Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call itThere wasn't one proposed.Exactly, there is no ban and the courts will not allow one to be
again, what ban?
Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?
Its a religious ban, based upon previous commentsDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountIts not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.
Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Which has what to do with a temporary halt for refugees from certain countries?
That lie has been debunked, so please, keep posting it. Show everybody your character.Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.Trump should be more Trump on this matter.
He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.
Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.
December 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountIts not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.Trump should be more Trump on this matter.
He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.
Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.
Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call itThere wasn't one proposed.
again, what ban?
Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?
The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
I believe the wording of his original EO allowed Christians from those countries legal entry into the USIts a religious ban, based upon previous commentsDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountOkay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Which has what to do with a temporary halt for refugees from certain countries?
Is he banning only the people of a certain religion, or people from a certain country?
Looking at the EO, I see countries listed, not religions.
YOU cant do shit. Deal with itDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountIts not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.Trump should be more Trump on this matter.
He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.
Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.
Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Well this commie judge is a personal friend of DumBama's who he met with that week. Should we demand he recuse himself from this decision since we can reasonably assume DumBama is interfering in presidential politics?
You beat me to it. Trumps own words prove the case that his EO is a ban against MuslimsIf you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountIts not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.Trump should be more Trump on this matter.
He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.
Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.
Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
Where, other than in you pea brain, has it been debunked?That lie has been debunked, so please, keep posting it. Show everybody your character.Its not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.Trump should be more Trump on this matter.
He should rewrite the order, and this time for a six month ban. If a liberal judge strikes that one down, rewrite it again for a one year ban. If another lib judge strikes that one down, rewrite another one for a two year ban and so on.
Liberals know they will eventually lose this battle, so let them make the decision on how painful they wish to lose.
YOU cant do shit. Deal with itDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountIts not about the length of the ban, its about banning a religion.
Okay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Well this commie judge is a personal friend of DumBama's who he met with that week. Should we demand he recuse himself from this decision since we can reasonably assume DumBama is interfering in presidential politics?
I believe the wording of his original EO allowed Christians from those countries legal entry into the USIts a religious ban, based upon previous commentsDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Which has what to do with a temporary halt for refugees from certain countries?
Is he banning only the people of a certain religion, or people from a certain country?
Looking at the EO, I see countries listed, not religions.
Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it
Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Do you have a different name for the ban? What do the right wingers prefer to call it
Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump said in a new interview Friday that persecuted Christians will be given priority over other refugees seeking to enter the United States, saying they have been "horribly treated."
Speaking with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Trump said that it had been "impossible, or at least very tough" for Syrian Christians to enter the United States.
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
Trump came out very clearly and said that Christians from Syria would be allowed to enter the USYOU cant do shit. Deal with itDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into accountOkay, well why don't you post the EO right here and now and point out to us where religion is mentioned
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Well this commie judge is a personal friend of DumBama's who he met with that week. Should we demand he recuse himself from this decision since we can reasonably assume DumBama is interfering in presidential politics?
Oh, so you don't like when other people draw conclusions--it's only okay for leftists to do it.
Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
Judges can take all of that into account when making a decision, and clearly they have been paying attention to Trumps own words on the matter
Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.
Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
Judges can take all of that into account when making a decision, and clearly they have been paying attention to Trumps own words on the matter
The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?Has Trump submitted an EO banning anyone?
What do his EOs request?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump said in a new interview Friday that persecuted Christians will be given priority over other refugees seeking to enter the United States, saying they have been "horribly treated."
Speaking with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Trump said that it had been "impossible, or at least very tough" for Syrian Christians to enter the United States.
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it doesTrump came out very clearly and said that Christians from Syria would be allowed to enter the USYOU cant do shit. Deal with itDecember 2015If you go back to his many comments during the primaries, religion was mentioned. Most likely the appellate court judges took this into account
The real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate shakes up the race when he announces that he wants to bar foreign Muslims from entering the country following the shooting in San Bernardino, California. "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," his campaign says in a release.
Well this commie judge is a personal friend of DumBama's who he met with that week. Should we demand he recuse himself from this decision since we can reasonably assume DumBama is interfering in presidential politics?
Oh, so you don't like when other people draw conclusions--it's only okay for leftists to do it.
Possibly the ruling was based upon intent.Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.If no one is banned, then anyone would be allowed to enter the country at any time- correctamundo?
He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
Judges can take all of that into account when making a decision, and clearly they have been paying attention to Trumps own words on the matterNot when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.
Are you saying the judge is ruling on what Trump said, and not on the contents of the EO?
Sounds like the judge didn't need to read the EO to make his decision.Possibly the ruling was based upon intent.Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.He called for a temporary halt.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/25/us/politics/document-Trump-EO-Draft-on-Refugees.html
Not a ban.
Nothing about religion, but you knew that, right?
Or do you only read the talking points you get emailed daily?The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
Judges can take all of that into account when making a decision, and clearly they have been paying attention to Trumps own words on the matterNot when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.
Are you saying the judge is ruling on what Trump said, and not on the contents of the EO?
First of all there are TWO judges that ruled against the emperor. Secondly ask them why, not meSounds like the judge didn't need to read the EO to make his decision.Possibly the ruling was based upon intent.Not when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion when the evidence is out there in the form of campaign speeches, sound bites and twitter rants. Trump just can't keep his mouth shut, and he doesn't understand how our system works.The EO doesn't need to specifically state anything about religion
In order to 'ban' only Muslims, yes, it does
Judges can take all of that into account when making a decision, and clearly they have been paying attention to Trumps own words on the matterNot when its author made perfectly clear in twitter rants and speeches exactly what is the intent of the EO.
Are you saying the judge is ruling on what Trump said, and not on the contents of the EO?
What kind of judge is that?
