BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 17,434
- 1,410
- 85
What is it that you think I didn't answer? Do you even know?
they are called the civil war amendments - where you got your ass blown off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is it that you think I didn't answer? Do you even know?
That's not anything like what he created. Perhaps you should do some research. There is no refutation of Judaism. The book ends with Jesus' death. There are no supernatural occurrences, no angels regarding his birth etc. Your interpretation is way off target.
You used the word aimless, so wonder would not work. You can't "wonder aimlessly". The Jews wandered in the desert, not wondered.
You can however wander aimlessly, which I am sure you do on a regular basis.
well, not everyone wonders in the desert, aimlessly and do attempt to know the truth - recorded history can help.
Bullshit. No law means no law. That prohibition is in no way limited to the declaration of a national religion at all. It is simply not the purview of the government to decide what is or is not religious in the first place.What this means, to those with any historical perspective, is that Congress has no power to declare a national religion,
Did you not write this in your Post #713? (emphasis mine):That you even wrote that sentence tells me you don't even bother to read what I write.
I have NEVER wanted a theocracy, would never consider it. Why? Because it is not good for theocracy. It doesn't help secular government either. I am very much in favor of ALL citizen participating in democracy with no intimidation by anyone.
The Church is the cumulative body of who believe in Jesus the Christ and have accepted him as their personal savior.again, what is a church - in response to your self serving assertion the gov't and church are not equally distinguishable.
So quote the sentences you think pertinent to support your position?I think I will rely on the words of the founding fathers. The link I provided was from the Washington and Lee Law Review is based upon documented historical facts and the words of the founding fathers.
Actually I didn't. I addressed the establishment clause was originally intended to only apply to the federal government and then in 1947 SCOTUS applied to the states.