flacaltenn
Diamond Member
I dont know the whole story on the reason why. To me thats not an issue. The ranchers are not entitled to graze on that land if they no longer have the grazing rights. Have you ever considered Bundy actually caused all of this by not paying his fees? All it takes is one bad apple to screw it up for everyone else.
Rumors about politics are behind most things like this. It may or may not be true but the point is that they simply do not have a legal right to continue grazing the land. If this land was owned by the ranchers then I would be concerned. As it is they don't have a leg to stand on. The ones that paid used the land so that was fair exchange. The free loader got off from paying but not for long.
Nice try Pappy.. Smooth move.. Suggesting that ONLY IF Bundy had written those checks, the Feds would have had the money to keep that area open to ranching operations.. That money went to pay for wars in Afghan/Iraq and Viagra for Fed employees. Just like the proceeds from the National Parks who have to BEG for funds even tho they are one of the few PROFITABLE operations of the Federal Govt.. (or could be).
So you dont think someone said even once "Hey this Bundy dude might convince the other ranchers to stop paying."?
He never stopped paying the State of Nevada.. And not many others would have had the conviction to fight the Feds in Court.. Bundy did lose.. So the threat of others ATTEMPTING to take on the Feds -- never really existed. The Courts are not the place to point out how bad the management track record really is.. That would be like trying to void a contract in court based on the D&B or Angie's List record of the service provider.. Those are things that you CAN'T sue the government over.. Ignorance, Arrogance, and Incompetence.. They have absolute immunity to those accusations in court..