Voting machines investigations in NJ....this is only the beginning folks

justoffal

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2013
24,796
16,842
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
 
We cannot allow our election integrity to be destroyed by the Democrats and these bogus gaming machines masquerading as vote counters. WTF do you have FLOATING POINT math algorithms for INTEGER vote counts? That alone merits a deep dive review.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo

Anyone with an even cursory understanding of statistics knows there is a difference between the biases of in-person voting and vote-by-mail.

derp derp derp
 
We cannot allow our election integrity to be destroyed by the Democrats and these bogus gaming machines masquerading as vote counters. WTF do you have FLOATING POINT math algorithms for INTEGER vote counts? That alone merits a deep dive review.

This algorithm is far more complex than a simple floating point for fuzzy guesstimates...no... to the contrary it is a precise mechanism that covers itself up by not being too bold.....ingenious really....it is pegged to a small percentile probability while at the same time performing outside the farthest outliers imaginable...in other words the results are actually not possible but very, very careful to keep the appearance of possible. That in and of itself has never been recorded in any field that deals with statistics on a national scale that I know of.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo

Anyone with an even cursory understanding of statistics knows there is a difference between the biases of in-person voting and vote-by-mail.

derp derp derp

That's right.... panic you mutha...you should be in panic...... this is not about in person versus machine...it's about the consistent warping of the results in one direction all the time...all you have to do is take a quarter and flip it to find out how that is impossible....you dope.

JO
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
I haven't even taken a course in statistics -but I am a damn good gambler and have a firm grasp on probabilities- and can see clear as day that the election was a sham.

Every "anomaly" and "irregularity" fell to the favor of one person?......Buuuuuuuuuuulllll-shit.
 
Last edited:
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
The thread premise is a lie.

No votes were ‘changed’ to benefit Democrats.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
The thread premise is a lie.

No votes were ‘changed’ to benefit Democrats.
Pound sand up your ass, commie scum.
 
We cannot allow our election integrity to be destroyed by the Democrats and these bogus gaming machines masquerading as vote counters. WTF do you have FLOATING POINT math algorithms for INTEGER vote counts? That alone merits a deep dive review.

This algorithm is far more complex than a simple floating point for fuzzy guesstimates...no... to the contrary it is a precise mechanism that covers itself up by not being too bold.....ingenious really....it is pegged to a small percentile probability while at the same time performing outside the farthest outliers imaginable...in other words the results are actually not possible but very, very careful to keep the appearance of possible. That in and of itself has never been recorded in any field that deals with statistics on a national scale that I know of.
Actually, it has been too bold, statistically speaking....There were hundreds (thousands?) of traunches of votes in the election that had impossibly similar ratio breakouts.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
The thread premise is a lie.

No votes were ‘changed’ to benefit Democrats.
color me shocked.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
The thread premise is a lie.

No votes were ‘changed’ to benefit Democrats.
color me shocked.
Sorry, you've already been colored dumb as a stump.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo
The thread premise is a lie.

No votes were ‘changed’ to benefit Democrats.


That hasn't been proven, at least not yet.

I think its very important that the disputed 2020 election be fully investigated to help remove the doubts people have about the very legitimacy of Sleepy Joe.
 
The election is history, the main focus should be toward this never happening again and voter ID verification. The integrity of our elections is essential in the preservation of our Freedom!


I think its absolutely critical to investigate the election , and verify its accuracy.

And if it turns out that it was stolen on the behalf of Sleepy Joe, his Presidency must be annulled.
 
The Algorithm is back and it will be uncovered


Anyone who has taken even a cursory course in statistics understands that no distribution can justify the constant flow of changed votes to democrat's favor. Such odds simply do not exist in the real world. The powers of ten we are talking about here are totally ridiculous. The rules of empirical data collection simply forbid the idea of coincidence or happenstance here.

An Algorithm is present of that there is no question.

jo

Anyone with an even cursory understanding of statistics knows there is a difference between the biases of in-person voting and vote-by-mail.

derp derp derp
Are you pretending to be a slightly less insane version of Toro again?
 
Anyone with an even cursory understanding of statistics knows there is a difference between the biases of in-person voting and vote-by-mail.
There really shouldn't be a problem at all with properly signed and identified votes lawfully transmitted through the mails, provided that the envelopes bear a true and correct postmark, to help substantiate the date and place of voting.
 
The election is history, the main focus should be toward this never happening again and voter ID verification. The integrity of our elections is essential in the preservation of our Freedom!
Fuck that noise.

The fraudsters and enablers are still in positions of power, and need to be exposed and properly disposed of.

Enough of "we'll gettem next time"....This shit needs to be dealt with swiftly and harshly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top