What Complete Nonsense

[Billy_Kinetta]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

Trump Admin Challenges Hawaii Judge’s Halt On New Travel Ban

 

[Norman]

Fools making fools out of themselves, always a pleasure.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

 

[brummelben]

Trump should order DHS, ICE and other agencies to comply in full with the first EO, right now. and make a short statement that until these judges can provide proof of their constitutional authority to override HIS clear constitutional authority, their rulings on this matter will be ignored.

Trump Admin Challenges Hawaii Judge’s Halt On New Travel Ban

Trump cannot order anyone to comply with his EO. To do so, would create an immediate avenue to his impeachment

 

[brummelben]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

what ban?

 

[brummelben]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

what ban?

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

what ban?

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

There wasn't one proposed.

again, what ban?

 

[brummelben]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

what ban?

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

There wasn't one proposed.

again, what ban?

Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

what ban?

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

There wasn't one proposed.

again, what ban?

Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it

Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?

What do his EOs request?

 

[brummelben]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account

 

[brummelben]

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

what ban?

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

There wasn't one proposed.

again, what ban?

Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it

Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?

What do his EOs request?

If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account

That's why such judges should be removed from the bench. Judges are to judge on law--not what they think somebody meant. Until we get mind reading judges, judges rule on the enforcement of the law.

 

[Auld Phart]

what ban?

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

There wasn't one proposed.

again, what ban?

Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it

Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?

What do his EOs request?

If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?

He called for a temporary halt.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html

Not a ban.

Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?

Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?

 

[J.E.D]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account

You beat me to it. Trumps own words prove the case that his EO is a ban against Muslims

 

[brummelben]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account

December 2015
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account

December 2015
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.

Which has what to do with a temporary halt for refugees from certain countries?

 

[brummelben]

Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be

There wasn't one proposed.

again, what ban?

Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it

Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?

What do his EOs request?

If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?

He called for a temporary halt.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html

Not a ban.

Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?

Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?

Isn't a "temporary" halt the same thing as a "temporary" ban?

 

[brummelben]

Trump should be more Trump on this matter.

He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.

Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.

Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.

Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned

If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account

December 2015
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.

Which has what to do with a temporary halt for refugees from certain countries?

Its a religious ban, based upon previous comments