🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Why is nationalism equated to white supremacists again?

Because theyre globalists and nationalist aka patriotism is an impediment to their global paradise.
 
Because Nationalism is incompatible with progressive liberalism and a charge of racism is a typical ploy of the left.
 
Those who are severely lacking in patriotism pretend there is something wrong with it.
 
Why is it considered to be bad "according to the beloved media?"

Good question. Everyone I'll handle this one, thanks.

You see the American public became desensitized to Obama's identity politics and endless, baseless accusations of racism. Much like the parable of the boy that cried wolf, when Romney is racist, Ben Carson is racist, police are racist--the tried and true tactic of the left was falling flat during the election.

So the media fabricated the notion that not only was Trump's American-first populism racist, his pro-American nationalism was inspiring a movement of white supremacists. The media then diligently went about to reinforce the false narrative that there was a large and growing movement of white nationalists all because of Trump. There were never any pictures or hard evidence of this huge white supremacist movement, but they assured us it was there. And it was being led by a gay, Jewish, British fellow with a fetish for black men, Milo. And, as we all know, white people are responsible for all of the injustices and wrong doings throughout history and are the only race that is capable to be racist, so advocating for the culture of European-decedents is advocating for genocide, homophobia, sexism.

Leading up to the election the media constantly parroted this narrative, giving attention to a microscopic, insignificant portion of the population that otherwise would be ignored and relegated to publishing anti-Semitic Tweets that, ironically, mirror the far left's opinion on Israel and Zionism.

The media told us that if Trump loses that white supremacists were going to act out all across the country, because America is a racist country just itching for white people to get out and start a race war. The absurdity is of course, if this did not occur when a black man, or half white if you're an optimist, was elected president twice, we were told that a privileged, rich, old white woman winning the president was going to incite racists to take to the street.

So in conclusion, white people are evil and the media needed a more convincing boogeyman to scare black people and niave morons to vote Democrat.
 
Those who are severely lacking in patriotism pretend there is something wrong with it.


Remember the DNC where they retired to look patriotic?
Hey dems you cant hide your contempt for your country no matter how much the media tries to promote your bullshit.
 
I consider white nationalism bad because it embraces a sickeningly anti-Semitic worldview, excuses and embraces the gutter religion of Islam and the made up nation of Palestine, and has a storied history of domestic terrorism in America.

That isn't to say that I don't believe that there are real racial differences or that it is morally wrong for white people to be proud of their identity and defend themselves culturally as every other racial group in America is not only allowed, but encouraged. But the white national movement is populated by inarticulate retards that for the most part are just rehashing the same bullshit David Duke and Robert Byrd were peddling in the 60's.
 
whats the difference between a white supremacist and a white nationalist?

One fucks his cousin, the other fucks his sister
 
I consider white nationalism bad because it embraces a sickeningly anti-Semitic worldview, excuses and embraces the gutter religion of Islam and the made up nation of Palestine, and has a storied history of domestic terrorism in America.

That isn't to say that I don't believe that there are real racial differences or that it is morally wrong for white people to be proud of their identity and defend themselves culturally as every other racial group in America is not only allowed, but encouraged. But the white national movement is populated by inarticulate retards that for the most part are just rehashing the same bullshit David Duke and Robert Byrd were peddling in the 60's.

Nationalism and supremeism are two entirely different things. Are there no Jewish nationalists?
 
I consider white nationalism bad because it embraces a sickeningly anti-Semitic worldview, excuses and embraces the gutter religion of Islam and the made up nation of Palestine, and has a storied history of domestic terrorism in America.

That isn't to say that I don't believe that there are real racial differences or that it is morally wrong for white people to be proud of their identity and defend themselves culturally as every other racial group in America is not only allowed, but encouraged. But the white national movement is populated by inarticulate retards that for the most part are just rehashing the same bullshit David Duke and Robert Byrd were peddling in the 60's.

Nationalism and supremeism are two entirely different things. Are there no Jewish nationalists?

:lol:

Actually, they're not different at all.

And yes, there are Jewish nationalists. What's your point?
 
The reason why white nationalists are called "white nationalists" is because they want to create an all-white nation. They want anyone who isn't white to be deported. Their goal is a nation free of any race other than white people.

Notice the similarity with modern day "Republicans"
 
The reason why white nationalists are called "white nationalists" is because they want to create an all-white nation. They want anyone who isn't white to be deported. Their goal is a nation free of any race other than white people.

Notice the similarity with modern day "Republicans"
B.S.
 

Forum List

Back
Top