Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm, I guess because your ignorant? That is my best guess,
You aren't making a strong argument for your cause.
LOL
An opinion doesn't have to be a cause.
I know that can be difficult to comprehend, but give it a shot.
You aren't making a strong argument for your cause.
LOL
An opinion doesn't have to be a cause.
I know that can be difficult to comprehend, but give it a shot.
Whatever. But nobody I know at the club would ever hire a tard like that guy except maybe for the mailroom.
I can't fathom why any business who has the option would still have an Obama voter on the payroll.
Hmm, I guess because your[sic] ignorant? That is my best guess,
Why not. then we hit him with a huge capital gain tax when he does and someone who is a decent human being who treats his employees well takes his business and does it better.
You really need to stop mistaking parasites for vital organs.
If they go out of business it because dumb asses won't let you lay them off or fire them, then I doubt they will have much in capital gains tax to get. Looks like the greedy government will get nothing but more on unemployment.
BTW: Many decent business people get out of business because of they can't afford to be in business.
You really need to stop being such a dumb ass when it comes to running businesses.
Joe can't help himself, he's a "Workers of the World, UNITE!" kind of guy...
And if he IS a worker in this world, he would be foolish NOT to "unite" with other workers.
Appeasement never works, and as per our own nation's stated government policy, we don't negotiate with terrorists.
It never ceases to amaze me the penchant for some within the same economic class to think that contracted benefits union employees are an obscenity - swallowed whole in the same breath that that excuses, even applauds, the CEOs and owners of industry for raising your prices based on the last dime the largest demographic has to spend.
Many people currently advocate for a balance between public and private sector wages and benefits, but it would not be a "balance," it would rather be a leveling of wages and benefits, and the only direction privately owned industry will ever level wages and benefits is down.
Meanwhile, prices continue to rise, and because corporations got rid of the people who once provided the service they charge such high prices for (The consumer is now considered to be just as much of an unnecessary and unpleasant overhead as labor traditionally has been), customer service continues to deteriorate. Whenever the ugly and inevitable results become evident, the advocates of supply side policies point to their handiwork as proof of the ―inefficiency of government bureaucracy and claim that, unregulated, and free from the constraints of collective bargaining laws, the private sector can do the job better. Theyll also claim that they can do it cheaper. And, oh, by the way, they just happen to know a guy
1. I put Romney down for his religion because his religion was a malicious lie started by a con artist who wanted to have sex with children. That he doesn't have the reasoning skills to understand the simple problem means I can't trust him on the more serious questions, like would bombing Iran be a good idea. He failed the reasonign test- miserably.
(Also. Not a liberal. Sorry. I'm a pragmatist. I go with what works.)
2. The recession was not made worse by what Obama did. In fact, things are a LOT better than they were four years ago. That's why Obama won.
3. I don't believe in business freedom.
This guy has a business because people work very hard for him and because the rest of us provide him with utilities and resources and tax breaks to have a business. He really didn't build that by himself. Other people helped him. And if he's going to be have a hissy and scream, "I'm firing you because I didn't like the way the election turned out!" maybe we need to look at the help the rest of us are giving him.
I hope those employees sue the shit out of that crybaby right wing piece of trash (if it's even true)
He didnt say he fired Dem employees. Way to jump to conclusions...you stupid liberal piece of shit.
But I sure hope they were. It's about time for small business to make a stand.
The libs have unions on their side so I dont see this as out of the realm of fair play.
Who the hell would even think about hiring a liberal?
That guy over in shipping drives a Prius.
I am pretty sure he voted Democrat, and I am just waiting for one wrong move from him.
He didnt say he fired Dem employees. Way to jump to conclusions...you stupid liberal piece of shit.
But I sure hope they were. It's about time for small business to make a stand.
The libs have unions on their side so I dont see this as out of the realm of fair play.
Who the hell would even think about hiring a liberal?
America
Yes, we DID, again.
And if he IS a worker in this world, he would be foolish NOT to "unite" with other workers.
Appeasement never works, and as per our own nation's stated government policy, we don't negotiate with terrorists.
It never ceases to amaze me the penchant for some within the same economic class to think that contracted benefits union employees are an obscenity - swallowed whole in the same breath that that excuses, even applauds, the CEOs and owners of industry for raising your prices based on the last dime the largest demographic has to spend.
It never ceases to amaze me that parasites, leaches and ticks on the ass of society think they have something in common with me or share common goals because they have similar incomes. Corporations set their prices according to the laws of supply and demand. Any other theory about how they do it is invariably based on some flavor of Mraxism.
Many people currently advocate for a balance between public and private sector wages and benefits, but it would not be a "balance," it would rather be a leveling of wages and benefits, and the only direction privately owned industry will ever level wages and benefits is down.
Meaningless twaddle. Government workers make more on average than the people who pay their salaries. Your lame attempt to justify that isn't fooling anyone.
Meanwhile, prices continue to rise, and because corporations got rid of the people who once provided the service they charge such high prices for (The consumer is now considered to be just as much of an unnecessary and unpleasant overhead as labor traditionally has been), customer service continues to deteriorate. Whenever the ugly and inevitable results become evident, the advocates of supply side policies point to their handiwork as proof of the ―inefficiency of government bureaucracy and claim that, unregulated, and free from the constraints of collective bargaining laws, the private sector can do the job better. Theyll also claim that they can do it cheaper. And, oh, by the way, they just happen to know a guy
Prices rise because government finances its operations by rolling the printing presses. Private corporations have nothing to do with it.
Government has demonstrated over and over that it produces an inferior product at a vastly inflated price. Economists have understood the mechanism for this result for centuries. The market is responsible for all the wealth and technical wonders we enjoy today. Government only spread poverty.
We don't negotiate with terrorists.
We don't negotiate with terrorists.
No, you stand idly by while they kill Americans.
We don't negotiate with terrorists.
No, you stand idly by while they kill Americans.
?
link?
We don't negotiate with terrorists.
No, you stand idly by while they kill Americans.
?
link?
How Team Obama Justifies the Killing of a 16-Year-Old American - Conor Friedersdorf - The Atlantic
No due process. Cruel and unusual punishment without even being accused of a crime in a court of law.
To think Nixon and Clinton got impeached for lying.
?
link?
How Team Obama Justifies the Killing of a 16-Year-Old American - Conor Friedersdorf - The Atlantic
No due process. Cruel and unusual punishment without even being accused of a crime in a court of law.
To think Nixon and Clinton got impeached for lying.
All of a sudden your side is concerned with collateral damage and the court of law?
Hey, RUN with that with an ounce of consistency and I'll get back to you.
I can't fathom why any business who has the option would still have an Obama voter on the payroll.
If productivity does not warrant keeping an employee on the pay role he must go.
I've worked for companies that if you did not make them at least 25% over cost of the job you were cutting into their profit margin of operation. Some companies hire people because the numbers warrant the mass hiring's, such as shut down upfit's will be time and materials contract. The more people on the job the more money a company made.
That's the way it works. Employees create profit, if they dont, you can them. To arbitrarily can them because you don't like who the President is the act of a Douchebag
When that presidents policies increase the cost of retaining that employee to the point it is no longer fiscally feasible to keep paying him even if he is doing the work the employee loses his job. It's all in the math.
If they go out of business it because dumb asses won't let you lay them off or fire them, then I doubt they will have much in capital gains tax to get. Looks like the greedy government will get nothing but more on unemployment.
BTW: Many decent business people get out of business because of they can't afford to be in business.
You really need to stop being such a dumb ass when it comes to running businesses.
Joe can't help himself, he's a "Workers of the World, UNITE!" kind of guy...
And if he IS a worker in this world, he would be foolish NOT to "unite" with other workers.
Appeasement never works, and as per our own nation's stated government policy, we don't negotiate with terrorists.
It never ceases to amaze me the penchant for some within the same economic class to think that contracted benefits union employees are an obscenity - swallowed whole in the same breath that that excuses, even applauds, the CEOs and owners of industry for raising your prices based on the last dime the largest demographic has to spend.
Many people currently advocate for a balance between public and private sector wages and benefits, but it would not be a "balance," it would rather be a leveling of wages and benefits, and the only direction privately owned industry will ever level wages and benefits is down. Meanwhile, prices continue to rise, and because corporations got rid of the people who once provided the service they charge such high prices for (The consumer is now considered to be just as much of an unnecessary and unpleasant overhead as labor traditionally has been), customer service continues to deteriorate. Whenever the ugly and inevitable results become evident, the advocates of supply side policies point to their handiwork as proof of the ―inefficiency of government bureaucracy and claim that, unregulated, and free from the constraints of collective bargaining laws, the private sector can do the job better. Theyll also claim that they can do it cheaper. And, oh, by the way, they just happen to know a guy
Those employers who want the right to hire and fire should get the message and get out. This isn't that country anymore.
Sure thing.
The sooner the better.
They can go find another country that offers all the opportunity, freedom, justice, and infrastructure the United States offers.
I've met a few business owners that tried it.
And came right back.
GMs December 31, 2011 annual report shows General Motors of North America accounting for 98,000 of the 207,000 GM jobs worldwide. But 12,000 of these jobs are in Canada and 11,500 are in Mexico. Accordingly, GM has 74,500 jobs in the United States and 122,500 abroad, even after Obamas touted surge in Detroit jobs. Almost two thirds of GMs jobs are in other countries.
Since Immelt took over GE in 2001, the company has lost 37,000 American jobs, and added 25,000 jobs overseas, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Some of those U.S. job losses are inflated by the companys sale of NBC to Comcast in 2009.
Chris Townsend, political director of the United Electrical Workers labor union that represents roughly 5,500 GE employees in the U.S., said the company has closed more than 30 U.S. plants since Obama took office.
