What is meant by saying There are to many Guns on the Street, or we have to get these Guns off the Street.? We have a right to bear Arms.!

[52ndStreet]

I keep hearing mayors in many Democratic cities saying that we have to get these Guns off the Street. Don't we as citizens of the United States have the right to bear Arms.? Are only Police officers allowed to have Guns?!. This is anti gun rhetoric is insane.

 

[Donald H]

I keep hearing mayors in many Democratic cities saying that we have to get these Guns off the Street. Don't we as citizens of the United States have the right to bear Arms.? Are only Police officers allowed to have Guns?!. This is anti gun rhetoric is insane.

Would this serve as a link?

As Inner-City Neighborhoods See a Surge in Gun Violence, These Are the Changes Community Leaders Say They Need

Experts argue that the federal government has to step in and make significant contributions

time.com

 

[2aguy]

I keep hearing mayors in many Democratic cities saying that we have to get these Guns off the Street. Don't we as citizens of the United States have the right to bear Arms.? Are only Police officers allowed to have Guns?!. This is anti gun rhetoric is insane.

27 years of experiences shows that guns are not the issue......democrats releasing violent criminals and attacking the police is the issue.

Over the last 27 years, up to the year 2015, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 19.4 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2019...guess what happened...

New Concealed Carry Report For 2020: 19.48 Million Permit Holders, 820,000 More Than Last Year despite many states shutting down issuing permits because of the Coronavirus - Crime Prevention Research Center


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.


This means that access to guns does not create gun crime........

Why do our democrat party controlled cities have gun crime problems?

1) the democrat party keeps releasing violent gun offenders...they have created a revolving door for criminals who use guns, and will release even the most serious gun offenders over and over again....why? Probably because they realise that normal people don't use their guns for crime, so if they want to push gun control, they need criminals to shoot people.....so they keep releasing them....

2) The democrat party keeps attacking the police.....driving the officers into not doing pro-active policing, cutting detective forces so that murders go unsolved..........

 

[Otis Mayfield]

You're preaching to the choir here.

Go over to reddit.

 

[Bobob]

I keep hearing mayors in many Democratic cities saying that we have to get these Guns off the Street. Don't we as citizens of the United States have the right to bear Arms.? Are only Police officers allowed to have Guns?!. This is anti gun rhetoric is insane.

Your right to bear arms for nefarious purposes is questionable and can be regulated.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Your right to bear arms for nefarious purposes is questionable and can be regulated.

For what "nefarious" purpose do we have the right to bear arms?

 

[Bobob]

For what "nefarious" purpose do we have the right to bear arms?

You do not have the right to bear arms for nefarious purposes.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You do not have the right to bear arms for nefarious purposes..

You just said:
"Your right to bear arms for nefarious purposes..."
The necessary implication is there IS a right to keep and bear arms for these purposes.
So:
For what "nefarious" purpose do we have the right to bear arms?

 

[Bobob]

You just said:
"Your right to bear arms for nefarious purposes..."
The necessary implication is there IS a right to keep and bear arms for these purposes.
So:
For what "nefarious" purpose do we have the right to bear arms?

Read it again.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

You do not have the right to bear arms for nefarious purposes.

You don't have the right to pursue nefarious purposes, no matter what your weapon of choice.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Read it again.

You can't answer the question.
Got it.

 

[Bobob]

You can't answer the question.
Got it.

You don't got it. You guchy

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You don't have the right to pursue nefarious purposes, no matter what your weapon of choice.

This.

Regulating firearms is not the issue and should be wholesale illegal. Pursuing nefarious purposes is the issue.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You don't got it. You guchy

Thank you for your mindless. zero-content response.