What MUST Be Done About Islam

The founders meant, as per their writings for any to be free to worship in any way they wanted, but it did not specifically cite islam. Only extreme fanatic libs say that.
They forgot Mormonism and Scientology as well. Those Bastards!!!
They did not, however, forget Christianity (or Judaism).
Those are also not mentioned by name. There are Christian and (one) Jewish nations in the world, we just aren't one of them, by design.
Explain our crediting the God of the Bible - the "Supreme Judge" and "divine Providence" - for our successful separation from the commonwealth. And then explain to us why the Presentments Clause excludes the Sabbath, i.e. Sundays.

Take your time.
 
Complete falsehood.
You might want to read up on the history of this nation.
I have read the history, and nowhere does it mention Islam except in left wing lying propaganda.

Unfortunately Mr. Mike, the founding fathers did make provisions for the Mohammadens to worship, as long as they obeyed our laws.

Had the red coats been using a church to plot their strategy, they would have been rounded up and jailed and the "church" "closed". Our Fathers never said, Religion above all, regardless of the damage it does us."
Pilgrims needed a peaceful place to practice their religion free of government interference. Muslim want death in the name of religion.
Finding a religion without death in the name of religion will not be an easy task. I can't think of a one besides the Baha'i, and they are always getting the shit kicked out of them.

Look, you can't make a religion peaceful when it was founded by a murderous warlord who took women sex slaves and a child bride and who gave open ended commands to kill the infidel.

It just won't work.
 
America was founded by dudes who knew the Bible was bullshit and the Koran gooseshit. They were educated, intelligent Europeans, not superstitious idiots.
Not true. The founders, in fact, held the "Supreme Judge" and "divine Providence" in high regard.
Many, but some thought religion was for idiots which is why they established None Of The Above as the national ethos. It was designed to keep the peace, such as it was.
You are so breathtakingly wrong it is beyond hope.

Look around Washington and see the religious references, like this one:

upload_2017-5-24_13-4-22.png
 
One cannot ban religion in America. It was founded by people afraid of those like you who might try.

All you need is to appoint the right stooges for SCOTUS so they can "interpret" the Constitution the way they want.
Since even the men who wrote it weren't sure exactly what it meant, interpenetration is therefore required. Without that we would have had to burn the thing ages ago.

No, they knew what it meant.

Take for example President Madison who was called the father of the US Constitution.

Most Dims use the General Welfare clause to justify the nanny state, however, look at what Madison said about it.

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America."

No one gives a damn, do they.
If they knew what it meant, why did they continue to argue over it decades later and almost not sign it?

Two options, they can't read or don't want to accept the truth.

Which do you think?

You can argue anything away. The more intelligent you are the easier it becomes.
 
America was founded by dudes who knew the Bible was bullshit and the Koran gooseshit. They were educated, intelligent Europeans, not superstitious idiots.
Not true. The founders, in fact, held the "Supreme Judge" and "divine Providence" in high regard.
Many, but some thought religion was for idiots which is why they established None Of The Above as the national ethos. It was designed to keep the peace, such as it was.
You are so breathtakingly wrong it is beyond hope.

Look around Washington and see the religious references, like this one:

View attachment 128593
I'll stick with the founding document of the nation - the Constitution (in which God is never mentioned), thanks all the same.
 
Washington prayed to God.
So do Muslims.

No they don't. They pray to the nonexistant moon god. Look here n00b, you suck and we've heard it all before, k?
The God of the Jews is the same as the God of the Muslims (and non-trinitarian Christians). You ignorance cannot be helped.

A) I can spell "Your"

B) Islamists are scum. Islam is scum, I'm over it.

Islamist apologists may feel the ire if they don't STFU.
I can spell it as well, tough man on the Internet.


You may be able to spell it, so it's safe to say you're too ignorant to use it properly.
 
So do Muslims.

No they don't. They pray to the nonexistant moon god. Look here n00b, you suck and we've heard it all before, k?
The God of the Jews is the same as the God of the Muslims (and non-trinitarian Christians). You ignorance cannot be helped.

A) I can spell "Your"

B) Islamists are scum. Islam is scum, I'm over it.

Islamist apologists may feel the ire if they don't STFU.
I can spell it as well, tough man on the Internet.


You may be able to spell it, so it's safe to say you're too ignorant to use it properly.
Thinking - not your strong suit.
 
America was founded by dudes who knew the Bible was bullshit and the Koran gooseshit. They were educated, intelligent Europeans, not superstitious idiots.
Not true. The founders, in fact, held the "Supreme Judge" and "divine Providence" in high regard.
Many, but some thought religion was for idiots which is why they established None Of The Above as the national ethos. It was designed to keep the peace, such as it was.
You are so breathtakingly wrong it is beyond hope.

Look around Washington and see the religious references, like this one:

View attachment 128593
I'll stick with the founding document of the nation - the Constitution (in which God is never mentioned), thanks all the same.
That is not our founding document, Genius.
 
Islam is a world domination blueprint masquerading as a religion.
Everyone wants to rule the world. Get over it.

If you can't you might as well dismiss capitalism. Same goal.

You'd like that, wouldn't you. Too much excess labor value being taken from the workers for your tastes, comrade?
Capitalism would be more than happy to use slave labor, and it's good at it.

Which is why the US has unrestricted illegal immigration
 
Islam is a world domination blueprint masquerading as a religion.
Everyone wants to rule the world. Get over it.

If you can't you might as well dismiss capitalism. Same goal.

You'd like that, wouldn't you. Too much excess labor value being taken from the workers for your tastes, comrade?
Capitalism would be more than happy to use slave labor, and it's good at it.

Do tell, fellow traveler, what system is superior?
 
One cannot ban religion in America. It was founded by people afraid of those like you who might try.

All you need is to appoint the right stooges for SCOTUS so they can "interpret" the Constitution the way they want.
Since even the men who wrote it weren't sure exactly what it meant, interpenetration is therefore required. Without that we would have had to burn the thing ages ago.

No, they knew what it meant.

Take for example President Madison who was called the father of the US Constitution.

Most Dims use the General Welfare clause to justify the nanny state, however, look at what Madison said about it.

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America."

No one gives a damn, do they.
If they knew what it meant, why did they continue to argue over it decades later and almost not sign it?

Two options, they can't read or don't want to accept the truth.

Which do you think?

You can argue anything away. The more intelligent you are the easier it becomes.
I think what is true. Even they weren't sure, not even when writing it.
 
Sharia law goes directly against American law, therefore Islam is incompatible with America.
 
All you need is to appoint the right stooges for SCOTUS so they can "interpret" the Constitution the way they want.
Since even the men who wrote it weren't sure exactly what it meant, interpenetration is therefore required. Without that we would have had to burn the thing ages ago.

No, they knew what it meant.

Take for example President Madison who was called the father of the US Constitution.

Most Dims use the General Welfare clause to justify the nanny state, however, look at what Madison said about it.

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America."

No one gives a damn, do they.
If they knew what it meant, why did they continue to argue over it decades later and almost not sign it?

Two options, they can't read or don't want to accept the truth.

Which do you think?

You can argue anything away. The more intelligent you are the easier it becomes.
I think what is true. Even they weren't sure, not even when writing it.

Well then, how do you explain what Madison said about the clause he wrote?
 
Islam is a world domination blueprint masquerading as a religion.
Everyone wants to rule the world. Get over it.

If you can't you might as well dismiss capitalism. Same goal.

You'd like that, wouldn't you. Too much excess labor value being taken from the workers for your tastes, comrade?
Capitalism would be more than happy to use slave labor, and it's good at it.

Which is why the US has unrestricted illegal immigration
They aren't much worse off than the average guy and if it's been "restricted" here one would be hard pressed to say so.
 
Since even the men who wrote it weren't sure exactly what it meant, interpenetration is therefore required. Without that we would have had to burn the thing ages ago.

No, they knew what it meant.

Take for example President Madison who was called the father of the US Constitution.

Most Dims use the General Welfare clause to justify the nanny state, however, look at what Madison said about it.

"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
and pay them out of their public treasury;
they may take into their own hands the education of children,
establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
they may assume the provision of the poor;
they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
down to the most minute object of police,
would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
of the limited Government established by the people of America."

No one gives a damn, do they.
If they knew what it meant, why did they continue to argue over it decades later and almost not sign it?

Two options, they can't read or don't want to accept the truth.

Which do you think?

You can argue anything away. The more intelligent you are the easier it becomes.
I think what is true. Even they weren't sure, not even when writing it.

Well then, how do you explain what Madison said about the clause he wrote?
One man - one opinion. That's not what rules here.
 
Sharia law goes directly against American law, therefore Islam is incompatible with America.

Keep in mind, the same men who fought a bloody war for their freedom turned right around and created the Alien and Sedition acts which made speaking out against the government to be illegal.

If it were not for the efforts of one Thomas Jefferson, America would have become a much darker place.

Even at that FDR used elements of that act that survived to legally lock up Japanese Americans.

Power is like the ring on Lord of the Rings.
 
The First thing that needs done about ISLAM is to get rid of Every Liberal Policy that has put our Security at Risk and has Enabled and Emboldened Terrorists.

The 2nd thing that needs done about ISLAM is to vote out Every Bleeding Heart Liberal out of Government that endangers the lives of our children and neighbors and loved ones by advocating Lawless Policies like Sanctuary Cities, and Open Borders.

The 3rd thing that needs done about ISLAM is to strike down all Liberal Ideologies being promoted in our schools such as Multiculturalism. We also need to Implement ENGLISH as THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

The 4th thing that needs done about ISLAM is to deport all Refugees and Immigrants who do not have LEGAL STATUS in THE US. If you are not in a Citizenship Path, you need to be removed from this country. OUTLAW SANCTUARY CITIES via a BILL Passed By Congress, and make it an automatic Sentence of 10 years in Federal Prison for granting an Illegal a Drivers License or Registering them to vote. Oh, sorry, my bad, that already is a felony....

The 5th thing that needs to be done about ISLAM is to suspend the H-1B Visa program. Shut it down completely if you can.

The 6th thing that needs to be done about ISLAM is to BAN the practice of SHARIA LAW, and make it illegal for ISLAMIC Courts to be formed.

The 7th thing that needs done about ISLAM is to create a National Voter ID Law and make it also illegal to enter any public building or space with one's face covered.

Do all that first, and then we can discuss other things. Secure America, then ISLAM will take care of itself.

I had to add this one.

Lastly one more thing that needs done about ISLAM.

IF YOU ARE AN AMERICAN CITIZEN and YOU TRAVEL TO A TERRORIST STATE, you should lose your CITIZENSHIP and be BARRED FROM RE-ENTERING THE COUNTRY!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top