Where is BLM?

[gtopa1]

The question was asked by one of the dumb ass racists:

Where is BLM?

BLM is about justice, and this murderer is facing his rightful justice for this terrible crime. So BLM does not have to protest or show up. Where are the ALL LIVES MATTER/BLUE LIVES MATTER people in regards to the killing of a capital police officer and the injuries to over 100 capital police due to Whitey's rebellion on 1-6-2021?

All bitches like the OP do is spend their days looking for stories about blacks to post. I don't have to do that. I have 400, going on 401 years of evidence and chumps like the OP has their imagination.

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

And the previous 2000 years?? lmao

Slavery has historically been widespread in Africa. Systems of servitude and slavery were common in parts of Africa in ancient times, as they were in much of the rest of the ancient world.[1] When the trans-Saharan slave trade, Indian ocean slave trade and Atlantic slave trade (which started in the 16th century)[2] began, many of the pre-existing local African slave systems began supplying captives for slave markets outside Africa.[3][4]

Slavery in historical Africa was practised in many different forms: Debt slavery, enslavement of war captives, military slavery, slavery for prostitution, and criminal slavery were all practised in various parts of Africa.[5] Slavery for domestic and court purposes was widespread throughout Africa.[6] Plantation slavery also occurred, primarily on the eastern coast of Africa and in parts of West Africa.[7] The importance of domestic plantation slavery increased during the 19th century, due to the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade.[8] Many African states dependent on the international slave trade reoriented their economies towards legitimate commerce worked by slave labor.[9][10]

Maybe you can start a new org: Reparations from Blacks who Enslaved Blacks?????

Greg

All Rise!

This Mornings Lesson:

The White Racists Disingenuous Tale About Blacks Enslaving Blacks.

This mornings lesson comes from the book of Dr. Henry Gates, legendary historian and victim of racist police harrassment.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

Henry Louis Gates Jr.
3/04/13

So what do the actual numbers of black slave owners and their slaves tell us? In 1830, the year most carefully studied by Carter G. Woodson, about 13.7 percent (319,599) of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States, so the numbers of slaves owned by black people over all was quite small by comparison with the number owned by white people. In his essay, " 'The Known World' of Free Black Slaveholders," Thomas J. Pressly, using Woodson's statistics, calculated that 54 (or about 1 percent) of these black slave owners in 1830 owned between 20 and 84 slaves; 172 (about 4 percent) owned between 10 to 19 slaves; and 3,550 (about 94 percent) each owned between 1 and 9 slaves. Crucially, 42 percent owned just one slave.

Pressly also shows that the percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. So why did these free black people own these slaves?

It is reasonable to assume that the 42 percent of the free black slave owners who owned just one slave probably owned a family member to protect that person, as did many of the other black slave owners who owned only slightly larger numbers of slaves. As Woodson put it in 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa … Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do, his own children were born his slaves and were thus reported to the numerators."

Moreover, Woodson explains, "Benevolent Negroes often purchased slaves to make their lot easier by granting them their freedom for a nominal sum, or by permitting them to work it out on liberal terms." In other words, these black slave-owners, the clear majority, cleverly used the system of slavery to protect their loved ones. That's the good news.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

So let's do the math.

In the year of record 13.7 percent of the blacks living in America were free. This means 82.3 percent were not.

There were 2,009,043 slaves in the U.S. on the year reported. 12,907 slaves were owned by blacks. Most of them were purchased family members, but that's not my point. My point is that 1,996,136 slaves were owned by whites. Furthermore only 4-500,000 blacks were ever delivered here from Africa. By 1830, the number of slaves had grown 500 percent as importation os slaves was not done.

So how did this happen since Africans were no longer selling Africans paleface?

Lesson number 2 this morning:

An Original Americsn Industry-Slave Breeding.

We are told how the so-called founders of this country created the way to end slavery when they wrote the constitution. Many will cite the fact they made the importation of slaves illegal by 1808 as evidence. But refusing to stop importing slaves did not end the slaving business in the United States. What it produced was an original American industry-slave breeding.

"During the fifty-three years from the prohibition of the African slave trade by federal law in 1808 to the debacle of the Confederate States of America in 1861, the Southern economy depended on the functioning of a slave-breeding industry, of which Virginia was the number-one supplier."

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

You see, if America had continued to import slaves, it would have diluted the market thereby driving down the costs of slaves. Slave sellers could not have this. So instead of the truth, we are told that “our nearer to God than thee” founders in all their benevolent glory, looked towards a future whereby slavery would be no more. According to some, the so-called founders had a dream whereby little black boys and little black girls would no longer be enslaved because of the color of their skin. This is the story we are supposed to believe. However, reality does not show that.

“In fact, most American slaves were not kidnapped on another continent. Though over 12.7 million Africans were forced onto ships to the Western hemisphere, estimates only have 400,000-500,000 landing in present-day America. How then to account for the four million black slaves who were tilling fields in 1860? “The South,” the Sublettes write, “did not only produce tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton as commodities for sale; it produced people.” Slavers called slave-breeding “natural increase,” but there was nothing natural about producing slaves; it took scientific management. Thomas Jefferson bragged to George Washington that the birth of black children was increasing Virginia’s capital stock by four percent annually.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

To be blunt, America had slave breeding “factories” where slaves were forced to breed. I call them factories but in most cases they are described as farms. These “farms” generally had at least a 2:1 female to male ratio. In some states, slave production was the number 1 industry. Virginia led the nation in slave production and PRESIDENT Thomas Jefferson was one of the main producers. The slave breeding industry has been hidden and left out of the annals of American history. This was done on purpose.

After reading how this was done it becomes very easy to see why. There are just some wrongs that cannot be excused by the belief that holding past generations to modern standards is wrong. Basically, the slave breeding industry manufactured human beings to be sold into labor.

This industry included the first employer-based health care program. Female slaves were the first people in America to get free health care. I do not say this to be funny because the reason why that happened was both sad and simple; after the importation of slaves was made illegal, white dependence on slave labor hinged on the continued births of healthy children. After importation was made illegal, the only way left to maintain the system was by increasing the number of slaves through births. Due to this, a black women’s ability to reproduce was of the utmost economic importance to southern planters and to the slave breeders.

Slaves worked for free. But that did not mean they had no value. Indeed, slaves were literally more valuable than gold. Ned & Constance Sublette wrote “The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry “ the following passage is from a blog titled “A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry in the United States,” by Jason Kottke who quotes from a Pacific Standard review of the book:

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

Slaves were worth more than the total currency plus all the farmland in the South combined yet did not receive a dime. As I write this America has 1.9 trillion dollars of total currency in circulation according to the federal reserve. In 1860 the total value of slaves was 17- and one-half times more than the money circulating in the economy. During slavery, more specifically during the 19th century, wealthy slaveowners looking for a way to get additional capital to buy more slaves came up with an idea- slave backed securities. Your eyes are not playing tricks on you. Slaveowners securitized slavery.

According to the Sublettes, 400 to 500,000 slaves landed on the shores of what is now America. By 1860 there were 4 million slaves living here. The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. So from 1808 until 1860 the number of slaves increased by at least 1,000 percent. If we allow for the Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsible for between 400 to 500 thousand slaves. What about the 3.5 million additional slaves? Africans did not create them. Whites did this through forced human breeding for business and for pleasure. “Africans sold each other into slavery”, says the racist.
​

And as usual, the racist is wrong. You will learn not to talk stupid when you talk to me son.

As usual you are an idiot!!!

Historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University have estimated that of the Africans captured and then sold as slaves to the New World in the Atlantic slave trade,[52] around 90% were enslaved by fellow Africans who sold them to European traders.[53] Henry Louis Gates, the Harvard Chair of African and African American Studies, has stated that "without complex business partnerships between African elites and European traders and commercial agents,[54] the slave trade to the New World would have been impossible, at least on the scale it occurred."[53]

One thing that many Westerners wonder about African enslavers is why they were willing to sell their own people. Why would they sell Africans to Europeans? The simple answer to this question is that they did not see enslaved people as "their own people." Blackness (as an identity or marker of difference) was at that time a preoccupation of Europeans, not Africans. There was also in this era no collective sense of being "African." In other words, African traders of enslaved people felt no obligation to protect enslaved Africans because they did not regard them as their equals.

So Black enslavers considered the enslaved to be their inferiors!!!

A History of African Traders of Enslaved People

During the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Europeans bought from African traders that sold enslaved Africans due to debt, class, or lack of empathy.

www.thoughtco.com

OMG...a nitwit called me a "racist"......the lying pos!!! Next he'll cal me a nazi!!! lmao

As for the US ending slavery so "late"...

"PBS.org and Dr. Henry Louis Gates reported that between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. Only about 388,000 were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice. CNN reported in March that 20,000 children were believed to be working as slaves on Lake Volta in the fishing industry in Ghana, Africa."

There Are 9.2-Million Slaves in Africa Today

Only about 388,000 slaves were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice.

needtoknow.news

9.2 MILLION slaves TODAY in AFRICA....V 388,000 to the entire US..........................I guess you'll be demonstrating tomorrow against AFRICA!!!


Greg

The white avoudance of what they have done is going to get you nowhere. Especially since there are slaves in Europe. Now since slavery ended 158 years ago, try telling me how blacks implemented jim crow and todays modern american racism.

Just wondering why Blacks aren't out BurningLootingMurdering the DemoKKKrat Party??? Is it because that Org is a sham just doing the will of the Plantation run by Dems?? If I had my way EVERY DEM would be paying reparations to Blacks for their Jim Crow Laws and Lynchings/other violence against Blacks. Hell even LBJ OPPOSED the Civil Rights Acts of 57/60!!! It took JFK...a NE CATHOLIC..to change the DemoKKKrat Party so that just over HALF of them voted for the 1964 Bill. Of course I am a racist for wanting Black schools to be OVERperforming, Black ghettos to be safe, violence free and prosperous and Black Daddies back with their families!! Yeah right; I'll fight on that hill every time you bloody nong!!!

Greg

ps: I want the same thing for all yanks AND Aussies!!!

 

[gtopa1]

The question was asked by one of the dumb ass racists:

Where is BLM?

BLM is about justice, and this murderer is facing his rightful justice for this terrible crime. So BLM does not have to protest or show up. Where are the ALL LIVES MATTER/BLUE LIVES MATTER people in regards to the killing of a capital police officer and the injuries to over 100 capital police due to Whitey's rebellion on 1-6-2021?

All bitches like the OP do is spend their days looking for stories about blacks to post. I don't have to do that. I have 400, going on 401 years of evidence and chumps like the OP has their imagination.

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

And the previous 2000 years?? lmao

Slavery has historically been widespread in Africa. Systems of servitude and slavery were common in parts of Africa in ancient times, as they were in much of the rest of the ancient world.[1] When the trans-Saharan slave trade, Indian ocean slave trade and Atlantic slave trade (which started in the 16th century)[2] began, many of the pre-existing local African slave systems began supplying captives for slave markets outside Africa.[3][4]

Slavery in historical Africa was practised in many different forms: Debt slavery, enslavement of war captives, military slavery, slavery for prostitution, and criminal slavery were all practised in various parts of Africa.[5] Slavery for domestic and court purposes was widespread throughout Africa.[6] Plantation slavery also occurred, primarily on the eastern coast of Africa and in parts of West Africa.[7] The importance of domestic plantation slavery increased during the 19th century, due to the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade.[8] Many African states dependent on the international slave trade reoriented their economies towards legitimate commerce worked by slave labor.[9][10]

Maybe you can start a new org: Reparations from Blacks who Enslaved Blacks?????

Greg

All Rise!

This Mornings Lesson:

The White Racists Disingenuous Tale About Blacks Enslaving Blacks.

This mornings lesson comes from the book of Dr. Henry Gates, legendary historian and victim of racist police harrassment.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

Henry Louis Gates Jr.
3/04/13

So what do the actual numbers of black slave owners and their slaves tell us? In 1830, the year most carefully studied by Carter G. Woodson, about 13.7 percent (319,599) of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States, so the numbers of slaves owned by black people over all was quite small by comparison with the number owned by white people. In his essay, " 'The Known World' of Free Black Slaveholders," Thomas J. Pressly, using Woodson's statistics, calculated that 54 (or about 1 percent) of these black slave owners in 1830 owned between 20 and 84 slaves; 172 (about 4 percent) owned between 10 to 19 slaves; and 3,550 (about 94 percent) each owned between 1 and 9 slaves. Crucially, 42 percent owned just one slave.

Pressly also shows that the percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. So why did these free black people own these slaves?

It is reasonable to assume that the 42 percent of the free black slave owners who owned just one slave probably owned a family member to protect that person, as did many of the other black slave owners who owned only slightly larger numbers of slaves. As Woodson put it in 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa … Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do, his own children were born his slaves and were thus reported to the numerators."

Moreover, Woodson explains, "Benevolent Negroes often purchased slaves to make their lot easier by granting them their freedom for a nominal sum, or by permitting them to work it out on liberal terms." In other words, these black slave-owners, the clear majority, cleverly used the system of slavery to protect their loved ones. That's the good news.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

So let's do the math.

In the year of record 13.7 percent of the blacks living in America were free. This means 82.3 percent were not.

There were 2,009,043 slaves in the U.S. on the year reported. 12,907 slaves were owned by blacks. Most of them were purchased family members, but that's not my point. My point is that 1,996,136 slaves were owned by whites. Furthermore only 4-500,000 blacks were ever delivered here from Africa. By 1830, the number of slaves had grown 500 percent as importation os slaves was not done.

So how did this happen since Africans were no longer selling Africans paleface?

Lesson number 2 this morning:

An Original Americsn Industry-Slave Breeding.

We are told how the so-called founders of this country created the way to end slavery when they wrote the constitution. Many will cite the fact they made the importation of slaves illegal by 1808 as evidence. But refusing to stop importing slaves did not end the slaving business in the United States. What it produced was an original American industry-slave breeding.

"During the fifty-three years from the prohibition of the African slave trade by federal law in 1808 to the debacle of the Confederate States of America in 1861, the Southern economy depended on the functioning of a slave-breeding industry, of which Virginia was the number-one supplier."

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

You see, if America had continued to import slaves, it would have diluted the market thereby driving down the costs of slaves. Slave sellers could not have this. So instead of the truth, we are told that “our nearer to God than thee” founders in all their benevolent glory, looked towards a future whereby slavery would be no more. According to some, the so-called founders had a dream whereby little black boys and little black girls would no longer be enslaved because of the color of their skin. This is the story we are supposed to believe. However, reality does not show that.

“In fact, most American slaves were not kidnapped on another continent. Though over 12.7 million Africans were forced onto ships to the Western hemisphere, estimates only have 400,000-500,000 landing in present-day America. How then to account for the four million black slaves who were tilling fields in 1860? “The South,” the Sublettes write, “did not only produce tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton as commodities for sale; it produced people.” Slavers called slave-breeding “natural increase,” but there was nothing natural about producing slaves; it took scientific management. Thomas Jefferson bragged to George Washington that the birth of black children was increasing Virginia’s capital stock by four percent annually.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

To be blunt, America had slave breeding “factories” where slaves were forced to breed. I call them factories but in most cases they are described as farms. These “farms” generally had at least a 2:1 female to male ratio. In some states, slave production was the number 1 industry. Virginia led the nation in slave production and PRESIDENT Thomas Jefferson was one of the main producers. The slave breeding industry has been hidden and left out of the annals of American history. This was done on purpose.

After reading how this was done it becomes very easy to see why. There are just some wrongs that cannot be excused by the belief that holding past generations to modern standards is wrong. Basically, the slave breeding industry manufactured human beings to be sold into labor.

This industry included the first employer-based health care program. Female slaves were the first people in America to get free health care. I do not say this to be funny because the reason why that happened was both sad and simple; after the importation of slaves was made illegal, white dependence on slave labor hinged on the continued births of healthy children. After importation was made illegal, the only way left to maintain the system was by increasing the number of slaves through births. Due to this, a black women’s ability to reproduce was of the utmost economic importance to southern planters and to the slave breeders.

Slaves worked for free. But that did not mean they had no value. Indeed, slaves were literally more valuable than gold. Ned & Constance Sublette wrote “The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry “ the following passage is from a blog titled “A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry in the United States,” by Jason Kottke who quotes from a Pacific Standard review of the book:

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

Slaves were worth more than the total currency plus all the farmland in the South combined yet did not receive a dime. As I write this America has 1.9 trillion dollars of total currency in circulation according to the federal reserve. In 1860 the total value of slaves was 17- and one-half times more than the money circulating in the economy. During slavery, more specifically during the 19th century, wealthy slaveowners looking for a way to get additional capital to buy more slaves came up with an idea- slave backed securities. Your eyes are not playing tricks on you. Slaveowners securitized slavery.

According to the Sublettes, 400 to 500,000 slaves landed on the shores of what is now America. By 1860 there were 4 million slaves living here. The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. So from 1808 until 1860 the number of slaves increased by at least 1,000 percent. If we allow for the Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsible for between 400 to 500 thousand slaves. What about the 3.5 million additional slaves? Africans did not create them. Whites did this through forced human breeding for business and for pleasure. “Africans sold each other into slavery”, says the racist.
​

And as usual, the racist is wrong. You will learn not to talk stupid when you talk to me son.

As usual you are an idiot!!!

Historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University have estimated that of the Africans captured and then sold as slaves to the New World in the Atlantic slave trade,[52] around 90% were enslaved by fellow Africans who sold them to European traders.[53] Henry Louis Gates, the Harvard Chair of African and African American Studies, has stated that "without complex business partnerships between African elites and European traders and commercial agents,[54] the slave trade to the New World would have been impossible, at least on the scale it occurred."[53]

One thing that many Westerners wonder about African enslavers is why they were willing to sell their own people. Why would they sell Africans to Europeans? The simple answer to this question is that they did not see enslaved people as "their own people." Blackness (as an identity or marker of difference) was at that time a preoccupation of Europeans, not Africans. There was also in this era no collective sense of being "African." In other words, African traders of enslaved people felt no obligation to protect enslaved Africans because they did not regard them as their equals.

So Black enslavers considered the enslaved to be their inferiors!!!

A History of African Traders of Enslaved People

During the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Europeans bought from African traders that sold enslaved Africans due to debt, class, or lack of empathy.

www.thoughtco.com

OMG...a nitwit called me a "racist"......the lying pos!!! Next he'll cal me a nazi!!! lmao

As for the US ending slavery so "late"...

"PBS.org and Dr. Henry Louis Gates reported that between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. Only about 388,000 were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice. CNN reported in March that 20,000 children were believed to be working as slaves on Lake Volta in the fishing industry in Ghana, Africa."

There Are 9.2-Million Slaves in Africa Today

Only about 388,000 slaves were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice.

needtoknow.news

9.2 MILLION slaves TODAY in AFRICA....V 388,000 to the entire US..........................I guess you'll be demonstrating tomorrow against AFRICA!!!


Greg

The white avoudance of what they have done is going to get you nowhere. Especially since there are slaves in Europe. Now since slavery ended 158 years ago, try telling me how blacks implemented jim crow and todays modern american racism.

You conflate repubs with African slavers and DemoKKKrats..........THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!! BTW: by the end of the Civil War the South was BROKE and their economy in tatters!!! There is nothing left of the value added by Slaves; it went with the Civil War and the Carpetbaggers.

Greg

 

[Indeependent]

You would think they would be front and center. An entire black family gunned down and murdered. 17 year old perp in custody.

Adams Street shooting: 17-year-old suspect arrested in Indianapolis mass shooting

Kezzie Childs, 42, Raymond Childs, 42, Elijah Childs, 18, Rita Childs, 13, Kiara Hawkins, 19, and the unborn child of Hawkins were pronounced dead after being found in a home around 4 a.m. Sunday in the 3500 block of Adams Street.

Investigators were led to the crime scene after making contact with a juvenile male, whose age police didn't disclose, who was found suffering from gunshot wounds just steps away in the 3300 block of East 36th Street, between Keystone Avenue and Sherman Drive.

It is believed that the boy was wounded in the Adams Street shooting. If so, he is the only recorded survivor at this time.

Adams Street shooting: 17-year-old suspect arrested in Indianapolis mass shooting

IMPD is withholding name and photo of the suspect due to their not being an adult. The shooting left five people and 1 unborn child dead.

www.indystar.com

BLM probably did it.

 

[Lysistrata]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

 

[gtopa1]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

A lot more than at the Capitol you dill!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

And yet it happened as did the Capitol debacle. Look; I don't know why you refuse to see the bloody obvious. Please read up on this bloke; he's a bloody genius......in his simplicity at being able to reach even numbskulls like US!!!



Greg

 

[Lysistrata]

People who support the BLM movement are a different group from street hoodlums. Should I assume that all people who hold "conservative" views are the same as the traitors that invaded the Capitol?

 

[gtopa1]

People who support the BLM movement are a different group from street hoodlums. Should I assume that all people who hold "conservative" views are the same as the traitors that invaded the Capitol?

Now ya got it, lass!!!!

However, that does NOT mean that I consider BLM to be anything other than a pissant bunch of useful idiots for the DemoKKKrat party!!!

Greg

ps: didn't know you were a sheila. Changed it.

 

[irosie91]

BLM only deals with deaths via the state. There are other organizations which cover the area you are looking for, but you don't really care because all you want to do is score points with yer fellow black hating poster friends.

Deaths like these occur almost daily in the US and it is done by many people who don't have the same skin color.

"same skin color" ???? what "PEOPLE" have "THE SAME SKIN COLOR" -----even I have a color DIFFERENT from my son and my hubby. I am pink----sonny is very light tan----hubby is dark tan----I blush lots and so does sonny----hubby does not blush but when he gets "pale" he actually turns greenish

 

[irosie91]

People who support the BLM movement are a different group from street hoodlums. Should I assume that all people who hold "conservative" views are the same as the traitors that invaded the Capitol?

Lysie-----HOLD ON. you seem to be in melt-down

 

[gtopa1]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

BurnLootMurder is not a cute term; it is an accusation!!!!

Greg

 

[irosie91]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

BurnLootMurder is not a cute term; it is an accusation!!!!

Greg

I believe that burn/loot/vandalize is---SIMPLY something like a fantasy for many people. It is
kinda like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz---melting the
wicked witch of THE WEST------everyone APPLAUDS.
Lysie needs to live in my neighborhood----and count the dead bodies PER WEEK---just around the corner.

 

[irosie91]

The question was asked by one of the dumb ass racists:

Where is BLM?

BLM is about justice, and this murderer is facing his rightful justice for this terrible crime. So BLM does not have to protest or show up. Where are the ALL LIVES MATTER/BLUE LIVES MATTER people in regards to the killing of a capital police officer and the injuries to over 100 capital police due to Whitey's rebellion on 1-6-2021?

All bitches like the OP do is spend their days looking for stories about blacks to post. I don't have to do that. I have 400, going on 401 years of evidence and chumps like the OP has their imagination.

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

And the previous 2000 years?? lmao

Slavery has historically been widespread in Africa. Systems of servitude and slavery were common in parts of Africa in ancient times, as they were in much of the rest of the ancient world.[1] When the trans-Saharan slave trade, Indian ocean slave trade and Atlantic slave trade (which started in the 16th century)[2] began, many of the pre-existing local African slave systems began supplying captives for slave markets outside Africa.[3][4]

Slavery in historical Africa was practised in many different forms: Debt slavery, enslavement of war captives, military slavery, slavery for prostitution, and criminal slavery were all practised in various parts of Africa.[5] Slavery for domestic and court purposes was widespread throughout Africa.[6] Plantation slavery also occurred, primarily on the eastern coast of Africa and in parts of West Africa.[7] The importance of domestic plantation slavery increased during the 19th century, due to the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade.[8] Many African states dependent on the international slave trade reoriented their economies towards legitimate commerce worked by slave labor.[9][10]

Maybe you can start a new org: Reparations from Blacks who Enslaved Blacks?????

Greg

All Rise!

This Mornings Lesson:

The White Racists Disingenuous Tale About Blacks Enslaving Blacks.

This mornings lesson comes from the book of Dr. Henry Gates, legendary historian and victim of racist police harrassment.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

Henry Louis Gates Jr.
3/04/13

So what do the actual numbers of black slave owners and their slaves tell us? In 1830, the year most carefully studied by Carter G. Woodson, about 13.7 percent (319,599) of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States, so the numbers of slaves owned by black people over all was quite small by comparison with the number owned by white people. In his essay, " 'The Known World' of Free Black Slaveholders," Thomas J. Pressly, using Woodson's statistics, calculated that 54 (or about 1 percent) of these black slave owners in 1830 owned between 20 and 84 slaves; 172 (about 4 percent) owned between 10 to 19 slaves; and 3,550 (about 94 percent) each owned between 1 and 9 slaves. Crucially, 42 percent owned just one slave.

Pressly also shows that the percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. So why did these free black people own these slaves?

It is reasonable to assume that the 42 percent of the free black slave owners who owned just one slave probably owned a family member to protect that person, as did many of the other black slave owners who owned only slightly larger numbers of slaves. As Woodson put it in 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa … Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do, his own children were born his slaves and were thus reported to the numerators."

Moreover, Woodson explains, "Benevolent Negroes often purchased slaves to make their lot easier by granting them their freedom for a nominal sum, or by permitting them to work it out on liberal terms." In other words, these black slave-owners, the clear majority, cleverly used the system of slavery to protect their loved ones. That's the good news.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

So let's do the math.

In the year of record 13.7 percent of the blacks living in America were free. This means 82.3 percent were not.

There were 2,009,043 slaves in the U.S. on the year reported. 12,907 slaves were owned by blacks. Most of them were purchased family members, but that's not my point. My point is that 1,996,136 slaves were owned by whites. Furthermore only 4-500,000 blacks were ever delivered here from Africa. By 1830, the number of slaves had grown 500 percent as importation os slaves was not done.

So how did this happen since Africans were no longer selling Africans paleface?

Lesson number 2 this morning:

An Original Americsn Industry-Slave Breeding.

We are told how the so-called founders of this country created the way to end slavery when they wrote the constitution. Many will cite the fact they made the importation of slaves illegal by 1808 as evidence. But refusing to stop importing slaves did not end the slaving business in the United States. What it produced was an original American industry-slave breeding.

"During the fifty-three years from the prohibition of the African slave trade by federal law in 1808 to the debacle of the Confederate States of America in 1861, the Southern economy depended on the functioning of a slave-breeding industry, of which Virginia was the number-one supplier."

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

You see, if America had continued to import slaves, it would have diluted the market thereby driving down the costs of slaves. Slave sellers could not have this. So instead of the truth, we are told that “our nearer to God than thee” founders in all their benevolent glory, looked towards a future whereby slavery would be no more. According to some, the so-called founders had a dream whereby little black boys and little black girls would no longer be enslaved because of the color of their skin. This is the story we are supposed to believe. However, reality does not show that.

“In fact, most American slaves were not kidnapped on another continent. Though over 12.7 million Africans were forced onto ships to the Western hemisphere, estimates only have 400,000-500,000 landing in present-day America. How then to account for the four million black slaves who were tilling fields in 1860? “The South,” the Sublettes write, “did not only produce tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton as commodities for sale; it produced people.” Slavers called slave-breeding “natural increase,” but there was nothing natural about producing slaves; it took scientific management. Thomas Jefferson bragged to George Washington that the birth of black children was increasing Virginia’s capital stock by four percent annually.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

To be blunt, America had slave breeding “factories” where slaves were forced to breed. I call them factories but in most cases they are described as farms. These “farms” generally had at least a 2:1 female to male ratio. In some states, slave production was the number 1 industry. Virginia led the nation in slave production and PRESIDENT Thomas Jefferson was one of the main producers. The slave breeding industry has been hidden and left out of the annals of American history. This was done on purpose.

After reading how this was done it becomes very easy to see why. There are just some wrongs that cannot be excused by the belief that holding past generations to modern standards is wrong. Basically, the slave breeding industry manufactured human beings to be sold into labor.

This industry included the first employer-based health care program. Female slaves were the first people in America to get free health care. I do not say this to be funny because the reason why that happened was both sad and simple; after the importation of slaves was made illegal, white dependence on slave labor hinged on the continued births of healthy children. After importation was made illegal, the only way left to maintain the system was by increasing the number of slaves through births. Due to this, a black women’s ability to reproduce was of the utmost economic importance to southern planters and to the slave breeders.

Slaves worked for free. But that did not mean they had no value. Indeed, slaves were literally more valuable than gold. Ned & Constance Sublette wrote “The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry “ the following passage is from a blog titled “A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry in the United States,” by Jason Kottke who quotes from a Pacific Standard review of the book:

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

Slaves were worth more than the total currency plus all the farmland in the South combined yet did not receive a dime. As I write this America has 1.9 trillion dollars of total currency in circulation according to the federal reserve. In 1860 the total value of slaves was 17- and one-half times more than the money circulating in the economy. During slavery, more specifically during the 19th century, wealthy slaveowners looking for a way to get additional capital to buy more slaves came up with an idea- slave backed securities. Your eyes are not playing tricks on you. Slaveowners securitized slavery.

According to the Sublettes, 400 to 500,000 slaves landed on the shores of what is now America. By 1860 there were 4 million slaves living here. The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. So from 1808 until 1860 the number of slaves increased by at least 1,000 percent. If we allow for the Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsible for between 400 to 500 thousand slaves. What about the 3.5 million additional slaves? Africans did not create them. Whites did this through forced human breeding for business and for pleasure. “Africans sold each other into slavery”, says the racist.
​

And as usual, the racist is wrong. You will learn not to talk stupid when you talk to me son.

As usual you are an idiot!!!

Historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University have estimated that of the Africans captured and then sold as slaves to the New World in the Atlantic slave trade,[52] around 90% were enslaved by fellow Africans who sold them to European traders.[53] Henry Louis Gates, the Harvard Chair of African and African American Studies, has stated that "without complex business partnerships between African elites and European traders and commercial agents,[54] the slave trade to the New World would have been impossible, at least on the scale it occurred."[53]

One thing that many Westerners wonder about African enslavers is why they were willing to sell their own people. Why would they sell Africans to Europeans? The simple answer to this question is that they did not see enslaved people as "their own people." Blackness (as an identity or marker of difference) was at that time a preoccupation of Europeans, not Africans. There was also in this era no collective sense of being "African." In other words, African traders of enslaved people felt no obligation to protect enslaved Africans because they did not regard them as their equals.

So Black enslavers considered the enslaved to be their inferiors!!!

A History of African Traders of Enslaved People

During the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Europeans bought from African traders that sold enslaved Africans due to debt, class, or lack of empathy.

www.thoughtco.com

OMG...a nitwit called me a "racist"......the lying pos!!! Next he'll cal me a nazi!!! lmao

As for the US ending slavery so "late"...

"PBS.org and Dr. Henry Louis Gates reported that between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. Only about 388,000 were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice. CNN reported in March that 20,000 children were believed to be working as slaves on Lake Volta in the fishing industry in Ghana, Africa."

There Are 9.2-Million Slaves in Africa Today

Only about 388,000 slaves were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice.

needtoknow.news

9.2 MILLION slaves TODAY in AFRICA....V 388,000 to the entire US..........................I guess you'll be demonstrating tomorrow against AFRICA!!!


Greg

The white avoudance of what they have done is going to get you nowhere. Especially since there are slaves in Europe. Now since slavery ended 158 years ago, try telling me how blacks implemented jim crow and todays modern american racism.

You conflate repubs with African slavers and DemoKKKrats..........THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!! BTW: by the end of the Civil War the South was BROKE and their economy in tatters!!! There is nothing left of the value added by Slaves; it went with the Civil War and the Carpetbaggers.

Greg

good point----how many slavers in the past 8000 years were registered republicans?

 

[Meathead]

BLM only deals with deaths via the state. There are other organizations which cover the area you are looking for, but you don't really care because all you want to do is score points with yer fellow black hating poster friends.

Deaths like these occur almost daily in the US and it is done by many people who don't have the same skin color.

So maybe they should change their name. Perhaps Some Black Lives Matter and ignore the 99.9% that don't.

Or at least be honest about it, as someone suggested, Burn Loot and Murder.

 

[gtopa1]

The question was asked by one of the dumb ass racists:

Where is BLM?

BLM is about justice, and this murderer is facing his rightful justice for this terrible crime. So BLM does not have to protest or show up. Where are the ALL LIVES MATTER/BLUE LIVES MATTER people in regards to the killing of a capital police officer and the injuries to over 100 capital police due to Whitey's rebellion on 1-6-2021?

All bitches like the OP do is spend their days looking for stories about blacks to post. I don't have to do that. I have 400, going on 401 years of evidence and chumps like the OP has their imagination.

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

And the previous 2000 years?? lmao

Slavery has historically been widespread in Africa. Systems of servitude and slavery were common in parts of Africa in ancient times, as they were in much of the rest of the ancient world.[1] When the trans-Saharan slave trade, Indian ocean slave trade and Atlantic slave trade (which started in the 16th century)[2] began, many of the pre-existing local African slave systems began supplying captives for slave markets outside Africa.[3][4]

Slavery in historical Africa was practised in many different forms: Debt slavery, enslavement of war captives, military slavery, slavery for prostitution, and criminal slavery were all practised in various parts of Africa.[5] Slavery for domestic and court purposes was widespread throughout Africa.[6] Plantation slavery also occurred, primarily on the eastern coast of Africa and in parts of West Africa.[7] The importance of domestic plantation slavery increased during the 19th century, due to the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade.[8] Many African states dependent on the international slave trade reoriented their economies towards legitimate commerce worked by slave labor.[9][10]

Maybe you can start a new org: Reparations from Blacks who Enslaved Blacks?????

Greg

All Rise!

This Mornings Lesson:

The White Racists Disingenuous Tale About Blacks Enslaving Blacks.

This mornings lesson comes from the book of Dr. Henry Gates, legendary historian and victim of racist police harrassment.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

Henry Louis Gates Jr.
3/04/13

So what do the actual numbers of black slave owners and their slaves tell us? In 1830, the year most carefully studied by Carter G. Woodson, about 13.7 percent (319,599) of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States, so the numbers of slaves owned by black people over all was quite small by comparison with the number owned by white people. In his essay, " 'The Known World' of Free Black Slaveholders," Thomas J. Pressly, using Woodson's statistics, calculated that 54 (or about 1 percent) of these black slave owners in 1830 owned between 20 and 84 slaves; 172 (about 4 percent) owned between 10 to 19 slaves; and 3,550 (about 94 percent) each owned between 1 and 9 slaves. Crucially, 42 percent owned just one slave.

Pressly also shows that the percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. So why did these free black people own these slaves?

It is reasonable to assume that the 42 percent of the free black slave owners who owned just one slave probably owned a family member to protect that person, as did many of the other black slave owners who owned only slightly larger numbers of slaves. As Woodson put it in 1924's Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830, "The census records show that the majority of the Negro owners of slaves were such from the point of view of philanthropy. In many instances the husband purchased the wife or vice versa … Slaves of Negroes were in some cases the children of a free father who had purchased his wife. If he did not thereafter emancipate the mother, as so many such husbands failed to do, his own children were born his slaves and were thus reported to the numerators."

Moreover, Woodson explains, "Benevolent Negroes often purchased slaves to make their lot easier by granting them their freedom for a nominal sum, or by permitting them to work it out on liberal terms." In other words, these black slave-owners, the clear majority, cleverly used the system of slavery to protect their loved ones. That's the good news.

Did Black People Own Slaves?

So let's do the math.

In the year of record 13.7 percent of the blacks living in America were free. This means 82.3 percent were not.

There were 2,009,043 slaves in the U.S. on the year reported. 12,907 slaves were owned by blacks. Most of them were purchased family members, but that's not my point. My point is that 1,996,136 slaves were owned by whites. Furthermore only 4-500,000 blacks were ever delivered here from Africa. By 1830, the number of slaves had grown 500 percent as importation os slaves was not done.

So how did this happen since Africans were no longer selling Africans paleface?

Lesson number 2 this morning:

An Original Americsn Industry-Slave Breeding.

We are told how the so-called founders of this country created the way to end slavery when they wrote the constitution. Many will cite the fact they made the importation of slaves illegal by 1808 as evidence. But refusing to stop importing slaves did not end the slaving business in the United States. What it produced was an original American industry-slave breeding.

"During the fifty-three years from the prohibition of the African slave trade by federal law in 1808 to the debacle of the Confederate States of America in 1861, the Southern economy depended on the functioning of a slave-breeding industry, of which Virginia was the number-one supplier."

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

You see, if America had continued to import slaves, it would have diluted the market thereby driving down the costs of slaves. Slave sellers could not have this. So instead of the truth, we are told that “our nearer to God than thee” founders in all their benevolent glory, looked towards a future whereby slavery would be no more. According to some, the so-called founders had a dream whereby little black boys and little black girls would no longer be enslaved because of the color of their skin. This is the story we are supposed to believe. However, reality does not show that.

“In fact, most American slaves were not kidnapped on another continent. Though over 12.7 million Africans were forced onto ships to the Western hemisphere, estimates only have 400,000-500,000 landing in present-day America. How then to account for the four million black slaves who were tilling fields in 1860? “The South,” the Sublettes write, “did not only produce tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton as commodities for sale; it produced people.” Slavers called slave-breeding “natural increase,” but there was nothing natural about producing slaves; it took scientific management. Thomas Jefferson bragged to George Washington that the birth of black children was increasing Virginia’s capital stock by four percent annually.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

To be blunt, America had slave breeding “factories” where slaves were forced to breed. I call them factories but in most cases they are described as farms. These “farms” generally had at least a 2:1 female to male ratio. In some states, slave production was the number 1 industry. Virginia led the nation in slave production and PRESIDENT Thomas Jefferson was one of the main producers. The slave breeding industry has been hidden and left out of the annals of American history. This was done on purpose.

After reading how this was done it becomes very easy to see why. There are just some wrongs that cannot be excused by the belief that holding past generations to modern standards is wrong. Basically, the slave breeding industry manufactured human beings to be sold into labor.

This industry included the first employer-based health care program. Female slaves were the first people in America to get free health care. I do not say this to be funny because the reason why that happened was both sad and simple; after the importation of slaves was made illegal, white dependence on slave labor hinged on the continued births of healthy children. After importation was made illegal, the only way left to maintain the system was by increasing the number of slaves through births. Due to this, a black women’s ability to reproduce was of the utmost economic importance to southern planters and to the slave breeders.

Slaves worked for free. But that did not mean they had no value. Indeed, slaves were literally more valuable than gold. Ned & Constance Sublette wrote “The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry “ the following passage is from a blog titled “A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry in the United States,” by Jason Kottke who quotes from a Pacific Standard review of the book:

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

Slaves were worth more than the total currency plus all the farmland in the South combined yet did not receive a dime. As I write this America has 1.9 trillion dollars of total currency in circulation according to the federal reserve. In 1860 the total value of slaves was 17- and one-half times more than the money circulating in the economy. During slavery, more specifically during the 19th century, wealthy slaveowners looking for a way to get additional capital to buy more slaves came up with an idea- slave backed securities. Your eyes are not playing tricks on you. Slaveowners securitized slavery.

According to the Sublettes, 400 to 500,000 slaves landed on the shores of what is now America. By 1860 there were 4 million slaves living here. The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. So from 1808 until 1860 the number of slaves increased by at least 1,000 percent. If we allow for the Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsible for between 400 to 500 thousand slaves. What about the 3.5 million additional slaves? Africans did not create them. Whites did this through forced human breeding for business and for pleasure. “Africans sold each other into slavery”, says the racist.
​

And as usual, the racist is wrong. You will learn not to talk stupid when you talk to me son.

As usual you are an idiot!!!

Historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University have estimated that of the Africans captured and then sold as slaves to the New World in the Atlantic slave trade,[52] around 90% were enslaved by fellow Africans who sold them to European traders.[53] Henry Louis Gates, the Harvard Chair of African and African American Studies, has stated that "without complex business partnerships between African elites and European traders and commercial agents,[54] the slave trade to the New World would have been impossible, at least on the scale it occurred."[53]

One thing that many Westerners wonder about African enslavers is why they were willing to sell their own people. Why would they sell Africans to Europeans? The simple answer to this question is that they did not see enslaved people as "their own people." Blackness (as an identity or marker of difference) was at that time a preoccupation of Europeans, not Africans. There was also in this era no collective sense of being "African." In other words, African traders of enslaved people felt no obligation to protect enslaved Africans because they did not regard them as their equals.

So Black enslavers considered the enslaved to be their inferiors!!!

A History of African Traders of Enslaved People

During the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Europeans bought from African traders that sold enslaved Africans due to debt, class, or lack of empathy.

www.thoughtco.com

OMG...a nitwit called me a "racist"......the lying pos!!! Next he'll cal me a nazi!!! lmao

As for the US ending slavery so "late"...

"PBS.org and Dr. Henry Louis Gates reported that between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. Only about 388,000 were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice. CNN reported in March that 20,000 children were believed to be working as slaves on Lake Volta in the fishing industry in Ghana, Africa."

There Are 9.2-Million Slaves in Africa Today

Only about 388,000 slaves were shipped to North America. Today in Africa there are an estimated 9.2-million people living in modern day slavery, but Western politicians do not speak out against this injustice.

needtoknow.news

9.2 MILLION slaves TODAY in AFRICA....V 388,000 to the entire US..........................I guess you'll be demonstrating tomorrow against AFRICA!!!


Greg

The white avoudance of what they have done is going to get you nowhere. Especially since there are slaves in Europe. Now since slavery ended 158 years ago, try telling me how blacks implemented jim crow and todays modern american racism.

You conflate repubs with African slavers and DemoKKKrats..........THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!! BTW: by the end of the Civil War the South was BROKE and their economy in tatters!!! There is nothing left of the value added by Slaves; it went with the Civil War and the Carpetbaggers.

Greg

good point----how many slavers in the past 8000 years were registered republicans?

From what I can gather; you could count them on one hand of a negligent sawmiller!!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

BLM only deals with deaths via the state. There are other organizations which cover the area you are looking for, but you don't really care because all you want to do is score points with yer fellow black hating poster friends.

Deaths like these occur almost daily in the US and it is done by many people who don't have the same skin color.

So maybe they should change their name. Perhaps Some Black Lives Matter and ignore the 99.9% that don't.

"#BlackCrimsKilledByCopsMatter"....would be more honest.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

BurnLootMurder is not a cute term; it is an accusation!!!!

Greg

I believe that burn/loot/vandalize is---SIMPLY something like a fantasy for many people. It is
kinda like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz---melting the
wicked witch of THE WEST------everyone APPLAUDS.
Lysie needs to live in my neighborhood----and count the dead bodies PER WEEK---just around the corner.

Dorothy.......was cool.

 

[irosie91]

I live ---uhm URBAN now----but grew up in a somewhat more----"rural area" where REAL MEN
----HUNTED and FISHED -----"kill bambi season" was
marked by more accidental deaths (some people LOOK
LIKE BAMBI) than are killed by cops in the whole state---per year. No one got hysterical

 

[irosie91]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

where was that? "HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS" where there was no vandalism, assault or death"?
...more to the point----in my town it does not take
"HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS" to put a few bullets into the heads of innocents for the glory of BLM--- just for the "hell of it"

 

[Lysistrata]

These horrible family wipeouts occur among all races. Stop trying to make something racial out of it. This case does not involve any racial issue. Don't you people have anything better to do than to try to stir up racial divisions?

So "Nothing to see here"...right!!! So "Only Blacks killed by Police" matter................whether its within the Law or not!!!

Greg

People can walk and chew gum at the same time. BLM concerns corrupt police, not all police. Don't run away from it.

Moreover, people can pursue more than one issue at the same time. People who live in neighborhoods where crimes occur act on a local level, many times with the assistance of clergy. If you want to make a racial issue of it, what are white people doing about white-on-white crime?

Yes: BurnLootMurder............that's THREE!!

They pursue non-issue and frankly are just meatheads!! Once you talk about Destruction I'm against it!!!

Greg

Just coming up with some phrase like BurnLootMurder that you think is cute does not erase the fact that enough evidence exists to show that there is a real problem with some LEOs that must be addressed by fair and rational people. It is an issue that has been talked about for years. Hundreds of thousands of people marching with signs and chanting in protest did not involve burning, looting, or murder.

BurnLootMurder is not a cute term; it is an accusation!!!!

Greg

Yeah. Another in a long line of false accusations. Stop going for the cutesy. It doesn't contribute anything and it's boring. Marching down the street with a sign to demand attention to a problem that should have been examined a long time ago is much different than an opportunist street thug, which we have always had with us. Moreover, there has been some talk that right-wing groups have planted agitators to foment violence at protest marches, and this has to be looked at, as well.