What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[JBvM]

Lie.
Many states you kill the unborn its murder and you go to prison.

that has to do with evolving life in a woman's body. you are a bit confused

There are children having dinner know who were born before the legal abortion age.

You are declared dead when your heart stops.
Abortion stops a beating heart.

So some women decided to give birth - get it 'give birth' meaning give life to a premature fetus? a fetus is declared dead if it is disconnected from the host mother. Of course an artificial source can be connected. But only if the host mother decides to allow it

 

[night_son]

No matter the topic, the Left always side with death.

So you are anti-capital punishment and are a conscientious objector?

Logic for the challenged:

Convicted criminal
-He kills someone. Consequence of killing: execution. He is held to personal responsibility.

Aborted unborn Child:
-Has committed no crime. Consequence of mother-to-be's desire for abortion: death. The mother is not held responsible for her termination of a life.

Expectant Mother who aborts:
-Gets pregnant. Consequence of her action: pregnancy; carry and give birth to child. Society transfers mother's responsibility for pregnancy to unborn child.

Life is a bitch

Amen to that.

 

[JBvM]

many of you people hate liberals more than you care about life

 

[JBvM]

Life is a bitch

so was my mom. and she was proud of it

 

[Weatherman2020]

Lie.
Many states you kill the unborn its murder and you go to prison.

that has to do with evolving life in a woman's body. you are a bit confused

There are children having dinner know who were born before the legal abortion age.

You are declared dead when your heart stops.
Abortion stops a beating heart.

So some women decided to give birth - get it 'give birth' meaning give life to a premature fetus? a fetus is declared dead if it is disconnected from the host mother. Of course an artificial source can be connected. But only if the host mother decides to allow it

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

 

[JBvM]

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

your obsession with fetuses is creepy

 

[Moonglow]

I've raised my four kids, I never advocated for abortion and I damn sure don't advocate the use of my kids as cannon fodder for rich capitalist fighting wars we have no business fighting.

 

[Crixus]

Are you prepared to allow the government to help the mothers that can't afford those babies? I doubt it. "Lol fuck you. Shoulda kept your legs closed, slut."

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Ice dream, but it wouldn’t matter a bit. Roe isn’t a law, it’s legislation from the bench. So all that really could be done is send it back to the states. It would be nothing but a snazzy bumper sticker for election 2020. Abortion ain’t going anywhere.

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Mike, I'm currently in a thread with a mess of conservatives who feel ANY welfare programs are "robbing" them of their hard earned cash. What would be so awful with overturning Roe v. Wade is that no one is going to want to spend the $ to care for these unwanted children. Financial reasons are high on the list of why women choose to terminate a pregnancy--they can't afford another baby. So what happens when the baby is born to a parent who can't afford to raise it? Then some on the right will blame the parents for not caring for it or asking for benefits.
THAT is part of what is so wrong with overturning Roe v. Wade.

Why overturn Roe V Wade?

2 reasons--------->

1. It is bad law, period. Even most Liberal lawyers will tell you so.

2. Because it will return the power to the states. I have no doubt that if Roe V Wade was overturned, 40 to 45 states would still allow abortion, just with restrictions for partial birth.


Why would the Left have any kind of problem with that?

Lets see if I get this straight, and maybe some CONSERVATIVES could jump in here--------->

When the LEFT tries to put MORE regulations on gun owners, they tell everyone they are NOT trying to restrict guns in any manner.

When we say that 45 states will still offer abortion, they tell us we are trying to deny a womans right to choose!

So you see folks, as we ALL already knew, the far Left is all phony-e-baloney, mixed with a little mac and cheese. They need judges to help them do their thing, cause nobody in their right minds is going to vote for higher taxes, forced government education, open borders, and transfer of wealth.

The Left isn't fooling ANYBODY, and as time goes by towards the elections, it is going to be proven, and that will be the end of the far Left-) Not just here, but in the media-)

Pretty much. If they were honest( they aren’t) they would just say they they are upset about losing a bumper sticker/T-shirt issue for election time. Complete nonissue.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

your obsession with fetuses is creepy

Says the freak hung up on murdering them and stop a beating heart.

 

[Moonglow]

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

your obsession with fetuses is creepy

Says the freak hung up on murdering them and stop a beating heart.

God does that every damn day..

 

[night_son]

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

your obsession with fetuses is creepy

Says the freak hung up on murdering them and stop a beating heart.

God does that every damn day..

Mankind does that everyday. God eats popcorn.

 

[Moonglow]

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

your obsession with fetuses is creepy

Says the freak hung up on murdering them and stop a beating heart.

God does that every damn day..

Mankind does that every. God eats popcorn.

Nothing happens but the will of God.

 

[night_son]

Liar.

'Miracle' baby born two weeks before legal abortion limit | Daily Mail Online

your obsession with fetuses is creepy

Says the freak hung up on murdering them and stop a beating heart.

God does that every damn day..

Mankind does that every. God eats popcorn.

Nothing happens but the will of God.

An argument for another thread.

 

[francoHFW]

Free birth control Cuts abortions by 40% immediately... 5000 women used to die a year would now be 10,000... 99% of abortions are in the first 3 months which the Supreme Court says are not human... The rest for the health of the mother. But thanks 4 the imaginary horror stories, Dupes... Freedom Fighters my butt...

 

[Borillar]

Go out and adopt a couple then.

Dumbass.

Thirty-Six Couples Wait for Every One Baby Who is Adopted | LifeNews.com

Better go get in line then.

Dumbass.

Why not just go and make your own babies if you can find a woman willing to sleep with you, and leave other people's decisions to them?

You really get off murdering babies, don't you.

You really get off on making shit up, don't you?

 

[beagle9]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Mike, I'm currently in a thread with a mess of conservatives who feel ANY welfare programs are "robbing" them of their hard earned cash. What would be so awful with overturning Roe v. Wade is that no one is going to want to spend the $ to care for these unwanted children. Financial reasons are high on the list of why women choose to terminate a pregnancy--they can't afford another baby. So what happens when the baby is born to a parent who can't afford to raise it? Then some on the right will blame the parents for not caring for it or asking for benefits.
THAT is part of what is so wrong with overturning Roe v. Wade.

No abortion on demand anymore or aborting babies out of convience means keeping them legs closed until your wedding day, and guy's, respect your potential life partners choice in waiting on that day. If not that standard, then stock up on birth control, and learn how to use it already.

Problem solved. See how simple it is ?? And we didn't even have to have 40 Harvard lawyers to figure it out for us.

 

[beagle9]

Free birth control Cuts abortions by 40% immediately... 5000 women used to die a year would now be 10,000... 99% of abortions are in the first 3 months which the Supreme Court says are not human... The rest for the health of the mother. But thanks 4 the imaginary horror stories, Dupes... Freedom Fighters my butt...

You rely on a man to tell you whether a human life is not a life once it shows up as a human being forming in the womb of a woman ?? Since when did a mortal man became God to you ?? Get help..

 

[beagle9]

Look at all the justifiers for abortion coming out of the woodworks in America now.

Justifying abortion (the murdering of life out of convience), won't go over to good come judgement day.. Just saying, but for the reprobates it don't matter in life, because their souls are waxed cold, and their souls are without meaning any longer to them. It is how one justifies murder today.

If you believe in that sort of thing, aren't you doing the fetus a favor by aborting it since the soul would go straight to heaven?

Good grief... You failed.

 

[Borillar]

Look at all the justifiers for abortion coming out of the woodworks in America now.

Justifying abortion (the murdering of life out of convience), won't go over to good come judgement day.. Just saying, but for the reprobates it don't matter in life, because their souls are waxed cold, and their souls are without meaning any longer to them. It is how one justifies murder today.

If you believe in that sort of thing, aren't you doing the fetus a favor by aborting it since the soul would go straight to heaven?

Good grief... You failed.

So, does the soul go straight to hell then?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Off the top of my head I would think women would have a problem with people telling them what to do with their own bodies.

The baby is not a part of the mother's body. The baby lives in the mother's body but is not a part of it. The baby has a separate blood supply, often with a different blood type. The baby has different DNA than the mother. The baby has a separate heart, separate brain, separate arms and legs and feet, separate body, separate everything.