What If the NYT Cartoon Depicted a Muslim, Lesbian, Black or Mexican As a Dog?

[irosie91]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

So...a star of david on a flag is racist?

so -----an image of a dog carrying a Koran is "RACIST"?

 

[Slade3200]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

A picture of Muhummad as a terrorist is not "calling all muslims
terrorists" -----Let's just be honest about it

Really? Are you being serious or cynical with that argument?

serious

You’re hopeless then. You can’t compare a president to a god and call it a fair comparison

 

[Slade3200]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

 

[irosie91]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

A picture of Muhummad as a terrorist is not "calling all muslims
terrorists" -----Let's just be honest about it

Really? Are you being serious or cynical with that argument?

serious

You’re hopeless then. You can’t compare a president to a god and call it a fair comparison

if you know any muslims----or live near a mosque-----TELL
either the muslim or make an announcement in the mosque---
"MUSLIMS BELIEVE THAT MUHUMMAD IS ALLAH"

 

[Weatherman2020]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

Yep.

 

[Slade3200]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Trump doesn’t need stars, his face is the definition of a cartoon, however if they were going to use a prop it would probably be a maga hat

 

[irosie91]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

you could be-----jewish women are WONDERFUL----ask my husband------some anti-Semites are FASCINATATED with
jewish women ------notably southerners

 

[Slade3200]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

 

[Weatherman2020]

What if the New York Times Cartoon had depicted a Muslim, a Lesbian, an African American or a Mexican as a Dog?

Nor is the publication of this anti-Semitic cartoon a one-off. For years now, the New York Times op-ed pages have been one-sidedly anti-Israel. Its reporting has often been provably false, and all the errors tend to favor Israel’s enemies. Most recently, the New York Times published an op-ed declaring, on Easter Sunday, that the crucified Jesus was probably a Palestinian. How absurd. How preposterous. How predictable.

In recent years, it has become more and more difficult to distinguish between the reporting of the New York Times and their editorializing. Sometimes its editors hide behind the euphemism “news analysis,” when allowing personal opinions to be published on the front page. More recently, they haven’t even bothered to offer any cover. The reporting itself, as repeatedly demonstrated by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), has been filled with anti-Israel error

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

NYT admitted it was racist, so shove your racist spins.

 

[Slade3200]

Judging from some of the comments here the good news is that the liberals are now starting to see/admit that not everything is "racist", still a long way to go but it's in the right direction.

How about the cons who are now so quick to play the race card?... entertaining as well

 

[Weatherman2020]

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

you could be-----jewish women are WONDERFUL----ask my husband------some anti-Semites are FASCINATATED with
jewish women ------notably southerners

Germans loved Jewish women in the 30’s.

 

[Slade3200]

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

NYT admitted it was racist, so shove your racist spins.

I agree the cartoon is inappropriate. It should not have used a dog with a Star of David collar... but it wasn’t an attack on the Jewish people. It was an attack on two men. Do you really not see that?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Our Progressive Jihadists defending rabid antisemitism...shocking

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

NYT admitted it was racist, so shove your racist spins.

I agree the cartoon is inappropriate. It should not have used a dog with a Star of David collar... but it wasn’t an attack on the Jewish people. It was an attack on two men. Do you really not see that?

Talk to the racist NYT and have them pull their apology then.

 

[irosie91]

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

you could be-----jewish women are WONDERFUL----ask my husband------some anti-Semites are FASCINATED with
jewish women ------notably southerners

Germans loved Jewish women in the 30’s.

sheeeesh-----even little old me----in my youth got, called
"MY BEAUTIFUL JEWESS" by a southern jerk

 

[Slade3200]

The cartoon was inappropriate but also, it was targeting Trump and Netanyahu... it wasn’t calling all Jews dogs. Let just be honest about it shall we?

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

you could be-----jewish women are WONDERFUL----ask my husband------some anti-Semites are FASCINATATED with
jewish women ------notably southerners

Well I’m not racist, not even close. Y’all should be able to engage in a debate without calling your opposers racist. The Right whines about it all the time when the Left does it... so don’t go down that road. I havent made one racist remark in this thread.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

My wife is Jewish... you think I’m racists against Jews?! What an idiot

you could be-----jewish women are WONDERFUL----ask my husband------some anti-Semites are FASCINATATED with
jewish women ------notably southerners

Well I’m not racist, not even close. Y’all should be able to engage in a debate without calling your opposers racist. The Right whines about it all the time when the Left does it... so don’t go down that road. I havent made one racist remark in this thread.

Filed under ‘Civil War Statues’

 

[Slade3200]

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

NYT admitted it was racist, so shove your racist spins.

I agree the cartoon is inappropriate. It should not have used a dog with a Star of David collar... but it wasn’t an attack on the Jewish people. It was an attack on two men. Do you really not see that?

Talk to the racist NYT and have them pull their apology then.

Why would I do that? They should apologize and pull the ad. Have you not understood anything I’ve said or are you just trolling?

 

[irosie91]

Yeah, the Star of David was on the dog because it had nothing to do with Jews.

Racist apologist.

He is the president of Israel dumbass, that is their flag. If it was Obama holding a leash of Castro wearing a Cuban collar would you think it was calling all Cubans dogs? Use your brain, this isn’t a hard one to figure out.

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

NYT admitted it was racist, so shove your racist spins.

I agree the cartoon is inappropriate. It should not have used a dog with a Star of David collar... but it wasn’t an attack on the Jewish people. It was an attack on two men. Do you really not see that?

of course you are right------I see no reason why a dog carrying a Koran would not be a fine Image of-----AYATOILET WHATs HIS NAME

 

[Weatherman2020]

So where’s the star on trump? We got 57 of them, why are they missing?

You racists are hilarious.

Let me ask you, if you were doing a parody cartoon on Netanyahu, what symbol or prop would you use to label the man?

NYT admitted it was racist, so shove your racist spins.

I agree the cartoon is inappropriate. It should not have used a dog with a Star of David collar... but it wasn’t an attack on the Jewish people. It was an attack on two men. Do you really not see that?

Talk to the racist NYT and have them pull their apology then.

Why would I do that? They should apologize and pull the ad. Have you not understood anything I’ve said or are you just trolling?

Do you read what you post?