Trumpette's, avert your eyes. Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

[Denizen]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

Please quote the text that says Russia was deliberately trying to help Trump.

Are you blind?

No. That's why I can see that the article doesn't quote the part of the report that says what it claims.

I will throw you a straw.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I find it hilarious that I posted actual Senate Documents, it is the second link, Berg reaction was this just FIVE MINUTES after my post:

"Nope. It is the conclusion of the intel agencies. Agreed with in a bipartisan fashion by the Repub controlled Senate intel committee. Peddle your bullshit elsewhere."

Here is what the Borg#80 DIDN'T read because he was busy being a bald faced liar,

"The declassification and release includes some seriously interesting documents the DOJ submitted to the FISA court, as far back as July 2018, which completely destroy the prior claims made by Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Baker, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and their very vocal media and Lawfare defenders. Here’s one example:

Lisa Page testified to congress, and claimed in media, that the FBI never had any contact with the Steele dossier material until September 2016. However, the DOJ directly tells the FISA court that Chris Steele was funneling his information to the FBI in June 2016.

Not only did Lisa Page perjure herself in her testimony to congress; but ironically the DOJ notified the FISC of the issues with Chris Steele (and his compromised contacts with the FBI officials) in July 2018, that’s before Lisa Page started making her media appearances.

Obviously Lisa Page did not expect this information to come out. It shows she was lying, and/or she never knew the truthful DOJ information to the FISA Court had taken place. This is just the beginning… there’s lots of stuff in the release."

=====

You are so far off the mark, that I wonder if you are a real borg, fully programmed to hate and lie every minute of the day.

 

[Denizen]

I find it hilarious that I posted actual Senate Documents, it is the second link, Berg reaction was this just FIVE MINUTES after my post:

"Nope. It is the conclusion of the intel agencies. Agreed with in a bipartisan fashion by the Repub controlled Senate intel committee. Peddle your bullshit elsewhere."

Here is what the Borg#80 DIDN'T read because he was busy being a bald faced liar,

"The declassification and release includes some seriously interesting documents the DOJ submitted to the FISA court, as far back as July 2018, which completely destroy the prior claims made by Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Baker, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and their very vocal media and Lawfare defenders. Here’s one example:

Lisa Page testified to congress, and claimed in media, that the FBI never had any contact with the Steele dossier material until September 2016. However, the DOJ directly tells the FISA court that Chris Steele was funneling his information to the FBI in June 2016.

Not only did Lisa Page perjure herself in her testimony to congress; but ironically the DOJ notified the FISC of the issues with Chris Steele (and his compromised contacts with the FBI officials) in July 2018, that’s before Lisa Page started making her media appearances.

Obviously Lisa Page did not expect this information to come out. It shows she was lying, and/or she never knew the truthful DOJ information to the FISA Court had taken place. This is just the beginning… there’s lots of stuff in the release."

=====

You are so far off the mark, that I wonder if you are a real borg, fully programmed to hate and lie every minute of the day.

That is total bullshit. If Barr believed it he would be prosecuting FBI agents and former agents.

Lies and Trumpery are being institutionalized.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

Your conspiracy theory is getting old
What you are saying is democrats are Russians because they keep putting weak candidates in a presidential election.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I find it hilarious that I posted actual Senate Documents, it is the second link, Berg reaction was this just FIVE MINUTES after my post:

"Nope. It is the conclusion of the intel agencies. Agreed with in a bipartisan fashion by the Repub controlled Senate intel committee. Peddle your bullshit elsewhere."

Here is what the Borg#80 DIDN'T read because he was busy being a bald faced liar,

"The declassification and release includes some seriously interesting documents the DOJ submitted to the FISA court, as far back as July 2018, which completely destroy the prior claims made by Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Baker, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and their very vocal media and Lawfare defenders. Here’s one example:

Lisa Page testified to congress, and claimed in media, that the FBI never had any contact with the Steele dossier material until September 2016. However, the DOJ directly tells the FISA court that Chris Steele was funneling his information to the FBI in June 2016.

Not only did Lisa Page perjure herself in her testimony to congress; but ironically the DOJ notified the FISC of the issues with Chris Steele (and his compromised contacts with the FBI officials) in July 2018, that’s before Lisa Page started making her media appearances.

Obviously Lisa Page did not expect this information to come out. It shows she was lying, and/or she never knew the truthful DOJ information to the FISA Court had taken place. This is just the beginning… there’s lots of stuff in the release."

=====

You are so far off the mark, that I wonder if you are a real borg, fully programmed to hate and lie every minute of the day.

That is total bullshit. If Barr believed it he would be prosecuting FBI agents and former agents.

Lies and Trumpery are being institutionalized.

You sound as crazy as a flat earther

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

Over the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an all-American mix of Democrats, Republicans and independents, but an elite group whose views veer sharply to the left.

Surveys over the past 25 years have consistently found that journalists are more liberal than rest of America. This MRC Special Report summarizes the relevant data on journalist attitudes, as well as polling showing how the American public’s recognition of the media’s liberal bias has grown over the years:

The Liberal Media:Every Poll Shows Journalists Are More Liberal than the American Public — And the Public Knows It

Executive SummaryOver the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an...

www.mrc.org

The Media Bubble Is Real — And Worse Than You Think

Wondering how reporters missed the Trump wave? We crunched the data on where they work and how fast it’s changing. The results should worry the country.

www.politico.com

 

[beautress]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

Please quote the text that says Russia was deliberately trying to help Trump.

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Even the Russians may have gotten sick and tired of paying Hillary Clinton millions and millions of dollars for her "compliance," and even the Russians do not respect a dishonest traitor like Hillary "I forget" Clinton, no matter how much the trade cost them. You see, dividers like Hillary Clinton do not only divide their own country, if they put their minds to it or are crossed in any way, she'd proceed to divide the entire world too.

Hillary Clinton is the most divisive person who ever lived on this planet, and everyone is sick of her doings.

 

[Denizen]

I find it hilarious that I posted actual Senate Documents, it is the second link, Berg reaction was this just FIVE MINUTES after my post:

"Nope. It is the conclusion of the intel agencies. Agreed with in a bipartisan fashion by the Repub controlled Senate intel committee. Peddle your bullshit elsewhere."

Here is what the Borg#80 DIDN'T read because he was busy being a bald faced liar,

"The declassification and release includes some seriously interesting documents the DOJ submitted to the FISA court, as far back as July 2018, which completely destroy the prior claims made by Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Baker, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and their very vocal media and Lawfare defenders. Here’s one example:

Lisa Page testified to congress, and claimed in media, that the FBI never had any contact with the Steele dossier material until September 2016. However, the DOJ directly tells the FISA court that Chris Steele was funneling his information to the FBI in June 2016.

Not only did Lisa Page perjure herself in her testimony to congress; but ironically the DOJ notified the FISC of the issues with Chris Steele (and his compromised contacts with the FBI officials) in July 2018, that’s before Lisa Page started making her media appearances.

Obviously Lisa Page did not expect this information to come out. It shows she was lying, and/or she never knew the truthful DOJ information to the FISA Court had taken place. This is just the beginning… there’s lots of stuff in the release."

=====

You are so far off the mark, that I wonder if you are a real borg, fully programmed to hate and lie every minute of the day.

That is total bullshit. If Barr believed it he would be prosecuting FBI agents and former agents.

Lies and Trumpery are being institutionalized.

You sound as crazy as a flat earther

You evidently have considerable intellectual intercourse with Flat-Earthers and their ilk red-hatters.

I also perceive you are also likely to be a fat-earther.

 

[Snouter]

Interesting that all the documents and memos that Judicial Watch has sued the federal government to obtain reveal the Russians worked with Crooked Hillary and Obama Deep State "intelligence" agencies.

 

[colfax_m]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

It was illegal.

 

[LoneLaugher]

This is why Trump took a few shots at Mueller and the FBI in Mondays press rally.

This got buried in tbe news cycle and he is almost so stupid that he invited inquiry.

The WH press corps predictably failed to ask any questions about this subject yesterday. Insread, there were numerous questions about the fake immigration ban.

It doesn't matter, of course. The Trobie herd wouldn't be moved.

 

[playtime]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

No one cares what you want, shit for brains.

buzz off you little flea.

Awwwwww! Did I hurt your witto feewings?

is that what you think you do? i got bored with you - so i moved on. deal with reality once in a while , stupid. it can only do you good.

 

[skews13]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

Please quote the text that says Russia was deliberately trying to help Trump.

He just did. The Republican controlled Senate report. If you can’t read, please have someone read it to you.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I find it hilarious that I posted actual Senate Documents, it is the second link, Berg reaction was this just FIVE MINUTES after my post:

"Nope. It is the conclusion of the intel agencies. Agreed with in a bipartisan fashion by the Repub controlled Senate intel committee. Peddle your bullshit elsewhere."

Here is what the Borg#80 DIDN'T read because he was busy being a bald faced liar,

"The declassification and release includes some seriously interesting documents the DOJ submitted to the FISA court, as far back as July 2018, which completely destroy the prior claims made by Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, James Baker, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and their very vocal media and Lawfare defenders. Here’s one example:

Lisa Page testified to congress, and claimed in media, that the FBI never had any contact with the Steele dossier material until September 2016. However, the DOJ directly tells the FISA court that Chris Steele was funneling his information to the FBI in June 2016.

Not only did Lisa Page perjure herself in her testimony to congress; but ironically the DOJ notified the FISC of the issues with Chris Steele (and his compromised contacts with the FBI officials) in July 2018, that’s before Lisa Page started making her media appearances.

Obviously Lisa Page did not expect this information to come out. It shows she was lying, and/or she never knew the truthful DOJ information to the FISA Court had taken place. This is just the beginning… there’s lots of stuff in the release."

=====

You are so far off the mark, that I wonder if you are a real borg, fully programmed to hate and lie every minute of the day.

That is total bullshit. If Barr believed it he would be prosecuting FBI agents and former agents.

Lies and Trumpery are being institutionalized.

You sound as crazy as a flat earther

You evidently have considerable intellectual intercourse with Flat-Earthers and their ilk red-hatters.

I also perceive you are also likely to be a fat-earther.

You are a total conspiracy theories nut Job I bet you believe in Sasquatch the Easter Bunny and all the fairytales

 

[OldLady]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

Over the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an all-American mix of Democrats, Republicans and independents, but an elite group whose views veer sharply to the left.

Surveys over the past 25 years have consistently found that journalists are more liberal than rest of America. This MRC Special Report summarizes the relevant data on journalist attitudes, as well as polling showing how the American public’s recognition of the media’s liberal bias has grown over the years:

The Liberal Media:Every Poll Shows Journalists Are More Liberal than the American Public — And the Public Knows It

Executive SummaryOver the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an...

www.mrc.org

The Media Bubble Is Real — And Worse Than You Think

Wondering how reporters missed the Trump wave? We crunched the data on where they work and how fast it’s changing. The results should worry the country.

www.politico.com

Recognizing bias is a good thing. Ignoring the information the media provides is crazy stupid. The consumer just needs to make a note there may be (1) more to the story or (2) another side to the story, and go look for it. Then you know all the facts.

 

[playtime]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

 

[playtime]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

No one cares what you want, shit for brains.

This Leftist fool hates the thumbs down. Do it to her posts and she goes batshit.

it's called mocking. god damn you're stupid. the best part is your projection....

you'll never catch up to all the likes & loves & that's why you need to search me out & carpet bomb like a child ... you & donny share the same defective personality. you get boring pretty fast & it's usually not worth exchanging much with you anymore - except for mocking entertainment. lol....

 

[berg80]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We could discuss just how misinformed that opinion is considering the gigantic amount of negative MSM coverage Hillary got over what essentially were bullshit stories regarding her e-mails and Benghazi..........or the massive social media campaign they launched to help Don...........but that's not what I wanted to talk about.

I wanted to point out "teeny tiny Russia" was responsible for the most consequential act of the campaign. The hacking and release of info stolen from DNC servers. First, the timing of the initial release blunted the potentially hugely damaging Access Hollywood story about Trump's admission he is a pussy grabber. Secondly, the media erroneously spun portions of the hacked material to suggest the nomination was stolen from Bernie, which alienated his voting base so badly some actually voted for the Orange Messiah out of spite.

So, let's not hear any more horseshit from morons with no appreciation of what actually transpired. If not for the media's jaded, negative, and inaccurate coverage of those stories we would not be living through the nightmare of the worst prez in the history of the US.

 

[NotYourBody]

How come PROGS like the OP are so oblivious to the fact all developed countries interfere with elections on both sides of the aisle, and the USA does the same. Especially in an era of internet.

So cry us a river, Russia wanted the better guy running the show.

Oh bless your heart, you kidder!

Russian wanted a tool they could manipulate. Putin is not our friend. He wanted the idiot baby man running the show.