SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
Climate science is a soft science and as such, few are trained beyond the basics in physics, thermodynamics, etc. Very few hard scientists, trained in physics, thermodynamics, etc., are on the AGW bandwagon.
No; it's not. Phsychologists/therapists practice what are called "soft science."[/QUOTE]
Half way there....climate science is a soft science just like psychology.
A soft science is a specialized field or disciplinesthat make interpretations on the basis of scientific investigations for which it may be difficult to establish strictly measurable criteria.
A hard science on the other hand is any of the natural or physical sciences, as chemistry, biology, physics, or astronomy, in which aspects of the universe are investigated by means of experimentation.
Now, which actual experiments support the basic hypothesis of AGW? Have you ever looked at the course requirements to get a degree in climate science? The average meteorologist is far better educated than a climate scientist and few meteorologists are on the AGW bandwagon.
Last edited: