Why isn't congress pushing impeachment proceedings now?

The federal government was the aggressor, when they sent the USS Star of the west to re-inforce sumter

Ft Sumter was US territory, they had every right to supply it. It was the traitors from the south who illegally took US property and paid a price for their treason

They actually got off light. The leadership could have (and maybe should have) been hung for treason.

"with malice toward none, with charity for all". Abe Lincoln

Great American. The southern traitors would not have been as generous
 
After the Traitors fired on a Federal installation...are you claiming that our federal government should not react when attacked? Is that what you support?

The federal government was the aggressor, when they sent the USS Star of the west to re-inforce sumter

Ft Sumter was US territory, they had every right to supply it. It was the traitors from the south who illegally took US property and paid a price for their treason

Sumter was on South Carolina soil, just like any military base outside the U.S. in todays terms.
 
Ft Sumter SC as the traitors from the south attacked loyal union troops. Lesson to you....don't start a fight you have no hope of winning

An attack is not a battle try again.

So 9/11 was a battle?

it is considered war yes. oh goodie now you are throwing this talking point under the bus so you wont be wrong

Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?
 
Ft Sumter was US territory, they had every right to supply it. It was the traitors from the south who illegally took US property and paid a price for their treason

Sumter was on South Carolina soil, just like any military base outside the U.S. in todays terms.

you are a fucking retard.Where is SC located......

first clue. You reside in its boarders.

Moron learn American history. before the war of northern aggression the individuals states considered themseleves seperate countries. It was state first then the rest.
 
It’s not the alleged crimes per se but what the opposition elects to do about the alleged crimes.

For the record I believe the President’s actions un-Constitutional – I just can’t prove it as the courts refuse to get involved.

But Congress also acted un-Constitutionally when it passed the WPA; Congress does not have the authority to abdicate its Constitutionally mandated and sole authority to declare war and cede it to the Executive. This can only be accomplished via the amendment process.

If Congress were serious about correcting this wrong, it would repeal the WPA and enact legislation ‘taking back’ its sole authority to declare war. It would then withdraw funding for this or any other military operation deemed not in the Nation’s interest.


the WPA and most of the new deal programs survived constitutional scrutiny?



and once more for the obama deranged:

Baby Bush advanced his agenda 255 times by using executive orders.

George W. Bush Executive Orders Disposition Tables

Let's clear this up for the obama defenders.
It's not the use of executive orders, it's the way they are used and the purpose they were used. Bush did not by-pass congress when a bill he wanted passed did not make it to his desk for his signature. obama has done that.

if there was something i disagreed with, i'd say so. but the level of fauxrage is really kind of funny.

the only reason bush's didn't bother you is you agreed with him.

so you can call it anything you want. but you might want to dial it down a bit.
 
An attack is not a battle try again.

So 9/11 was a battle?

it is considered war yes. oh goodie now you are throwing this talking point under the bus so you wont be wrong

Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?

So your position now is that Ft Sumter was a terrorist attack by southern terrorists?

I guess you could look at it that way
 
The federal government was the aggressor, when they sent the USS Star of the west to re-inforce sumter

Ft Sumter was US territory, they had every right to supply it. It was the traitors from the south who illegally took US property and paid a price for their treason

Sumter was on South Carolina soil, just like any military base outside the U.S. in todays terms.

It was federal property just like Military bases today. An attack on a federal installation is an act of war or in this case, outright treason.
 
An attack is not a battle try again.

So 9/11 was a battle?

it is considered war yes. oh goodie now you are throwing this talking point under the bus so you wont be wrong

Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?

There was no Northern Aggression. The south were the first to commit treason. They were all traitorous slavers and their treachery caused the deaths of well over 600k Americans.

Lee should have been hung. His body ripped to shreds by pigs and his head put on a post until it was completely fly blown. Then his skull should have been put into excrement. Same with Jefferson Davis.

The stars and bars are suitable for toilet paper. And Sherman was way to kind to the south.

The bodies of the traitors should have lined the roads on gallows.
 
it is considered war yes. oh goodie now you are throwing this talking point under the bus so you wont be wrong

Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?

There was no Northern Aggression. The south were the first to commit treason. They were all traitorous slavers and their treachery caused the deaths of well over 600k Americans.

Lee should have been hung. His body ripped to shreds by pigs and his head put on a post until it was completely fly blown. Then his skull should have been put into excrement. Same with Jefferson Davis.

The stars and bars are suitable for toilet paper. And Sherman was way to kind to the south.

The bodies of the traitors should have lined the roads on gallows.

Or maybe they just could have allowed former slaves to decide what to do with them
 
Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?

There was no Northern Aggression. The south were the first to commit treason. They were all traitorous slavers and their treachery caused the deaths of well over 600k Americans.

Lee should have been hung. His body ripped to shreds by pigs and his head put on a post until it was completely fly blown. Then his skull should have been put into excrement. Same with Jefferson Davis.

The stars and bars are suitable for toilet paper. And Sherman was way to kind to the south.

The bodies of the traitors should have lined the roads on gallows.

Or maybe they just could have allowed former slaves to decide what to do with them

Far far to kind.

Slaves had far more grace and generosity then Confederates, who were the scum of the earth not worthy to ever be called American.:mad:
 
An attack is not a battle try again.

So 9/11 was a battle?

it is considered war yes. oh goodie now you are throwing this talking point under the bus so you wont be wrong

Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?

There was no war of northern aggression...that is just a silly tag that traitor supporters like you put on the South's treason in the name of slavery to make yourselves feel like victims.
 
Ft Sumter was US territory, they had every right to supply it. It was the traitors from the south who illegally took US property and paid a price for their treason

Sumter was on South Carolina soil, just like any military base outside the U.S. in todays terms.

It was federal property just like Military bases today. An attack on a federal installation is an act of war or in this case, outright treason.

Little Traitor doesn't seem to understand that. Who shall we blame for his lack of education?
 
Sumter was on South Carolina soil, just like any military base outside the U.S. in todays terms.

you are a fucking retard.Where is SC located......

first clue. You reside in its boarders.

Moron learn American history. before the war of northern aggression the individuals states considered themseleves seperate countries. It was state first then the rest.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

It gets funnier and funnier. We should all just stand by and let him dig his own hole of stupidity.
 
Last edited:
An attack is not a battle try again.

So 9/11 was a battle?

it is considered war yes. oh goodie now you are throwing this talking point under the bus so you wont be wrong

Was 9/11 a battle or an attack that is the question.

And the original question was where was the first battle of the war of northern aggression?

It's "the War of Southern Rebellion". What kinda school books you all usin down there?
 
It's not the use of executive orders, it's the way they are used and the purpose they were used. Bush did not by-pass congress when a bill he wanted passed did not make it to his desk for his signature. obama has done that.

This makes no sense – is it the EOs or not.

Otherwise you’ve not provided evidence of a crime.

Frankly, you’re in way over your head because you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Sumter was on South Carolina soil, just like any military base outside the U.S. in todays terms.
And South Carolina was then as it is now part of the United States, as it has been without interruption since 1788.

Agreed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top