WH Speechwriter Fired For Appearing With White Supremacists

[Biff_Poindexter]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

 

[JakeStarkey]

don't be sharing stage with ws trash, hmmm

 

[OldLady]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

Sounds to me like he's acting like one, though. Attending their events, defending a Nazi's views as deserving "schololarly attention." If Steven Miller isn't going anywhere, you KNOW this guy must be the real deal. js

 

[S.J.]

Well, at least he didn't stand outside a voting place with a night stick and yell racial slurs at people.

 

[protectionist]

Do people who attend black nationalist events get fired ?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

Sounds to me like he's acting like one, though. Attending their events, defending a Nazi's views as deserving "schololarly attention." If Steven Miller isn't going anywhere, you KNOW this guy must be the real deal. js

I mean, who's to say attending a white supremacist event makes you a Nazi -- have you tried the fish? I hear its fantasitic

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Well, at least he didn't stand outside a voting place with a night stick and yell racial slurs at people.

Yea, those guys can kiss their chances of being WH speech writers good bye

 

[toobfreak]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

Sounds to me like he's acting like one, though. Attending their events, defending a Nazi's views as deserving "schololarly attention." If Steven Miller isn't going anywhere, you KNOW this guy must be the real deal. js

I mean, who's to say attending a white supremacist event makes you a Nazi -- have you tried the fish? I hear its fantasitic

What I find interesting is the ease at which people lump others into categories without knowing anything about them.

• For years, being a Globalist has been touted as a good, progressive thing, yet its opposite, being pro-your own country (a nationalist) is somehow bad? I should think that all healthy countries begin at home with taking care of themselves first. So let's start by dismissing the attempt to paint nationalism in and of itself as bad, hateful or racist.
• You can be ANY color and be nationalistic or a supremacist, yet I only hear of WHITE nationalism and WHITE supremicism; the Black Panthers is an example of a group painted as being pro-Black and promoting black rights, yet they are every bit the Black Supremacist as any white group, yet we don't see them in the news. La Raza is another group of pro-Mexicans painted as promoting and protecting Mexican interests, yet by the same measure, they are Mexican Nationalists or Supremacists, yet no mention in the news. So people who constantly tout white this and white that are themselves shown up as being racist and merely anti-white as well.
• No group alive today can be accurately touted as being "Nazis." Aryan skinheads may be white supremacists, but a true Nazi was much more. Quit using the world 'Nazi' when you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
• I imagine any advocacy has a whole spectrum of attitudes, so while it is convenient to fear-monger and hate-monger any group as hateful and bad by lumping them under the umbrella of another convenient and self-serving label (Nazi, white supremacist, etc.), what I don't see here or anywhere are any examples of any ACTUAL IDEAS or PROMOTIONS from these groups! Don't you think you should at least know what a group believes, actually believes, before you exclude them as a "hate" organization? You might find some of their ideas make sense or are at least not all as crazy as you think. Growing up with an endless list of pro-black societies, pro-Italian societies, pro-German societies, et al., I find it strange that the only ones being attacked are those labeled as "white." Could it be that the REAL racism lies in all of the anti-white rhetoric? Especially when "white" isn't even a real race?

 

[JakeStarkey]

toobfreak, the issue of danger in America is our history of white supremacy.

Peoples of color have gotten the shaft for that for centuries.

 

[toobfreak]

toobfreak, the issue of danger in America is our history of white supremacy.
Peoples of color have gotten the shaft for that for centuries.

Irrelevant non sequitur bullshit. America was founded as a white nation by white people (northern Europeans) with a white majority. A racial majority does not equate to a racial supremacy. Being a minority means you are a minority but not necessarily that you have "gotten a shaft." Was "Affirmative Action" a "shaft?" The very fact that whites owned and controlled everything and fought to give that up and share/spread that as evenly as possible between all races and minorities is PROOF of that. Show me any other race which had controlling interest in their country and actively worked to give that up? Please list them here immediately.

 

[protectionist]

toobfreak, the issue of danger in America is our history of white supremacy.

Peoples of color have gotten the shaft for that for centuries.

FALSE! The issue of DAMAGE in our society is BLACK supremacy embodied in Affirmative Action and Black privilege >>

Black privilege manifests itself in numerous forms:

Blacks have the right to take pride in their race. Whites don't.

Blacks can never be racist. Whites are always racist, even if they don't try to be.
Blacks get to play the race card. Whites don't.

Blacks never have to feel guilty about being black. Whites are trained to feel guilty about being white.

Blacks have the right to make blacks only organizations like the Black Student Union and the Congressional Black Caucus. Whites don't.

Blacks have the right to never take responsibility for their own actions. Anything bad which happens to a black person can be blamed on racism or white people.
Whites have to take responsibility and apologize for their actions.

Rich black people have a right to be rich. Rich white people don't.

Black people have the right to demonize white people. White people don't have the right to demonize black people.

Black people are excused when they are prejudiced against white people. White people are never excused for prejudice against black people.

Black people are a "protected class." White people are not.

Violent crimes by whites on blacks are "hate crimes." Violent crimes by blacks on whites are just "random" crimes.

Blacks have the right to affirmative action and minority set-asides. Whites have to earn their positions.

Blacks are "cool." Whites are "squares" and "rednecks."

Blacks have the right to say words like "******," which whites are never allowed to use. They have the right to incessantly repeat the word "******" in front of white people, to intimidate them and keep them in their place.

Blacks can make the most racially insensitive comments and, more often than not, no one blinks twice. They are allowed to insult others without repercussion.

Blacks can spend their rent money on designer handbags and then complain about how they don’t have the same economic opportunities as everyone else. And they get away with it.

Black men are sexual supermen. White men are sexually inadequate. Black men have huge penises. White men have small, inadequate penises.

Blacks have "civil rights". Whites don't.

Blacks are in prison because of racism. Whites are in prison because they're criminals.

Black jury members have the right to acquit criminals, if they're black.

Blacks have the right to put a halt to any policy, statement, symbol, statistic, outcome, word or expression they find offensive. Whites have no such rights.

Blacks are morally superior to whites.

"[Blacks] enjoy cultural cache around the world as victors over oppression and the hard reality of what that looks like at this point in world history. The music that they enjoy, the clothes that they wear, their very mannerisms carry a certain amount of gravitas."

Blacks can assign collective racial guilt to "you white folks." White people cannot do the reverse because that would be racist.

White people everywhere, and at all times, bear guilt for the crimes of a minority of white people in the past (e.g., slave owners, Adolf Hitler). Making blacks bear guilt, as a race, for the despicable crimes of their criminal minority is stereotyping, racist, and an insult to reason; after all, no one should ever be blamed for the acts of some unrelated person.

Blacks have "black culture." Whites are not allowed to have white culture.
African-American studies is a celebration of blackness and black culture. Whiteness studies is a demonization of white people and white culture.

White people need to undergo diversity/sensitivity training. Black people don't.
"... any generalization--favorable or unfavorable--about any minority that someone does not like is by definition "racist" and deserves to be suppressed--as long as it is said by a white person. Black diversity consultants, in contrast, can parade, without a shred of empirical evidence, the grossest racial and ethnic stereotypes with virtual impunity."

It's racist to point out racism by blacks. It's never racist to point out racism by whites.

Whites have to walk on eggshells around blacks. Blacks don't give a shit what whites think.

Blacks have the right to riot and commit violent acts in response to perceived grievances. White people have to obey the law at all times.

Blacks have the right to never be portrayed as criminals or lowlifes in films or on TV. Bad guys on the screen must always be White.

Blacks have the right to never be ridiculed, mocked, belittled or laughed at. Whites have no such right.

Black criminals have the right to have their race censored in media reports.

Facts which cause blacks embarrassment or cast them in a bad light must be suppressed. Facts which cause whites embarrassment or cast them in a bad light are reported as is.

Blacks can silence and intimidate whites by calling them racist. Whites can't silence and intimidate blacks because that would be racist.

Forcing whitey to apologize shows black power and clout. Whites can never force blacks to apologize because that would constitute a lynching.

Whites are held to a system of 'sensitivity' requirements that do not apply to blacks.

"Whites are monitored, pestered, and punished for preposterous reasons--for a look, for an innocent word, for wearing a T-shirt, for expressing a plausible argument--but blacks can say almost anything with perfect impunity."

"In discussions of race between black people and white people the conscious black person is always right; is always the ultimate authority on questions having to do with race and racism; must always be regarded as the ‘injured party,’ or the oppressed. . . . [Whites] cannot possibly be expected to be objective about questions of race."

Blacks may work for explicitly racial goals but whites may not.

Blacks are permitted to notice race. Whites are not.

"It is quite acceptable for either party to explicitly go after the black, Hispanic, or even the Jewish vote. In fact both parties gain an indispensable moral authority by doing so. But it is absolutely verboten for either party, or any white candidate, to appeal to whites as a racial identity group. Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world. Black children today are hammered with the idea of racial identity and pride, yet racial pride in whites constitutes a grave evil. Say 'I'm white and I'm proud' and you are a National Socialist."

A black who punches a White person is a hero standing up to oppression. A White person who punches a black is a racist.

It can be publicly admitted that blacks are superior to Whites in certain pursuits (i.e. basketball). It can never be publicly admitted that Whites are superior to blacks in other pursuits (i.e. winning Nobel prizes in science).

When blacks are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to their abilities.
When Whites are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to racism. When blacks are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is due to racism. When Whites are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is their own fault.

Most African countries are made up almost entirely of blacks, and have some of the world's highest birth rates. Most European countries consist of White people having to live alongside blacks and other non-whites, and have some of the world's lowest birth rates.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Actually, white majority in North America did affect a white supremacy attitude toward peoples of color, whether American Indian, African slave, the Mexicanos and Californios of the Southwest, or the Asians imported to build rail roads. Anyone who would equate Affirmative Action with our history of people of color in America reveal a mindset worthy of nothing to offer to the OP.

protections vapid response of "blacks are dangerous" above puts him beyond the limits of rational discourse as well.

 

[protectionist]

Anyone who would equate Affirmative Action with our history of people of color in America reveal a mindset worthy of nothing to offer to the OP.

protections vapid response of "blacks are dangerous" above puts him beyond the limits of rational discourse as well.

Anyone who would find it necessary to make such statements as >> "Anyone who would equate Affirmative Action with our history of people of color in America reveal a mindset worthy of nothing to offer to the OP" display a degree of absurdity worthy of nothing, period.

Of course Affirmative Action isn't equal to all US history of people of color, and nobody, least of all me ( a person of color myself) would ever say that. My point is in response to the phrase >> "the issue of danger in America" which refers to the present.

Regarding that, the overwhelming danger and damage is to whites in Affirmative Action, and other manifestations of black privilege. This is the CURRENT issue, and has been for the past 50+ years.

 

[August West]

toobfreak, the issue of danger in America is our history of white supremacy.

Peoples of color have gotten the shaft for that for centuries.

FALSE! The issue of DAMAGE in our society is BLACK supremacy embodied in Affirmative Action and Black privilege >>

Black privilege manifests itself in numerous forms:

Blacks have the right to take pride in their race. Whites don't.

Blacks can never be racist. Whites are always racist, even if they don't try to be.
Blacks get to play the race card. Whites don't.

Blacks never have to feel guilty about being black. Whites are trained to feel guilty about being white.

Blacks have the right to make blacks only organizations like the Black Student Union and the Congressional Black Caucus. Whites don't.

Blacks have the right to never take responsibility for their own actions. Anything bad which happens to a black person can be blamed on racism or white people.
Whites have to take responsibility and apologize for their actions.

Rich black people have a right to be rich. Rich white people don't.

Black people have the right to demonize white people. White people don't have the right to demonize black people.

Black people are excused when they are prejudiced against white people. White people are never excused for prejudice against black people.

Black people are a "protected class." White people are not.

Violent crimes by whites on blacks are "hate crimes." Violent crimes by blacks on whites are just "random" crimes.

Blacks have the right to affirmative action and minority set-asides. Whites have to earn their positions.

Blacks are "cool." Whites are "squares" and "rednecks."

Blacks have the right to say words like "******," which whites are never allowed to use. They have the right to incessantly repeat the word "******" in front of white people, to intimidate them and keep them in their place.

Blacks can make the most racially insensitive comments and, more often than not, no one blinks twice. They are allowed to insult others without repercussion.

Blacks can spend their rent money on designer handbags and then complain about how they don’t have the same economic opportunities as everyone else. And they get away with it.

Black men are sexual supermen. White men are sexually inadequate. Black men have huge penises. White men have small, inadequate penises.

Blacks have "civil rights". Whites don't.

Blacks are in prison because of racism. Whites are in prison because they're criminals.

Black jury members have the right to acquit criminals, if they're black.

Blacks have the right to put a halt to any policy, statement, symbol, statistic, outcome, word or expression they find offensive. Whites have no such rights.

Blacks are morally superior to whites.

"[Blacks] enjoy cultural cache around the world as victors over oppression and the hard reality of what that looks like at this point in world history. The music that they enjoy, the clothes that they wear, their very mannerisms carry a certain amount of gravitas."

Blacks can assign collective racial guilt to "you white folks." White people cannot do the reverse because that would be racist.

White people everywhere, and at all times, bear guilt for the crimes of a minority of white people in the past (e.g., slave owners, Adolf Hitler). Making blacks bear guilt, as a race, for the despicable crimes of their criminal minority is stereotyping, racist, and an insult to reason; after all, no one should ever be blamed for the acts of some unrelated person.

Blacks have "black culture." Whites are not allowed to have white culture.
African-American studies is a celebration of blackness and black culture. Whiteness studies is a demonization of white people and white culture.

White people need to undergo diversity/sensitivity training. Black people don't.
"... any generalization--favorable or unfavorable--about any minority that someone does not like is by definition "racist" and deserves to be suppressed--as long as it is said by a white person. Black diversity consultants, in contrast, can parade, without a shred of empirical evidence, the grossest racial and ethnic stereotypes with virtual impunity."

It's racist to point out racism by blacks. It's never racist to point out racism by whites.

Whites have to walk on eggshells around blacks. Blacks don't give a shit what whites think.

Blacks have the right to riot and commit violent acts in response to perceived grievances. White people have to obey the law at all times.

Blacks have the right to never be portrayed as criminals or lowlifes in films or on TV. Bad guys on the screen must always be White.

Blacks have the right to never be ridiculed, mocked, belittled or laughed at. Whites have no such right.

Black criminals have the right to have their race censored in media reports.

Facts which cause blacks embarrassment or cast them in a bad light must be suppressed. Facts which cause whites embarrassment or cast them in a bad light are reported as is.

Blacks can silence and intimidate whites by calling them racist. Whites can't silence and intimidate blacks because that would be racist.

Forcing whitey to apologize shows black power and clout. Whites can never force blacks to apologize because that would constitute a lynching.

Whites are held to a system of 'sensitivity' requirements that do not apply to blacks.

"Whites are monitored, pestered, and punished for preposterous reasons--for a look, for an innocent word, for wearing a T-shirt, for expressing a plausible argument--but blacks can say almost anything with perfect impunity."

"In discussions of race between black people and white people the conscious black person is always right; is always the ultimate authority on questions having to do with race and racism; must always be regarded as the ‘injured party,’ or the oppressed. . . . [Whites] cannot possibly be expected to be objective about questions of race."

Blacks may work for explicitly racial goals but whites may not.

Blacks are permitted to notice race. Whites are not.

"It is quite acceptable for either party to explicitly go after the black, Hispanic, or even the Jewish vote. In fact both parties gain an indispensable moral authority by doing so. But it is absolutely verboten for either party, or any white candidate, to appeal to whites as a racial identity group. Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world. Black children today are hammered with the idea of racial identity and pride, yet racial pride in whites constitutes a grave evil. Say 'I'm white and I'm proud' and you are a National Socialist."

A black who punches a White person is a hero standing up to oppression. A White person who punches a black is a racist.

It can be publicly admitted that blacks are superior to Whites in certain pursuits (i.e. basketball). It can never be publicly admitted that Whites are superior to blacks in other pursuits (i.e. winning Nobel prizes in science).

When blacks are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to their abilities.
When Whites are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to racism. When blacks are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is due to racism. When Whites are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is their own fault.

Most African countries are made up almost entirely of blacks, and have some of the world's highest birth rates. Most European countries consist of White people having to live alongside blacks and other non-whites, and have some of the world's lowest birth rates.

What you`re saying is that if you had another chance to be born and pick your race you would want to be black. If you`re going to use so many quotation marks you should say who you`re quoting...unless of course you`re just making shit up. Is it something that you printed out when you were on Stormfront?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, your refusal to recognize what you have written in comparative value, protectionist, is absurdism at its finest.

Step off. Done with your argument.

 

[bodecea]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

$15 thousand a month with the campaign...to shut him up.

 

[protectionist]

What you`re saying is that if you had another chance to be born and pick your race you would want to be black. If you`re going to use so many quotation marks you should say who you`re quoting...unless of course you`re just making shit up. Is it something that you printed out when you were on Stormfront?

I've never been on Stormfront, but if Stormfront is where this came from, then at least in that respect, they've got their heads on straight.

As for what I'm saying, I'll say what I'm saying, not you.

 

[protectionist]

Yes, your refusal to recognize what you have written in comparative value, protectionist, is absurdism at its finest.

Step off. Done with your argument.

If you want to make comparisons, feel free. You have that right. But you don't have the right to command others to also make comparisons. And I have the right to talk about the past 50 years, and the present (in comparison to nothing other than common decency), and you have no right to make any demand upon that. This is called freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

I will choose my content and subject matter, not you.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Step off. I choose the right to out when you are wrong, have done so, and need not argue further.

 

[protectionist]

Step off. I choose the right to out when you are wrong, have done so, and need not argue further.

I'm not wrong about anything here, nor have you made any case that I am. All you've done is look silly.