UC Berkeley Attacker: WHO IS HE?

He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Only a repressive fascist asshole like you would see things in this warped upside down way.
Merely being on campus representing a political point of view is "giving the middle finger" only to the people that disagreed with him (as if they weren't themselves giving all conservatives the middle finger).
And it's only giving the finger to someone because they consider it so. Other people would call what this beating victim did was merely exercise his right to free speech and expression.

And the consequences you refer to, a vicious unprovoked beat down, are only the consequences in backwards repressive totalitarian fascist states, which you seem to admire.
What a miserable little prick you are thinking some should pay a price for exercising their right to freedom of speech and political conviction.
 
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Only a repressive fascist asshole like you would see things in this warped upside down way.
Merely being on campus representing a political point of view is "giving the middle finger" only to the people that disagreed with him (as if they weren't themselves giving all conservatives the middle finger).
And it's only giving the finger to someone because they consider it so. Other people would call what this beating victim did was merely exercise his right to free speech and expression.

And the consequences you refer to, a vicious unprovoked beat down, are only the consequences in backwards repressive totalitarian fascist states, which you seem to admire.
What a miserable little prick you are thinking some should pay a price for exercising their right to freedom of speech and political conviction.
You think slaughtered school kids is a fine price to pay for flooding streets with guns. A MAGA sheep getting clocked every once in a while? I’m perfectly happy with that price.
 
You think slaughtered school kids is a fine price to pay for flooding streets with guns.
This is a non sequitur with regard to the issue and I suppose you would be just as happy banning all guns and living with the knowledge that the people slaughtered by criminals with guns were a price you were perfectly willing to pay.
You don't seem to mind people dying at the hands of those with a gun as long as they are the right kind of victims.

A MAGA sheep getting clocked every once in a while? I’m perfectly happy with that price.
Well then I guess I'm happy with someone beating the shit out of you.
 
If she’s naked at a party and begging people to fuck her while completely sober then it’s not rape.
The man in Berkeley who was attacked begged no one to punch him in the face. What's your idiotic point?
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Consequences does not include a beat down by some deranged assailant.
 
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

If a conservative goes to Berkeley intending to anger people, they shouldn’t be surprised if people get angry

You assume he went to Berkeley merely to "anger people" and "give them the middle finger". Even if you were capable of making this assessment (which you are not), you are still advocating violence against people who say things you don't agree with.

Perhaps you will soon meet someone who agrees with you on these points, but doesn't adhere to ALL your stated beliefs. If he then pounds you into the ground, that's ok, right?
 
It appears you are complimenting the attacker on taking action
Then you really should learn how to read better. I was merely drawing a distinction between him and cackling, fat ass trump cultists. Nobody should ever start violence over mere words. Unless they are immediate threats.
 
Then you really should learn how to read better. I was merely drawing a distinction between him and cackling, fat ass trump cultists. Nobody should ever start violence over mere words. Unless they are immediate threats.
Thanks for the clarification. What sort of words do you consider "immediate threats"?

May we have an example please?
 
If she’s naked at a party and begging people to fuck her while completely sober then it’s not rape.
The man in Berkeley who was attacked begged no one to punch him in the face. What's your idiotic point?
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

Spoken like a true Stalinist!
You'd prefer a bullet to the back of the head.
 
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Only a repressive fascist asshole like you would see things in this warped upside down way.
Merely being on campus representing a political point of view is "giving the middle finger" only to the people that disagreed with him (as if they weren't themselves giving all conservatives the middle finger).
And it's only giving the finger to someone because they consider it so. Other people would call what this beating victim did was merely exercise his right to free speech and expression.

And the consequences you refer to, a vicious unprovoked beat down, are only the consequences in backwards repressive totalitarian fascist states, which you seem to admire.
What a miserable little prick you are thinking some should pay a price for exercising their right to freedom of speech and political conviction.
To fascists like Black Flag, disagreement is a provocation justifying violence.

That is why people like him need one way helicopter trips, lol
 
Are we supposed to declare it national news everytime some moron gets clocked for trying to piss people off?
Yeah...the guy who was sucker punched provoked his own beating. :113:

The same thing happens when women get raped. We know what you mean.
If she’s naked at a party and begging people to fuck her while completely sober then it’s not rape.


More libtard logic from BlackFag……..
 
If she’s naked at a party and begging people to fuck her while completely sober then it’s not rape.
The man in Berkeley who was attacked begged no one to punch him in the face. What's your idiotic point?
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

Spoken like a true Stalinist!
You'd prefer a bullet to the back of the head.
^ :cuckoo:
 
Why has this case gone down the memory hole, even with conservative news? The most I can find is "identified but not arrested" three days ago, with no name...
UC Berkeley police identify punching suspect in viral right-wing videos
This issue, like most conservative alarmist posts, has nothing to do with UC Berkeley students & faculty. Your source indicates:

UC Berkeley has said, however, that neither the activist or the man suspected of punching him are students, and there is no indication the man is affiliated with any left-wing groups.


You seem the calm cool collected NAZI….

But you’re still a NAZI….

What else would you Tards call someone

that physically attacks another for their political views….
 
If she’s naked at a party and begging people to fuck her while completely sober then it’s not rape.
The man in Berkeley who was attacked begged no one to punch him in the face. What's your idiotic point?
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.


How so? You sound coinfused.

Are you claiming no conservative should go to Berkeley? Or if they do they are just asking to get attack....that seems to be your narrative.
If a conservative goes to Berkeley intending to anger people, they shouldn’t be surprised if people get angry


We know the truth angers you Tards……...
 
If she’s naked at a party and begging people to fuck her while completely sober then it’s not rape.
The man in Berkeley who was attacked begged no one to punch him in the face. What's your idiotic point?
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.


So you NAZI's think it's alright to beat up people you disagree with.....
 
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Only a repressive fascist asshole like you would see things in this warped upside down way.
Merely being on campus representing a political point of view is "giving the middle finger" only to the people that disagreed with him (as if they weren't themselves giving all conservatives the middle finger).
And it's only giving the finger to someone because they consider it so. Other people would call what this beating victim did was merely exercise his right to free speech and expression.

And the consequences you refer to, a vicious unprovoked beat down, are only the consequences in backwards repressive totalitarian fascist states, which you seem to admire.
What a miserable little prick you are thinking some should pay a price for exercising their right to freedom of speech and political conviction.
You think slaughtered school kids is a fine price to pay for flooding streets with guns. A MAGA sheep getting clocked every once in a while? I’m perfectly happy with that price.


Look Squirrel…………..
 
So, bottom line, a gay liberal democrat lies about being attacked and gets headlines for a week, and a straight conservative is actually attacked in broad daylight in front of multiple witnesses on video, and it's "meh".

I really don't get it.
Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
HitBlunt.jpg
 
He went into Berkeley to give the middle finger to everyone there. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Only a repressive fascist asshole like you would see things in this warped upside down way.
Merely being on campus representing a political point of view is "giving the middle finger" only to the people that disagreed with him (as if they weren't themselves giving all conservatives the middle finger).
And it's only giving the finger to someone because they consider it so. Other people would call what this beating victim did was merely exercise his right to free speech and expression.

And the consequences you refer to, a vicious unprovoked beat down, are only the consequences in backwards repressive totalitarian fascist states, which you seem to admire.
What a miserable little prick you are thinking some should pay a price for exercising their right to freedom of speech and political conviction.
You think slaughtered school kids is a fine price to pay for flooding streets with guns. A MAGA sheep getting clocked every once in a while? I’m perfectly happy with that price.


BlackFag, you won't like it when we get really pissed....

Keep it up...….
 

Forum List

Back
Top