When You Elect a Community Organizer....

Many of the verbs used in the Judicial Watch reportage (I went to their site since they are the origin of this story, not the OP link) are questionable. For example, JW claims the CRS was sent to "train" the protestors. However, I see no evidence of that. The CRS acted as mediators in a very tense racial situation, and if that prevented the protestors from going into full riot mode, that is hardly what I would calling "training" them. Except in the sense of training a dog to be obedient.

What I do have a problem with is the federal government getting involved in a local level problem to begin with. Local governments have mediators for this kind of crap. The DOJ is way, way, way outside their jurisdiction, and probably used the thinnest of "civil rights" excuses to insinuate themselves into the situation.

I believe this is because Obama opened his big yap and adopted Trayvon Martin as his son. From that moment forward, those who hate Obama wanted to see Obama's kid convicted as a drug using thief and thug who deserved what he got, while those who like Obama wanted to see Zimmerman go to prison for murdering Obama's kid.

If Obama had simply refused to take the media's bait and just said he deferred the matter to whatever the local authorities determined about the matter, that would have been the last day any of us even heard anything more about it. And the DOJ would have stayed in DC where they belong.

I also see this as the DOJ sending a 'subtle' message, like: do 'the right thing' here or we will take the case as civil rights case ;)
 
Why is it so important to conservatives that George Zimmerman be found not guilty?

What are conservatives afraid of if an armed man is convicted of shooting an unarmed man? If Zimmerman goes to jail for what he did, what have we lost as a society?

I'll tell you why. Because conservatives live in fear of young black men, and want to be able to call the cops on them for walking down the street without it being deemed racist. The actual commission of a crime by the young black man should not be needed for a call to the cops to be made. The young black kid's existence warrants a call.

They also want to be able to confront young black men about their presence, and the young black man to react to the confrontation deferentially. Uppity reactions, like "leave me alone" or "who are you?" must not be tolerated. Standing still till the cops come is what conservatives want blacks kids to do.

If they don't do this, or even "stand their ground" by fighting back, conservatives then want to be able to fire away, regardless of the actual threat to them.


If Zimmerman goes free, it's open season on young black men.
 
... conservatives live in fear of young black men...

Americans should be in fear of young black men. Statistically speaking there is no more crime prone cohort. They average about 5 to 10 times as many crimes per capita as a random American, about 100 times more than your grandmother.

Is a thinking human supposed to ignore this ugly reality?
 
... conservatives live in fear of young black men...

Americans should be in fear of young black men. Statistically speaking there is no more crime prone cohort. They average about 5 to 10 times as many crimes per capita as a random American, about 100 times more than your grandmother.

Is a thinking human supposed to ignore this ugly reality?

It's only going to get worse......as long as Obama occupies the White House, because he tells them constantly that they have a beef regardless if they're a criminal or whatever. Anything goes. Heck, it works for Obama!!!
 
... conservatives live in fear of young black men...

Americans should be in fear of young black men. Statistically speaking there is no more crime prone cohort. They average about 5 to 10 times as many crimes per capita as a random American, about 100 times more than your grandmother.

Is a thinking human supposed to ignore this ugly reality?

It's only going to get worse......as long as Obama occupies the White House, because he tells them constantly that they have a beef regardless if they're a criminal or whatever. Anything goes. Heck, it works for Obama!!!

And then there's scumbag Holder, looking out for 'his people'.
 
... conservatives live in fear of young black men...

Americans should be in fear of young black men. Statistically speaking there is no more crime prone cohort. They average about 5 to 10 times as many crimes per capita as a random American, about 100 times more than your grandmother.

Is a thinking human supposed to ignore this ugly reality?

It's only going to get worse......as long as Obama occupies the White House, because he tells them constantly that they have a beef regardless if they're a criminal or whatever. Anything goes. Heck, it works for Obama!!!

conservatives live in fear of young black men..

And with good reason....
Was that a blond haired white Amish young man caught on that "nanny cam" beating
the shit out of that white woman in front of her young child recently?...

C'mon people...
 
Libs want to act as if black people committing violent crimes against white people is blown way out of proportion....
 
Truth is so repetitive, as opposed to the endless imagination of the Pub BS infotainment media. In a couple days some fact checker will prove this to be ridiculous. It'll be on Google p. 16 after 150 lockstep Pub Propaganda sites...ZZZZZZZZZZ
You mean MediaMatters, DailyKOS, HuffPo, and MSNBC will receive their marching orders from the White House and all you prog morons will dutifully start repeating the talking points.
 
Why is it so important to conservatives that George Zimmerman be found not guilty?

What are conservatives afraid of if an armed man is convicted of shooting an unarmed man? If Zimmerman goes to jail for what he did, what have we lost as a society?

I'll tell you why. Because conservatives live in fear of young black men, and want to be able to call the cops on them for walking down the street without it being deemed racist. The actual commission of a crime by the young black man should not be needed for a call to the cops to be made. The young black kid's existence warrants a call.

They also want to be able to confront young black men about their presence, and the young black man to react to the confrontation deferentially. Uppity reactions, like "leave me alone" or "who are you?" must not be tolerated. Standing still till the cops come is what conservatives want blacks kids to do.

If they don't do this, or even "stand their ground" by fighting back, conservatives then want to be able to fire away, regardless of the actual threat to them.


If Zimmerman goes free, it's open season on young black men.
Well, that's easier than thinking, I suppose. :cool:

You start off with a falsehood. Let me correct it:

It's important to conservatives that Zimmerman is tried fairly.

Not tried in the media, not tried by racist leftists, not tried by the threat of riots if he's found not guilty.
 
Truth is so repetitive, as opposed to the endless imagination of the Pub BS infotainment media. In a couple days some fact checker will prove this to be ridiculous. It'll be on Google p. 16 after 150 lockstep Pub Propaganda sites...ZZZZZZZZZZ
You mean MediaMatters, DailyKOS, HuffPo, and MSNBC will receive their marching orders from the White House and all you prog morons will dutifully start repeating the talking points.

They are the fact checkers who actually bother with the piles of Pubcrappe the dupes believe. Then there are the NYT, Post, PBS, ABC, BBC, and every other newspaper and journalistic source around the world who couldn't care less about your BS..., hater dupe LOL! You people are a world wide horror and laughingstock. Hitler was a socialist, Obama is a Marxist, Fanny started the World Depression and all the other IDIOCY.
 
Many of the verbs used in the Judicial Watch reportage (I went to their site since they are the origin of this story, not the OP link) are questionable. For example, JW claims the CRS was sent to "train" the protestors. However, I see no evidence of that. The CRS acted as mediators in a very tense racial situation, and if that prevented the protestors from going into full riot mode, that is hardly what I would calling "training" them. Except in the sense of training a dog to be obedient.

What I do have a problem with is the federal government getting involved in a local level problem to begin with. Local governments have mediators for this kind of crap. The DOJ is way, way, way outside their jurisdiction, and probably used the thinnest of "civil rights" excuses to insinuate themselves into the situation.

I believe this is because Obama opened his big yap and adopted Trayvon Martin as his son. From that moment forward, those who hate Obama wanted to see Obama's kid convicted as a drug using thief and thug who deserved what he got, while those who like Obama wanted to see Zimmerman go to prison for murdering Obama's kid.

If Obama had simply refused to take the media's bait and just said he deferred the matter to whatever the local authorities determined about the matter, that would have been the last day any of us even heard anything more about it. And the DOJ would have stayed in DC where they belong.

I also see this as the DOJ sending a 'subtle' message, like: do 'the right thing' here or we will take the case as civil rights case ;)

Too late, the FBI investigated and said there was no reason to believe that racism had anything to do with this case, also only public officials can be charged with civil right violations. Ordinary citizens have no obligation to protect anyone's civil rights.
 
By Bob Owens
July 10, 2013

Trayvon Martin's phone had hundreds of messages discussing criminal behavior, including trafficking black-market firearms.

A forensic expert discovered more than 600 items on Trayvon’s cell phone, including texts and photos between Trayvon and other people with specific references to criminal activity — particularly fighting, drugs, and firearms.

Everyone in the courtroom likely understood which “someone” deleted the evidence, but attorneys and Judge Nelson were very careful not to name Martin.

The forensic expert testified that he recovered multiple conversations between Trayvon Martin and specific family members and friends discussing multi-round street fights and schoolyard fights in which Trayvon Martin had participated. Martin’s half-brother, Demetrius Martin, even asked Trayvon when he would teach him how to fight. Trayvon Martin’s family appeared to know Trayvon was a street fighter.


[Excerpt]

Read more:
PJ Media » Disorder: Judge Recesses Zimmerman Trial, Excludes Damning Evidence

Now why would Judge Nelson block any testimony like this, yet allow the prosecution to use information on Zimmerman dating back eight years ago? Why would the Judge allow the prosecution to sandbag the defense by submitting this evidence so late?
 
Obama was elected because of his race; not job qualifications.

He realized early on that he didn't posses the necessary presidential skill sets to be re-elected.

So he instead chose to utilize his experience as a community organizer.

And strengthen his political base by the tried and true tactics of race division. .. :cool:

Sunni Man, great to see you posting again!


I will never forget Barack Obama's tactic of racial division in Cambridge when he accused Cambridge PD for "acting stupidly" when white police officers arrested his friend, Harvard professor, Henry Louis Gates. Obama couldn't resist the opportunity to use this as an opportunity to cause racial divide in this nation:


"I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That's just a fact."

So, not only is the dictator causing racial division, he is also trying to create a hatred of law enforcement. Obama made such an ass of himself he had to have a beer summit to cool things down. This America-hater will never miss an opportunity to cause racial division in America to distract Americans from his and the Democrat party's Marxist agenda.


PoliticalChic said:
Every time another anti-American endeavor by this President is revealed, you bang out the same post.

Just about word for word.

As though it represents the full range of your vocabulary.



You should stick to the task for which you are better prepared, using silly putty to lift the comic page.
I’m sure somebody will open the egg for you.

Somehow, I think Ivan Pavlov would've given anything to have francoHFW instead of a dog.
 
Last edited:
I knew right from the start that the Trayvon Martin case was being popularized by the government media to create race wars, the very moment Al Sharpton started doing entire newscasts on it from MSNBC ... also known as Obama headquarters.

Wow, you're really pushing for this race wars angle.
 
You need new material....
Everything is repugs...repug dupes....
Pretty weak...

Franco is one of only 2 people I've put on ignore....then someone quotes him and I get to see his garbage again!! Lol!

You are weak, putting people on ignore.

How about you have more courage to face dissenting opinions.

Face dissenting opinions!!!

Don’t make me laugh. It is not a case of facing others opinions. It is a case of not wishing to engage with people that are not worth engaging in. I have placed 2 or 3 people in ignore myself and none of them were because I could not ‘face’ their opinions. They made that list because debating them was a worthless exercise.

If I were to quote every single post you made and respond
“OMG u FOOCKING WORTHLESS ASSWIPE TROLL. U ARE A….”

Fill the rest with some more obscenities. When you placed me on ignore it would not be because you could not face the ‘counterpoint.’ It would be because I was not worth the time scrolling past my post. Hell, you might not put me on ignore but I would highly doubt that you would read my posts after realizing that was all I had to offer. Same thing as ignore IMHO.

Franco is exactly like that. Repeat hater dup the number of his post count and you have reiterated his entire posting history.
 
Why is it so important to conservatives that George Zimmerman be found not guilty?

What are conservatives afraid of if an armed man is convicted of shooting an unarmed man? If Zimmerman goes to jail for what he did, what have we lost as a society?

I'll tell you why. Because conservatives live in fear of young black men, and want to be able to call the cops on them for walking down the street without it being deemed racist. The actual commission of a crime by the young black man should not be needed for a call to the cops to be made. The young black kid's existence warrants a call.

They also want to be able to confront young black men about their presence, and the young black man to react to the confrontation deferentially. Uppity reactions, like "leave me alone" or "who are you?" must not be tolerated. Standing still till the cops come is what conservatives want blacks kids to do.

If they don't do this, or even "stand their ground" by fighting back, conservatives then want to be able to fire away, regardless of the actual threat to them.


If Zimmerman goes free, it's open season on young black men.




"Why is it so important to conservatives that George Zimmerman be found not guilty?"


Wrong thread, Cheezy.



Seems like it's time for new specs, old fella......

This is about an unconstitutional tyrant who sent his flying monkeys to Sanford, Florida to make sure that a peaceful situation did not remain so.




Remember King George sending troops so Lexington and Concord?

That didn't work out so well, either.
 
Here's the problem. America was founded on hard work and personal responsibility. It wasn't founded on handouts, a free ride and political correctness. Want to fix our problems, we have to get back to our roots. it's a simple as that
 

Forum List

Back
Top