Trumpette's, avert your eyes. Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

[Toddsterpatriot]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. '

Based on his Biden-like performance in his Congressional testimony, what are the odds Mueller even saw, let alone spoke/wrote this statement?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We could discuss just how misinformed that opinion is considering the gigantic amount of negative MSM coverage Hillary got over what essentially were bullshit stories regarding her e-mails and Benghazi..........or the massive social media campaign they launched to help Don...........but that's not what I wanted to talk about.

I wanted to point out "teeny tiny Russia" was responsible for the most consequential act of the campaign. The hacking and release of info stolen from DNC servers. First, the timing of the initial release blunted the potentially hugely damaging Access Hollywood story about Trump's admission he is a pussy grabber. Secondly, the media erroneously spun portions of the hacked material to suggest the nomination was stolen from Bernie, which alienated his voting base so badly some actually voted for the Orange Messiah out of spite.

So, let's not hear any more horseshit from morons with no appreciation of what actually transpired. If not for the media's jaded, negative, and inaccurate coverage of those stories we would not be living through the nightmare of the worst prez in the history of the US.

We could discuss just how misinformed that opinion is considering the gigantic amount of negative MSM coverage Hillary got over what essentially were bullshit stories regarding her e-mails and Benghazi..........

Media coverage of Trump before the election was at least 90% negative.
Poor Hillary, her negative coverage was a fraction of that, but cost her the election?
Maybe she should throw some ashtrays at some reporters?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How come PROGS like the OP are so oblivious to the fact all developed countries interfere with elections on both sides of the aisle, and the USA does the same. Especially in an era of internet.

So cry us a river, Russia wanted the better guy running the show.

Oh bless your heart, you kidder!

Russian wanted a tool they could manipulate. Putin is not our friend. He wanted the idiot baby man running the show.

Putin is not our friend. He wanted the idiot baby man running the show.

You're right. He also wanted the idiot baby man's idiot Secretary of State, but Hillary left that post in 2013 and Obama couldn't serve a third term.

 

[bodecea]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

I guess Russian collusion was as much of a hoax as the corona virus was a hoax after all.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

I guess Russian collusion was as much of a hoax as the corona virus was a hoax after all.

I guess Russian collusion was as much of a hoax......

Which Americans were charged with collusion?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Back to this worn out shit again???

Pandemic not going your way or what?

 

[hadit]

Perspective...a Republican-controlled Senate Committee has concluded and published a report confirming an opinion supported with evidence Russians assisted in the election of Donald Trump.

And what is surprising about a foreign country trying to influence the American election? I would expect EVERY country with the means to do exactly that. What you are attempting to do without explicitly saying it, is to have people believe that Trump colluded with Russia, which has never been established at all.

You’re making unwarranted assumptions. This was not normal. You’re attempting to trivialize it for political reasons.

How is noting that this happens every election cycle trivializing it? Methinks that you are exaggerating something that happens with great regularity and running to your fainting couch in faux horror, pretending the world has never seen such shenanigans, when the reality is, the US has dirtier hands than anyone when it comes to interfering with other countries picking their leadership. Just ask Obama how that's done.

Because it doesn’t happen every election cycle. Name the last time Russia did anything remotely close to this.

We only know about it this last time. It would be foolish to believe they, the Chinese, the Japanese, and everyone else with the means hasn't tried before. Foolish and naive.

So you’re making a claim based on zero evidence and I’m the foolish one?

And you're claiming that Russia has never tried to influence our elections before? Seriously claiming that? Yes, it is foolish to believe that other nations do not attempt to exert what influence they can. We're the big dog on the block, of course they'll try to get the leaders they want. Heck, they try to get influence during an administration, or have you forgotten Biden's China problem and Hillary's disappearing charity donations?

Ive heard of a few failed attempts back in the 60s I believe. Some candidates had been approached. They certainly don’t do it “every year” and there is nothing ordinary or usual about what happened in 2016. You keep back pedaling and demonstrating a complete lack of evidence.

You’re just making it up as you go along.

Why is it believable to think that administration officials are constantly approached for influence (since you ignored my examples, I'll take it as tacit acceptance) while in office, but suddenly, during the campaign, the efforts magically disappear?

 

[playtime]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

Over the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an all-American mix of Democrats, Republicans and independents, but an elite group whose views veer sharply to the left.

Surveys over the past 25 years have consistently found that journalists are more liberal than rest of America. This MRC Special Report summarizes the relevant data on journalist attitudes, as well as polling showing how the American public’s recognition of the media’s liberal bias has grown over the years:

The Liberal Media:Every Poll Shows Journalists Are More Liberal than the American Public — And the Public Knows It

Executive SummaryOver the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an...

www.mrc.org

The Media Bubble Is Real — And Worse Than You Think

Wondering how reporters missed the Trump wave? We crunched the data on where they work and how fast it’s changing. The results should worry the country.

www.politico.com

Recognizing bias is a good thing. Ignoring the information the media provides is crazy stupid. The consumer just needs to make a note there may be (1) more to the story or (2) another side to the story, and go look for it. Then you know all the facts.

No I will never believe anything coming from mainstream media you fucking sheep

 

[playtime]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

 

[Nostra]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

 

[WEATHER53]

Mueller is working tirelessly for you fantasy loons and he’s going to bring it home Real soon

Any day now.

 

[playtime]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

& barr, being an ankle grabber for donny - could have it released if he petitioned the court. he didn't want to, because it's damning to trump et al & the DC judge has it now. warts & all. so to quote yer chosen one:

 

[playtime]

Mueller is working tirelessly for you fantasy loons and he’s going to bring it home Real soon

Any day now.

'eh - - - it's in the hands of a circuit judge, so it literally is out of barr's hands what happens next.

 

[berg80]

Which Americans were charged with collusion?

Moot question, there is no statute pertaining to collusion.

 

[berg80]

Mueller is working tirelessly for you fantasy loons and he’s going to bring it home Real soon

He already did. He proved the case for obstruction on at least four counts.

 

[berg80]

'eh - - - it's in the hands of a circuit judge, so it literally is out barr's hands what happens next.

"House Democrats scored a significant legal victory Tuesday as a federal appeals court panel granted them permission to access grand jury secrets from Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

The 2-1 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a lower court decision in favor of the House’s ability to see redacted passages in the public version of the Mueller report, a 448-page tome that describes the two-year investigation into potential links between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia. The report, released in April 2019, also examines President Trump’s attempts to stymie the Russia probe."

Democrats should get Mueller evidence, judges rule

It's a notable win for House Democrats seeking to obtain more information from the Russia probe.

www.politico.com

The House’s victory is also no guarantee that lawmakers will get to immediately see the full range of Mueller’s evidence. Appeals from the Justice Department are all but certain. So..........Billy the Bagman is still fighting to keep crucial parts of the report from the American public.

 

[Nostra]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

& barr, being an ankle grabber for donny - could have it released if he petitioned the court. he didn't want to, because it's damning to trump et al & the DC judge has it now. warts & all. so to quote yer chosen one:

How dare Barr want to keep classified info secret, and not release grand Jury testimony.

Especially when Mueller saw all that and concluded there was NO COLLUSION.

Oops!

 

[Nostra]

Which Americans were charged with collusion?

Moot question, there is no statute pertaining to collusion.

Especially when there was no collusion.

 

[BluesLegend]

Are Dems going to try impeaching president Trump over this? Oh wait, tried and failed already Maybe they would double dog dare impeach him this time

 

[berg80]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

& barr, being an ankle grabber for donny - could have it released if he petitioned the court. he didn't want to, because it's damning to trump et al & the DC judge has it now. warts & all. so to quote yer chosen one:

How dare Barr want to keep classified info secret, and not release grand Jury testimony.

Especially when Mueller saw all that and concluded there was NO COLLUSION.

Oops!

You need to go a little deeper than Billy the Bagman's duplicitous, bumper sticker length summary, nitwit.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org