Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You didn't what? Call it bribery? Fail to show what Biden got out of it?ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.
our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!
justice is suppose to be blind
HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?
We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.
HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.
our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!
justice is suppose to be blind
HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?
We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.
carrying out USA policy is a crime now?? I didn't know thatROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.
our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!
justice is suppose to be blind
HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?
We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.
he likely monetized his own last name, but that in and of itself, is not a crime.HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.
Just don’t expect anyone else to go along with that sick fantasy.”
- “You can pretend, if you want, that there was a purpose in hiring Hunter Biden beyond currying favor with his father.
- You can pretend, as did John Kerry’s State Department, that there was no conflict of interest or quid pro quo involved that involved pressure being removed from Ukraine in return for employing Joe Biden’s kid.
- You can pretend that Joe Bidens’ interest in firing that prosecutor was some high minded expression of unity with the EU.
Members of the Democrats of the Fake News Media and Lying DNC excluded, of course.
I've also read that this guy is tied in with Hillary Clinton. And Schumer. Can anyone verify?A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Please, may we refrain by calling other individuals that you don't agree with, by family names? Thank you.No. They were not. Stop repeating this lie.LOLThe WB went through all the required legal steps . That’s not leaking stupid
Well you ignorant welp...
They changed the rules specifically for this individual... so that they could not be investigated, so that the origins of the leak were hidden...
This is organized crime and illegal.
he's notI've also read that this guy is tied in with Hillary Clinton. And Schumer. Can anyone verify?A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Family names? Let me guess... English is not your native tonguePlease, may we refrain by calling other individuals that you don't agree with, by family names? Thank you.No. They were not. Stop repeating this lie.LOLThe WB went through all the required legal steps . That’s not leaking stupid
Well you ignorant welp...
They changed the rules specifically for this individual... so that they could not be investigated, so that the origins of the leak were hidden...
This is organized crime and illegal.
There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Also, your post has no link.
Quid Pro Quo Joe putting a Billion Dollar Bounty on the head other prosecutor investigating his son's corruption was a total coincidence, I'm sure.he likely monopolized his own last name, but that in and of itself, is not a crime.HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?
Just don’t expect anyone else to go along with that sick fantasy.”
- “You can pretend, if you want, that there was a purpose in hiring Hunter Biden beyond currying favor with his father.
- You can pretend, as did John Kerry’s State Department, that there was no conflict of interest or quid pro quo involved that involved pressure being removed from Ukraine in return for employing Joe Biden’s kid.
- You can pretend that Joe Bidens’ interest in firing that prosecutor was some high minded expression of unity with the EU.
Members of the Democrats of the Fake News Media and Lying DNC excluded, of course.
Allegedly, after the UK tried to prosecute them years earlier and Shokin, the corrupt prosecutor would not help them... Burisma tried to clean up their act, and hired a bunch of well known names, for good appearance...
still had nothing to do with Joe Biden's comments about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired.
they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Also, your post has no link.
This collection of Crooks and Felons wants to sit in judgment on the Choice of the US Electorate:For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.Trump has business dealing all around the globe. Let's get every one of those nations to open up investigations into him. That would be reasonable, right?a debunked crowdstrike conspiracy investigation is also for his own personal political gain.Yup. First line on page 3.You have a transcript where Trump solicits the Urkainian president to open an investigation into Trumps chief political rival. Where Trump explicitly connects additional US aid.....to doing this favor for Trump.
Zelensky: ...we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
President: I would like you to do us a favor though...
What line and what page is Biden brought up?
Trump's Ukraine call transcript: Read the document
our president should not be asking a foreign country to investigate an American citizen...while holding back aid... the Doj should do it, if they find probable cause to do it.... the president should NOT be involved.... or put his thumb on the scale, EVER!
justice is suppose to be blind
HOW CAN YOU NOT COMPREHEND THAT...?
We can't investigate crimes that may have happened in a foreign country without that countries approval and cooperation. The DOJ can't go to Ukraine and investigate stuff. They have NO jurisdiction.
The prosecutor was NOT investigating Burisma at the time of Joe's request to fire Shokin, in fact shokin HELPED Burisma to get off on charges the UK was making against him years earlier.Quid Pro Quo Joe putting a Billion Dollar Bounty on the head other prosecutor investigating his son's corruption was a total coincidence, I'm sure.he likely monopolized his own last name, but that in and of itself, is not a crime.HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.For what crime, moron? Biden committed a crime on video.
Just don’t expect anyone else to go along with that sick fantasy.”
- “You can pretend, if you want, that there was a purpose in hiring Hunter Biden beyond currying favor with his father.
- You can pretend, as did John Kerry’s State Department, that there was no conflict of interest or quid pro quo involved that involved pressure being removed from Ukraine in return for employing Joe Biden’s kid.
- You can pretend that Joe Bidens’ interest in firing that prosecutor was some high minded expression of unity with the EU.
Members of the Democrats of the Fake News Media and Lying DNC excluded, of course.
Allegedly, after the UK tried to prosecute them years earlier and Shokin, the corrupt prosecutor would not help them... Burisma tried to clean up their act, and hired a bunch of well known names, for good appearance...
still had nothing to do with Joe Biden's comments about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired.
Rod Rosenstein, Exposed. Remember how the Fake News Media Democrats told us he was a solid Republican and a straight shooter. Yeah, that was just another lie.
There is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Also, your post has no link.
their OATH is not to a mere man...
He says he was. And if Ukraine wants to investigate it, of course we will cooperate. We are bound by treaty to do so.The prosecutor was NOT investigating Burisma at the time of Joe's request to fire Shokin, in fact shokin HELPED Burisma to get off on charges the UK was making against him years earlier.Quid Pro Quo Joe putting a Billion Dollar Bounty on the head other prosecutor investigating his son's corruption was a total coincidence, I'm sure.he likely monopolized his own last name, but that in and of itself, is not a crime.HEH: There Is Absolutely Nothing Suspicious And Criminal-Like About Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Director’s Salary.ROFL! You must be doing LSD. I did no such thing. His crime is on video.You've already been shown Biden committed no crime. You called it bribery but couldn't show what Biden got out of it.
Just don’t expect anyone else to go along with that sick fantasy.”
- “You can pretend, if you want, that there was a purpose in hiring Hunter Biden beyond currying favor with his father.
- You can pretend, as did John Kerry’s State Department, that there was no conflict of interest or quid pro quo involved that involved pressure being removed from Ukraine in return for employing Joe Biden’s kid.
- You can pretend that Joe Bidens’ interest in firing that prosecutor was some high minded expression of unity with the EU.
Members of the Democrats of the Fake News Media and Lying DNC excluded, of course.
Allegedly, after the UK tried to prosecute them years earlier and Shokin, the corrupt prosecutor would not help them... Burisma tried to clean up their act, and hired a bunch of well known names, for good appearance...
still had nothing to do with Joe Biden's comments about getting the corrupt prosecutor fired.
Rod Rosenstein, Exposed. Remember how the Fake News Media Democrats told us he was a solid Republican and a straight shooter. Yeah, that was just another lie.
Shokin came from the Russian puppet Ukrainian President,and needed to go.... he is re-writing history to claim he was after Burisma,,,, he was a co-conspirator with Burisma
as far as your other garbage, start a thread on it, it is off topic.
Yes we do have the Memorandum Notes, NOT the transcriptThere is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Also, your post has no link.
their OATH is not to a mere man...
The Anesthetic Effect of Ukrainegate .
They have underestimated just how tired of the Lying Left's antics in the wake of their 2016 election loss that the American People have become.
It does no such thing.Yes we do have the Memorandum Notes, NOT the transcriptThere is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.A CIA analyst just stopped short of naming the whistle-blower who he described as a LEAKER not a protected whistle-blower. He also went on to explain that the form and requirement for first hand knowledge were removed specifically for this leaker in an attempt to give him/her cover and make it so they can not be investigated. He went on to state that this individual was a deep state operative with direct connections to John Brennen and Obama. Laura Ingraham stopped him short of naming the individual that he clearly had the name of...
The Attempted Coup De'Taut is ongoing. The deep state is trying every trick in the book to get Trump! This is blatant treason and it needs to be taken out...
These people are brazen and criminals!
Also, your post has no link.
their OATH is not to a mere man...
The Anesthetic Effect of Ukrainegate .
They have underestimated just how tired of the Lying Left's antics in the wake of their 2016 election loss that the American People have become.
and it is clear as day, he was doing precisely what the whistleblower claimed....
And now we have the emails of the ambassadors and diplomats and state dept.... all verifying the whistleblower complaint.
do you have a news link?It does no such thing.Yes we do have the Memorandum Notes, NOT the transcriptThere is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!This ^ is a lie. The supposed "rule change" never happened, and furthermore the whistleblower does indeed have first hand information.
Also, your post has no link.
their OATH is not to a mere man...
The Anesthetic Effect of Ukrainegate .
They have underestimated just how tired of the Lying Left's antics in the wake of their 2016 election loss that the American People have become.
and it is clear as day, he was doing precisely what the whistleblower claimed....
And now we have the emails of the ambassadors and diplomats and state dept.... all verifying the whistleblower complaint.
SHOCKER:
They aren't credible they are wild fabrications.do you have a news link?It does no such thing.Yes we do have the Memorandum Notes, NOT the transcriptThere is no law breaking. We have the transcript and the word of both Presidents on the call. Everything the Democrats have claimed about this call is a lie in the service of their attempts to overturn the 2016 election.they are obligated to leak when a gvt official is breaking the law, their OATH is to the constitution and all the laws derived from it....There is no whistle blower with direct first hand knowledge of the call. But there sure is an inner circle leaker. That's where all of this trouble began!
their OATH is not to a mere man...
The Anesthetic Effect of Ukrainegate .
They have underestimated just how tired of the Lying Left's antics in the wake of their 2016 election loss that the American People have become.
and it is clear as day, he was doing precisely what the whistleblower claimed....
And now we have the emails of the ambassadors and diplomats and state dept.... all verifying the whistleblower complaint.
SHOCKER:
AND as said, it matters naught what his political leanings are...
the only question is whether the complaint was credible or not and
the IG verified his/her? 2nd hand claims with first hand evidence that made the complaint, credible...
WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT?
