Who's The Fascist?

[Mac1958]

View attachment 292474

They really do believe this.

Except for the phony Christians, of course.

Not sure what adjective to use, but it ain't a good one.
.

 

[Synthaholic]

View attachment 292474

You just posted a link that says 'not.'


I can help.

not
adverb
Save Word
To save this word, you'll need to log in.

Log In

\ ˈnät \
Definition of not
(Entry 1 of 2)

1—used as a function word to make negative a group of words or a word
2—used as a function word to stand for the negative of a preceding group of words
Definition of NOT



So I caught you lying again.

Yes, ultra Liberal Bishop Talbert Swan is REFUTING the fake evangelicals who believe Trump is god, trump was sent by god, trump was chosen by god. You’re not smart.

Definition of Refute:


refute
[ ri-fyoot ]

verb (used with object), re·fut·ed, re·fut·ing.
to prove to be false or erroneous, as an opinion or charge.
to prove (a person) to be in error.




Just as I regularly refute your dumbass posts.

"...evangelicals who believe Trump is god..."


Another lie.

Once again for the willfully ignorant:

 

[PoliticalChic]

You see a hamburger at McDonal's and you credit "God" a "miracle" for it...

You exist with a paper bag over your head, that prevents you from truly understanding that which you observe....

It would help if you had some talent in math, but not having any is a pre-requisite for believing the unreal bullshit you do....


If we kill enough muslims in the Middle East, will Jesus float down from the clouds??

As is the case in so many of your posts, you have that 100% backwards.

It is the Muslim faith that demands slaughter to have Heaven....


Iran: Their foreign policy is aimed at world domination under the leadership of the 12th Imam.

The Hidden Imam, as he is also known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos, war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse –


“ The hidden Imam who is expected to return....
....beware of doubting, for to doubt the order of God, the Mighty, the Sublime, is apostasy (Kufr). Ibn Khaldun also states that “ When imprisoned with his mother in the house, he entered a sort of well or pit in the house that his family occupies at Samarrah, Iraq, and there he disappeared, but he is to come forth at the end of the age to fill the earth with justice”.
The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn al-Hasan (Al-Mahdi-Sahibuz Zaman) (The hidden Imam who is expected to return)


12th Imam
12th Imam



3. "IRANIAN CLERIC EBAD MOHAMMADTABAR: WHEN THE HIDDEN IMAM ARRIVES, THE WHOLE WORLD WILL CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE; WE WILL CONFRONT, DEFEAT THE JEWS, ZIONISM
October 07, 2019
Iranian Cleric Ebad Mohammadtabar: When the Hidden Imam Arrives, The Whole World Will Convert to Islam or Die; We Will Confront, Defeat the Jews, Zionism




Any who voted for Hussein should be able to answer this question:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

Everyone outside your bubble of garbage propaganda knows the deal kept Iran from getting nuclear weapons for 15 years and could be renewed duh, brainwashed functional moron.

It didn't do that you moron....and what it did was provide the most dangerous terrorist nation in the world with easy to move cash....150 billion dollars, to supply their terrorist minions to murder people all around the world......you are an idiot.

everybody outside your bubble of dumbass idiocy knows it stopped Iran from getting a bomb for 15 years. The money was Iran's that we confiscated temporarily in 1979. The whole thing was working great except for you dupes. I wish you well on proving thousands of years of diplomacy wrong, brainwashed functional morons and greedy idiot assholes....

No one 'knows' any such thing....and certainly not you.

There were never.....NEVER....any real inspections allowed or required.

1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

The key term in today's NYSun editorial is UNVERIFIABLE.


"Under this agreement the United States released approximately $150 billion of frozen Iranian assets, which substantially have been squandered in underwriting the terrorist acts and infiltrations supervised by the late Soleimani — especially by the Iranian-sponsored terrorist organizations Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Houthi in Yemen.

Apart from being unverifiable, and giving a tremendous stimulus to Iran’s terrorist and other destabilizing activities around the Middle East, the agreement (also ratified by France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Russia and China), only dealt with fissile material, not rocket development or the perfection of a warhead. So Iran’s nuclear military research has continued apace, as it escalated its terrorist activities: a terrible and indefensible agreement the Democrats are now robotically defending."
Democrats Start To Look Like the Gadarene Swine



There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

 

[anynameyouwish]

1. When you've been 'educated' in government school, via the 'Mushroom Management Method:' "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em manure," you can be 'fed' all sorts of lies and not be aware of it.

Hence, the Fascists have 'taught' the unaware that the other side indulges in the iniquities that they are guilty of.


In fact, said graduates have been taught the very opposite of the truth:

2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism


The term Fascism has been appropriated to mean any view that doesn't correspond to the Liberal orthodoxy:

3. " More broadly, fascism may be defined as any totalitarian regime which does not aim at the nationalization of industry but preserves at least nominal private property. The term can even be extended to any dictatorship that has become unfashionable among intellectuals. [working-class Americans call it "Communism." Middle-class Americans, educated enough to understand that it's uncouth to say anything against Communism, call if "fascism."] When the Soviet Union and People's China had a falling out in the 1960s, they each promptly discovered that the other fraternal socialist country was not merely capitalist but "fascist." At the most vulgar level, "fascist" is a handy swear-word for such hated figures as Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft who, whatever their faults, are as remote from historical Fascism as anyone in public life today."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele




4. Rather than define 'Fascism,' consider what would be the most antithetical, most removed from fascism, most representative of America:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.





5. As a working definition, and one more accurate than any of the above, Fascism is any attempt to deny our citizens the inalienable rights given by our Creator, some of which are named in the first amendment.



Restrictions on free speech, and freedom of thought, are a priori examples of Fascism.
Universities, the places that the Left most dominates, are the least free places in America.

you are

limbaugh is

most conservatives are

 

[alang1216]

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Well you're wrong now. It is generally agreed that the Iran treaty was working and work had ceased on the bomb. It is only now, since the US pulled out, that Iran is developing their bomb.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. When you've been 'educated' in government school, via the 'Mushroom Management Method:' "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em manure," you can be 'fed' all sorts of lies and not be aware of it.

Hence, the Fascists have 'taught' the unaware that the other side indulges in the iniquities that they are guilty of.


In fact, said graduates have been taught the very opposite of the truth:

2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism


The term Fascism has been appropriated to mean any view that doesn't correspond to the Liberal orthodoxy:

3. " More broadly, fascism may be defined as any totalitarian regime which does not aim at the nationalization of industry but preserves at least nominal private property. The term can even be extended to any dictatorship that has become unfashionable among intellectuals. [working-class Americans call it "Communism." Middle-class Americans, educated enough to understand that it's uncouth to say anything against Communism, call if "fascism."] When the Soviet Union and People's China had a falling out in the 1960s, they each promptly discovered that the other fraternal socialist country was not merely capitalist but "fascist." At the most vulgar level, "fascist" is a handy swear-word for such hated figures as Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft who, whatever their faults, are as remote from historical Fascism as anyone in public life today."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele




4. Rather than define 'Fascism,' consider what would be the most antithetical, most removed from fascism, most representative of America:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.





5. As a working definition, and one more accurate than any of the above, Fascism is any attempt to deny our citizens the inalienable rights given by our Creator, some of which are named in the first amendment.



Restrictions on free speech, and freedom of thought, are a priori examples of Fascism.
Universities, the places that the Left most dominates, are the least free places in America.

you are

limbaugh is

most conservatives are

Your defining characteristic is that you are such a bore....

Please consider getting an education before you return.....


.....or, consider haunting some other venue.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Well you're wrong now. It is generally agreed that the Iran treaty was working and work had ceased on the bomb. It is only now, since the US pulled out, that Iran is developing their bomb.

Only an imbecile would still claim such, as there was never any way to see if it was working.


1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

 

[alang1216]

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Well you're wrong now. It is generally agreed that the Iran treaty was working and work had ceased on the bomb. It is only now, since the US pulled out, that Iran is developing their bomb.

Only an imbecile would still claim such, as there was never any way to see if it was working.


1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

I may be stupid and an imbecile but I'm smart enough to put my trust in the professionals of the IAEA and the US State Dep't rather than the OPINIONS of a bunch of uneducated pundits. Are you?

Jackie Wolcott, U.S. representative to the IAEA, appeared to defend the agency’s process during her March 5 remarks to the IAEA board. Wolcott said Iran must address questions raised by the archival material, but emphasized that the United States supports the “IAEA’s continued, careful assessment of the nuclear archive materials.” She said Washington has the “highest confidence that the agency will independently and professionally review these materials, in combination with all other available information, to appropriately inform its monitoring and verification activities in Iran.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Well you're wrong now. It is generally agreed that the Iran treaty was working and work had ceased on the bomb. It is only now, since the US pulled out, that Iran is developing their bomb.

Only an imbecile would still claim such, as there was never any way to see if it was working.


1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

I may be stupid and an imbecile but I'm smart enough to put my trust in the professionals of the IAEA and the US State Dep't rather than the OPINIONS of a bunch of uneducated pundits. Are you?

Jackie Wolcott, U.S. representative to the IAEA, appeared to defend the agency’s process during her March 5 remarks to the IAEA board. Wolcott said Iran must address questions raised by the archival material, but emphasized that the United States supports the “IAEA’s continued, careful assessment of the nuclear archive materials.” She said Washington has the “highest confidence that the agency will independently and professionally review these materials, in combination with all other available information, to appropriately inform its monitoring and verification activities in Iran.”

Nah...you're simply a plain ol' imbecile.


" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to “go and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,” before Iran hides its contents.

A week later, however, the IAEA rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, “All information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agency’s own expertise.”

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know — or want to know — about Iran’s nuclear program

 

[Ken Mac]

1. When you've been 'educated' in government school, via the 'Mushroom Management Method:' "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em manure," you can be 'fed' all sorts of lies and not be aware of it.

Hence, the Fascists have 'taught' the unaware that the other side indulges in the iniquities that they are guilty of.


In fact, said graduates have been taught the very opposite of the truth:

2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism


The term Fascism has been appropriated to mean any view that doesn't correspond to the Liberal orthodoxy:

3. " More broadly, fascism may be defined as any totalitarian regime which does not aim at the nationalization of industry but preserves at least nominal private property. The term can even be extended to any dictatorship that has become unfashionable among intellectuals. [working-class Americans call it "Communism." Middle-class Americans, educated enough to understand that it's uncouth to say anything against Communism, call if "fascism."] When the Soviet Union and People's China had a falling out in the 1960s, they each promptly discovered that the other fraternal socialist country was not merely capitalist but "fascist." At the most vulgar level, "fascist" is a handy swear-word for such hated figures as Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft who, whatever their faults, are as remote from historical Fascism as anyone in public life today."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele




4. Rather than define 'Fascism,' consider what would be the most antithetical, most removed from fascism, most representative of America:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.





5. As a working definition, and one more accurate than any of the above, Fascism is any attempt to deny our citizens the inalienable rights given by our Creator, some of which are named in the first amendment.



Restrictions on free speech, and freedom of thought, are a priori examples of Fascism.
Universities, the places that the Left most dominates, are the least free places in America.

This is the hypocrisy of the socialist left. Socialism always leads to fascism. The rights of the people must be removed to protect them from themselves. The exact opposite of libertarian. The liberal "elitist" Oligarchy wants control of the people. It is painfully obvious through the hypocrisy you point out.

 

[alang1216]

Nah...you're simply a plain ol' imbecile.


" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to “go and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,” before Iran hides its contents.

A week later, however, the IAEA rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, “All information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agency’s own expertise.”

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know — or want to know — about Iran’s nuclear program

Joshua S. Block, a lawyer, is CEO and president of The Israel Project so may not be the most technically knowledgeable or unbiased voice on the issue.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. When you've been 'educated' in government school, via the 'Mushroom Management Method:' "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em manure," you can be 'fed' all sorts of lies and not be aware of it.

Hence, the Fascists have 'taught' the unaware that the other side indulges in the iniquities that they are guilty of.


In fact, said graduates have been taught the very opposite of the truth:

2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism


The term Fascism has been appropriated to mean any view that doesn't correspond to the Liberal orthodoxy:

3. " More broadly, fascism may be defined as any totalitarian regime which does not aim at the nationalization of industry but preserves at least nominal private property. The term can even be extended to any dictatorship that has become unfashionable among intellectuals. [working-class Americans call it "Communism." Middle-class Americans, educated enough to understand that it's uncouth to say anything against Communism, call if "fascism."] When the Soviet Union and People's China had a falling out in the 1960s, they each promptly discovered that the other fraternal socialist country was not merely capitalist but "fascist." At the most vulgar level, "fascist" is a handy swear-word for such hated figures as Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft who, whatever their faults, are as remote from historical Fascism as anyone in public life today."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele




4. Rather than define 'Fascism,' consider what would be the most antithetical, most removed from fascism, most representative of America:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.





5. As a working definition, and one more accurate than any of the above, Fascism is any attempt to deny our citizens the inalienable rights given by our Creator, some of which are named in the first amendment.



Restrictions on free speech, and freedom of thought, are a priori examples of Fascism.
Universities, the places that the Left most dominates, are the least free places in America.

This is the hypocrisy of the socialist left. Socialism always leads to fascism. The rights of the people must be removed to protect them from themselves. The exact opposite of libertarian. The liberal "elitist" Oligarchy wants control of the people. It is painfully obvious through the hypocrisy you point out.

Here's Bloomberg saying that we should tax the poor because they don't know how to spend their own money...


"Flashback: Bloomberg Says Raising Taxes on Poor People is a "Good Thing"
Flashback: Bloomberg Says Raising Taxes on Poor People is a Good Thing

 

[Ken Mac]

1. When you've been 'educated' in government school, via the 'Mushroom Management Method:' "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em manure," you can be 'fed' all sorts of lies and not be aware of it.

Hence, the Fascists have 'taught' the unaware that the other side indulges in the iniquities that they are guilty of.


In fact, said graduates have been taught the very opposite of the truth:

2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1223
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism


The term Fascism has been appropriated to mean any view that doesn't correspond to the Liberal orthodoxy:

3. " More broadly, fascism may be defined as any totalitarian regime which does not aim at the nationalization of industry but preserves at least nominal private property. The term can even be extended to any dictatorship that has become unfashionable among intellectuals. [working-class Americans call it "Communism." Middle-class Americans, educated enough to understand that it's uncouth to say anything against Communism, call if "fascism."] When the Soviet Union and People's China had a falling out in the 1960s, they each promptly discovered that the other fraternal socialist country was not merely capitalist but "fascist." At the most vulgar level, "fascist" is a handy swear-word for such hated figures as Rush Limbaugh or John Ashcroft who, whatever their faults, are as remote from historical Fascism as anyone in public life today."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele




4. Rather than define 'Fascism,' consider what would be the most antithetical, most removed from fascism, most representative of America:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.





5. As a working definition, and one more accurate than any of the above, Fascism is any attempt to deny our citizens the inalienable rights given by our Creator, some of which are named in the first amendment.



Restrictions on free speech, and freedom of thought, are a priori examples of Fascism.
Universities, the places that the Left most dominates, are the least free places in America.

This is the hypocrisy of the socialist left. Socialism always leads to fascism. The rights of the people must be removed to protect them from themselves. The exact opposite of libertarian. The liberal "elitist" Oligarchy wants control of the people. It is painfully obvious through the hypocrisy you point out.

Here's Bloomberg saying that we should tax the poor because they don't know how to spend their own money...


"Flashback: Bloomberg Says Raising Taxes on Poor People is a "Good Thing"
Flashback: Bloomberg Says Raising Taxes on Poor People is a Good Thing

What an asshole.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nah...you're simply a plain ol' imbecile.


" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to “go and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,” before Iran hides its contents.

A week later, however, the IAEA rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, “All information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agency’s own expertise.”

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know — or want to know — about Iran’s nuclear program

Joshua S. Block, a lawyer, is CEO and president of The Israel Project so may not be the most technically knowledgeable or unbiased voice on the issue.

This must be why you imagined (I almost said 'thought') the thread was about you....

"1. When you've been 'educated' in government school, via the 'Mushroom Management Method:' "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em manure," you can be 'fed' all sorts of lies and not be aware of it."



There were no real inspections....Iran could hold any inspections off for up to 45 days.

Are you really this stupid????


Or...simply a coward afraid to question your masters?

 

[alang1216]

There were no real inspections....Iran could hold any inspections off for up to 45 days.

Are you really this stupid????


Or...simply a coward afraid to question your masters?

How much nuclear engineering have you had? (or education of ANY kind for that matter?) What makes you think 45 days is enough time to clean up radioactive waste? A billion years might not be enough.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There were no real inspections....Iran could hold any inspections off for up to 45 days.

Are you really this stupid????


Or...simply a coward afraid to question your masters?

How much nuclear engineering have you had? (or education of ANY kind for that matter?) What makes you think 45 days is enough time to clean up radioactive waste? A billion years might not be enough.

It's so sad......any attempt to educate you is like dropping a rose petal down the Grand Canyon and waiting for the echo.

 

[LaDairis]

Political Chic would be ecstatic if Mikey Bloomberg won, because the US would spend his entire Presidency at war in the Middle East for the cause of Greater Israel....


Bloomberg and Steyer both made billions on 911 with "insider info." We'll see if that ever matters....

 

[PoliticalChic]

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Well you're wrong now. It is generally agreed that the Iran treaty was working and work had ceased on the bomb. It is only now, since the US pulled out, that Iran is developing their bomb.

Only an imbecile would still claim such, as there was never any way to see if it was working.


1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

I may be stupid and an imbecile but I'm smart enough to put my trust in the professionals of the IAEA and the US State Dep't rather than the OPINIONS of a bunch of uneducated pundits. Are you?

Jackie Wolcott, U.S. representative to the IAEA, appeared to defend the agency’s process during her March 5 remarks to the IAEA board. Wolcott said Iran must address questions raised by the archival material, but emphasized that the United States supports the “IAEA’s continued, careful assessment of the nuclear archive materials.” She said Washington has the “highest confidence that the agency will independently and professionally review these materials, in combination with all other available information, to appropriately inform its monitoring and verification activities in Iran.”

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”

This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"
Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq

 

[alang1216]

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”

This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"
Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq

Really? Naftali Bennett? A Zionist/businessman/politician is your best source on the technical problems with the nuke deal? He's welcome to his opinions but I don't see they should carry any more weight than mine and certainly less than the sources I provided. Fail.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”

This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"
Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq

Really? Naftali Bennett? A Zionist/businessman/politician is your best source on the technical problems with the nuke deal? He's welcome to his opinions but I don't see they should carry any more weight than mine and certainly less than the sources I provided. Fail.

"Iran Announces They Will Stop Pretending To Follow Nuclear Deal
January 7th, 2020

TEHRAN—In response to the United States’ recent killing of top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, Iran announced on Tuesday it will no longer pretend to abide by the 2015 Nuclear Deal between the two nations.


Sources confirm Iran has already dismantled its Department of Compliance Chicanery and fired its Director for Nuclear Deal Duplicity. “America is the Great Satan and cannot be trusted,” a spokesperson told reporters. “They do not deserve our sham adherence to an agreement we never intended to follow in the first place.”

Iranian officials then revealed that their National Center to Help Children and Orphans and their Department of Puppies and Candy were actually nuclear facilities in disguise this whole time. Shocked New York Times reporters watched as Iranian officials pressed a button at the Center for World Peace and Also Cake and Ice Cream, rotating the walls to reveal it was actually a nuclear research center.

At publishing time, North Korea was threatening to stop faking compliance with its nuclear restrictions."
Iran Announces They Will Stop Pretending To Follow Nuclear Deal