šŸŒŸ Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! šŸŒŸ

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs šŸŽ

Ukrainian marines in Mariupol turned to crisps.

How does it make any sense that Iā€™d be ā€œenviousā€ that you also read some Rothbard? Iā€™m glad you read Rothbard. But itā€™s not something to be envious of.

I have a dollar in my wallet. Iā€™m not jealous if you also have a dollar in your wallet. Iā€™m actually indifferent to how much money you might have.

Furthermore,It is irrelevant if ā€œcommunismā€ was practiced on the Mayflower. Do you have an array of alternative non sequiturs? :cuckoo:
The point went over your head Dollar Breath, and is not irrelevant. That is why badger has no cringing desire to get near your funky ass in either two, or three dimensions.
 
The point went over your head Dollar Breath, and is not irrelevant. That is why badger has no cringing desire to get near your funky ass in either two, or three dimensions.
Your inability to have or make a point is all on you, Oblio. And you can keep your rancid desires and fantasies to yourself. It is sickening to think of you as being anywhere near anybodyā€™s ass.
 
When you see 'Slava ukrani' you have found a nazi, though that is only part of the entire phrase.
 
No the
You are pre-castraed about NATO history. NATO's origins lie in the Korean War. Seek help.
no they donā€™t. Look it up it only takes seconds. The Korean War was just more communist aggression fomented and supported by Russia.
 
The overwhelming majority of diplomats from Europe, Africa, Asia, America you name it, that were active during the Cold War and the peaceful dismantlement of the Soviet Union shook their heads in disbelief witnessing the expansion of NATO and prophesized:

"This absurd, gratuitous aggression against Russia is bound to become one of the biggest strategic blunders in the history of the western world."

Strategic blunder is diplomatic language for shit sandwich.

Where is Albright and all the other hawks to see that pile of young Ukrainians, where are they to see the consequences of bullying Russia.

Really? What aggression occurred towards Russia by expanding NATO?
 
Originally posted by Admiral Rockwell Tory
Really? What aggression occurred towards Russia by expanding NATO?

The same kind of aggression that almost forced America to invade Cuba in 62.
 
The same kind of aggression that almost forced America to invade Cuba in 62.
The Soviets placed nuclear missiles IN Cuba.

Not seeing how that is an analog for how the US and NATO didnā€™t place any nukes in Ukraine.
 
Originally posted by BackAgain
The Soviets placed nuclear missiles IN Cuba.

Not seeing how that is an analog for how the US and NATO didnā€™t place any nukes in Ukraine.

You're not seeing the striking similarity because you don't want to.

Two military alliances placing military equipment on each other's regional sphere of influence.

And if nukes are the fundamental difference, someone forgot to tell Reagan there was no soviet missiles in Grenada in 83.
 
You're not seeing the striking similarity because you don't want to.

Two military alliances placing military equipment on each other's regional sphere of influence.

And if nukes are the fundamental difference, someone forgot to tell Reagan there was no soviet missiles in Grenada in 83.
Someone forgot to tell you that there is gas under the current battlefield and the POSPOTUS and his POS son want it.
 
Where are they? The Ukrainians are moving freely killing the Russian invaders. No one is turning them in. My guess is that the people who were pro-Russian changed their minds in the face of Russian conduct during the invasion.
Freely?
Last time i checked, Ukrainian neo nazis are trapped in Mariupol and the Ukrainian army is unable to help them. The majority of Ukrainian forces in donbas also have no fuel to move around either, being stuck in their positions.
They dont have the mobility they had at the start of the war.
 

Forum List

Back
Top