U.S. Gov't Won't Reveal Evidence of Russian Hacking

[B. Kidd]

Because it has none!...............

 

[Stratford57]

Because it has none!...............

You can't reveal what doesn't exist.

Tamir Halperin (Poland): “They [ Dems] are using “Russia the monster” as a tool to attract as much compassion as possible. They simply need an artificial enemy to get more support inside their system.”

Vladimir Putin: There are a lot of hackers today, you know, and they perform their work in such a filigreed and delicate manner and they can show their “tracks” anywhere and anytime. Anyway, we do not do that at the national level.

Besides, does it really matter who hacked Mrs. Clinton’s election campaign team database? Does it? What really matters is the content shown to the community. This is what the discussion should be held about. There is no need to distract the attention of the community from the essence of the subject substituting it with secondary questions dealing with the search of those who did it.

I have seen several times that anti-Russian cards are being played during domestic campaigns in the United States. I find this approach very short-sighted.
Interview to Bloomberg

 

[B. Kidd]

Meanwhile, Russia is calling for all of their foreign students to come back home. I sorta expect a 'false flag' event to be occurring in the next week.

 

[Stratford57]

I posted that in August and I still think that one of two or both can happen: too much talks about "Russians aggression" from Dem and after Trump has brought Bill's rape victims to the debates, Dems may invent something similar against Trump.

1. One thing they could do would be catching a group of alleged “Russian terrorists” ( since they already started scaring the voters with “Russian threat”), showing their passports on TV (just like official Kiev has done in 2014 after the coup, organized and sponsored by Washington and Soros).

Russihttphttps://www.google.com/search?q=Russian+passports+captured+in+Donbass&biw=1568&bih=739&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOgrPqoM7OAhXBJiYKHUSDBBoQ7AkIWA&dpr=1
http://www.gettyimages.com/event/uk...of-ukraine-and-claimed-to-picture-id464061614

The voters have been already “warmed up” by alleged story with “Russians hacked Hillary’s emails”, so a lot of ignorant people will buy this story easily and a lot of dummies will immediately start their numerous “WOW!” and “Russians Are Coming!” threads on USMB.

2. They may invent and start some kind of criminal case on Trump (he sure will be acquitted of the charge later, after the elections are over), just like they’ve done with Dominique Strauss-Kahn in France, who wanted to Run for a French president (and the guy would have been a strong president!):

By early 2011, his work as head of the International Monetary Fund saw him touted as a potential challenger to Nicolas Sarkozy as president of France.
But in May 2011, his political ambitions were all but ended in a single day when the US authorities filed charges of attempted rape.
He was acquitted of the charge of "aggravated pimping" on 12 June, bringing to an end four years of legal proceedings against him.
Profile: Dominique Strauss-Kahn - BBC News
Dominique Strauss-Kahn courtroom drama headed for the big screen
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/13/world/europe/dsk-acquitted-aggravated-pimping-charges.html?_r=0

 

[occupied]

Even if they fully revealed how they know to the point that it exposes CIA/NSA sources and methods you Russian sympathizers would call it a fabrication. Putin is attacking our presidential election and it seems you all want him to succeed.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You want them to reveal their methods because you're face is wet with tears?

 

[B. Kidd]

I posted that in August and I still think that one of two or both can happen: too much talks about "Russians aggression" from Dem and after Trump has brought Bill's rape victims to the debates, Dems may invent something similar against Trump.

1. One thing they could do would be catching a group of alleged “Russian terrorists” ( since they already started scaring the voters with “Russian threat”), showing their passports on TV (just like official Kiev has done in 2014 after the coup, organized and sponsored by Washington and Soros).

Russihttphttps://www.google.com/search?q=Russian+passports+captured+in+Donbass&biw=1568&bih=739&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOgrPqoM7OAhXBJiYKHUSDBBoQ7AkIWA&dpr=1
http://www.gettyimages.com/event/uk...of-ukraine-and-claimed-to-picture-id464061614

The voters have been already “warmed up” by alleged story with “Russians hacked Hillary’s emails”, so a lot of ignorant people will buy this story easily and a lot of dummies will immediately start their numerous “WOW!” and “Russians Are Coming!” threads on USMB.

2. They may invent and start some kind of criminal case on Trump (he sure will be acquitted of the charge later, after the elections are over), just like they’ve done with Dominique Strauss-Kahn in France, who wanted to Run for a French president (and the guy would have been a strong president!):

By early 2011, his work as head of the International Monetary Fund saw him touted as a potential challenger to Nicolas Sarkozy as president of France.
But in May 2011, his political ambitions were all but ended in a single day when the US authorities filed charges of attempted rape.
He was acquitted of the charge of "aggravated pimping" on 12 June, bringing to an end four years of legal proceedings against him.
Profile: Dominique Strauss-Kahn - BBC News
Dominique Strauss-Kahn courtroom drama headed for the big screen
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/13/world/europe/dsk-acquitted-aggravated-pimping-charges.html?_r=0

I was thinking more along the conventional false flags like an errant bombing of in-country 'advisors' or a downed military jet.