What happens if Republicans are Wrong?

[Brambo]

I constantly hear stupid shills like "Hannity" criticize government officials for "waiting for more evidence" and "gathering all the facts" before declaring an attack an attack by a radical-Islamic terrorist.

This implies that the Republicans know the motivations of each attack (like they did with the Orlando shooter who turned out to be a self-hating gay with mental issues and had no connections to terrorists).

So what happens when there's a big attack by say Anarchists, like the Wall Street Bombing in 1920s and the Republican President, the blow-hard fucking retard, says on the first day it's Radical-Islamic Terror.

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

Then what?

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

 

[rdean]

Republicans know the motivation like they know science.

If Trump becomes president, get ready for four years of riots.

What the Republicans have done to blacks, Hispanics, gays, Muslims and other minorities, a Trump administration will empower Republicans leading to an all out attack on minorities. They go as far as they can now. But if they hold both houses and the Supreme Court like they did under Bush, they will make the Bush administration seem like a weekend street festival.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/18/us/politics/hate-crimes-american-muslims-rise.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — Hate crimes against American Muslims have soared to their highest levels since the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, according to data compiled by researchers, an increase apparently fueled by terrorist attacks in the United States and abroad and by divisive language on the campaign trail.

Hate crimes and attacks against Muslims doubled in California last year – report

 

[ClosedCaption]

Even if they are wrong they'll just talk about how the left or the media is wrong and hope it works

 

[TheOldSchool]

Even if they are wrong they'll just talk about how the left or the media is wrong and hope it works

Yes. It really doesn't matter to them if they're right or wrong.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I constantly hear stupid shills like "Hannity" criticize government officials for "waiting for more evidence" and "gathering all the facts" before declaring an attack an attack by a radical-Islamic terrorist.

This implies that the Republicans know the motivations of each attack (like they did with the Orlando shooter who turned out to be a self-hating gay with mental issues and had no connections to terrorists).

So what happens when there's a big attack by say Anarchists, like the Wall Street Bombing in 1920s and the Republican President, the blow-hard fucking retard, says on the first day it's Radical-Islamic Terror.

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

Then what?

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

After we round up all the Islamic terrorists, and discover we were wrong, then we'll go get the "say Anarchists".

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

Why would he apologize for telling the truth about Islam?

 

[Eloy]

Name one Republican who ever got it wrong.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

and what if the Democrats are wrong about sticking their heads in the sand????

It's not that any Republican knows any secrets beforehand....it's just that they are realists that see things, events and people for what they are. Democrats only see what they want to, not what IS

 

[owebo]

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

I think hitlery alread apologized to radical Islamic Muslims......

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Republicans know the motivation like they know science.

If Trump becomes president, get ready for four years of riots.

What the Republicans have done to blacks, Hispanics, gays, Muslims and other minorities, a Trump administration will empower Republicans leading to an all out attack on minorities. They go as far as they can now. But if they hold both houses and the Supreme Court like they did under Bush, they will make the Bush administration seem like a weekend street festival.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/18/us/politics/hate-crimes-american-muslims-rise.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — Hate crimes against American Muslims have soared to their highest levels since the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, according to data compiled by researchers, an increase apparently fueled by terrorist attacks in the United States and abroad and by divisive language on the campaign trail.

Hate crimes and attacks against Muslims doubled in California last year – report

couple things,.
You are admitting that the left are violent animals unable to control themselves.
then you say what the republicans have done to the minorities? Tell us specifically what they have done to minorities as a targeted group.
Then, just to be fair, tell us about all the wonderful things the democrats have done for the minorities.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I constantly hear stupid shills like "Hannity" criticize government officials for "waiting for more evidence" and "gathering all the facts" before declaring an attack an attack by a radical-Islamic terrorist.

This implies that the Republicans know the motivations of each attack (like they did with the Orlando shooter who turned out to be a self-hating gay with mental issues and had no connections to terrorists).

So what happens when there's a big attack by say Anarchists, like the Wall Street Bombing in 1920s and the Republican President, the blow-hard fucking retard, says on the first day it's Radical-Islamic Terror.

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

Then what?

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

As opposed to being so politically correct you claim a terror attack is not one? Like that helps? Obama has yet to admit it was a terror attack and trump was attacked for saying it was, when it WAS. Remind though so we are clear, when did trump say it was an Islamic attack? be specific quote and link to the source.

 

[jwoodie]

I constantly hear stupid shills like "Hannity" criticize government officials for "waiting for more evidence" and "gathering all the facts" before declaring an attack an attack by a radical-Islamic terrorist.

This implies that the Republicans know the motivations of each attack (like they did with the Orlando shooter who turned out to be a self-hating gay with mental issues and had no connections to terrorists).

So what happens when there's a big attack by say Anarchists, like the Wall Street Bombing in 1920s and the Republican President, the blow-hard fucking retard, says on the first day it's Radical-Islamic Terror.

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

Then what?

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

I was thinking of replying to your post, but it so idiotic that I decided to IGNORE you.

 

[jc456]

and what if the Democrats are wrong about sticking their heads in the sand????

It's not that any Republican knows any secrets beforehand....it's just that they are realists that see things, events and people for what they are. Democrats only see what they want to, not what IS

Told to see. remember they are all puppets.

 

[blackhawk]

 

[Trump.Stamped]

I constantly hear stupid shills like "Hannity" criticize government officials for "waiting for more evidence" and "gathering all the facts" before declaring an attack an attack by a radical-Islamic terrorist.

This implies that the Republicans know the motivations of each attack (like they did with the Orlando shooter who turned out to be a self-hating gay with mental issues and had no connections to terrorists).

So what happens when there's a big attack by say Anarchists, like the Wall Street Bombing in 1920s and the Republican President, the blow-hard fucking retard, says on the first day it's Radical-Islamic Terror.

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

Then what?

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

Well as we all know there are laws of science that things balance out. The right will assume it is Islamic terror, the left will deny it is Islamic terror. See? Balanced.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I constantly hear stupid shills like "Hannity" criticize government officials for "waiting for more evidence" and "gathering all the facts" before declaring an attack an attack by a radical-Islamic terrorist.

This implies that the Republicans know the motivations of each attack (like they did with the Orlando shooter who turned out to be a self-hating gay with mental issues and had no connections to terrorists).

So what happens when there's a big attack by say Anarchists, like the Wall Street Bombing in 1920s and the Republican President, the blow-hard fucking retard, says on the first day it's Radical-Islamic Terror.

But then it turns out to not be radical Islamic Terror?

Then what?

Will the big fat pig faced shit apologize to all Muslims for his days of ranting and raving against the dangers of Islam?

Yo retard? Yeah you, stupid fuck - it was your allies, radical Islam - AGAIN.

 

[Mac1958]

I was thinking of replying to your post, but it so idiotic that I decided to IGNORE you.

It's a topic that could inspire some interesting conversation; unfortunately it's clear by the OP's words that he's really not interested in that.
.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's a topic that could inspire some interesting conversation; unfortunately it's clear by the OP's words that he's really not interested in that.
.

Trump said that the explosions were caused by bombs - and Deplorable Hillary melted down.

Now MOST of us knew instinctively that this was YET AGAIN Muzzie Beasts, but Trump didn't say that - only that the explosions were cause be bombs.. Well duh, only Hillary and her scumbag supporters are dumb enough to claim otherwise.

 

[Mac1958]

It's a topic that could inspire some interesting conversation; unfortunately it's clear by the OP's words that he's really not interested in that..

Now MOST of us knew instinctively that this was YET AGAIN Muzzie Beasts, but Trump didn't say that - only that the explosions were cause be bombs.. Well duh, only Hillary and her scumbag supporters are dumb enough to claim otherwise.

Well, we can't offend the jihadists, it might make them mad at us.
.

 

[owebo]

It's a topic that could inspire some interesting conversation; unfortunately it's clear by the OP's words that he's really not interested in that..

Now MOST of us knew instinctively that this was YET AGAIN Muzzie Beasts, but Trump didn't say that - only that the explosions were cause be bombs.. Well duh, only Hillary and her scumbag supporters are dumb enough to claim otherwise.

Well, we can't offend the jihadists, it might make them mad at us.
.

Democrats are always mad at us....