drippinhun
Rookie
- Jan 15, 2012
- 36
- 6
- 1
Yeah, an organization that has people like Douglas Feith, Barry McCaffrey, John McCain and James A. Baker III
is a Democratic front. Get real.
is a Democratic front. Get real.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, an organization that has people like Douglas Feith, Barry McCaffrey, John McCain and James A. Baker III
is a Democratic front. Get real.
According to a source in the U.S. government, one week ago, the Arab League Secretary-General, Nabil al-Arabi, told the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, Jeffrey Feltman, that the Assad regime was breaking the terms of the Arab League initiative. If true, this quiet admission of failure preceded the high-profile resignation of Algerian League delegate Anwar Malek, who told Al Jazeera that his team had been unable to prevent the Assad regimes multiple crimes against humanity and that the mission itself was a farce. More delegates are now said to be planning to quit.
When I asked a State Department spokesperson yesterday to confirm al-Arabis judgment, delivered in advance of the League report on Syria, he referred me to Hillary Clintons Wednesday interview with Qatari PM Jassim bin Jabor Al Thani, who said: [W]hat is now obvious today is that attacks are still ongoing and it seems that the Government of Syria is still not ready to change its course. Quite simply, a consensus is forming in Washington and Arab capitals that the last chance effort to broker an end to the violence in Syria is an embarrassing shambles.
So where does that leave the Assad regime? As first reported by Foreign Policy magazine, the Obama administration has begun the preliminaries of internationalising the response to ongoing Syrian crisis. They are weighing the option of some kind of humanitarian military intervention, most likely led by Turkey. Repeated attempts to get a UN Security Council resolution condemning the regime have failed chiefly because Russia will not give up its ally in Damascus. Cyprus, which is the Kremlin's Mediterranean partner in money laundering and corruption, has just violated EU sanctions by allowing a Russian ship full of "35 to 60 tons of ammunition and explosives" to sail for Syrias Russian-controlled port of Tartus.
Read More:
War in Syria may now be inevitable Telegraph Blogs
15-Jan-12 World View Consensus Is Growing For Military Action In Syria
I humbly suggest you subscribe to another source, it might make your posts credible and even allow you to provide your own insight and be less of a mindless troll.
Try this for a bit: About Foreign Affairs | Foreign Affairs
From Foreign Affairs: Snapshot,
January 6, 2012
What it Will Take to Intervene in Syria
Michael Weiss
More and more outsiders are calling for a humanitarian intervention in Syria to stop Bashar al-Assad's killing sprees. But for this to work, Syria's various opposition groups will have to first coalesce into a single, unified political and military force.
Link: What it Will Take to Intervene in Syria | Foreign Affairs
Your source doesn't saying anything different than my source does. That's why you should probably read Posts thoroughly before pecking out an angry reply. And we don't need any more 'Humanitarian Wars.' We've had enough of those already.
The CFR is where liberals come and go from the State Department, it is a holding cell for them while they wait for their handlers to get back in charge. I'm sure they are being leaked classified information about Syria.....from their insiders in the State Department, I've never trusted those people when I met them.
The CFR is run by Elitist Globalist assholes. To Hell with em.![]()
This is an arab league problem. The only one wanting to "internationalize" it is obama.
I humbly suggest you subscribe to another source, it might make your posts credible and even allow you to provide your own insight and be less of a mindless troll.
Try this for a bit: About Foreign Affairs | Foreign Affairs
From Foreign Affairs: Snapshot,
January 6, 2012
What it Will Take to Intervene in Syria
Michael Weiss
More and more outsiders are calling for a humanitarian intervention in Syria to stop Bashar al-Assad's killing sprees. But for this to work, Syria's various opposition groups will have to first coalesce into a single, unified political and military force.
Link: What it Will Take to Intervene in Syria | Foreign Affairs
Your source doesn't saying anything different than my source does. That's why you should probably read Posts thoroughly before pecking out an angry reply. And we don't need any more 'Humanitarian Wars.' We've had enough of those already.
I suggest you read my response, I questoned the source not the content and offered a credible alternative, if you are choose to offer credible threads with less 'hysterical' titiles. You post many new threads, all of which make you appear as a partisan hack and a troll.
There are serious issues about, and serious sources and links make the authors opinons stronger. Anyone posting on a matter using Fox News or the Washington Times as a sole source needs to understand they are not credible sources in the opinon of many.
I think for our next war, we should invade Canada. It's close to home and the troops could all come home on the weekends.
I humbly suggest you subscribe to another source, it might make your posts credible and even allow you to provide your own insight and be less of a mindless troll.
Try this for a bit: About Foreign Affairs | Foreign Affairs
From Foreign Affairs: Snapshot,
January 6, 2012
What it Will Take to Intervene in Syria
Michael Weiss
More and more outsiders are calling for a humanitarian intervention in Syria to stop Bashar al-Assad's killing sprees. But for this to work, Syria's various opposition groups will have to first coalesce into a single, unified political and military force.
Link: What it Will Take to Intervene in Syria | Foreign Affairs
Yeah cause the CFR is unbiased ......![]()
There is always a bias, only morons respond as did you. I called out the OP for his sources and offered another, one which has been in operation since the early 1920's. You call out mine, and offer a "Smilie". Given your quick response it's obvious you didn't read the article - willful ignorance is not a virtue.
So where does that leave the Assad regime? As first reported by Foreign Policy magazine, the Obama administration has begun the preliminaries of internationalising the response to ongoing Syrian crisis. They are weighing the option of some kind of humanitarian military intervention, most likely led by Turkey. Repeated attempts to get a UN Security Council resolution condemning the regime have failed chiefly because Russia will not give up its ally in Damascus. Cyprus, which is the Kremlin's Mediterranean partner in money laundering and corruption, has just violated EU sanctions by allowing a Russian ship full of "35 to 60 tons of ammunition and explosives" to sail for Syrias Russian-controlled port of Tartus.
I think for our next war, we should invade Canada. It's close to home and the troops could all come home on the weekends.
Right, and it'd be far more of value to us to invade Canada then all of the middle eastern economies put together.
I say win-win.