Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.
Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
If you can't survive without a 30 round magazine, then curl up in a corner and die for all I care. You'll get no sympathy from me.
No one needs a 30 round magazine.
I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.
The Founders supported the right of the people to have weapons appropriate to a militia, thus military type weapons. Unless you think the Marin Corps should be restricted to muzzle loaders, your argument is as stupid as your usual tripe.
That's a pretty convenient interpretation.
Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Answer: Except for military, they don't
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
If you can't survive without a 30 round magazine, then curl up in a corner and die for all I care. You'll get no sympathy from me.
Obama is an authoritarian who is trying to balance capitalism and socialism
Any restrictions on firearms including magazine is unconstitutional.
The only weapons protected by the second amendment must have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia.
Restricting magazine capacity would in fact be a violation of the second amendment.
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
Good thing nobody ever had to stop more than one person at a time...
is right
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
Tell that to the Korean store owners in Los Angeles that defended their property, their lives, and the lives of their families during the riots. Unless of course those were just church goers trying to burn the city down...
Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.
Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.
Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
They showed a clip of a guy shooting an assault weapon with a 30 round on a news program this morning. All they have to do is show that thing over and over and plenty of people will understand why nobody needs one.
Extremely powerful weapon, the guy was barely holding onto it. There is no good reason why citizens need this type of automatic weapon. Your excuses are stupid and so are you.
Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
May-be when the welfare and the free phones stop.........?
Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Answer: Except for military, they don't
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
If you can't survive without a 30 round magazine, then curl up in a corner and die for all I care. You'll get no sympathy from me.
Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)
(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)
Answer: Except for military, they don't
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
If you can't survive without a 30 round magazine, then curl up in a corner and die for all I care. You'll get no sympathy from me.
who gives a damn about your sympathy....
why do you think so many cops carry 15+ round clips....?
Answer: Except for military, they don't
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
If you can't survive without a 30 round magazine, then curl up in a corner and die for all I care. You'll get no sympathy from me.
who gives a damn about your sympathy....
why do you think so many cops carry 15+ round clips....?
Why do you need a 30 round mag, though? Answer: you don't.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
Tell that to the Korean store owners in Los Angeles that defended their property, their lives, and the lives of their families during the riots. Unless of course those were just church goers trying to burn the city down...
During the riots. Do riots happen everyday?.......
Answer: Except for military, they don't
If you can't stop somebody with a magazine of less than 30 rounds, then you're doing something wrong.
If you're using gangs as an excuse to hold 30 rounds in a magazine, then you're probably doing something illegal.
If you can't survive without a 30 round magazine, then curl up in a corner and die for all I care. You'll get no sympathy from me.
who gives a damn about your sympathy....
why do you think so many cops carry 15+ round clips....?
Why do you need a 30 round mag, though? Answer: you don't.
