no comment eots? I thought engineers designed for thermal expansion due to office fires?
i said that engineers are well of the effects of fire on a steel framed hi-rise and take it in to consideration in the design are you actually trying to say they are not aware of the effects of fire and do not consider it in the design
Here you go fuckstick. Proof positive that you are speaking out of your ass.
Taken from this PDF document. I'll provide more proof since I like making you look like a complete asshole.
http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc50830/nrcc50830.pdf
Here are just a couple of quotes from the document.
Thermal expansion is not a new term in structural engineering, as it has been considered in the design of bridge structures for many years at ambient temperature. However, such consideration has not been extended to the design of building structures exposed to fire.
This result reveals the fact that currently, there is a clear lack of knowledge and design methodology relating to the effects of thermal expansion on performance of structures in fire.
THAT is why I asked you if you got this information from a structural engineer or other source to which you blatantly ignored. So I guess you WERE just assuming this claim?
No comment eots?
You were proven wrong yet again and were just guessing all this time. And you supposedly fight for the truth? What a joke. Nice to know your "knowledge" is nothing more than assumptions.