Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,285
- 73,619
Thanks, dummy! We will! Better hope for another October surprise...Let them continue with their polling
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks, dummy! We will! Better hope for another October surprise...Let them continue with their polling
Yep. you lying sack of shit.Just before the election? Nope.ahh,,,didnt the polls in 2016 give Hillary up to a 14 point lead and about 400 electoral votes?
Tell us where you digress from the Democratic Platform...or are you a LibBot?By "we", I assume you mean the Trump cult.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
We all know thats not true.
In what the rest of us call "reality", the national polls were off, collectively, by 3.1 points. The average margin of error is right about 3.3%. The polls were as accurate as you can expect polls to be. The 10 major national polls taken in the last 2 days averaged 47% - 44% Clinton. The final result was 48.2% to 46.1%, for Clinton.
Spell out the entire Democratic platform, and I will. Be specific and articulate.Tell us where you digress from the Democratic Platform...or are you a LibBot?By "we", I assume you mean the Trump cult.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
We all know thats not true.
In what the rest of us call "reality", the national polls were off, collectively, by 3.1 points. The average margin of error is right about 3.3%. The polls were as accurate as you can expect polls to be. The 10 major national polls taken in the last 2 days averaged 47% - 44% Clinton. The final result was 48.2% to 46.1%, for Clinton.
Polls were spot on in 2016?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
Look it up...prove you're not a LibBot.Spell out the entire Democratic platform, and I will. Be specific and articulate.Tell us where you digress from the Democratic Platform...or are you a LibBot?By "we", I assume you mean the Trump cult.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
We all know thats not true.
In what the rest of us call "reality", the national polls were off, collectively, by 3.1 points. The average margin of error is right about 3.3%. The polls were as accurate as you can expect polls to be. The 10 major national polls taken in the last 2 days averaged 47% - 44% Clinton. The final result was 48.2% to 46.1%, for Clinton.
Why? Gonna write me a ticket, Officer Crybaby? Go diddle yourself.Look it up...prove you're not a LibBot
Many Pollsters Are Only Polling About 24% Replublicans?
Man that popular vote sure worked out well.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
Right, i get your fishing for liberal tears idiot point, but it was only brought up in response to a claim about the polls that was incorrect.Man that popular vote sure worked out well.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
I dont recall if it was on Rush, or Fox & Friends. But on one of these programs today, someone called into the show, and disclosed a number of well known pollsters, and the per-cent of at least Republicans that they polled. It was about 24 or 25% of those polled were Republican.
It was a credible reporter who did the research on these pollsters.
Hmm, no wonder all Americans are doubting these polls !!!, then again, nothing new here, right? we went thru this in 2016 when Hillary was supposed to be 50 Points Ahead !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well you keep riding those sweet ass polls slick. And spend the next four years soothing your butt hurt with that popular vote salve.Right, i get your fishing for liberal tears idiot point, but it was only brought up in response to a claim about the polls that was incorrect.Man that popular vote sure worked out well.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
Fucking amazing how only 25% of the people got Trump elected and hold the Senate.I dont recall if it was on Rush, or Fox & Friends. But on one of these programs today, someone called into the show, and disclosed a number of well known pollsters, and the per-cent of at least Republicans that they polled. It was about 24 or 25% of those polled were Republican.
It was a credible reporter who did the research on these pollsters.
Hmm, no wonder all Americans are doubting these polls !!!, then again, nothing new here, right? we went thru this in 2016 when Hillary was supposed to be 50 Points Ahead !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How many Republicans do you think that there are in the USA?
This Gallup Poll says that only 25% of Americans are Republicans. So the pollsters are correct that only 25% of the people they poll are Republicans.
![]()
Party Affiliation
In politics, as of today, do you consider yourself a Republican, a Democrat, or an Independent? (Asked of independents: As of today, do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?)news.gallup.com
Right wing posters on this board always seem to expect that pollsters should split their poll groups evenly between Republicans and Democrats, but those polls wouldn't be reflective of the American people. There were more Republicans before Trump was elected, but he has driven millions away from the Republican Party.
Why are you crying to me? Your cult leader just fired his campaign manager over the polling. Go cry to him. I wasn't saying the polling right now proves any winner for 2020. Trump has turned you into a rabid little dweeb.Well you keep riding those sweet ass polls slick. And spend the next four years soothing your butt hurt with that popular vote salve.Right, i get your fishing for liberal tears idiot point, but it was only brought up in response to a claim about the polls that was incorrect.Man that popular vote sure worked out well.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
Right, so that means a lot of people are embarrassed to call themselves republicans, even in anonymous polls.Fucking amazing how only 25% of the people got Trump elected and hold the Senate.I dont recall if it was on Rush, or Fox & Friends. But on one of these programs today, someone called into the show, and disclosed a number of well known pollsters, and the per-cent of at least Republicans that they polled. It was about 24 or 25% of those polled were Republican.
It was a credible reporter who did the research on these pollsters.
Hmm, no wonder all Americans are doubting these polls !!!, then again, nothing new here, right? we went thru this in 2016 when Hillary was supposed to be 50 Points Ahead !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How many Republicans do you think that there are in the USA?
This Gallup Poll says that only 25% of Americans are Republicans. So the pollsters are correct that only 25% of the people they poll are Republicans.
![]()
Party Affiliation
In politics, as of today, do you consider yourself a Republican, a Democrat, or an Independent? (Asked of independents: As of today, do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?)news.gallup.com
Right wing posters on this board always seem to expect that pollsters should split their poll groups evenly between Republicans and Democrats, but those polls wouldn't be reflective of the American people. There were more Republicans before Trump was elected, but he has driven millions away from the Republican Party.
Crying to you? LoL! I’m laughing at you and you don’t even get it.Why are you crying to me? Your cult leader just fired his campaign manager over the polling. Go cry to him. I wasn't saying the polling right now proves any winner for 2020. Trump has turned you into a rabid little dweeb.Well you keep riding those sweet ass polls slick. And spend the next four years soothing your butt hurt with that popular vote salve.Right, i get your fishing for liberal tears idiot point, but it was only brought up in response to a claim about the polls that was incorrect.Man that popular vote sure worked out well.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
No, you're rabid and frustrated. Thus your childish, irrelevant comments.Crying to you? LoL! I’m laughing at you and you don’t even get it.Why are you crying to me? Your cult leader just fired his campaign manager over the polling. Go cry to him. I wasn't saying the polling right now proves any winner for 2020. Trump has turned you into a rabid little dweeb.Well you keep riding those sweet ass polls slick. And spend the next four years soothing your butt hurt with that popular vote salve.Right, i get your fishing for liberal tears idiot point, but it was only brought up in response to a claim about the polls that was incorrect.Man that popular vote sure worked out well.As spot on as they can be... the margin of the popular vote was within the margin of error of thee aggregate of the major polls. That's what polling "being accurate" means.Hold on here. The polls in 2016 were spot on? Since when?Your side was using the same conspiracy theories in 2018, when the polls under-reported the magnitude of the Democratic win.
They were saying the same thing in 2016, when the polls were spot on.
This isn't going to end well for you. That means you're going to have to create a conspiracy theory about Democrats cheating to justify losing so big.
baseless, delusionalThey tighten things up the last week to gain credibility,