US scientists: Global warming pause 'no longer valid'

[orogenicman]

So much for the denier arguments.

US scientists Global warming pause no longer valid - BBC News

A US government laboratory says the much talked about "pause" is an illusion caused by inaccurate data.

Updated observations show temperatures did not plateau, say National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) scientists.

The warming rate over the past 15 years is "virtually identical" to the last century, they report in Science.

Dr Thomas Karl of NOAA, who led the new analysis, said: "We would hope that it would inform the general public that the temperature today really is continuing to warm."

 

[Ernie S.]

scientists tamper with global warming data US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[S.J.]

Not this shit again! There IS no global warming, it's another attempt by the left to hoodwink the sheepish public into walking in lockstep with liberal policies. Give it up, Organicman. Sheesh.

 

[ScienceRocks]

How can they charge data like this? Did they find that the poles were warmer or something?

 

[Wyatt earp]

So much for the denier arguments.

US scientists Global warming pause no longer valid - BBC News

A US government laboratory says the much talked about "pause" is an illusion caused by inaccurate data.

Updated observations show temperatures did not plateau, say National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) scientists.

The warming rate over the past 15 years is "virtually identical" to the last century, they report in Science.

Dr Thomas Karl of NOAA, who led the new analysis, said: "We would hope that it would inform the general public that the temperature today really is continuing to warm."

From the link, Lmao....

The new analysis corrects for ocean observations made using different methods as well as including new data on surface temperatures ~translation We are fudging numbers again

 

[Old Rocks]

Going to be interesting to see what that 'Pause' looks like by the end of this year.

 

[skookerasbil]

Well duh.......who didn't think a government agency like NASA are perpetually corrupt NOAA wasn't going to get around to fudging the #'s for effect??!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

Oh....and take a good look at the graph that accompanies the link........1 degree..........statistically insignificant!!

 

[skookerasbil]

"John Christy, the University of Alabama-Huntsville climate scientist who has constructed and studied temperature records of the lower atmosphere using satellite data, says atmospheric data do not exhibit the short term warming seen in Karl’s analysis."


[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/593fd13e-7ca9-41df-9875-c0b16e2db00e_1.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

Why do you frauds even bother..........I consistently come in and blow up your threads!!! Whats the obsession with constantly being publically humiliated?

 

[Billy_Bob]

As I posted in the original thread on this subject (HERE)...

This is nothing more than another MANN style FRAUD... Just like Mann used temperature rewriting to make the MEWP and RWP go away now NASA and NOAA do the same fraud as shown in failed and discredited Mann work of the Hockey Stick..

The same Parlor trick that Mann used is being attempted by more fraudsters.. And it was easily EXPOSED as fraud.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Our Science institutions can't afford to have 38-50% of our country saying they're corrupt. Science isn't about politics but fact!!!

The last thing I want to see is for these institutions that do a good job be harmed..In fact, it was the republicans that not too long ago that were the most likely to support nasa the most out of both parties, so it brings great sadness to see the change of heart now...But they really have a long road ahead attempting to explain why 15 years of steady land temperatures never happened and why they needed the change???

Did they find extra warming in the arctic?
Did they find more warming over the oceans?
Where they able to show that areas over northeast Russia had warmed more??

Way to many people are pissed off to ignore this reality....Enough to elect leaders that would defund and would rather not have that warning that has saved tens of thousands of lives. It is up to these institutions and people that love them to get serious.

 

[orogenicman]

So much for the denier arguments.

US scientists Global warming pause no longer valid - BBC News

A US government laboratory says the much talked about "pause" is an illusion caused by inaccurate data.

Updated observations show temperatures did not plateau, say National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) scientists.

The warming rate over the past 15 years is "virtually identical" to the last century, they report in Science.

Dr Thomas Karl of NOAA, who led the new analysis, said: "We would hope that it would inform the general public that the temperature today really is continuing to warm."

From the link, Lmao....

The new analysis corrects for ocean observations made using different methods as well as including new data on surface temperatures ~translation We are fudging numbers again

You are certainly welcome to read the actual paper and then submit your evidence that the numbers were fudged to the publisher.

 

[IanC]

Hahahaha. ARGO shows almost no warming (admittedly only from 2004) and satellites show less than no warming for the range of Karl's paper. Yet we are being told there has been warming.

Can you spell reanalysis? I knew you could.

 

[Crick]

Hahahaha. ARGO shows almost no warming (admittedly only from 2004) and satellites show less than no warming for the range of Karl's paper. Yet we are being told there has been warming.

Can you spell reanalysis? I knew you could.

Link?

 

[mamooth]

As each denier cult talking point collapses, the deniers get ever more bitter, pissy and conspiratorial. This is what the death of a cult looks like.

And this is the temperature record. Deal with it. The cult, hysterical over its looming demise, has ordered the faithful to somehow turn this graph into "no warming".

The result? Deniers going into hilarious conspiracy contortions. WUWT is up to at least 8 articles, all of them completely hysterical. Deniers so depended on their phony pause fraud, and they don't want to give it up.

 

[Crick]

Like this one: ftp://140.90.235.82/nodc/web/woa.data.nodc/PUBLICATIONS/grlheat08.pdf

Or this one: World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change 0 2000 m 1955 2010 - Levitus - 2012 - Geophysical Research Letters - Wiley Online Library

or this one concerning adjustments to XBT fall-rate equations: Reevaluation of historical ocean heat content variations with time-varying XBT and MBT depth bias corrections - Springer

Abstract
As reported in former studies, temperature observations obtained by expendable bathythermographs (XBTs) and mechanical bathythermographs (MBTs) appear to have positive biases as much as they affect major climate signals. These biases have not been fully taken into account in previous ocean temperature analyses, which have been widely used to detect global warming signals in the oceans. This report proposes a methodology for directly eliminating the biases from the XBT and MBT observations. In the case of XBT observation, assuming that the positive temperature biases mainly originate from greater depths given by conventional XBT fall-rate equations than the truth, a depth bias equation is constructed by fitting depth differences between XBT data and more accurate oceanographic observations to a linear equation of elapsed time. Such depth bias equations are introduced separately for each year and for each probe type. Uncertainty in the gradient of the linear equation is evaluated using a non-parametric test. The typical depth bias is +10 m at 700 m depth on average, which is probably caused by various indeterminable sources of error in the XBT observations as well as a lack of representativeness in the fall-rate equations adopted so far. Depth biases in MBT are fitted to quadratic equations of depth in a similar manner to the XBT method. Correcting the historical XBT and MBT depth biases by these equations allows a historical ocean temperature analysis to be conducted. In comparison with the previous temperature analysis, large differences are found in the present analysis as follows: the duration of large ocean heat content in the 1970s shortens dramatically, and recent ocean cooling becomes insignificant. The result is also in better agreement with tide gauge observations.

Or this one: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Abstract
Two significant instrument biases have been identified in the in situ profile data used to estimate globally integrated upper-ocean heat content. A large cold bias was discovered in a small fraction of Argo floats along with a smaller but more prevalent warm bias in expendable bathythermograph (XBT) data. These biases appear to have caused the bulk of the upper-ocean cooling signal reported by Lyman et al. between 2003 and 2005. These systematic data errors are significantly larger than sampling errors in recent years and are the dominant sources of error in recent estimates of globally integrated upper-ocean heat content variability. The bias in the XBT data is found to be consistent with errors in the fall-rate equations, suggesting a physical explanation for that bias. With biased profiles discarded, no significant warming or cooling is observed in upper-ocean heat content between 2003 and 2006.

 

[prison/con.net]

eff Nasa into the GROUND. man. 90+% of the money we've spent on it has been wasted, just like every other govt' project, SPECIFICALLY including the military and spy outfits.

 

[depotoo]

They want funds, they go along with the game plan. Many, are quietly pissed about the game playing they have to perpetuate, but realize how their bread is buttered.

As I posted in the original thread on this subject (HERE)...

This is nothing more than another MANN style FRAUD... Just like Mann used temperature rewriting to make the MEWP and RWP go away now NASA and NOAA do the same fraud as shown in failed and discredited Mann work of the Hockey Stick..

The same Parlor trick that Mann used is being attempted by more fraudsters.. And it was easily EXPOSED as fraud.

 

[mamooth]

Hahahaha. ARGO shows almost no warming (admittedly only from 2004) and satellites show less than no warming for the range of Karl's paper. Yet we are being told there has been warming.

Can you spell reanalysis? I knew you could.

Copying claims from a Monckton article on WUWT is really scraping bottom.