gallantwarrior
Gold Member
There's a case currently being tried here that has raised some interesting questions about defining rape. In a nutshell:
A serial rapist whose MO is to contract with a prostitute for services and after she has entered the car, he refuses to pay her and enjoys her services at knifepoint.
He's being prosecuted for rape but the defense claims that he's not guilty of anything more than theft of services and aggravated assault.
Opinions?
A serial rapist whose MO is to contract with a prostitute for services and after she has entered the car, he refuses to pay her and enjoys her services at knifepoint.
He's being prosecuted for rape but the defense claims that he's not guilty of anything more than theft of services and aggravated assault.
Opinions?