UPDATE: Letter by Ted Cruz and 6 GOP Senators and 4 Senators-Elect Sign Letter to Reject Election –Call For Election Commission 10-Day Emergency Audit

[Uncensored2008]

They have the power to impeach people who committed impeachable acts.

Impeachment is defined by the United States Constitution.

No Chief Justice, No impeachment.

What the Nazi Reich conducted was a Lynching.

 

[Uncensored2008]

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

YOU said he died from a heart attack BEFORE you said he actually died from a stroke. I was the one who said he didn't die from a heart attack, which you now agree with.

I know you live in the third world; but have they tried shock therapy on you? The lobotomy didn't work. Maybe if they hook jumper cables from a car battery to your genitals it will help?

Or maybe a brain transplant? The brain of a toad would be a VAST improvement for you... Ask your Mullahs...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sicknick did not die from a heart attack. Can you get anything right??

Fucking liar. But you're a Nazi - so that goes without saying.

UPDATE: DC Officer Sicknick’s Death was Driven by Medical Condition

[ad_1] Brian Sicknick Capitil Hill Police Officer Brian Sicknick died after protesters stormed the US Capitol on Wednesday. Officer Sicknick passed away on Thursday he was the fifth victim after the US Capitol was stormed on Wednesday.Rest in Peace. The BBC reported: TRENDING: BREAKING: FBI Clai ...

thespectator.info

LOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

There isn't one word in there about him dying from a heart attack. That's now twice today I've seen you utterly destroy your own bullshit with links that don't echo your lies.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/04/nolte-investigators-say-blunt-force-trauma-did-not-kill-officer-sicknick-capitol-riot/​

According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true.​

​

In fact, there is apparently so little evidence Sicknick was physically injured in any serious or notable way during the incident, the following is being considered…​

One possibility being considered by investigators is that Sicknick became ill after interacting with a chemical irritant like pepper spray or bear spray that was deployed in the crowd.​

Exactly how retarded are you, ya fucking moron? Your fellow fucking moron claims he died of a heart attack. What you posted says nothing about a heart attack.

You cult freak are flaming delusional.

What he posted is irrelevant. The bottom line is that Sicknick wasn't killed by any protester. That's a big fat Dim NAZI lie. He died of natural causes.

Heart attack and stroke are cardio vascular events closely related, caused by blood clots.

Fawn is a moron Nazi desperate to pimp his fiction that Sicknick was murdered.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sorry, no. I don’t believe in your stupid conspiracy theory.

Good luck with that kraken thingy.

Like your fellow Nazis, you don't pay attention to the thread.

Read my posts from the beginning, moron.

 

[colfax_m]

They have the power to impeach people who committed impeachable acts.

Impeachment is defined by the United States Constitution.

No Chief Justice, No impeachment.

What the Nazi Reich conducted was a Lynching.

What does it say about who presides over the impeachment of a former president?

 

[Uncensored2008]

What does it say about who presides over the impeachment of a former president?

There is no provision for impeaching former presidents - that is called "lynching."

Now in a lynching, the "judge" is also the jury foreman and executioner.

Sound familiar?

You Nazis lynched a former president.

You must be so proud.

Fuck all Nazis, democrats are traitors and the scum of the earth - enemies of the republic, enemies of the Constitution, enemies of liberty, enemies of life.

democrats took what Adolf and his scum did, and magnified it by a thousand.

Fuck the democrats, fuck ALL Nazis.

 

[colfax_m]

What does it say about who presides over the impeachment of a former president?

There is no provision for impeaching former presidents - that is called "lynching."

Now in a lynching, the "judge" is also the jury foreman and executioner.

Sound familiar?

You Nazis lynched a former president.

You must be so proud.

Fuck all Nazis, democrats are traitors and the scum of the earth - enemies of the republic, enemies of the Constitution, enemies of liberty, enemies of life.

democrats took what Adolf and his scum did, and magnified it by a thousand.

Fuck the democrats, fuck ALL Nazis.

There’s no provision for excluding former presidents for being impeached because of impeachable behavior during their tenure.

It would be illogical to think a president can escape accountability simply because their term is up. The founders weren’t that stupid.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There’s no provision for excluding former presidents for being impeached because of impeachable behavior during their tenure.

It doesn't work like that.

There is no provision for excluding millions from death camps, yet that doesn't make death camps constituitonal.

What you Nazis did was a lynching - fact.

You lynched a duly elected president.

You are traitors - fact.

 

[colfax_m]

There’s no provision for excluding former presidents for being impeached because of impeachable behavior during their tenure.

It doesn't work like that.

There is no provision for excluding millions from death camps, yet that doesn't make death camps constituitonal.

What you Nazis did was a lynching - fact.

You lynched a duly elected president.

You are traitors - fact.

Due process clause prevents “death camps”.
Your analogies are idiotic.

You think that the founders intended to allow presidents to be able to evade accountability? I don’t. They weren’t stupid.

 

[CowboyTed]

It looks like Republicans will release the Kraken on Jan 6. It will be fun watching the Republicans explaining to the entire country why Biden is a fraud.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/update-letter-ted-cruz-6-gop-senators-4-senators-elect-sign-letter-reject-election-call-election-commission-10-day-emergency-audit-takes-place/​

​

Ten US Senators are discussing plans to join Senator Josh Hawley in objecting to the 2020 fraudulent election results.​

​

According to Jack Posobiec they are upset with Mitch McConnell’s ABSOLUTE failure to follow President Trump’s lead and issue $2,000 checks to the American people.​

​

Seven GOP senators signed the letter and FOUR GOP Senators-elect signed on!​

​

Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.)​

​

Four Senators-Elect signed on:​

​

Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.)​

​

Here is the joint statement released on Saturday.​

​

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Lauren Bianchi: [email protected] January 2, 2021​

​

Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville​

​

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) issued the following statement in advance of the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021:​

​

“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.​

​

“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.​

​

“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.​

​

Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.​

​

“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread.​

​

Reuters/Ipsos polling tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).​

​

Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.​

​

“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.​

​

“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.​

​

“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.​

​

At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.​

​

“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states—Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina—were alleged to have been conducted illegally.​

​

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission—consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices—to consider and resolve the disputed returns.​

​

“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.​

​

Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.​

​

“We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit—conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20—would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.​

​

“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”​

Just checking in... Is Biden still President?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Due process clause prevents “death camps”.
Your analogies are idiotic.

You think that the founders intended to allow presidents to be able to evade accountability? I don’t. They weren’t stupid.

Due process should have prevented the lynching, but you Nazis are not constrained by laws or the Constitution.

What you did was illegal, unconstitutional, it was treason.

Nancy Pigshit attempted a literal coup on January 8th. She deserves the needle. But treason is so common in the Nazi party we barely pay attention anymore - since democrats are not subject to any laws.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Just checking in... Is Biden still President?

Nope, Obama remains Fuhrer.

 

[colfax_m]

Due process clause prevents “death camps”.
Your analogies are idiotic.

You think that the founders intended to allow presidents to be able to evade accountability? I don’t. They weren’t stupid.

Due process should have prevented the lynching, but you Nazis are not constrained by laws or the Constitution.

What you did was illegal, unconstitutional, it was treason.

Nancy Pigshit attempted a literal coup on January 8th. She deserves the needle. But treason is so common in the Nazi party we barely pay attention anymore - since democrats are not subject to any laws.

Trump got due process. The house voted to impeach and he had his senate trial. Just as the constitution says.

 

[Faun]

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. BLM never stormed the White House.

One thing about you Nazis, you're pathological liars.

Trump was rushed to White House bunker due to breach of temporary barricades: report

President Trump was reportedly rushed to the White House’s secure bunker on Friday evening after protesters began dismantling a temporary barricade outside the building, despite his claims th…

thehill.com

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake. Your own link shows they never stormed the White House. They never even got closer than 30 yards from the White House lawn.

You're a mental case. Seek professional help. Meds are in order.

The President was in such severe danger secret service had to move him to the Underground Bunker - the democrats posed a credible threat to his life.

During the Reichstag Fire, no one had be be hustled to a bunker.

Unarmed protestors with no guns, bombs, or incendiaries trespassed. . (despite blatant lies to the contrary by the Reich press at the time, lies you continue to repeat even though they were debunked long ago.)

You Nazis are trying to paint a protest as something it isn't and never was. You're lying scum and traitors, so that's expected.

But you don't get to get away with it.

Fuck you
Fuck your Reichstag Fire fiction
Fuck all Nazis, democrats or otherwise.

Fruitcake, BLM never stormed the White House. You really are out of your fucking mind.

Nazi; being a pathological liar is mental illness.

Trump was 'rushed to the White House underground bunker' on Friday

Secret Service agents on Friday night rushed President Trump and his family to an underground bunker in the White House while hundreds protested the death of George Floyd just across the street.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Get help, Nazi.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

Repeating Trump had to be taken to a secure location does not mean the White House was stormed. It wasn't and your own link corroborates that. Your own link states BLM skirmishes with police occurred "outside" the White House. That would be NOT storming the White House.

And your denial that Mike Pence had to be taken to a secure location on 1/6 was utterly destroyed by the video I posted of him being escorted to a secure location.

Get help Nazi.

You're mentally ill.

Slobbers the nutter who denies Mike Pence was escorted to a secure location because of the mob who stormed the Capitol; while also claiming BLM stormed the White House though they never did.

Just imagine what your crowd would have done if the situation was reversed? They burned, looted, rioted and took over city blocks for months for much less just a couple of months prior. Capital Hill would have been in flames and anything of value stolen. It somehow soothes the pain of whatever cause they are protesting if they get a flat screen TV or a few iPads while they are at it. That is how anti-Trumpers roll.

These were protestors who went to far, but funny not as far as the rioters and looters and did all over tehe country. Those folks took over an entire city block and a police station. This was CLEARLY not a planned insurection attempt. You don’t plan to overthrow a government without guns. Remember, these were largely Trump supporters. I can assure you the vast majority have guns. They left them at home. I guess they figured they wouldn’t need them during their attempted insurrection? LOL..you guys are idiots.

Fantasizing what Democrats might have done is irrelevant. Your side attacked our government and did so in the name of the loser of an election and with the intent on having him installed as president. That you try to equate that with other events is absurd as nothing like that has ever happened before in this country. That you try to minimize the situation by imagining what others would have done reveals even you understand that.

 

[Faun]

Trump was no longer the president at the time of his trial.

Is the Senate a judicial body? Do they have the authority to try private citizens?

Roberts refused because it was a lynching, not an impeachment.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

The Judiciary has no jurisdiction over impeachment trials -- Article III, Section 2...

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury;​

The Senate has "sole" power. Article I, Section 3...

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.​

Hey stupid, I know you're a Nazi - not a hint of integrity - and fucking nutty as a fruitcake.

But who presides over the impeachment?

Here's a hint, you insane retard, if the Chief Justice refuses to preside because it's an illegal action - it's an illegal action.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

The Chief Justice didn't preside over it because Trump wasn't president at the time of the trial and the Chief Justice only presides over impeachment trials when a sitting president is on trial.

 

[Faun]

They have the power to impeach people who committed impeachable acts.

Impeachment is defined by the United States Constitution.

No Chief Justice, No impeachment.

What the Nazi Reich conducted was a Lynching.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

Most impeachment trials did not have a Chief Justice presiding.

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

YOU said he died from a heart attack BEFORE you said he actually died from a stroke. I was the one who said he didn't die from a heart attack, which you now agree with.

I know you live in the third world; but have they tried shock therapy on you? The lobotomy didn't work. Maybe if they hook jumper cables from a car battery to your genitals it will help?

Or maybe a brain transplant? The brain of a toad would be a VAST improvement for you... Ask your Mullahs...

Spits the asylum inmate who said Sicknick dies of a heart attack.

 

[Faun]

Sicknick did not die from a heart attack. Can you get anything right??

Fucking liar. But you're a Nazi - so that goes without saying.

UPDATE: DC Officer Sicknick’s Death was Driven by Medical Condition

[ad_1] Brian Sicknick Capitil Hill Police Officer Brian Sicknick died after protesters stormed the US Capitol on Wednesday. Officer Sicknick passed away on Thursday he was the fifth victim after the US Capitol was stormed on Wednesday.Rest in Peace. The BBC reported: TRENDING: BREAKING: FBI Clai ...

thespectator.info

LOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

There isn't one word in there about him dying from a heart attack. That's now twice today I've seen you utterly destroy your own bullshit with links that don't echo your lies.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/04/nolte-investigators-say-blunt-force-trauma-did-not-kill-officer-sicknick-capitol-riot/​

According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true.​

​

In fact, there is apparently so little evidence Sicknick was physically injured in any serious or notable way during the incident, the following is being considered…​

One possibility being considered by investigators is that Sicknick became ill after interacting with a chemical irritant like pepper spray or bear spray that was deployed in the crowd.​

Exactly how retarded are you, ya fucking moron? Your fellow fucking moron claims he died of a heart attack. What you posted says nothing about a heart attack.

You cult freak are flaming delusional.

What he posted is irrelevant. The bottom line is that Sicknick wasn't killed by any protester. That's a big fat Dim NAZI lie. He died of natural causes.

Heart attack and stroke are cardio vascular events closely related, caused by blood clots.

Fawn is a moron Nazi desperate to pimp his fiction that Sicknick was murdered.

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

It matters not that both are cardio vascular related. A stroke is not a heart attack.

 

[bripat9643]

Oh yea, I forgot all about the kraken.

How did that go?

Is Trump president now?

He should be.

And you know it.

Sorry, no. I don’t believe in your stupid conspiracy theory.

Good luck with that kraken thingy.

You believe what your filthy party tells you to believe.

 

[bripat9643]

LOLOLOL

You're fucking deranged, Fruitcake.

YOU said he died from a heart attack BEFORE you said he actually died from a stroke. I was the one who said he didn't die from a heart attack, which you now agree with.

I know you live in the third world; but have they tried shock therapy on you? The lobotomy didn't work. Maybe if they hook jumper cables from a car battery to your genitals it will help?

Or maybe a brain transplant? The brain of a toad would be a VAST improvement for you... Ask your Mullahs...

Spits the asylum inmate who said Sicknick dies of a heart attack.

Typical FAUX post harping on irrelevancies.