bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,027
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
No. This has nothing to do with the Grey trial. This was 3 weeks prior.
Shes the top law enforcement agent of Baltimore. And shes ordering specific targeting of a black neighborhood. Thats RACIST. Has Ferguson taught us nothing?
Why are the NAACP leaders tolerating this? THIS is a smoking gun of RACIAL PROFILING. Specifically ordering targeted enforcement on a black neighborhood. Email PROOF.
Shes racist. Right?
Kind of a reach even for you
But I guess it is all you have to try to divert attention away from the Grey case which involved his treatment after arrest
Police have always been expected to target enforcement where it is needed the most. There has never been an expectation that law enforcement must be distributed equally in all neighborhoods regardless of the threat
But thanks...your OP gave me a chuckle
This isnt about the trial.
Her racist order was given 3 weeks prior.
Ive had my mind opened by the BlackLivesMatter movement. Targeting black areas for heavy policing is wrong and racist.
And we have a smoking gun email that she committed this sin.
Is it "light skinned" privilege for her?
Here is your problem...
If she had said ignore the drug selling in white neighborhoods and only concentrate in the black neighborhoods.....your "outrage" would be justified
If the neighborhood she said to concentrate on had no previous evidence of drug activity....your "outrage" would be justified
But targeting drug enforcement in areas of high drug activity....does not justify your "outrage"
So does that mean the outrage by lefties when a white cop or mayor or prosecutor has heavier enforcement on black areas also unjustified? Because those are higher crime areas too.
So...are you saying the outrages by the NAACP against cops who police high crime areas are unwarranted?
Well maybe you will have to provide an example of that "outrage" from lefties before I take you seriously
MSNBC.com
NAACP.com
nytimes.com
For a start.