Voting Advice For Liberals

[PaintMyHouse]

Even a dunce like you must recognize that that doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nope. We have a deal so Obama did as promised, which fucks you good and hard.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And a war with North Korea?

Gads, you're a dope.
As stupid as you are, no wonder you vote as you do.



Do you know what Iran's nuclear bomb laboratory is called?

North Korea.

Tehran pays North Korea some $2 billion dollars a year.
That's out of North Korea's $15 billion GNP.



"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.
“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even a dunce like you must recognize that that doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nope. We have a deal so Obama did as promised, which fucks you good and hard.

The vulgarity is the usual admission from a Liberal that he either is lying, or ignorant.
For you.....both.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And a war with North Korea?

Gads, you're a dope.
As stupid as you are, no wonder you vote as you do.



Do you know what Iran's nuclear bomb laboratory is called?

North Korea.

Tehran pays North Korea some $2 billion dollars a year.
That's out of North Korea's $15 billion GNP.



"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.
“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea

Countries have the right to build weapons, even nukes, without our permission. We didn't ask for permission, Israel didn't ask for permission, and we are the only nation to use the things as a terrorist would so, can it, Korean hypocrite.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Even a dunce like you must recognize that that doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nope. We have a deal so Obama did as promised, which fucks you good and hard.

The vulgarity is the usual admission from a Liberal that he either is lying, or ignorant.
For you.....both.

Get over the swearing, No one but you gives a fuck. Clear?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even a dunce like you must recognize that that doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nope. We have a deal so Obama did as promised, which fucks you good and hard.

The vulgarity is the usual admission from a Liberal that he either is lying, or ignorant.
For you.....both.

Get over the swearing, No one but you gives a fuck. Clear?

I recognize the white flag.

Excellent.

 

[NYcarbineer]

And a war with North Korea?

Gads, you're a dope.
As stupid as you are, no wonder you vote as you do.



Do you know what Iran's nuclear bomb laboratory is called?

North Korea.

Tehran pays North Korea some $2 billion dollars a year.
That's out of North Korea's $15 billion GNP.



"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.
“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea

You didn't answer the question. Shut up and answer the question.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How many times must your candidate lie in your face before you stand up for your own self-respect?

There were so very many Obama lies....perhaps this is the most egregious in terms of the consequences for the world:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon



Now...you see why 'voting' is a mistake for you Liberals?

So you're guaranteeing a war with Iran if the Republican gets elected?

Do you know what it means when you begin a sentence with "So...."?

Look it up.

It means based on what you've said I've concluded you want wars with Iran and North Korea.

Feel free to deny that or let my conclusion stand.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Even a dunce like you must recognize that that doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nope. We have a deal so Obama did as promised, which fucks you good and hard.

The vulgarity is the usual admission from a Liberal that he either is lying, or ignorant.
For you.....both.

Get over the swearing, No one but you gives a fuck. Clear?

I recognize the white flag.

Excellent.

War looks easy for someone like you for whom it won't cost anything in blood and treasure.

 

[BlindBoo]

gee thanks Mighty Mouse.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Even a dunce like you must recognize that that doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nope. We have a deal so Obama did as promised, which fucks you good and hard.

The vulgarity is the usual admission from a Liberal that he either is lying, or ignorant.
For you.....both.

Get over the swearing, No one but you gives a fuck. Clear?

See how you cannot get her to actually take a stand on an issue?

 

[Contumacious]

Supposedly smart people don't believe the "Wet Paint" sign until they touch the bench.
That's why these debates are meaningless...
How ya' gonna decide who ya' gonna vote for?

As always, I'm trying to be helpful....I just want to help all of our Liberal/Progressive pals so they don't made the same sort of humungous mistakes they did in '08 and '12.



That was some embarrassment, huh?
Gee....the dozens of flops, flubs, and pratfalls by the dope currently in the White House! Gotta' hurt sumpthin' awful, huh, Liberal/Progressives?
But.....like Mighty Mouse, here I come to save the day!


Now, pay attention:

1. The saying goes...
'You don't need a parachute to skydive.
You need a parachute to skydive twice.'

And the same is true in analyzing your recent voting record: like skydiving, landing safely, in terms of your voting decision,.....if you voted for the failure currently in the White House....you should consider never.....never.....voting again!

For the good of America.

Looking at the result of a vote for Obama, you endangered the nation and the world with a vote for Obama....and you were warned!
The 'wet paint' sign was all over the guy!!!




2. Didn't you know that he was raised and nurtured by communists?
He learned his 'religion' at the feet of one who preached "God damn America.'
He supported infanticide!!!
He had no record of accomplishment...unless you could his 'present' vote as an accomplishment.
He endorsed socialism...."spread the wealth."
And has a well documented record of lying.....so, I mean, really....why watch debates altogether? You could just vote Hillary and be done with it.




3. Oh....and I know how painful it is to remember this: ... how Obama's supporters referred to him as 'messiah,' 'God', and 'Jesus' in the run-up to 2008.
They claim only rightwingers so stated....and I love giving a dozen or so examples of the Leftists doing just what I said they did.


I mean....really...it isn't as though you weren't warned! Like this:

"Rudy Giuliani doubled down on his claims that President Obama doesn’t “love America” in an interview with The Post Friday — claiming the commander-in-chief has been influenced by communists since his youth.

“From the time he was 9 years old, he was influenced by Frank Marshall Davis, who was a communist,” Giuliani said. Giuliani: Obama influenced by communists since youth | New York Post



In 2008, we warned you that the paint was wet....wet 'red' paint....

See where I'm going?

The political groundwork for Hitler to be an effective fascist/nazi chancellor was laid down by the Bismarck and Weimar administrations.

The political groundwork for Comrade Sanders to be an effective socialist administrator has been laid down by the Demopublican administrations.

And so it fucking goes.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And a war with North Korea?

Gads, you're a dope.
As stupid as you are, no wonder you vote as you do.



Do you know what Iran's nuclear bomb laboratory is called?

North Korea.

Tehran pays North Korea some $2 billion dollars a year.
That's out of North Korea's $15 billion GNP.



"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.
“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea

You didn't answer the question. Shut up and answer the question.

Nothing could be more illustrative of the intelligence of a Liberal than this sentence:

"Shut up and answer the question."


Gads, you're an imbecile.

 

[NYcarbineer]

And a war with North Korea?

Gads, you're a dope.
As stupid as you are, no wonder you vote as you do.



Do you know what Iran's nuclear bomb laboratory is called?

North Korea.

Tehran pays North Korea some $2 billion dollars a year.
That's out of North Korea's $15 billion GNP.



"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.
“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea

You didn't answer the question. Shut up and answer the question.

Nothing could be more illustrative of the intelligence of a Liberal than this sentence:

"Shut up and answer the question."


Gads, you're an imbecile.

People who've seen your act long enough can explain the brilliance of what I said.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How many times must your candidate lie in your face before you stand up for your own self-respect?

There were so very many Obama lies....perhaps this is the most egregious in terms of the consequences for the world:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon



Now...you see why 'voting' is a mistake for you Liberals?

So you're guaranteeing a war with Iran if the Republican gets elected?

Do you know what it means when you begin a sentence with "So...."?

Look it up.

It means based on what you've said I've concluded you want wars with Iran and North Korea.

Feel free to deny that or let my conclusion stand.

Since obviously no denial is coming anytime soon, my conclusion stands.

PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war with Iran.

Hell, we don't even need CackleBird's assurance. Most of the candidates made it clear the other day they wanted to go to war with Iran over those captured sailors.

Please do not vote for these lunatics. They will kill your children for no good reason.

 

[HenryBHough]

If you're concerned about The America You're Leaving to Your Children....

Then vote for Nutty Old Uncle Bernie (Sanders). You'll quickly discover than in his Utopia abortions will be free and you won't have enough left after taxes to raise a child (let alone "children") so there will be none to leave anything to.

Now what could possibly go wrong with that?

 

[PoliticalChic]

And a war with North Korea?

Gads, you're a dope.
As stupid as you are, no wonder you vote as you do.



Do you know what Iran's nuclear bomb laboratory is called?

North Korea.

Tehran pays North Korea some $2 billion dollars a year.
That's out of North Korea's $15 billion GNP.



"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.
“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea

You didn't answer the question. Shut up and answer the question.

Nothing could be more illustrative of the intelligence of a Liberal than this sentence:

"Shut up and answer the question."


Gads, you're an imbecile.

People who've seen your act long enough can explain the brilliance of what I said.

I have no 'act.'

I have a mission.

And, inadvertently, you serve as my pawn, advancing that mission.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How many times must your candidate lie in your face before you stand up for your own self-respect?

There were so very many Obama lies....perhaps this is the most egregious in terms of the consequences for the world:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon



Now...you see why 'voting' is a mistake for you Liberals?

So you're guaranteeing a war with Iran if the Republican gets elected?

Do you know what it means when you begin a sentence with "So...."?

Look it up.

It means based on what you've said I've concluded you want wars with Iran and North Korea.

Feel free to deny that or let my conclusion stand.

Since obviously no denial is coming anytime soon, my conclusion stands.

PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war with Iran.

Hell, we don't even need CackleBird's assurance. Most of the candidates made it clear the other day they wanted to go to war with Iran over those captured sailors.

Please do not vote for these lunatics. They will kill your children for no good reason.

"PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war..."

A perfect example of how you serve as my pawn.....your lies identify the way Liberals function.

As usual, I reveal your malevolence by simply asking you to provide any quote where I've said what you claim I've said.

And....as is the usual pattern....you can't.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How many times must your candidate lie in your face before you stand up for your own self-respect?

There were so very many Obama lies....perhaps this is the most egregious in terms of the consequences for the world:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon



Now...you see why 'voting' is a mistake for you Liberals?

So you're guaranteeing a war with Iran if the Republican gets elected?

Do you know what it means when you begin a sentence with "So...."?

Look it up.

It means based on what you've said I've concluded you want wars with Iran and North Korea.

Feel free to deny that or let my conclusion stand.

Since obviously no denial is coming anytime soon, my conclusion stands.

PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war with Iran.

Hell, we don't even need CackleBird's assurance. Most of the candidates made it clear the other day they wanted to go to war with Iran over those captured sailors.

Please do not vote for these lunatics. They will kill your children for no good reason.

"PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war..."

A perfect example of how you serve as my pawn.....your lies identify the way Liberals function.

As usual, I reveal your malevolence by simply asking you to provide any quote where I've said what you claim I've said.

And....as is the usual pattern....you can't.

I concluded it from the content of your posts. I don't need a quote. I even offered you an opportunity to deny it, to state for the record what you really believe.

You refuse. My conclusion stands undenied.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How many times must your candidate lie in your face before you stand up for your own self-respect?

There were so very many Obama lies....perhaps this is the most egregious in terms of the consequences for the world:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon



Now...you see why 'voting' is a mistake for you Liberals?

So you're guaranteeing a war with Iran if the Republican gets elected?

Do you know what it means when you begin a sentence with "So...."?

Look it up.

It means based on what you've said I've concluded you want wars with Iran and North Korea.

Feel free to deny that or let my conclusion stand.

Since obviously no denial is coming anytime soon, my conclusion stands.

PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war with Iran.

Hell, we don't even need CackleBird's assurance. Most of the candidates made it clear the other day they wanted to go to war with Iran over those captured sailors.

Please do not vote for these lunatics. They will kill your children for no good reason.

"PoliticalChic has assured us that electing a Republican will get us into a war..."

A perfect example of how you serve as my pawn.....your lies identify the way Liberals function.

As usual, I reveal your malevolence by simply asking you to provide any quote where I've said what you claim I've said.

And....as is the usual pattern....you can't.

You mean like when you called me a liar for saying you believed abortion is murder, and then I produced your verbatim quote?

You mean like when you called me a liar for saying that you accused Joe Biden of being a Communist, and I produced your quote calling ALL liberals Communists?

You mean like when you called me a liar for saying that you thought Medicare and Medicaid were unconstitutional, and I produced your quote saying exactly that?

Those usual patterns?