What you must believe to think Biden is innocent.

[Billiejeens]

Firtash lawyers are Victoria Toensing and Joe DiGenova, Who also were John Solomon's attorneys....and Giuliani friends. John Solomon is the sole news source for Giuliani's propaganda campaign against Joe and Hunter in the Ukraine....breaking news from Solomon every day, reporting (for the lack of a better word) all of the Giuliani shenanigans and propaganda that got Trump impeached.

Firtash said (try To ending and DiGenova, that he would help Giuliani, and paid Shokin to come to Austria, where Firtash was hiding out fighting extradition to the USA, for a deposition allegedly that would help Firtash....this I believe is where they got Shokin to claim Biden stopped him from investigating Burisma.... Though Shokin never claimed Biden did, he claim the USA did and said only when Giuliani or one of Giuliani workers, told him about Biden holding back military aid till he was removed, did he learn about that....in 2019.

Coo coo

 

[mamooth]

The FBI said the laptop is real, moron.

No, they didn't. That'sa crazy story you were told to repeat. And, because you're so damned stupid, you do it.

 

[mamooth]

You must "believe" that Joe Biden never fondled his daughter naked in the shower and that he never got an erection looking at his 15 year old naked daughter in the shower.

This is the kind of depraved pervy fiction that Trump cultists think about all day long, as they touch themselves.

That's why normal people don't let children or pets anywhere near Trump cultists.

 

[bripat9643]

No, they didn't. That'sa crazy story you were told to repeat. And, because you're so damned stupid, you do it.

Hunter Biden investigation: FBI official admits bureau 'certainly' knew laptop was real

EXCLUSIVE — An FBI official told the House Judiciary Committee in a transcribed interview this week that at least one top agent and likely others who were warning social media companies about a "hack and dump" operation ahead of the 2020 election knew Hunter Biden’s laptop was real.​

​

Laura Dehmlow, head of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force, said, according to excerpts of the testimony obtained by the Washington Examiner, that her then-colleague Brad Benavides “certainly” was aware of the laptop’s authenticity.​

 

[mamooth]

Hunter Biden investigation: FBI official admits bureau 'certainly' knew laptop was real

Cool! A vague thirdhand report!

You are so damned desperate and corrupt, it's hilarious. You just ooze loserdom.

Dumbass, nobody denies there was a laptop. You know, the one the russians put together, after they copied Hunter's during one of his blackouts in Ukraine.

 

[toobfreak]

In order to believe Biden is taking bribes….
You must see evidence that he was actually sent money
You must see unexplained money in Biden’s accounts
You must see specific actions that Biden took in return

WRONG AGAIN, Troglodytic shill!
You must only SEE evidence, SEE unexplained money and to SEE specific actions to CONCLUSIVELY KNOW.
You don't need ANY of that just to BELIEVE Biden's guilt.
To believe Biden's guilt, one must merely INFER from a vast collection of circumstantial EVIDENCE.
And the circumstantial evidence is damning. Worse than Watergate.
So much worse that it would be impossible to believe Biden is innocent lest for some EXTRAORDINARY evidence which thus far, Biden has refused to come forth to offer!

Until you have that, you have no evidence of a crime

Wrong again, Petunia. Murderers are often convicted on circumstantial evidence. Ever hear of MOTIVE, REASON, and OPPORTUNITY? And once Comer gets Biden's hidden bank records, there will be IRRECONCILABLE PROOF. Biden is toast.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Yes they are. Of course, reality is no match for your utter stupidity.

They haven't much since:

Republicans’ big investigation into the Biden family has revealed … not a lot.

The House GOP accused Joe Biden and his family on Wednesday of engaging in business with foreign entities—but were unable to provide any actual evidence linking the president to any wrongdoing.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer released a 65-page memo detailing a sprawling investigation into Biden and some of his relatives, particularly his son Hunter Biden. Nowhere in the massive document was there a specific allegation of a crime committed by Biden or any of his relatives.

Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden

A 65-page report, a press conference, and nothing to show for it

newrepublic.com

 

[Dante Reawakened]

You must "believe" that Joe Biden never fondled his daughter naked in the shower and that he never got an erection looking at his 15 year old naked daughter in the shower.

Is that the kind of thing you think about?

Ug!

 

[bripat9643]

Cool! A vague thirdhand report!

You are so damned desperate and corrupt, it's hilarious. You just ooze loserdom.

Dumbass, nobody denies there was a laptop. You know, the one the russians put together, after they copied Hunter's during one of his blackouts in Ukraine.

That laptop was really Hunter's, moron. He even tried to get it back.

You're so fucking stupid it must hurt.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Cool story.

Doesn't change the fact you claimed the bank records show nothing, Simp.

I went with what another said that you claimed is untrue: they show nothing in the context you weirdos deal in

With bank records they've had for a looong time:

Republicans’ big investigation into the Biden family has revealed … not a lot.
The House GOP accused Joe Biden and his family on Wednesday of engaging in business with foreign entities—but were unable to provide any actual evidence linking the president to any wrongdoing.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer released a 65-page memo detailing a sprawling investigation into Biden and some of his relatives, particularly his son Hunter Biden. Nowhere in the massive document was there a specific allegation of a crime committed by Biden or any of his relatives.

...

The memo accuses the Biden family of involvement in a “scheme to peddle influence” in Romania from 2015 to 2017, as well as financial dealings with individuals in China. Hunter Biden’s name comes up repeatedly. But the memo contains scant details of all of these alleged dealings, nor does it contain any evidence that any laws were broken or that Biden was involved in his son’s Chinese business.

Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden

A 65-page report, a press conference, and nothing to show for it

newrepublic.com

 

[mamooth]

That laptop was really Hunter's, moron. He even tried to get it back.

Uh-huh. What else have you been told?

We'll have to keep repeating this until it sinks in: You being fooled by the world's dumbest propaganda only reflects badly on you.

Anways, what's it like being such a loser, and having the whole world constantly laughing at you? That must really be tough. No wonder you're always so grumpy.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

The guy lays everything out in the article, but here is his synopsis at the end. Unfortunately, the liberal board members believe all this.

Que the "where is the evidence' crowd...........

In order to believe that Biden is innocent of taking bribes for favorable foreign policy decisions, we must ignore his own words, his son’s text messages and emails, all the “spontaneous” meetings, all the whistleblowers and witnesses, and the need for more than 20 shell companies to launder and distribute loot among family members who have no demonstrable skills. Finally, we must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people except the only one possessed of the power to make it rain.

What We Must Believe to Believe Biden Is Innocent - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

We must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people in Biden's circle but not him.

spectator.org

great paraphrased quote:

For Republicans, the impeachment inquiry draws attention away from Trump's legal troubles and provides a showcase–or, more accurately, a political circus–for "alternative facts" and outlandish conspiracy theories.

 

[Care4all]

Coo coo

Fact! Try researching it, on your own.

 

[bripat9643]

Uh-huh. What else have you been told?

We'll have to keep repeating this until it sinks in: You being fooled by the world's dumbest propaganda only reflects badly on you.

Anways, what's it like being such a loser, and having the whole world constantly laughing at you? That must really be tough. No wonder you're always so grumpy.

You're the idiot who's being fooled. You think because the fake news media doesn't report on the evidence that there is no evidence? I've watched youTube video for hours that does nothing but go over the reams and reams of evidence. I watch the testimony of both whistleblowers. Only a profound moron would sincerely claim there is no evidence.

 

[Clipper]

I called it.

Cult gonna cult.

And Nostra gonna face plant Trump's ass.

 

[Clipper]

You seem to be responding to the wrong person. I have not lost anything in any court.

You defend those who have, including the babbling orange ape.

Do you suffer from memory loss or is the stink causing you problems?

 

[Clipper]

You're the idiot who's being fooled. You think because the fake news media doesn't report on the evidence that there is no evidence? I've watched youTube video for hours that does nothing but go over the reams and reams of evidence. I watch the testimony of both whistleblowers. Only a profound moron would sincerely claim there is no evidence.

Oh, ok. Some jerkoff hearing voices in his head & posting on YouTube is evidence.

Sounds about right.

 

[Crepitus]

So, $5 million at a time doesn't qualify for bribery? Got a link to a statute that says that?

Chicken feed. Kushner got $3 billion for covering for the Saudi prince.

 

[bdtex]

no evidence of a crime

Correct. None.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

That’s because you want to believe what he’s saying.

You can’t tell the difference between someone who is credible and someone who is telling you what you want to hear.

How do you know what I can tell? Listen for yourself and see?