Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 46,133
- 35,756
- 3,615
Crime was less. Conditions were better. I think that's the best we can expect to do under the circumstances.I don't really expect an honest reply from you so no disappointment. Was there no crime in NYC with Stop and Frisk in place?
I'm sure you have a magic formula, however.
And show me where I said I was a big defender of the Stop and Frisk policy.
I said confiscation of guns doesn't end crime and somehow you conflate that into a statement about stop and frisk. Honest, you ain't.
Many will argue that if the government would confiscate every gun that crime would be less and conditions would be better.
The Democrats have advocated for that for decades, and have largely enacted it in Heck Holes like Chicago and LA.
Hasn't worked.
They have advocated for it. They have not done it.
Actually, they have done it almost 100% in Chicago and other major liberal hotbeds.
Its virtually impossible for a law abider to legally walk around packing heat there.