sizeable costs when implementing voter ID laws, including the cost of educating the public, training poll workers, and providing IDs to voters.
  • Texas spent nearly $2 million on voter education and outreach efforts following passage of its Voter ID law.11
  • Indiana spent over $10 million to produce free ID cards between 2007 and 2010.12

The ACLU has led the charge against Voter ID in several states, challenging voter ID laws in in states such as Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. For more information, please contact Robert Hoffman at [email protected] or visit Fighting Voter ID Requirements to learn more

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Actually there is some evidence that being gay is not a choice- but it is not convincing evidence- because there is also evidence that appears to counter that.
Next.

You don't realize it....but you just made my point for me

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Perhaps you should review the US Constitution. It actually REQUIRES that voters be US citizens regardless of the anti-Americans attempts to nullify the Constitution.

Now, without identifying a person, how do you determine if they are CONSTITUTIONALLY eligible to vote in US elections?

Repeat after me........
.
.
"duh"

 

[Syriusly]

LOL- this is #3 of your clear proof that you are either insane- or an idiot.
There is absolutely no evidence that there were millions of illegal votes cast in 2016.
Stop listening to the voices in your head.

There Is evidence that the Dems created sanctuary cities and provided driver licenses to illegal immigrants.....why?

The policy was first initiated in 1979 in Los Angeles, to prevent police from inquiring about the immigration status of arrestees. The internal policy, "Special Order 40", states: "Officers shall not initiate police action with the objective of discovering the alien status of a person. Officers shall not arrest nor book persons for violation of title 8, section 1325 of the United States Immigration code (Illegal Entry)."[56] These cities have adopted "sanctuary" ordinances banning city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status.[57][58]

Drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants
Proponents backed the move as a public safety measure, ensuring that more immigrants receive proper certification before driving and that they purchase auto insurance. The IDs will be specially marked to indicate they can be used only in limited circumstances as identification, but they will look identical to licenses used by legal immigrants

 

[Syriusly]

LOL- this is #3 of your clear proof that you are either insane- or an idiot.
There is absolutely no evidence that there were millions of illegal votes cast in 2016.
Stop listening to the voices in your head.

So evidence suggests that the idiot you reference might be found as you face the nearest mirror

You don't really know what 'evidence' means- do you?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

You don't really know what 'evidence' means- do you?

You really don't know when you've been crushed in a debate....do you ?

Stop towing the elitist line and be your own person for once.

 

[Syriusly]

Perhaps you should review the US Constitution. It actually REQUIRES that voters be US citizens regardless of the anti-Americans attempts to nullify the Constitution."

Really? Where does it say that in the U.S. Constitution?

Not that i disagree with the concept- I think that only citizens should vote- I am just curious where in the Constitution you believe it says that.

Because Justice Alito appears to disagree with you:

Justice Samuel Alito also dissented, stating, “The Court reads an ambiguous federal statute in a way that brushes aside the constitutional authority of the States and produces truly strange results.”

SCOTUS: States Can't Require Proof of Citizenship to Vote Using Federal Form - Breitbart
Under the Constitution, the States, not Congress, have the authority to establish the qualifications of voters in elections for Members of Congress. The States also have default authority to regulate federal voter registration. Exercising its right to set federal voter qualifications, Arizona, like every other State, permits only U.S. citizens to vote in federal elections

 

[Syriusly]

You don't really know what 'evidence' means- do you?

You really don't know when you've been crushed in a debate....do you ?.

I will let you know when it happens- clearly isn't going to happen from you.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I will let you know when it happens- clearly isn't going to happen from you.

For you to think that Democrats do not cheat on elections.....after all the evidence from Obama lying about the IRS scandal....to Hillary getting debate questions from the head of the DNC (and a plethora of other evidence) is evidence itself that you have not thought out your positions clearly.

Now that the Democrats are losing their grip on power, I expect that the mechanisms providing the cover up will fail and you'll soon have all the evidence needed to see your mistake on this at least.

Democrats...at least the current PTB in the DNC are some of the most conniving and deceitful politicians ever.

And how you can believe that Trump actually colluded with Russia....but that Democrats haven't aided the votes of massive numbers of illegals is astonishing.

 

[AgentSparky]

Proof is for liberals

Speculation is for Conservatives.

Conservatives define proof as what is KNOWN to be true. (EX. You see fish swimming - you've proven they can swim)

Yet people claiming to be Conservatives claim that 5 million illegals voted in the last election- and that is not 'KNOWN to be true"- it isn't even educated speculation- it is an unsubstantiated theory at most..

Sorta like when Libs keep pushing this Russia and Trump narative.

 

[AgentSparky]

Yet people claiming to be Conservatives claim that 5 million illegals voted in the last election- and that is not 'KNOWN to be true"- it isn't even educated speculation- it is an unsubstantiated theory at most. Though when Trump says it, it is probably just a lie.

All depends on what you define as "KNOWN"

By conservative perspective, It IS known to be true.

Liberals prefer facts- provable facts.

Then where's all those facts about the Trump and Russia to back up all those Liberals' claims?

 

[Syriusly]

I will let you know when it happens- clearly isn't going to happen from you.

For you to think that Democrats do not cheat on elections...

For you to think that 5 million illegal votes were cast in the 2016- despite absolutly no evidence that there millions of illegal votes cast in 2016- just shows you are Trump voter.

 

[Syriusly]

Yet people claiming to be Conservatives claim that 5 million illegals voted in the last election- and that is not 'KNOWN to be true"- it isn't even educated speculation- it is an unsubstantiated theory at most. Though when Trump says it, it is probably just a lie.

All depends on what you define as "KNOWN"

By conservative perspective, It IS known to be true.

Liberals prefer facts- provable facts.

Then where's all those facts about the Trump and Russia to back up all those Liberals' claims?

Its a proven fact that the FBI, the House and the Senate are investigating Russian hacking into our election, and that includes if there was any collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.

Liberals prefer facts- and also prefer that we at least wait until the investigation is complete before coming to conclusions.

 

[Syriusly]

Proof is for liberals

Speculation is for Conservatives.

Conservatives define proof as what is KNOWN to be true. (EX. You see fish swimming - you've proven they can swim)

Yet people claiming to be Conservatives claim that 5 million illegals voted in the last election- and that is not 'KNOWN to be true"- it isn't even educated speculation- it is an unsubstantiated theory at most..

Sorta like when Libs keep pushing this Russia and Trump narative.

And by 'Libs' you mean the FBI and CIA etc, etc.

 

[Syriusly]

[
And how you can believe that Trump actually colluded with Russia....

I don't actually believe that Trump actually colluded with Russia. I think it is extremely unlikely, and I hope it didn't happen. It would be a tragedy for our country if it happened.

I support the completion of the investigation and I hope that the final report of the FBI clears Trump of breaking any laws as clearly as the FBI cleared Clinton of breaking any laws.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

[
And how you can believe that Trump actually colluded with Russia....

I don't actually believe that Trump actually colluded with Russia. I think it is extremely unlikely, and I hope it didn't happen. It would be a tragedy for our country if it happened.

I support the completion of the investigation and I hope that the final report of the FBI clears Trump of breaking any laws as clearly as the FBI cleared Clinton of breaking any laws.

I do. He has even said it.

Yes, a case can be made for it being a slip of the tongue and it's certainly true that trump has no control over what falls out of his mouth. But, added to the entire picture and it looks obvious.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[RASTAMEN]

A new study reveals that up to 5.7 million illegal immigrants were likely to have voted in the 2008 election, meaning Donald Trump was almost certainly right when he said this was the reason for him losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 race.
Trump Was Right: New Study Reveals Up to 5.7 Million Illegals Voted in Election



View attachment 134384
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the deep state pricks were desperate to cheat and get Hillary a Win bahahhah, the American lovers still won. That's what happens when you cheat and or steal losers.

Heeeeeeeeeee.......ALEX JONES----INFO WARS

 

[RASTAMEN]

Yet people claiming to be Conservatives claim that 5 million illegals voted in the last election- and that is not 'KNOWN to be true"- it isn't even educated speculation- it is an unsubstantiated theory at most. Though when Trump says it, it is probably just a lie.

All depends on what you define as "KNOWN"

By conservative perspective, It IS known to be true.

Liberals prefer facts- provable facts.

Then where's all those facts about the Trump and Russia to back up all those Liberals' claims?

Patients Dumb Billy.

 

[protectionist]

Sorta like when Libs keep pushing this Russia and Trump narative.

At least with the illegals voting, it a self-evident fact. Nothing evident about Russin collusion. (whatever that even means)