What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[beagle9]

The baby is not a part of the mother's body. The baby lives in the mother's body but is not a part of it. The baby has a separate blood supply, often with a different blood type. The baby has different DNA than the mother. The baby has a separate heart, separate brain, separate arms and legs and feet, separate body, separate everything.

If it lives in the mothers body then my point stands. The mother is under zero obligation to let the baby stay there.

So she can commit murder just because the baby sadly enough happens to be unfortunately carried by a murderer found in her for whom can kill without thought of ??? You think the country should condone or be dragged into this kind of thing in which corrupts the nations overall character also ??

Last I checked murder is a crime and since its not a crime to get an abortion youre deflecting and or you are ignorant. Since you are not carrying the child you have no say in what she does to rid her body of an unwanted baby.

Listen at you - "RID HER BODY OF AN UNWANTED BABY". OTHERWISE TO DENY THAT BABY A LIFE OR a CHANCE AS WAS ONCE UPON A TIME GRANTED UNTO YOU BY GOD HIMSELF, AND THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF BIRTH ??

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

God gave man enough sense to carry this out, but as the day and hour gets closer, man's soul waxes colder and colder in the coming times or days ahead.

 

[2aguy]

So she can commit murder just because the baby sadly enough happens to be unfortunately carried by a murderer found in her for whom can kill without thought of ??? You think the country should condone or be dragged into this kind of thing in which corrupts the nations overall character also ??

Last I checked murder is a crime and since its not a crime to get an abortion youre deflecting and or you are ignorant. Since you are not carrying the child you have no say in what she does to rid her body of an unwanted baby.

Listen at you - "RID HER BODY OF AN UNWANTED BABY". OTHERWISE TO DENY THAT BABY A LIFE OR a CHANCE AS WAS ONCE UPON A TIME GRANTED UNTO YOU BY GOD HIMSELF, AND THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF BIRTH ??

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

Thou shalt do no murder....

 

[beagle9]

So she can commit murder just because the baby sadly enough happens to be unfortunately carried by a murderer found in her for whom can kill without thought of ??? You think the country should condone or be dragged into this kind of thing in which corrupts the nations overall character also ??

Last I checked murder is a crime and since its not a crime to get an abortion youre deflecting and or you are ignorant. Since you are not carrying the child you have no say in what she does to rid her body of an unwanted baby.

Listen at you - "RID HER BODY OF AN UNWANTED BABY". OTHERWISE TO DENY THAT BABY A LIFE OR a CHANCE AS WAS ONCE UPON A TIME GRANTED UNTO YOU BY GOD HIMSELF, AND THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF BIRTH ??

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

Thou shalt not KILL.

 

[Asclepias]

Last I checked murder is a crime and since its not a crime to get an abortion youre deflecting and or you are ignorant. Since you are not carrying the child you have no say in what she does to rid her body of an unwanted baby.

Listen at you - "RID HER BODY OF AN UNWANTED BABY". OTHERWISE TO DENY THAT BABY A LIFE OR a CHANCE AS WAS ONCE UPON A TIME GRANTED UNTO YOU BY GOD HIMSELF, AND THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF BIRTH ??

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

Thou shalt not KILL.

Where does that say you are designated as the person to stop all killing? Its a personal commandment, not a license to interfere with what someone else is doing.

 

[beagle9]

Listen at you - "RID HER BODY OF AN UNWANTED BABY". OTHERWISE TO DENY THAT BABY A LIFE OR a CHANCE AS WAS ONCE UPON A TIME GRANTED UNTO YOU BY GOD HIMSELF, AND THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF BIRTH ??

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

Thou shalt not KILL.

Where does that say you are designated as the person to stop all killing? Its a personal commandment, not a license to interfere with what someone else is doing.

Where did you get the idea that you can just kill your baby is the better question ??

 

[Asclepias]

If God wanted to save aborted children he would at the very least made it illegal and at best impossible to do. You ever think about that?

If God wanted us to save babies in the womb, he would have made a commandment against killing them....oh, that's right, he did.

He didnt tell you to save babies in the womb. Please link to a commandment that says you must stop women from having abortions.

Thou shalt not KILL.

Where does that say you are designated as the person to stop all killing? Its a personal commandment, not a license to interfere with what someone else is doing.

Where did you get the idea that you can just kill your baby is the better question ??

From the fact that a womans body is her property? Now can you answer my question instead of deflecting?

 

[initforme]

This whole issue could easily be solved by contraception. It would fix the issue. Slot less pregnancies would please both sides.

 

[Asclepias]

This whole issue could easily be solved by contraception. It would fix the issue. Slot less pregnancies would please both sides.

Contraception doesnt always work. Every single one of my children were conceived while the mother was on contraception.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Another benefit of reducing the number of abortions would be that fewer women would put themselves at greater risk for breast cancer, since dozens of studies have found that having an abortion increases a woman's chance of having breast cancer. It is appalling and shameful to see the abortion lobby deny the link between abortion and breast cancer. Here's a sample of the evidence:

Researchers Uncover Hidden Risk Factor For Breast Cancer

Abortion and Breast Cancer: The Stubborn Link Returns | National Review

The Abortion–Breast Cancer Link | Michael J. New

 

[buttercup]

From the fact that a womans body is her property? Now can you answer my question instead of deflecting?

Why is it so hard for some of you to grasp that there are TWO bodies involved?

 

[initforme]

I believe this whole issue will encourage many young women to get their tubes tied so there is no chance of pregnancy ever. Perhaps a wide move on their part.

 

[rightwinger]

Let’s ban abortion

But before we do....

Provide Low cost/free birth control
Free neonatal and maternity care for low income mothers
Provide free childcare for low income mothers
Expand welfare and healthcare for low income mothers

 

[Avatar4321]

Nothing would be awful about it

 

[Avatar4321]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

I think it would be better to start taking care of the born first. Then worry about the unborn.

It really seems as if Republicans only see little kids as target practice. They may want to change that perception first if they want to achieve the moral high ground. Don't you think?

so you want us to either allow you to kill your child or take care of them for you? And if we don't we are the bad guy.

How come you aren't the bad guy despite you wanting to kill your children and have someone else take care of them? When can we reasonably expect you to take responsibility for your actions instead expecting us to do so?

 

[whitehall]

Everyone seems to use Roe v. Wade as a political tool rather than looking at the Constitutional merits of the case. Democrats use Roe v. Wade as a fear mongering tool to get votes from women who are victims of sexual abuse by liberal men but democrats instinctively know that the case doesn't hold water in Constitutional terms. There is no "right to privacy" guaranteed by the Constitution but the liberal justices found it and the liberal media went along with it.

 

[rightwinger]

Everyone seems to use Roe v. Wade as a political tool rather than looking at the Constitutional merits of the case. Democrats use Roe v. Wade as a fear mongering tool to get votes from women who are victims of sexual abuse by liberal men but democrats instinctively know that the case doesn't hold water in Constitutional terms. There is no "right to privacy" guaranteed by the Constitution but the liberal justices found it and the liberal media went along with it.

Roe v Wade was found to be a fourth amendment violation

 

[hazlnut]

What exactly would be so awful or terrible about overturning Roe v. Wade, allowing the states to resume control over the issue, and saving thousands or tens of thousands of unborn babies' lives?

Roe v. Wade was based on junk science, junk law, and on the myth of an epidemic of "back alley abortions." Legalized elective abortion is far more of a stain on our nation's history than slavery was. The number of babies killed by abortion dwarfs the number of slaves who were killed by abusive slaveholders.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned, state governments would retake control of the issue. Some states would legalize all abortion except partial-birth abortion (which is illegal under federal law). Other states would place significant restrictions on abortion. And some states would ban most or all abortions. Undoubtedly, thousands or tens of thousands of babies would be saved from abortion.

If women were really determined to kill their babies for their own convenience (i.e., elective abortion), they could always go to a state where elective abortion were legal.

Debunking the myth of ‘back-alley’ abortions

U.S. Abortion Statistics

Chilean Study Proves that Outlawing Abortion Does Not Lead to "Coat-hanger Deaths"

https://www.mccl.org/single-post/2017/01/20/The-three-fundamental-problems-with-Roe-v-Wade

Science Has Advanced Since Roe v. Wade But Abortion Laws Haven’t

It's a scientific fact: Human life begins at conception

Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo's Conception

When Does Life Begin | Just The Facts

Human “Life” Begins at Birth

Bible: Life Begins at Breath, Not Conception

Canadian Doctors: “Life Begins at Birth”

Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime * | The Quarterly Journal of Economics | Oxford Academic

The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime

Keep in mind GOP conservatives, minorities tend to out screw whites and have way more kids.

You sure you want to go down that road?

 

[initforme]

Overturning Wil not be enough. We must also push contraception and try to limit the number of unwanted pregnancies. If none of the unwanted pregnancies ever happen then everyone wins. Right?

 

[buttercup]

If it lives in the mothers body then my point stands. The mother is under zero obligation to let the baby stay there.

All parents have a moral obligation to their offspring... If they can't raise the baby, no problem, they can give the baby up for adoption. Killing an innocent human being is not a right… no matter what any law says.

 

[initforme]

Should the nation encourage alot more contraception? Yes or no?