Uh, no.Then start your own political party and you too can be partisan. LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh, no.Then start your own political party and you too can be partisan. LOL
"The best thing to do?"i love it when people inside the 2 party system think that voting for the same shitty people that got us to were we are now over and over again is just the best thing to do....
I don't have "people'. Not all of us are herd animals.“Their people” are absolute dogshit and you people still can’t find a single person with a shot at competing…What does that say about “your people”?
I thought you were all giddy on this faggot?I don't have "people'. Not all of us are herd animals.
Ok - this is gonna sound totally crazy, so bear with me, but what if ..."The best thing to do?"
What alternative exists -- in the real world?
Me neither. But they do seem to float to the top of the two shit parties.I don't subscribe to all pols being shitty people
Sometimes I think you just can't be for real. That you're just a liberal's caricature of a asinine, bigoted conservative. I dunno. Are you?I thought you were all giddy on this faggot?
I never vote for what is considered to be a bad candidate. Some candidates are stronger than others. But to rise up in a party process, one has something going on there. And I am not talking about gadflys and others who jump in without any inside party support.Ok - this is gonna sound totally crazy, so bear with me, but what if ...
we just stopped voting for bad candidates on purpose?
Crazy talk, I know.
Me neither. But they do seem to float to the top.
Have you ever been active in local party politics?Ok - this is gonna sound totally crazy, so bear with me, but what if ...
we just stopped voting for bad candidates on purpose?
Crazy talk, I know.
Me neither. But they do seem to float to the top of the two shit parties.
I never vote for what is considered to be a bad candidate. Some candidates are stronger than others. But to rise up in a party process, one has something going on there. And I am not talking about gadflys and others who jump in without any inside party support.
I've been involved in party politics. I was on a ballot -- a slate of people for party positions. I've seen people work at winning over their neighbors and friends. It's admirable -- most of the time.
But that's what partisans are constantly asking others to do.I never vote for what is considered to be a bad candidate.
Me too. And I didn't think all politicians are shit. But the two party system is failing us miserably.I've been involved in party politics. I was on a ballot -- a slate of people for party positions. I've seen people work at winning over their neighbors and friends. It's admirable -- most of the time.
I blame the citizens and the media. I see flaws with the two party system, but I have yet to see any credible alternatives that I'd support being proposed.But that's what partisans are constantly asking others to do.
Me too. And I didn't think all politicians are shit. But the two party system is failing us miserably.
Yep. Ran for city council once. Worked with the Ron Paul campaign. Used to be involved with the Libertarians locally.Have you ever been active in local party politics?
Ranked choice voting would address many of its flaws.I blame the citizens and the media. I see flaws with the two party system, but I have yet to see any credible alternatives that I'd support being proposed.
That's opinion.But that's what partisans are constantly asking others to do.
No. It's not. You said "I never vote for what is considered to be a bad candidate". Me neither. That's a fact. But douche bags like the OP insist that I should."I never vote for what is considered to be a bad candidate."
That's opinion.
I can see people gaming that too. I despise term limits. I've seen it gamed and it's flaws are terrible.Ranked choice voting would address many of its flaws.
Considerations are opinions. And eff the OP LOLNo. It's not. You said "I never vote for what is considered to be a bad candidate". Me neither. That's a fact. But douche bags like the OP insist that I should.
I had to laugh out loud at that. Chicken egg etc..I can see people gaming that too. I despise term limits. I've seen it gamed and it's flaws are terrible.
I'd support ranked choice, if there were more than two major parties. But there are not.
You're missing the point. The question is, should you for a considerate that you think is bad, merely because the "other side" is worse?Considerations are opinions. And eff the OP LOL
Chicken or the Egg: You do know what came first, don't you?I had to laugh out loud at that. Chicken egg etc..
For my money, the biggest flaw of the current system is the topic of this thread: lesser-of-two-evils voting. Ranked choice voting does away with that.