Why No FBI....?

Lakhota said:
Well, sparky, who's trying to confirm him to SCOTUS? Who nominated him? Plus, Kavanaugh is already a fed on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
This Alleged Incident
Didn't Occur While He Was An Anything Anywhere

Genius

No Prosecutor Will Pick-Up This Case
Because Of The Statute Of Limitations
And Any Judge Will Toss It Out Because Of The Statute Of limitations

Don't You Even Watch 'Law & Order' ??

Duh, it's in the hands of the feds now.
 
It's not?

But it was in the Thomas hearing.

Odd huh?

Your desperation is really getting boring.

The false testimony concerning Justice Thomas concerned relatively current issues.

This involves an allegation from more than a thirty-five years ago.

Why are you so afraid of such a distinguished person, who abides by our Constitution in his decisions, being on the Supreme Court?
 
Kavanaugh is NaziCon garbage. Long live Merrick Garland.

Oh fucking really? Did you know that when Kavanaugh and Garland were on the same panel they agreed 95% of the time.

Does that make Garland a NaziCon piece of garbage too?
 
Kavanaugh is NaziCon garbage. Long live Merrick Garland.


"Kavanaugh is NaziCon garbage" .... My friend, you are taking this far too seriously... maybe a (F politics) road trip might help...

.
 
In the Kavanaugh hearing regarding the very serious allegations of sexual assault?

The FBI was called on during the Clarence Thomas hearings to investigate the accusations made by Anita Hill.

That is how this is done. In fact Orin Hatch REQUESTED that investigation in that case, He KNOWS that is the "regular order".

What are they afraid of?
Not for something from 40 years ago with NO physical evidence no list of witnesses no location listed. Further it was a local matter between TEENAGERS. Any possibility it had a criminal component is null and void by statute of Limitations to boot.

Well, sparky, it was a local matter then - but it's a federal matter now.
It is not any matter as all it is is she said he said. Further the statute of Limitations is LONG past. You can not charge a man with a crime that happened 40 years ago past any reasonable time period for statute of limitations.
An investigation would show if he was at that party. If anyone saw him take Professor Ford into that bedroom...what her state was on returning...

How DRUNK he was. What he said and acted like when he left that bedroom..

There were other people at that party and that is EVIDENCE

And then there is the problem of him claiming NOT to be at a party where this occurred. His denial alone if it turns out he was there...is damning.

And an investigation would show this...or clear him.

He ought to be DEMANDING this...if he didn't do it
At what party? You mean the one that Ford can't tell you the location, month, day, year of or who attended it?
 
If Senate Republicans don't treat Dr. Ford with a reasonable degree of fairness and respect, she may feel compelled to file a criminal complaint against Kavanaugh in Maryland which could trigger a criminal investigation. This was discussed by Rachel Maddow earlier tonight.
In fact it's possible that were he confirmed...we might be treated to the "joy" of having a sitting Supreme Court Justice brought up on charges of attempted rape

Lol, especially when the accuser can't even remember what year it all took place.
 
If Senate Republicans don't treat Dr. Ford with a reasonable degree of fairness and respect, she may feel compelled to file a criminal complaint against Kavanaugh in Maryland which could trigger a criminal investigation. This was discussed by Rachel Maddow earlier tonight.

Since Mr. Kavanaugh is being accused of serious crimes, which if guilty, he should be locked up in a federal penitentiary, a criminal investigation in the state where it happened is the ONLY appropriate venue.

Sen. Grassley's committee is unable to lock him up, this entire complaint has nothing to do with the committee or the Senate's work here.
 
In the Kavanaugh hearing regarding the very serious allegations of sexual assault?

The FBI was called on during the Clarence Thomas hearings to investigate the accusations made by Anita Hill.

That is how this is done. In fact Orin Hatch REQUESTED that investigation in that case, He KNOWS that is the "regular order".

What are they afraid of?

Not regular order when you've already had 6 THOROUGH FBI checks and several clearance updates by the FBI. Also not anything the FBI can address because there are no potential criminal charges due to statute of limitations.

FBI is NOT a political tool. Have her hire a private investigation team. You Dems need to stop thinking that the FBI is your personal Gestapo..
It's not?

But it was in the Thomas hearing.

Odd huh?

were they investigating a 36 year old 'crime' in the Thomas case?
Did you think there was a statute of limitations here?

There is not

And further...what does that have to do with anything anyway.

Are you saying it's OK to confirm a SCOTUS Justice to a LIFETIME appointment even if you knew he had attempted to rape a woman 36 years ago?
He didn't.
 
LordBrownTrout said:
Lol, especially when the accuser can't even remember what year it all took place.
Can't Remember The Year ??
Can She Remember How Old She Was ??
Can This 'Professor' Count On Her Fingers And Toes ??

No Lawyers To Question Her
Kavanaugh Out Of The Room
This Idiot Will Make A Fool Of Herself No Matter What
There Will Be No Ford Testimony
Just More And More Demands
 
Polishprince said:
this entire complaint has nothing to do with the committee or the Senate's work here.
That's Right
This Pick Kills The Prog Activist Grip On SCOTUS For The Last 60yrs
This Would Have Happened No Matter Who Trumps Nominee
 
In the Kavanaugh hearing regarding the very serious allegations of sexual assault?

The FBI was called on during the Clarence Thomas hearings to investigate the accusations made by Anita Hill.

That is how this is done. In fact Orin Hatch REQUESTED that investigation in that case, He KNOWS that is the "regular order".

What are they afraid of?

Sexual assault is not a Federal crime it is a state matter. Anita Hilld's complaint was an alleged violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which is a Federal matter.
 
In the Kavanaugh hearing regarding the very serious allegations of sexual assault?

The FBI was called on during the Clarence Thomas hearings to investigate the accusations made by Anita Hill.

That is how this is done. In fact Orin Hatch REQUESTED that investigation in that case, He KNOWS that is the "regular order".

What are they afraid of?
having to explain to you AGAIN why it's not their role.

they're tired of the lefts shit also.
 
Polishprince said:
this entire complaint has nothing to do with the committee or the Senate's work here.
That's Right
This Pick Kills The Prog Activist Grip On SCOTUS For The Last 60yrs
This Would Have Happened No Matter Who Trumps Nominee
yea, fords letter initially had "fill in name here" where they eventually put kavanaugh.
 
If Senate Republicans don't treat Dr. Ford with a reasonable degree of fairness and respect, she may feel compelled to file a criminal complaint against Kavanaugh in Maryland which could trigger a criminal investigation. This was discussed by Rachel Maddow earlier tonight.

Since Mr. Kavanaugh is being accused of serious crimes, which if guilty, he should be locked up in a federal penitentiary, a criminal investigation in the state where it happened is the ONLY appropriate venue.

Sen. Grassley's committee is unable to lock him up, this entire complaint has nothing to do with the committee or the Senate's work here.

Seriously? Is that your post or did you screw up a quote?
 

Forum List

Back
Top