UAW files charges against Trump and Musk

[john doe 101]

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/13/musk-trump-uaw-labor-union-x-interview.html

During yesterdays interview with Musk, Trump was applauding Musk firing people for going on strike. It's illegal to fire people for going on strike in the US. The UAW filed federal labor charges against the duo.

Legally, it won't probably accomplish much but it will put attention on Trumps anti-labor stance, making it more difficult for trump to attract the average joe voter.

 

[shockedcanadian]

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/13/musk-trump-uaw-labor-union-x-interview.html

During yesterdays interview with Musk, Trump was applauding Musk firing people for going on strike. It's illegal to fire people for going on strike in the US. The UAW filed federal labor charges against the duo.

Legally, it won't probably accomplish much but it will put attention on Trumps anti-labor stance, making it more difficult for trump to attract the average joe voter.

Trumps anti-labor position as 20M illegal immigrants arrive to replace workers with new workers willing to work under the table for less than minimum wage.

 

[PeanutGallery]

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/13/musk-trump-uaw-labor-union-x-interview.html

During yesterdays interview with Musk, Trump was applauding Musk firing people for going on strike. It's illegal to fire people for going on strike in the US. The UAW filed federal labor charges against the duo.

Legally, it won't probably accomplish much but it will put attention on Trumps anti-labor stance, making it more difficult for trump to attract the average joe voter.

Legally, it should be instantly thrown out because the UAW has no standing in the case. The employees aren't UAW employees.

 

[john doe 101]

Trumps anti-labor position as 20M illegal immigrants arrive to replace workers with new workers willing to work under the table for less than minimum wage.

Companies would be be breaking the law under your scenario. And yes you'd be working for minimum wage if it werent for the UAW.

 

[luiza]

Good old Donald .
With his razor sharp brain he already knew the info. given here by Peanuts and threw in this excellent taunt of the Sheeple .
So on the ball, is our Donald , ready for his Second Coming .

 

[jackflash]

Legally, it should be instantly thrown out because the UAW has no standing in the case. The employees aren't UAW employees.

FIRE THE STATIST LEFT BLOODSUCKING UNION MARXINAZIS! RIGHT TO WORK FOREVER!

 

[Dekster]

Musk didn't fire them because they were threatening to strike; they were threatening to strike because he was firing them en masse.

 

[wamose]

Trumps anti-labor position as 20M illegal immigrants arrive to replace workers with new workers willing to work under the table for less than minimum wage.

That's true. The union is for the union, not very much the laborers. Trump is for the working man first, unlike the illegal alien happy Democrats. MAGA

 

[whitehall]

How in the world can you file federal labor charges against a civilian who isn't affiliated with a labor union? The crooked union Hoffa types must be desperate

 

[Hellokitty]

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/13/musk-trump-uaw-labor-union-x-interview.html

During yesterdays interview with Musk, Trump was applauding Musk firing people for going on strike. It's illegal to fire people for going on strike in the US. The UAW filed federal labor charges against the duo.

Legally, it won't probably accomplish much but it will put attention on Trumps anti-labor stance, making it more difficult for trump to attract the average joe voter.

Musk fired people who wanted to continue working at home.

 

[Hellokitty]

Legally, it should be instantly thrown out because the UAW has no standing in the case. The employees aren't UAW employees.

LOL, so can the people who pay UAW dues file charges against the UAW for misuse of funds?