What's crazier

[SassyIrishLass]

I think the craziest thing is believing in the Establishment's paid servants who happen to masquerade as scientists. Democrats have a monopoly on that religion~

Believing anything from Matthew is a fairly close second-place, I would say.

At least I use science and logic to support my beliefs.

Too bad your science can't disprove God's existence

 

[ChrisL]

Wrong-wing “science” is an ideology—almost a religion—far less rational than any genuine religion. I guess it's what they use to fill the hole left in their soul by rejecting God,.

Good grief! It is not a religion. IT is just science. Lol. Sorry, but religious folks are pretty whacked out.

It most certainly is not science, in any genuine sense. It may not be a religion, but it is much more like a religion than it is like genuine science. And if anyone is “pretty whacked out”, it is those who have chosen to reject and rebel against God, and to substitute this false science/religion for genuine religion.

That's whacky right there. Religion and science are opposites. Science needs and tests evidence. Religion is strictly faith based without any evidence required.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

At least I use science and logic to support my beliefs.

Too bad your science can't disprove God's existence

His “science” cannot prove anything except his own folly, and his own ignorance about what genuine science really is.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

At least I use science and logic to support my beliefs.

Too bad your science can't disprove God's existence

His “science” cannot prove anything except his own folly, and his own ignorance about what genuine science really is.

He's a one trick pony with a little added comedy value

 

[LA RAM FAN]

What's crazier?

1. Believing in god? There's no evidence for such! Believe it or not all the evidence, data and the reality of the facts all are against such! Pretty freaking crazy!
2. Believing in Aliens? Well, there's 300 billion stars in our galaxy and some stars have 3-8 planets. We have found about 8-9 planets that could already have such life. It isn't that much of a stretch of the imagination.
3. Well, half a million years ago a huge ape that stood 10-12 feet tall was very real.
4. No evidence to support it but the US government has done some fucked up stuff in history!
5. No evidence for such! Pretty crazy as far as I can tell. Now McCain and some other people in our government did visit and come close to baghdadi,,,so who knows.

I believe that the craziest effin thing on this list is believing in some all powerful creature and believing in what some 2,000 year old book says.

Uh its only crazy for people like you to believe 9/11 was not an inside job,that there are not aliens,and that Israel funds Isis because people like are so much in denial you only see what you WANT to see.

whats crazy is for you to believe the official version of 9/11 bjust because the government tells you so.Its crazy to accept the word of the government and media when they have no evidence to support their claims and on top of that,to ignore credible experts in their field along with witnesses who have refuted their findings.

who you going to believe,our government and the media that have a long history of lying to the american people,or these credible experts?

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

the evidence in these two videos is overwhelming that it was a joint CIA/mossad operation.NOBODY has ever been able to debunk them.If you would actually stop living in denial and actually take the time to watch them,you would see for yourself that it was a CIA/mossad.operation.lo




the REAL question you should be asking is what is more craizer,ignoring all these credible experts in that link i just posted,or accepting the governments version of events that it was carried out by 19 muslims and bin laden even though there is no evidence of that?

this link here proves anybody would have to be a lunatic to accept the governments version of events.
Idaho Observer: The looniest of all 9/11 conspiracy theories

Now that I just proved that Israel along with the CIA was behind 9/11,WHY would is be crazy to believe Israel funds Isis?

and as far as aliens,that just proves you are close minded and the though that there are indeed aliens out there is too scary a thought for you to comprehend the fact we have many credible experts such as airline pilots and astronauts that have witnessed a UFO. you going to tell us that there are HUMANS flying around in outer space in space vehicles that fly 100 times faster than anything mankind has? that all those astronauts are making stories up? are you even listening to yourself?


those three sure as hell dont belong in the same catagory as believeing in god and in bigfoot.

unlike god and bigfoot,as I just proved,there is hard core evidence to support 9/11 being an inside job,aliens in space,and Israel funding Isis.

 

[westwall]

The reason it is so fucking insane is because we as a society are so accepting of it, even through it is more insane then the other 4 choices. We give up logic, rationality and hate on science because of it, why? Because we're all brainwashed to believe some 2,000 year old book! Would we do the same to someone screaming about space aliens visiting his room at night or someone that came back from a hiking trip that says he seen big foot? Fuck no. We wouldn't cut science because of these two individuals and we wouldn't give up our rationality. We only accept the holy bible for the same reason as 100 bucks may get the mob after you, but 1 trillion bucks gets you bailed out by the government.

Don't think people 'cut science' for people's other beliefs, either. People are allowed to believe whatever they like, and the fact that you're not okay with other people accepting it only goes to show how intolerant Democrats are of opinions and beliefs that conflict with their own.

I take it you are a conservative ;-)? Surely you aren't a fan of Trump? I'm not a fan of Hillary, but Bernie, he was something else in my view. Now that he lost, if I were American, I think I'd be voting for Jill Stein (Green Party).

Why? No socialist country has ever survived for more than 90 years. All of the Scandinavian country's, save those with oil, are in dire straits.

The United States could have been considered a social democratic country, back when Franklin D. Roosevelt made the "New Deal" reforms. I would argue that the erosion of those reforms is the reason the U.S. is in such dire straits today. Take heart though, it's not just the U.S. that is in these dire straits. Environmentally rapacious trickle down economics is something that is being practiced far and wide and the results are coming in...

The Soviet Union collapsed under it's own weight. That is the very nature of socialist countries.

The soviet union was a communist oligarchy, not a democratic socialist country. The Huffington Post explains the difference in the following article:
History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie.

Eventually you run out of other peoples money and then you're screwed.

People are so focused on 'money' and who currently possesses it. What people -should- be focusing on is, who is doing the actual -work- of running the country. Certainly not the rapacious bankers and the other corporate cronies. No, their focus is to leach off of all the -real- workers, like a tapeworm. The general population in essence creates most money from their signatures when they sign loan papers at the bank. The bank is the only entity allowed to literally create money out of these loans. The banks give them newly created money in the form of "credit", which only bankers are allowed to engage in with their vile fractional reserve banking. Anyone else trying to create money in this way or any other way would be charged for fraud. But the "Federal" Reserve (which is controlled by the banks) can -use- this newly created money to buy up bonds, which then turns into actual cash after its maturity date. The following 4 minute video explains it:


The banks, being the source of most new money, naturally can greatly influence large corporations which rely on those loans, which over time has become as rapacious as they are. The following 45 minute documentary on the subject of money creation is more in depth then the previous one:

The problem that you have of course is that mankind is governed by self interest. Your utopian ideal while cute, is not born out by reality. The reality is when a group of people is allowed to sit back and take it easy, while sponging off of a small group of producers, those producers eventually get pissed off and stop working. then all get to starve.

And no, it doesn't matter who is doing the work in the long run. That is a Marxist ideal, the reality is there are many people who can do simple work. In fact the majority of the population of this planet can do menial work. Thus, menial work is not particularly valuable. Work that is doable by a small group of people on the other hand, that is valuable.

The problem arises when you get a group of fundamentally not smart people called politicians, who rely on the votes of the ignorant to get themselves in power. Then, they take from the producers and give a bit to the masses while keeping the majority of that which they took for themselves and their preferred minions. FDR was great at taking money from the middle class, those least able to give it, and giving it to his preferred people.

The rich got richer under FDR than at any other time save for the current demagogue obama. That is a fact. Under FDR and his policies, the wealthiest 2% of the population of this country went from controlling 76% of this nations wealth to controlling 90% of the wealth while reducing their overall number to where they are now less than one percent of the population. That is a fact. Under progressive policies the wealthiest become even richer, and the poor stay static (5 trillion dollars spent on the war on poverty and there are more people living in poverty than before the "war" started) and the middle class suffers. That is a fact.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

That's whacky right there. Religion and science are opposites.

I couldn't disagree more. Both, properly understood and applied, are essential sources of knowledge. As Einstein put it, “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”

They only seem “opposite” to the foolish and ignorant, who assume that our understanding of both is perfect, and fail to grasp that it is imperfections in our understanding of both science and religion that are the sole source of the apparent conflicts between them. I am convinced, beyond any shred of doubt, that if we had a truly complete and correct understanding of science, and a truly complete and correct understanding of religion, that we would find the two to be in perfect harmony. It is the hubris of foolish mortal men, far removed from the wisdom of God, that assumes that the conflicts that we see between science and religion are because one or the other is false, rather than because of our own incomplete and incorrect understanding of both.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

He's a one trick pony with a little added comedy value

He doesn't even perform that one trick very well, does he?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He's a one trick pony with a little added comedy value

He doesn't even perform that one trick very well, does he?

He's become redundant and stale

 

[Asclepias]

Wrong-wing “science” is an ideology—almost a religion—far less rational than any genuine religion. I guess it's what they use to fill the hole left in their soul by rejecting God,.

Good grief! It is not a religion. IT is just science. Lol. Sorry, but religious folks are pretty whacked out.

It most certainly is not science, in any genuine sense. It may not be a religion, but it is much more like a religion than it is like genuine science. And if anyone is “pretty whacked out”, it is those who have chosen to reject and rebel against God, and to substitute this false science/religion for genuine religion.

That's whacky right there. Religion and science are opposites. Science needs and tests evidence. Religion is strictly faith based without any evidence required.

No. Science and religion were once one and the same. Western ideology has confused you and others.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

What's crazier?

1. Believing in god? There's no evidence for such! Believe it or not all the evidence, data and the reality of the facts all are against such! Pretty freaking crazy!
2. Believing in Aliens? Well, there's 300 billion stars in our galaxy and some stars have 3-8 planets. We have found about 8-9 planets that could already have such life. It isn't that much of a stretch of the imagination.
3. Well, half a million years ago a huge ape that stood 10-12 feet tall was very real.
4. No evidence to support it but the US government has done some fucked up stuff in history!
5. No evidence for such! Pretty crazy as far as I can tell. Now McCain and some other people in our government did visit and come close to baghdadi,,,so who knows.

I believe that the craziest effin thing on this list is believing in some all powerful creature and believing in what some 2,000 year old book says.

As to God, it all depends on how you define it. I'm a Pantheist, Pantheists define God as everything combined. By that definition, everyone believes in God. I also think there's plenty of evidence to support the theory that 9/11 was an inside job . As to Israel funding ISIS, I believe there is actually evidence of this. Though I haven't really investigated it myself, a site that I trust has found that there is such evidence and written an article about it:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-is...ted-by-the-us-israel-and-saudi-arabia/5396171

I also believe there's evidence of Aliens, read some books that support this, and I thought the show "Ancient Aliens" and the documentary "Thrive" were all quite credible. Finally, as to Bigfoot, I don't know. I found an article that claims some scientists have found evidence that they exist:
Bigfoot does EXIST claim scientists after five years of research: See their video

That being said, they seem to be saying that they're within the range of human tallness and hairiness (the hairiness thing would actually be the rarer trait by far).

Where'd you hear about these 10-12 foot apes ?

Yeah Bigfoot,I have not done any research into,its possible no doubt but as far as i know,there is no solid proof in it. western civilization had to have something to cling onto and believe in for all the evil that goes on in the world so they clung on to the hope that god exists and that there will be a perfect world someday despite the lack of evidence.

the other three as I just proved have indeed been proved to be factual. Thats what baffles me about you,you are so worked worried about 9/11 what happened in the past instead of being concerned about the present and the future which is the existence of UFO'S which is something that affects us right now because it is something that is going on right now in the PRESENT.yet you just want to discuss the past and not be concerned about whats going on NOW?

amazing how you are so obsessed over 9/11 when 9/11 is the LEAST of our problems we have to worry about from the government right now.that you get worked up so much over the past rather than worry about whats going on right now in the PRESENT with our government what they are plotting against us NOW.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The reason it is so fucking insane is because we as a society are so accepting of it, even through it is more insane then the other 4 choices. We give up logic, rationality and hate on science because of it, why? Because we're all brainwashed to believe some 2,000 year old book! Would we do the same to someone screaming about space aliens visiting his room at night or someone that came back from a hiking trip that says he seen big foot? Fuck no. We wouldn't cut science because of these two individuals and we wouldn't give up our rationality. We only accept the holy bible for the same reason as 100 bucks may get the mob after you, but 1 trillion bucks gets you bailed out by the government.

Don't think people 'cut science' for people's other beliefs, either. People are allowed to believe whatever they like, and the fact that you're not okay with other people accepting it only goes to show how intolerant Democrats are of opinions and beliefs that conflict with their own.

I take it you are a conservative ;-)? Surely you aren't a fan of Trump? I'm not a fan of Hillary, but Bernie, he was something else in my view. Now that he lost, if I were American, I think I'd be voting for Jill Stein (Green Party).

I am a Conservative, yes. I dislike both Hillary and Trump. I just dislike Hillary even more than I dislike Trump. On the other hand, if Bernie Sanders became President, I'd ask my parents to drop me off in another country. I don't like the idea of the US becoming the Soviet States of America.

Why?

Because Hillary is an Establishment Servant that's incapable of speaking a single word without it being a lie, has absolutely no qualifications, and has accomplished nothing during her time in the government. This all ignoring that she has allowed people to die, and actually broke nine+ different laws, whether through sheer incompetence, sheer stupidity, carelessness, intentionally, or any combination of the four. You know, even worse, if she has been totally honest, she will absolutely destroy the American economy through Marxist policies, even after actually stating that they'd destroy the economy during one of her debates with Sanders. If you're referring to not wanting the US to become the Soviet States of America, I don't like the idea of becoming government property, especially under an awful economy.

this is what I am talking about Phoenxy.Pumpkin Row hit the nail on the head on everything he said here about Hellery.

You could be spending your time more constructively worrying about whats going on NOW.If anything your energy you use to get so worked up over 9/11 would be put to much better use if you used it to be worked up over the elections and what is going on NOW.

Because this election will probably be the most important election in america because our future as a free country is at stake if that evil witch HELLERY gets elected because pumpkin row hit the nail on everything he said.Not only that,she is a mass murderer and part of the establishment same as The Bushs,Romney,Obama and all the other candidates that ran are.

since you are so worked up about 9/11 being an inside job,you should be putting all your efforts and time into getting the word out that Trump is americas last hope to break free from this facist dictatership that we became in 1913 since Trump is a RINO not part of that establishment that Bush,Obama and Romney are.instead,you just want to talk about the past of 9/11 being an inside job all the time though.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I think the craziest thing is believing in the Establishment's paid servants who happen to masquerade as scientists. Democrats have a monopoly on that religion~

Believing anything from Matthew is a fairly close second-place, I would say.

best damn post on this thread.same would go for Laughing gas as well obviously.

At least I use science and logic to support my beliefs.

No you ignore facts and evidence that dont go along with the governments version of events to support your beliefs.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

What's crazier?

1. Believing in god? There's no evidence for such! Believe it or not all the evidence, data and the reality of the facts all are against such! Pretty freaking crazy!
2. Believing in Aliens? Well, there's 300 billion stars in our galaxy and some stars have 3-8 planets. We have found about 8-9 planets that could already have such life. It isn't that much of a stretch of the imagination.
3. Well, half a million years ago a huge ape that stood 10-12 feet tall was very real.
4. No evidence to support it but the US government has done some fucked up stuff in history!
5. No evidence for such! Pretty crazy as far as I can tell. Now McCain and some other people in our government did visit and come close to baghdadi,,,so who knows.

I believe that the craziest effin thing on this list is believing in some all powerful creature and believing in what some 2,000 year old book says.

Your beloved "gubermint" leaders are luciferian that worship Moloch at Bohemian Grove. The power elite are 33rd degree and above free masons. Albert Pike's book "Morals and Dogma" is considered the bible of free masonry. Albert Pike was a confederate general and one of the founders of the KKK using free masonry as it's structure....and there is a statute of Pike prominently displayed in Washington, DC...wonder why Sharpton or the Revrun Jesse uh Jackson have never protested this??? OH WAIT! That's because they are free masons as well and part of the "Brotherhood". So it stands to reason that if there is a satan, there is a God....no? There is a God and it's only by HIS grace that shit hasn't hit the fan by now because christians are keeping the faith. We have "white hats" trying to keep the wolf at bay hoping that enough people will wake up and lend a hand. There has been at least THREE false flag events that have been averted by patriots whose names may never be known until the battle is over but they did it for love of country and mankind....FACT.

Yeah, 9/11/01 was a total inside job and it accomplished MANY things for the elites. It shut down SEC investigations into insider trading of the elites, it stopped the investigation into the missing 2.3 TRILLION dollars that Rumsfeld said was unaccounted for on 9/10/11. It allowed the Black Eagle Trust to move 240 Billion dollars in ten year securities with no scrutiny by the SEC since the Fed bank used it's emergency powers to allow trades to go through unabated. It created yet another war that made tremendous profits for the military industrial complex. Did you know that the Patriot Act was written before 9/11?...It was. Did you know that the spying apparatus to collect data on every American citizen was already in place and being used BEFORE 9/11? PATRIOT is an acronym for "Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism"...what a fucking joke...terrorism that your beloved "gubermint" created. Do you want to discuss the bullshit false flag event that was 9/11? Bring it on...wake the fuck up and learn about what the Hegelian Dialectic is.

Matthew got taken to school major big time by you there.lol

 

[Pumpkin Row]

What's crazier?

1. Believing in god? There's no evidence for such! Believe it or not all the evidence, data and the reality of the facts all are against such! Pretty freaking crazy!
2. Believing in Aliens? Well, there's 300 billion stars in our galaxy and some stars have 3-8 planets. We have found about 8-9 planets that could already have such life. It isn't that much of a stretch of the imagination.
3. Well, half a million years ago a huge ape that stood 10-12 feet tall was very real.
4. No evidence to support it but the US government has done some fucked up stuff in history!
5. No evidence for such! Pretty crazy as far as I can tell. Now McCain and some other people in our government did visit and come close to baghdadi,,,so who knows.

I believe that the craziest effin thing on this list is believing in some all powerful creature and believing in what some 2,000 year old book says.

Your beloved "gubermint" leaders are luciferian that worship Moloch at Bohemian Grove. The power elite are 33rd degree and above free masons. Albert Pike's book "Morals and Dogma" is considered the bible of free masonry. Albert Pike was a confederate general and one of the founders of the KKK using free masonry as it's structure....and there is a statute of Pike prominently displayed in Washington, DC...wonder why Sharpton or the Revrun Jesse uh Jackson have never protested this??? OH WAIT! That's because they are free masons as well and part of the "Brotherhood". So it stands to reason that if there is a satan, there is a God....no? There is a God and it's only by HIS grace that shit hasn't hit the fan by now because christians are keeping the faith. We have "white hats" trying to keep the wolf at bay hoping that enough people will wake up and lend a hand. There has been at least THREE false flag events that have been averted by patriots whose names may never be known until the battle is over but they did it for love of country and mankind....FACT.

Yeah, 9/11/01 was a total inside job and it accomplished MANY things for the elites. It shut down SEC investigations into insider trading of the elites, it stopped the investigation into the missing 2.3 TRILLION dollars that Rumsfeld said was unaccounted for on 9/10/11. It allowed the Black Eagle Trust to move 240 Billion dollars in ten year securities with no scrutiny by the SEC since the Fed bank used it's emergency powers to allow trades to go through unabated. It created yet another war that made tremendous profits for the military industrial complex. Did you know that the Patriot Act was written before 9/11?...It was. Did you know that the spying apparatus to collect data on every American citizen was already in place and being used BEFORE 9/11? PATRIOT is an acronym for "Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism"...what a fucking joke...terrorism that your beloved "gubermint" created. Do you want to discuss the bullshit false flag event that was 9/11? Bring it on...wake the fuck up and learn about what the Hegelian Dialectic is.

Matthew got taken to school major big time by you there.lol

Worst part is that he's probably still going to vote for Hillary.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The United States could have been considered a social democratic country, back when Franklin D. Roosevelt made the "New Deal" reforms. I would argue that the erosion of those reforms is the reason the U.S. is in such dire straits today.

It was those reforms that set America up for the decline that it has been in ever since; that have established precedents by which our government has strayed ever farther from the model defined for it in the Constitution, and ever deeper into corruption and tyranny. FDR may have meant well, but he, alone, has done more to damage this nation than any other President.

well said.FDR was a traiter to americans actually.FDR did more damamge to the country than any other president at that TIME no doubt,but your way off base if you include him with all the other presidents since then.

compared to many of the presidents we have had since FDR,the damage FDR did to this nation back then is peanuts compared to many of them.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The reason it is so fucking insane is because we as a society are so accepting of it, even through it is more insane then the other 4 choices. We give up logic, rationality and hate on science because of it, why? Because we're all brainwashed to believe some 2,000 year old book! Would we do the same to someone screaming about space aliens visiting his room at night or someone that came back from a hiking trip that says he seen big foot? Fuck no. We wouldn't cut science because of these two individuals and we wouldn't give up our rationality. We only accept the holy bible for the same reason as 100 bucks may get the mob after you, but 1 trillion bucks gets you bailed out by the government.

Don't think people 'cut science' for people's other beliefs, either. People are allowed to believe whatever they like, and the fact that you're not okay with other people accepting it only goes to show how intolerant Democrats are of opinions and beliefs that conflict with their own.

I take it you are a conservative ;-)? Surely you aren't a fan of Trump? I'm not a fan of Hillary, but Bernie, he was something else in my view. Now that he lost, if I were American, I think I'd be voting for Jill Stein (Green Party).

Why? No socialist country has ever survived for more than 90 years. All of the Scandinavian country's, save those with oil, are in dire straits.

The United States could have been considered a social democratic country, back when Franklin D. Roosevelt made the "New Deal" reforms. I would argue that the erosion of those reforms is the reason the U.S. is in such dire straits today. Take heart though, it's not just the U.S. that is in these dire straits. Environmentally rapacious trickle down economics is something that is being practiced far and wide and the results are coming in...

The Soviet Union collapsed under it's own weight. That is the very nature of socialist countries.

The soviet union was a communist oligarchy, not a democratic socialist country. The Huffington Post explains the difference in the following article:
History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie.

Eventually you run out of other peoples money and then you're screwed.

People are so focused on 'money' and who currently possesses it. What people -should- be focusing on is, who is doing the actual -work- of running the country. Certainly not the rapacious bankers and the other corporate cronies. No, their focus is to leach off of all the -real- workers, like a tapeworm. The general population in essence creates most money from their signatures when they sign loan papers at the bank. The bank is the only entity allowed to literally create money out of these loans. The banks give them newly created money in the form of "credit", which only bankers are allowed to engage in with their vile fractional reserve banking. Anyone else trying to create money in this way or any other way would be charged for fraud. But the "Federal" Reserve (which is controlled by the banks) can -use- this newly created money to buy up bonds, which then turns into actual cash after its maturity date. The following 4 minute video explains it:


The banks, being the source of most new money, naturally can greatly influence large corporations which rely on those loans, which over time has become as rapacious as they are. The following 45 minute documentary on the subject of money creation is more in depth then the previous one:

The problem that you have of course is that mankind is governed by self interest. Your utopian ideal while cute, is not born out by reality. The reality is when a group of people is allowed to sit back and take it easy, while sponging off of a small group of producers, those producers eventually get pissed off and stop working. then all get to starve.

And no, it doesn't matter who is doing the work in the long run. That is a Marxist ideal, the reality is there are many people who can do simple work. In fact the majority of the population of this planet can do menial work. Thus, menial work is not particularly valuable. Work that is doable by a small group of people on the other hand, that is valuable.

The problem arises when you get a group of fundamentally not smart people called politicians, who rely on the votes of the ignorant to get themselves in power. Then, they take from the producers and give a bit to the masses while keeping the majority of that which they took for themselves and their preferred minions. FDR was great at taking money from the middle class, those least able to give it, and giving it to his preferred people.

The rich got richer under FDR than at any other time save for the current demagogue obama. That is a fact. Under FDR and his policies, the wealthiest 2% of the population of this country went from controlling 76% of this nations wealth to controlling 90% of the wealth while reducing their overall number to where they are now less than one percent of the population. That is a fact. Under progressive policies the wealthiest become even richer, and the poor stay static (5 trillion dollars spent on the war on poverty and there are more people living in poverty than before the "war" started) and the middle class suffers. That is a fact.

Seems like there are a lot of sheep in america that have been brainwashed by our corrupt schools that both FDR and Reagan were great presidents when in fact they were both mass murderers and traiters to americans.Reagan same as FDR also had the rich get richer under him and betrayed the middle class familys contrary to the myth spread about him.

 

[westwall]

Wrong-wing “science” is an ideology—almost a religion—far less rational than any genuine religion. I guess it's what they use to fill the hole left in their soul by rejecting God,.

Good grief! It is not a religion. IT is just science. Lol. Sorry, but religious folks are pretty whacked out.

It most certainly is not science, in any genuine sense. It may not be a religion, but it is much more like a religion than it is like genuine science. And if anyone is “pretty whacked out”, it is those who have chosen to reject and rebel against God, and to substitute this false science/religion for genuine religion.

That's whacky right there. Religion and science are opposites. Science needs and tests evidence. Religion is strictly faith based without any evidence required.

No. Science and religion were once one and the same. Western ideology has confused you and others.

Yes, they were. However, around 3000 years ago that started to change. It took a long time though for policies to be created that allowed mankind to make meaningful observations that he was then able to use to advance civilization.

 

[Kristian]

In God many Christians trust to belief no shortly Protestants. But I cannot when once breathe inside me he will takes my belief before I starts to faith.

 

[phoenyx]

I sincerely believe you are unfairly maligning Bernie. Democratic Socialism is nothing like Communism. The Huffington Post did an article about this a few months back...
History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie.

On another note, do you like manga/anime? Your icon suggests you may...

Your article is a blog aka opinion piece.

First of all, calling the Huffington Post a "blog" is stretching the definition of the term to its limit. Google defines a blog as "a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style."

The Huffington Post is not exactly small:
**The Huffington Post was launched on May 9, 2005 as an alternative to news aggregators such as the Drudge Report.[5][6][7] On February 7, 2011, AOL acquired the mass market[8] Huffington Post for US$315 million, making Arianna Huffington editor-in-chief of The Huffington Post Media Group.[9][10] In 2012,The Huffington Post became the first commercially run United States digital media enterprise to win a Pulitzer Prize.[11]

In July 2012, The Huffington Post was ranked #1 on the 15 Most Popular Political Sites list by eBizMBA Rank, which bases its list on each site's Alexa Global Traffic Rank and U.S. Traffic Rank from both Compete and Quantcast.[12]**

Source: The Huffington Post - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Secondly, I suspect you are using the term "opinion piece" disparagingly. While it is true that the author of the article expresses his opinion, he does far more then that. He brings -evidence- for his claims, evidence that you have not disputed. I'll bring up a little of his evidence for the audience to focus on:
**Actual true-blue communism, a radical strain of Marxism expounded by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky after the 1917 Russian Revolution, has a dark, scary history: totalitarianism, purges, mass murders, espionage, and global oppression. Calling someone a “Communist,” particularly at the height of the Cold War during the 1950s and 1960s, amounted to accusing them of treason, child beating, or worse.

But most of the people tarred over the years as “communist” by generations of demagogues had nothing to do with any of this. Particularly socialists. And this brings us to Bernie Sanders. No, Bernie Sanders is no communist. In fact, in America especially, socialists like Sanders have often been communism’s worst enemies.

Democratic socialists — the kind Bernie Sanders embraces — have a long history in this country. At their popular height a century ago, they had achieved wide acceptance in the American mainstream. By 1917, the American Socialist Party had won elections all across the country. Two socialists had sat in the United States Congress, socialists had held mayoral offices in 56 towns and cities including Milwaukee and Schenectady. Socialists held over thirty seats in state legislatures from Minnesota to California to Oklahoma and Wisconsin, plus dozens of city council and alderman chairs.**

The author starts out by defining a communist as someone you murders and imprisons people, so they got it wrong from the beginning.

Actually, the article starts out as posted above. Specifically, it refers to communism as practiced during the Cold War by countries such as Russia and China, under the administrations of the likes of Stalin in Russia and Mao Zedong in China. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with these political figures, so I will lay it out for you nice and easy. Here's the amount of deaths that occurred during Stalin's reign:
**Before the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, researchers who attempted to count the number of people killed under Stalin's regime produced estimates ranging from 3 to 60 million.[111] After the Soviet Union dissolved, evidence from the Soviet archives also became available, containing official records of 799,455 executions (1921–1953),[112] around 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag and some 390,000 deaths during kulak forced resettlement – with a total of about 2.9 million officially recorded victims in these categories.[113]**

Source: Joseph Stalin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stalin's numbers pale in comparison to Mao's total:
**critics consider him a dictator comparable to Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin who severely damaged traditional Chinese culture, as well as a perpetrator of systematic human rights abuses who was responsible for an estimated 40 to 70 million deaths through starvation,forced labour and executions, ranking his tenure as the top incidence of democide in human history.[7][8][9]**

Source: Mao Zedong - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's hard to compare to the likes of Stalin and Mao. But let's not forget a few of the things that certain -Capitalist- countries have done as well. The U.S., for instance, in the ongoing war in Iraq:
**Various scientific surveys of Iraqi deaths resulting from the first four years of the Iraq War estimated that between 151,000 and over one million Iraqis died as a result of conflict during this time.[1] A later study, published in 2011, estimated that approximately 500,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the conflict since the invasion.[2]Counts of deaths reported in newspapers collated by projects like the Iraq Body Count project found 174,000 Iraqis reported killed between 2003 and 2013, with between 112,000-123,000 of those killed being civilian noncombatants.**

Source: Casualties of the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Socialism has never had these types of ghosts in its closet.