Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
No, he is not excused. That's an easy one. (there is no tyranny, the GOP hasn't done anything yet)
So, you believe that government tyranny only takes the form of violence against the citizens?I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
He is not. The government wasn't firing upon him first.
I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
No, he is not excused. That's an easy one. (there is no tyranny, the GOP hasn't done anything yet)
No more than Randy Weaver, Koresh, the Unibomber, etc.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
I guess it depends if you believe we are at war with our gov. It did not come across as an act to start a revolution but he might of thought it was.View attachment 133830
If James Hodgkinson believed that he was firing shots against government tyranny, is he excused? If not, why not?
If Rand Paul (and many others) believe what he said, how do we determine who is fighting tyranny and who is a hyper-partisan nutjob?
Or is his entire statement just nonsense to begin with?
In your subjective opinion. There is no objective standard.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
No, he is not excused. That's an easy one. (there is no tyranny, the GOP hasn't done anything yet)
Of course not. I'm not a violence-threatening rightwinger.No more than Randy Weaver, Koresh, the Unibomber, etc.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
Now, answer my question;
Do you agree with what he did?
I guess it depends if you believe we are at war with our gov. It did not come across as an act to start a revolution but he might of thought it was.
Of course not. I'm not a violence-threatening rightwinger.No more than Randy Weaver, Koresh, the Unibomber, etc.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
Now, answer my question;
Do you agree with what he did?
Was Randy Weaver firing at government tyranny when the agents had a legal, court-ordered warrant for his arrest?
Do we fight the government with bullets, like Weaver, or do we go to court and defend our rights?
Of course not. I'm not a violence-threatening rightwinger.No more than Randy Weaver, Koresh, the Unibomber, etc.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
Now, answer my question;
Do you agree with what he did?
Was Randy Weaver firing at government tyranny when the agents had a legal, court-ordered warrant for his arrest?
Do we fight the government with bullets, like Weaver, or do we go to court and defend our rights?
Who fired the first shot?
Weaver, or the gubmit men trespassing on his property?
Of course not. I'm not a violence-threatening rightwinger.No more than Randy Weaver, Koresh, the Unibomber, etc.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?are you saying Hodgkinson was right in what he did?
If not, why not?
Now, answer my question;
Do you agree with what he did?
Was Randy Weaver firing at government tyranny when the agents had a legal, court-ordered warrant for his arrest?
Do we fight the government with bullets, like Weaver, or do we go to court and defend our rights?
Who fired the first shot?
Weaver, or the gubmit men trespassing on his property?
The sequence of events during the ensuing shootout is disputed, with Weaver and Harris saying that the camouflaged marshals fired first[5] and did not identify themselves. The marshals' version of events is when they were rising to identify themselves, they were fired on first by Sammy and Harris.[5][10] In another version of events, the Weavers' dog, Striker, was shot as he exposed a hiding Bill Degan, Sammy Weaver shot Bill Degan in retaliation, then a running Sammy was shot in the back by a dying Bill Degan and/or other federal agents.[11] Both died. After this, the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team (HRT) was called in to assist with the situation.
Randy Weaver - Wikipedia
View attachment 133830
If James Hodgkinson believed that he was firing shots against government tyranny, is he excused? If not, why not?
If Rand Paul (and many others) believe what he said, how do we determine who is fighting tyranny and who is a hyper-partisan nutjob?
Or is his entire statement just nonsense to begin with?
You brought up Weaver. Why? I don't know.Of course not. I'm not a violence-threatening rightwinger.No more than Randy Weaver, Koresh, the Unibomber, etc.I am asking: if he believed that he was using his 2nd amendment responsibility to fight government tyranny, is he excused?
If not, why not?
Now, answer my question;
Do you agree with what he did?
Was Randy Weaver firing at government tyranny when the agents had a legal, court-ordered warrant for his arrest?
Do we fight the government with bullets, like Weaver, or do we go to court and defend our rights?
Who fired the first shot?
Weaver, or the gubmit men trespassing on his property?
The sequence of events during the ensuing shootout is disputed, with Weaver and Harris saying that the camouflaged marshals fired first[5] and did not identify themselves. The marshals' version of events is when they were rising to identify themselves, they were fired on first by Sammy and Harris.[5][10] In another version of events, the Weavers' dog, Striker, was shot as he exposed a hiding Bill Degan, Sammy Weaver shot Bill Degan in retaliation, then a running Sammy was shot in the back by a dying Bill Degan and/or other federal agents.[11] Both died. After this, the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team (HRT) was called in to assist with the situation.
Randy Weaver - Wikipedia
I know, I just read the same article.
regardless...
IF Weaver shot first, he was shooting at unannounced trespassers on his property.
Hodgkinson can't make that claim
