Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Bullshit if for no other reason than it wasn't Hillary's call to send in a QRF.Which would have made no difference. But she was like Mattis, who left warriors to die on the battlefield in 2001, so she had good role models.
$25 says he'll be confirmed by Congress if his name is put up for confirmation. Care to bet? Loser pays $25 into the winner's account for an additional year of "Gold Supporting Member".He's going to have a hard time getting confirmed. For a lot of reasons.
As SoS she could have ordered him to stay. Same for POTUS. So why did they let him go? Because I doubt the veracity of the meme "because he insisted".because he insisted on itWhile I agree with the sentiment, it wasn't Hillary's call to send in the military. She didn't run the CIA or the DOD. She was, however, responsible for the actions and security of her Ambassadors. Why was the Ambassador in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 in the first place? Why wasn't he at the Embassy in Tripoli instead of a relatively insecure consulate?But if failing to send aid was OK for Hillary and supported by all you libs, why is it a bar to Mattis?
Nope, the far right knows he is a criminal just like Hillary. But the far right does not care.Agreed the far Right branded her a criminal and nowThe far right branded her as a criminal, so the far right better be branding Mattis as a criminal.youthe far Left is branding Mattis a criminal.
You were a clerk typist, huh? Yeah, Genl Mattis failed in the heat of the pressure.Bullshit if for no other reason than it wasn't Hillary's call to send in a QRF.Which would have made no difference. But she was like Mattis, who left warriors to die on the battlefield in 2001, so she had good role models.
Secondly, while I fully understand why a clerk typist from Fort Dix doesn't understand military strategy and tactics, General Mattis did not leave "warriors to die on the battlefield".
She let him use his own personal accountability. Just the way it is.As SoS she could have ordered him to stay. Same for POTUS. So why did they let him go? Because I doubt the veracity of the meme "because he insisted".because he insisted on itWhile I agree with the sentiment, it wasn't Hillary's call to send in the military. She didn't run the CIA or the DOD. She was, however, responsible for the actions and security of her Ambassadors. Why was the Ambassador in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 in the first place? Why wasn't he at the Embassy in Tripoli instead of a relatively insecure consulate?But if failing to send aid was OK for Hillary and supported by all you libs, why is it a bar to Mattis?
Who cares what you think?As SoS she could have ordered him to stay. Same for POTUS. So why did they let him go? Because I doubt the veracity of the meme "because he insisted".because he insisted on itWhile I agree with the sentiment, it wasn't Hillary's call to send in the military. She didn't run the CIA or the DOD. She was, however, responsible for the actions and security of her Ambassadors. Why was the Ambassador in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 in the first place? Why wasn't he at the Embassy in Tripoli instead of a relatively insecure consulate?But if failing to send aid was OK for Hillary and supported by all you libs, why is it a bar to Mattis?
What was his crime? Taking care of his troops and not rushing off to rescue people in an extremely hostile situation who, as it turns out, probably couldn't be saved?Nope, the far right knows he is a criminal just like Hillary. But the far right does not care.
You obviously do. Next question.Who cares what you think?
You are describing Hillary? The fact of the matter is Mattis failed, just like HRC, yet you defend him.What was his crime? Taking care of his troops and not rushing off to rescue people in an extremely hostile situation who, as it turns out, probably couldn't be saved?Nope, the far right knows he is a criminal just like Hillary. But the far right does not care.
You obviously do. Next question.Who cares what you think?
Obviously you overrate yourself. We are talking about Mattis and Clinton, so please focus.
I haven't heard nor read about that. OTOH, due to her exclusive use of a private email server (i.e. not having access to a classified email system), it wouldn't surprise me she didn't have a fucking clue where he was until the attack began.She let him use his own personal accountability. Just the way it is.
See? You do care what I think!You are describing Hillary? The fact of the matter is Mattis failed, just like HRC, yet you defend him.
And every post you make to me proves you care what I think thus proving your claim to be a lie.You obviously do. Next question.Who cares what you think?
Then you are not well read. Next. And what you think is so easily discarded is the reason I let you amuse me.I haven't heard nor read about that. OTOH, due to her exclusive use of a private email server (i.e. not having access to a classified email system), it wouldn't surprise me she didn't have a fucking clue where he was until the attack began.She let him use his own personal accountability. Just the way it is.
No. A 7562. What was your MOS? Disagreed about General Mattis and your claim that Hillary failed at Benghazi.You were a clerk typist, huh? Yeah, Genl Mattis failed in the heat of the pressure.
Translation: Mattis didn't commit a crime. I was just spinning my usual bullshit because the right has given my hero, Hillary Clinton, so much guff over the years.You are describing Hillary? The fact of the matter is Mattis failed, just like HRC, yet you defend him.What was his crime? Taking care of his troops and not rushing off to rescue people in an extremely hostile situation who, as it turns out, probably couldn't be saved?Nope, the far right knows he is a criminal just like Hillary. But the far right does not care.
Proving once again you care what I think.Then you are not well read. Next. And what you think is so easily discarded is the reason I let you amuse me.I haven't heard nor read about that. OTOH, due to her exclusive use of a private email server (i.e. not having access to a classified email system), it wouldn't surprise me she didn't have a fucking clue where he was until the attack began.She let him use his own personal accountability. Just the way it is.
11B jump qualified and Northern Warfare qualified. I admire any chopper head, pilot or crew. My hat is off to you.No. A 7562. What was your MOS? Disagreed about General Mattis and your claim that Hillary failed at Benghazi.You were a clerk typist, huh? Yeah, Genl Mattis failed in the heat of the pressure.
How silly you are. Mattis was wrong, yet you want him, although he did what Hillary did.Translation: Mattis didn't commit a crime. I was just spinning my usual bullshit because the right has given my hero, Hillary Clinton, so much guff over the years.You are describing Hillary? The fact of the matter is Mattis failed, just like HRC, yet you defend him.What was his crime? Taking care of his troops and not rushing off to rescue people in an extremely hostile situation who, as it turns out, probably couldn't be saved?Nope, the far right knows he is a criminal just like Hillary. But the far right does not care.
How did Mattis fail? How did Hillary fail? I've already posted on both but you seem to disagree, so what is your opinion on the matter?
