Why is it always Muslims?

[Lipush]

Because the japanese are smart enough to keep them at arms' length, telling them "We won't tolerate your terrorist shit, so take it someplace else".

 

[JoeB131]

That's because Japan severely restricts Islamic activity inside their country, and do not grant citizenship to Muslims. They have it right.

They also don't knock over governments, support Israel or bomb anyone.

THey also don't let North Koreans into the country, but Kim Jong Il still managed to hit them a few times with terrorists strikes.

 

[JoeB131]

Because the japanese are smart enough to keep them at arms' length, telling them "We won't tolerate your terrorist shit, so take it someplace else".

That's awesome. The Zionists need to do the same thing. Pack up, go the fuck back to Europe and be done with it.

 

[Roudy]

So your theory is that if we just roll over and play dead the bad guys will be nice. Does that about sum up your position?

No, but you obviously don't have good reading comprehension skills.

Okay, going to make this easy for you. Maybe if we stopped BOMBING these people and stopped aiding the ZIONISTS in taking their homes and stopped PROPPING UP terrible governments over there, maybe, just maybe they wouldn't see us as the source of a lot of their misery.

The Japanese didn't roll over and play dead. They just made a conscious decision to not interfere in their politics. (Mostly because we stuck them with a constitution that kept them from doing so.)

Ah I see. The cartoonists were slaughtered because of the Joooooooos, it's always the Jooooooos with you Muslims, isn't it?

You kit want to decide which it was though, was it the Jooooos, or the cruuuuuusades?

 

[Lipush]

Yeah, after they're shot in a supermarket on a ramdom day by random terrorists. You know, I always knew you weren't exactly the sharpest pencil in the drawer, but I also see that you're tactless. After what happened this weekend, you should be at least smart enough and don't suggest the "go back to europe" bullshit after Jews and just been shot in Europe!

MORON!

 

[Roudy]

Because the japanese are smart enough to keep them at arms' length, telling them "We won't tolerate your terrorist shit, so take it someplace else".

That's awesome. The Zionists need to do the same thing. Pack up, go the fuck back to Europe and be done with it.

I find it interesting and pathetic that no matter what Muslims do, other Muslims like Joe Blow will always try to blame the Joooooos.

These people are truly sick in the head.

 

[Roudy]

Yeah, after they're shot in a supermarket on a ramdom day by random terrorists. You know, I always knew you weren't exactly the sharpest pencil in the drawer, but I also see that you're tactless. After what happened this weekend, you should be at least smart enough and don't suggest the "go back to europe" bullshit after Jews and just been shot in Europe!

MORON!

And guess who's shooting Jews in Europe?

SAME ISLAMONAZI ANIMALS THAT ARE TRYING TO KILL JEWS IN ISRAEL.

 

[Rusty Houser]

Yes it's true, Muslims are alone in shutting down liberals that mock their God. They have my complete Christian respect.

 

[JoeB131]

Ah I see. The cartoonists were slaughtered because of the Joooooooos, it's always the Jooooooos with you Muslims, isn't it?

You kit want to decide which it was though, was it the Jooooos, or the cruuuuuusades?

Actually, all of Islam didn't kill these racist cartoonists. It was just three guys.

Again, kind of like the asshole who goes into the biker bar and starts talking smack to the bikers.

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah, after they're shot in a supermarket on a ramdom day by random terrorists. You know, I always knew you weren't exactly the sharpest pencil in the drawer, but I also see that you're tactless. After what happened this weekend, you should be at least smart enough and don't suggest the "go back to europe" bullshit after Jews and just been shot in Europe!

You might have a point. Maybe you need to move somewhere where you haven't offended anyone yet.

 

[Roudy]

Ah I see. The cartoonists were slaughtered because of the Joooooooos, it's always the Jooooooos with you Muslims, isn't it?

You kit want to decide which it was though, was it the Jooooos, or the cruuuuuusades?

Actually, all of Islam didn't kill these racist cartoonists. It was just three guys.

Again, kind of like the asshole who goes into the biker bar and starts talking smack to the bikers.

Yes, but this is a totally isolated, now isn't it. They didn't kill Theo Van Gogh over the same thing, they did to kill the Danish cartoonist, they didn't try to kill Salman Rushdie, they didn't target others who either made movies or said negative things about Islam.

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy


The controversial cartoons of Muhammad, as they were first published in Jyllands-Posten in September 2005 (English version). The headline, "Muhammeds ansigt", means "The face of Muhammad".
The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (or Muhammad cartoons crisis) (Danish: Muhammedkrisen)[1] began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaperJyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005. The newspaper announced that this was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship. Muslim groups in Denmark complained, and the issue eventually led to protests around the world, including violent demonstrations and riots in some Muslim countries.

Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims

Thousands of protesters march towards the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur in protest at the film
Date September 11, 2012 – September 29, 2012
Location Worldwide
Causes Innocence of Muslims

Deaths and injuries
Over 50 deaths

• 12 (Afghanistan)[1]
• 23 (Pakistan)[2][3][4]
• 4 (Yemen)[5]
• 4 (Tunisia)[6]
• 4 (Israeli border)[7]
• 3 (Sudan)[8]
• 3 (Lebanon)[8][9]
• 1 (Egypt)[10]

At least 694-695 injured

• At least 280 (Pakistan)[4][11][12]
• 250 (Egypt)[13]
• 46 (Tunisia)[6]
• 35 (Yemen)[5]
• 25 (India)[14]
• 25 (Australia)[15]
• 15 (Lebanon)[8][9]
• 4 (France)[16]
• 1-2 (Indonesia)[17]
• At least 1 (Afghanistan)[18]
• 1 (Niger)[19]
• 1 (Belgium)[20]

On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.

On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy inSana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Context of reactions
The late 20th and early 21st centuries have seen several major incidents of the Islamic world taking offence at pictorial or written representation of Muhammad and his teachings.[21][22][23] In practice people have been brought to trial, killed or had afatwa called on them for a wide range of acts that have been cited as blasphemous, including depicting Mohammad either in writing or in some other manner that was perceived as insulting.[22][24][25][26]

 

[Roudy]

Ah I see. The cartoonists were slaughtered because of the Joooooooos, it's always the Jooooooos with you Muslims, isn't it?

You kit want to decide which it was though, was it the Jooooos, or the cruuuuuusades?

Actually, all of Islam didn't kill these racist cartoonists. It was just three guys.

Again, kind of like the asshole who goes into the biker bar and starts talking smack to the bikers.

Yes, but this is a totally isolated, now isn't it. They didn't kill Theo Van Gogh over the same thing, they did to kill the Danish cartoonist, they didn't try to kill Salman Rushdie, they didn't target others who either made movies or said negative things about Islam.

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy


The controversial cartoons of Muhammad, as they were first published in Jyllands-Posten in September 2005 (English version). The headline, "Muhammeds ansigt", means "The face of Muhammad".
The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (or Muhammad cartoons crisis) (Danish: Muhammedkrisen)[1] began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaperJyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005. The newspaper announced that this was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship. Muslim groups in Denmark complained, and the issue eventually led to protests around the world, including violent demonstrations and riots in some Muslim countries.

Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims

Thousands of protesters march towards the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur in protest at the film
Date September 11, 2012 – September 29, 2012
Location Worldwide
Causes Innocence of Muslims

Deaths and injuries
Over 50 deaths

• 12 (Afghanistan)[1]
• 23 (Pakistan)[2][3][4]
• 4 (Yemen)[5]
• 4 (Tunisia)[6]
• 4 (Israeli border)[7]
• 3 (Sudan)[8]
• 3 (Lebanon)[8][9]
• 1 (Egypt)[10]

At least 694-695 injured

• At least 280 (Pakistan)[4][11][12]
• 250 (Egypt)[13]
• 46 (Tunisia)[6]
• 35 (Yemen)[5]
• 25 (India)[14]
• 25 (Australia)[15]
• 15 (Lebanon)[8][9]
• 4 (France)[16]
• 1-2 (Indonesia)[17]
• At least 1 (Afghanistan)[18]
• 1 (Niger)[19]
• 1 (Belgium)[20]

On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.

On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy inSana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Context of reactions
The late 20th and early 21st centuries have seen several major incidents of the Islamic world taking offence at pictorial or written representation of Muhammad and his teachings.[21][22][23] In practice people have been brought to trial, killed or had afatwa called on them for a wide range of acts that have been cited as blasphemous, including depicting Mohammad either in writing or in some other manner that was perceived as insulting.[22][24][25][26]

Mohammed Bouyeri

Mohammed Bouyeri

Bouyeri in 2004
Born 8 March 1978 (age 36)
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Criminal charge
Murder, terrorism
Criminal penalty
Life without parole
Criminal status In prison
Mohammed Bouyeri (Arabic: محمد بويري‎) (born 8 March 1978) is a Dutch–Moroccan Islamist and convicted murderer who is serving a life sentencewithout parole for the assassination of Dutch film director Theo van Gogh. He holds both Dutch and Moroccan citizenship and was a member of theHofstad Network.


Assassination of Theo Van Gogh
Background
Filmmaker Theo van Gogh was notorious for his crude insults to "everyone respected in postwar multicultural Dutch society, including Jews and Muslims" but who "also helped bring Muslim actors onto Dutch television."[1] In 2004, he and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali refugee who was a Dutch member of parliament at the time, directed a short film called Submission, Part Iabout violence against women, and the Islam. In the film women are shown wearing transparent clothes with verses of theQuran written on their bodies. The film aired in August 2004 on Dutch television in prime time, the ensuing outcry led the Dutch police to offer police protection for both directors, but van Gogh refused. His death was a "direct result of the film".[1]

Assassination
The 26-year-old Bouyeri assassinated Van Gogh in the early morning of 2 November 2004, in Amsterdam, in front of the city's East Borough office (stadsdeelkantoor) on the corner of the Linnaeusstraat and Tweede Oosterparkstraat (52°21′32.22″N 4°55′34.74″E), while he was bicycling to work.[2] Bouyeri shot van Gogh eight times with a handgun, who was hit, as were two bystanders. Wounded, Van Gogh ran to the other side of the road and fell to the ground on the cycle lane. According to eyewitnesses, Van Gogh's last words were: "Mercy, mercy! We can talk about it, can't we?"

Bouyeri then walked up to Van Gogh, who was still lying down, and calmly shot him several more times at close range. Bouyeri then cut Van Gogh’s throat and tried to decapitate him with a large knife, after which he stabbed the knife deep into Van Gogh's chest, reaching his spinal cord.[3] He then attached a note to the body with a smaller knife before fleeing. Van Gogh died on the spot.[4] The note threatened Western governments, Jews and Ayaan Hirsi Ali and referenced the ideologies of the Egyptian organization Takfir wal-Hijra.

 

[Roudy]

Ah I see. The cartoonists were slaughtered because of the Joooooooos, it's always the Jooooooos with you Muslims, isn't it?

You kit want to decide which it was though, was it the Jooooos, or the cruuuuuusades?

Actually, all of Islam didn't kill these racist cartoonists. It was just three guys.

Again, kind of like the asshole who goes into the biker bar and starts talking smack to the bikers.

Yes, but this is a totally isolated, now isn't it. They didn't kill Theo Van Gogh over the same thing, they did to kill the Danish cartoonist, they didn't try to kill Salman Rushdie, they didn't target others who either made movies or said negative things about Islam.

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy


The controversial cartoons of Muhammad, as they were first published in Jyllands-Posten in September 2005 (English version). The headline, "Muhammeds ansigt", means "The face of Muhammad".
The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (or Muhammad cartoons crisis) (Danish: Muhammedkrisen)[1] began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaperJyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005. The newspaper announced that this was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship. Muslim groups in Denmark complained, and the issue eventually led to protests around the world, including violent demonstrations and riots in some Muslim countries.

Reactions to Innocence of Muslims
Reactions to Innocence of Muslims

Thousands of protesters march towards the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur in protest at the film
Date September 11, 2012 – September 29, 2012
Location Worldwide
Causes Innocence of Muslims

Deaths and injuries
Over 50 deaths

• 12 (Afghanistan)[1]
• 23 (Pakistan)[2][3][4]
• 4 (Yemen)[5]
• 4 (Tunisia)[6]
• 4 (Israeli border)[7]
• 3 (Sudan)[8]
• 3 (Lebanon)[8][9]
• 1 (Egypt)[10]

At least 694-695 injured

• At least 280 (Pakistan)[4][11][12]
• 250 (Egypt)[13]
• 46 (Tunisia)[6]
• 35 (Yemen)[5]
• 25 (India)[14]
• 25 (Australia)[15]
• 15 (Lebanon)[8][9]
• 4 (France)[16]
• 1-2 (Indonesia)[17]
• At least 1 (Afghanistan)[18]
• 1 (Niger)[19]
• 1 (Belgium)[20]

On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.

On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy inSana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Context of reactions
The late 20th and early 21st centuries have seen several major incidents of the Islamic world taking offence at pictorial or written representation of Muhammad and his teachings.[21][22][23] In practice people have been brought to trial, killed or had afatwa called on them for a wide range of acts that have been cited as blasphemous, including depicting Mohammad either in writing or in some other manner that was perceived as insulting.[22][24][25][26]

Mohammed Bouyeri

Mohammed Bouyeri

Bouyeri in 2004
Born 8 March 1978 (age 36)
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Criminal charge
Murder, terrorism
Criminal penalty
Life without parole
Criminal status In prison
Mohammed Bouyeri (Arabic: محمد بويري‎) (born 8 March 1978) is a Dutch–Moroccan Islamist and convicted murderer who is serving a life sentencewithout parole for the assassination of Dutch film director Theo van Gogh. He holds both Dutch and Moroccan citizenship and was a member of theHofstad Network.


Assassination of Theo Van Gogh
Background
Filmmaker Theo van Gogh was notorious for his crude insults to "everyone respected in postwar multicultural Dutch society, including Jews and Muslims" but who "also helped bring Muslim actors onto Dutch television."[1] In 2004, he and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali refugee who was a Dutch member of parliament at the time, directed a short film called Submission, Part Iabout violence against women, and the Islam. In the film women are shown wearing transparent clothes with verses of theQuran written on their bodies. The film aired in August 2004 on Dutch television in prime time, the ensuing outcry led the Dutch police to offer police protection for both directors, but van Gogh refused. His death was a "direct result of the film".[1]

Assassination
The 26-year-old Bouyeri assassinated Van Gogh in the early morning of 2 November 2004, in Amsterdam, in front of the city's East Borough office (stadsdeelkantoor) on the corner of the Linnaeusstraat and Tweede Oosterparkstraat (52°21′32.22″N 4°55′34.74″E), while he was bicycling to work.[2] Bouyeri shot van Gogh eight times with a handgun, who was hit, as were two bystanders. Wounded, Van Gogh ran to the other side of the road and fell to the ground on the cycle lane. According to eyewitnesses, Van Gogh's last words were: "Mercy, mercy! We can talk about it, can't we?"

Bouyeri then walked up to Van Gogh, who was still lying down, and calmly shot him several more times at close range. Bouyeri then cut Van Gogh’s throat and tried to decapitate him with a large knife, after which he stabbed the knife deep into Van Gogh's chest, reaching his spinal cord.[3] He then attached a note to the body with a smaller knife before fleeing. Van Gogh died on the spot.[4] The note threatened Western governments, Jews and Ayaan Hirsi Ali and referenced the ideologies of the Egyptian organization Takfir wal-Hijra.

Censorship of the depiction of Muhammad
We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh for airing this show. This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them.


Zachary Adam Chesser[74]
The season 10 episodes "Cartoon Wars Part I" and "Cartoon Wars Part II" feature a plot in which the Fox network plans to air an episode of the animated show Family Guy that contains an uncensored cartoon depiction of the Muslim ProphetMuhammad. Residents of South Park panic, fearing a terrorist response and a repeat of the real-life violent protests and riots that occurred worldwide after some Muslims regarded the prophet's cartoon depiction in a Danish newspaper as insulting and blasphemous. The first episode had a cliffhanger ending instructing viewers to watch part two to find out whether the image of Muhammad would be shown uncensored. In the second episode, Kyle persuades a Fox executive to air the Family Guy with the image uncensored, while echoing Parker and Stone's sentiments regarding what should or should not be censored of "[either] it's got to all be OK or none of it is".[2] Within the universe of the episode, the Family Guy episode is aired uncensored, despite a retaliation threat from Al-Qaeda. However, the actual South Park broadcast itself ran a black screen that read "Comedy Central has refused to broadcast an image of Mohammed on their network" instead of the scene containing Muhammad's depiction, which Parker and Stone say was neutral and not intended to insult Muslims.[2][26]

Parker and Stone note the contradiction in being allowed to feature a profane depiction of Jesus, while being forbidden to feature a purely benign depiction of Muhammad, but claim they harbor no hard feelings toward Comedy Central for censoring the scene, since the network confessed to being "afraid of getting blown up" rather than claim they refrained from airing the scene uncensored out of religious tolerance.[2][50] Parker and Stone claim the only regrets they have over the incident was that their mocking of the show Family Guy in the episode generated more attention than its commentary on the ethics of censorship.[75] Previously, Muhammad was depicted uncensored and portrayed in a heroic light in the season five(2001) episode "Super Best Friends", which resulted in virtually no controversy.[2] Muhammad also appears among the large crowd of characters gathered behind the main characters and "South Park" sign in some of the show's previous opening sequences.[76]

 

[Roudy]

Sudanese teddy bear blasphemy case

The Sudanese teddy bear blasphemy case concerns the 2007 arrest, trial, conviction, imprisonment and subsequent release of British schoolteacher Gillian Gibbons, who taught middle-class Muslim and Christian children at Unity High Schoolin Khartoum, Sudan.

Arrest
Gillian Gibbons was born in 1953 and gained a Bachelor of Education degree from the CF Mott College of Education inPrescot in 1975 (the college closed in 1992). Teaching in a school in Sudan, she was arrested for allegedly insulting Islam by allowing her class of six-year-olds to name a teddy bear "Muhammad".

The Satanic Verses controversy

Satanic Verses controversy

Salman Rushdie, the author of the novel The Satanic Verses

Ayatollah Khomeini,Supreme Leader of Iran who issued the fatwa

The Satanic Verses controversy, also known as the Rushdie Affair, was the heated and frequently violent reaction of Muslims to the publication ofSalman Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses, which was first published in theUnited Kingdom in 1988. Many Muslims accused Rushdie of blasphemy or unbelief and in 1989 Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran issued a fatwaordering Muslims to kill Rushdie. Numerous killings, attempted killings, and bombings resulted from Muslim anger over the novel.

 

[saveliberty]

We have a bunch of pastors running around the US asking for people to be killed? Rev. Sharpton excepted of course.

 

[whitehall]

What about "piss Christ"? American artist Andres Serrano received funding from taxpayers through the "National Endowment for the Arts" to produce perhaps the most offensive "art" in modern history featuring Jesus Christ upside down on a Cross in a vat of urine. Libs loved it, Christians were understandably angered and Serrano is presumably still around pissing on various sacred objects. Nobody died. The radical Muslems who mentally live in the 6th century do not conform to the mores of modern human society. The question is why does the jihad American left continue to defend these maniacs?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Charlie Hebdo was an equal opportunity satirist. Here he is mocking of all three faiths in one cartoon.

Yet only Muslim animals react the way they do.

Your question only works within a narrow context since Christians have a long history of killing each other for no good reason at all.

Those were Catholics! Catholics are not Christians, guys! Hello???????!! IS ANYONE HOME OUT THERE? Christians don't do crusades, mass slaughter, any of that. Enough already.

 

[Sunni Man]

What about "piss Christ"? American artist Andres Serrano received funding from taxpayers through the "National Endowment for the Arts" to produce perhaps the most offensive "art" in modern history featuring Jesus Christ upside down on a Cross in a vat of urine. Libs loved it, Christians were understandably angered and Serrano is presumably still around pissing on various sacred objects. Nobody died. The radical Muslems who mentally live in the 6th century do not conform to the mores of modern human society. The question is why does the jihad American left continue to defend these maniacs?

Sad that Christians allow this act of blaspheme to happen.

No wonder their religion has become so weak and marginalized.. ....

 

[MAGOG89]

Charlie Hebdo was an equal opportunity satirist. Here he is mocking of all three faiths in one cartoon.

Yet only Muslim animals react the way they do.

Your question only works within a narrow context since Christians have a long history of killing each other for no good reason at all.

Two wrongs=right?, and you know most people are not too fond of the Old Testament or New Testament for that matter.

The topic is Islam, we need more explanations and less diversions.

 

[Roudy]

Today the words Islam and Muslims are synonymous with terrorism, intolerance, and failed states.

And yet Muslims think its Christinty and not Islam that is on the decline. They must be living in an alternate universe.