Why does desperate Trump have to LIE so much?

[PK1]

Anyone who voted for a known criminal for POTUS is a jackass.
Congrats if your candidate gets impeached.

Not my first or second choice.
I'd vote for Johnson or Stein before Trump.
As far as any criminal investigation is concerned, let the FACTS do the talking.

 

[jon_berzerk]

yup democrat andrew jackson

 

[jwoodie]

Anyone who voted for a known criminal for POTUS is a jackass.
Congrats if your candidate gets impeached.

Not my first or second choice.
I'd vote for Johnson or Stein before Trump.
As far as any criminal investigation is concerned, let the FACTS do the talking.

Interesting example of being pathetic and desperate at the same time.

 

[PK1]

yup democrat andrew jackson

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

 

[jon_berzerk]

yup democrat andrew jackson

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

liar

 

[PK1]

Anyone who voted for a known criminal for POTUS is a jackass.
Congrats if your candidate gets impeached.

Not my first or second choice.
I'd vote for Johnson or Stein before Trump.
As far as any criminal investigation is concerned, let the FACTS do the talking.

Interesting example of being pathetic and desperate at the same time.

Apparently, you don't understand logic.

 

[PK1]

yup democrat andrew jackson

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

liar

Are your pants on fire?

 

[owebo]

I'm not sure Trump is even aware of his lying.

I'm not sure hitlery is even aware of the truth....

That right there would be the main difference between you and I, I got 'em both in the same bucket, you're right.

Yep....you're a liberal.....

 

[Fenton Lum]

I'm not sure Trump is even aware of his lying.

I'm not sure hitlery is even aware of the truth....

That right there would be the main difference between you and I, I got 'em both in the same bucket, you're right.

Yep....you're a liberal.....

Whatever mang.

 

[Rozman]

Trump who is run by Steve Bannon from Breitbart knew early on how
to manipulate the angry white people out there who were hungry for this BS....

Trump who is a good con man is just the mouthpiece....

Not long ago Trump thought Bill Clinton was a good President
and thought Hillary did a good job as Sec of State....

Now Trump is just a puppet reading from a script or doing his standup comedy schtick....

And oh how the folks are buying into actually
believing Trump cares about them....

 

[Norman]

Does Trump realize he's a pathological liar, or is he "innocent" and simply sloppy, stupid, and senile (SSS) at his age 70?

In the three Presidential debates, for which a Canadian newspaper fact-checked their statements, Trump said 104 false things, Clinton only 13.

Donald Trump made 37 false claims in final debate | Toronto Star

The liberal fact checkers are much bigger liars than he is.

 

[PK1]

Does Trump realize he's a pathological liar, or is he "innocent" and simply sloppy, stupid, and senile (SSS) at his age 70?

In the three Presidential debates, for which a Canadian newspaper fact-checked their statements, Trump said 104 false things, Clinton only 13.

Donald Trump made 37 false claims in final debate | Toronto Star

The liberal fact checkers are much bigger liars than he is.

Where's your evidence?
Or, are you mouthing crap like Trump, hoping his uneducated masses eat that made-up shit?

 

[jwoodie]

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

No, people from prior centuries still vote for Democrats.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Trumps "lies" have jeopardized national security!!!!

For example:

 

[jwoodie]

Where's your evidence?

How about 33,000 deleted/scrubbed emails?

 

[PK1]

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

No, people from prior centuries still vote for Democrats.

Apparently, you are not educated on this topic:
"The parties have indeed flipped on racial issues, corresponding to the movement of southern whites from the Democratic to the Republican party."
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/reversal2.pdf

 

[jwoodie]

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

No, people from prior centuries still vote for Democrats.

Apparently, you are not educated on this topic

Apparently, you are not educated on the topic of voter fraud.

 

[PK1]

Where's your evidence?

How about 33,000 deleted/scrubbed emails?

Deleted emails (prior to subpoena) are not evidence, you dummy. LOL.

 

[PK1]

The racist southern Democrats from prior centuries are now Republicans.

No, people from prior centuries still vote for Democrats.

Apparently, you are not educated on this topic

Apparently, you are not educated on the topic of voter fraud.

Can you back up your claim?

 

[jwoodie]

Can you back up your claim?

Scholarly analysis of the question of how Kennedy won has focused, quite rightly, on administration of the electoral process in two crucial states: Illinois and Texas. Kennedy ultimately was credited with the electoral votes of both, which gave him victory in the Electoral College tally. The problem with answering the question of how he prevailed there is twofold in nature. In Illinois, the most recent and fair-minded study (Kallina’s Kennedy v. Nixon) concludes that sufficient evidence does not exist to determine whether Chicago’s Democratic machine stole more votes there than Republicans did downstate. Texas presents a different kind of problem. A system of free and fair elections in the modern sense had not yet taken hold on the ground there in 1960. Voter fraud was fairly common, safeguards to prevent it were few, and 1960 was no different in those respects. Thus, the most dispassionate analysis of this issue from the perspective of fifty years later is that we will never know whether Kennedy really “won,” in the sense of what result an entirely honest and effective administration of the electoral process in Illinois and Texas would have produced on Election Day in 1960. - See more at: Who Really Won the 1960 Election?