Moonglow
Diamond Member
The electorial college is fixed to allow only repubs or dems in the White House.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup..thats how they keep the charade going. I no longer call them Elections, They are SELECTIONSThe electorial college is fixed to allow only repubs or dems in the White House.
That's true.Fully agree with the OP. I still think replacing the electoral collage with a popular vote would go a long way in aiding any third parties/independents. It wouldn't work right away, but imagine how much public perception would have changed in '92 had Ross Perot's 20% support actually meant something.
The way it stands right now, a third party/independent candidate can get a decent chunk of the popular vote, yet have zilch show up in the electoral vote. That by itself demoralizes many people (including a few that have responded in this thread) from straying out of line.
In my opinion he isn't much better, he's the same. Republican or Democrat will never get my vote because I have long since figured out that they are one and the same.I disagree with your assessment, and although Romney isn't the candidate I wanted, he's much better than Obama. Maybe if Romney pulls ahead of Obama by a good enough margin then I might vote a 3rd party but for now, I'll not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Lets just say that Romney wins. He will carry on with Obama's policy's just as Obama has done with George's, the dems will scream and pound their fists and the republicans will tell them they have no clue what they're talking about. The cycle will continue.
Attack and defend, attack and defend, it's the same damn thing no matter who is in office and what changes? Not a darn thing. The lemmings continue to fight among each other defending "their guy"
Fully agree with the OP. I still think replacing the electoral collage with a popular vote would go a long way in aiding any third parties/independents. It wouldn't work right away, but imagine how much public perception would have changed in '92 had Ross Perot's 20% support actually meant something.
The way it stands right now, a third party/independent candidate can get a decent chunk of the popular vote, yet have zilch show up in the electoral vote. That by itself demoralizes many people (including a few that have responded in this thread) from straying out of line.
You haven't made a point yet. So I'm not sure how you can prove it.Yeah, again you prove my point.
Edit: I repeat
A self proclaimed libertarian voting for someone who isn't even remotely close to those values is like a guy who says he's straight while pumping his penis into another guys butt... Now I really don't care if you do that, to each their own... But to suggest that you are straight while doing it... I don't know what you are, but you sure as hell ain't straight. Same thing here... I don't know what you are, but you aren't libertarian.
I'm a Libertarian who will be voting for Romney.
The reason?
"Because I'm a hypocrite and not actually a libertarian, I just pretend to be"
I'm a Libertarian who will be voting for Romney.
The reason?
"Because I'm a hypocrite and not actually a libertarian, I just pretend to be"
Excellent points. It's trading one so-called "big government" candidate for another "big government" candidate.
That's rich, a couple of obamabots telling me I'm not a Libertarian.
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................
Yup..thats how they keep the charade going. I no longer call them Elections, They are SELECTIONSThe electorial college is fixed to allow only repubs or dems in the White House.
That's rich, a couple of obamabots telling me I'm not a Libertarian.
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................
There are libertarians telling you that you are not a libertarian. That's fine if you aren't, just don't pretend to be one.
That's rich, a couple of obamabots telling me I'm not a Libertarian.
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................
There are libertarians telling you that you are not a libertarian. That's fine if you aren't, just don't pretend to be one.
Don't tell me you are claiming to be a Libertarian now. the Guy that thinks Libertarians should hate Romney more than Obama.
to fucking Rich.
You do not have a single clue what you are talking about, my 6 Year old makes more sense than you.
There are libertarians telling you that you are not a libertarian. That's fine if you aren't, just don't pretend to be one.
Don't tell me you are claiming to be a Libertarian now. the Guy that thinks Libertarians should hate Romney more than Obama.
to fucking Rich.
You do not have a single clue what you are talking about, my 6 Year old makes more sense than you.
You should have your 6 year old post, I'm sure they would make you look like a 3 year old with your stupidity.
Yup..thats how they keep the charade going. I no longer call them Elections, They are SELECTIONSThe electorial college is fixed to allow only repubs or dems in the White House.
We are literally 1 Party away from just another 1 Party False Democracy. lol
Isn't it Great. Don't Expect to change it, the Cancer is to deep, Normal Means will never change it, and Americans no longer have the Stomach for Extreme measures, We are Sheep on a Farm.
That's rich, a couple of obamabots telling me I'm not a Libertarian.
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................
There are libertarians telling you that you are not a libertarian. That's fine if you aren't, just don't pretend to be one.
Don't tell me you are claiming to be a Libertarian now. the Guy that thinks Libertarians should hate Romney more than Obama.
to fucking Rich.
You do not have a single clue what you are talking about, my 6 Year old makes more sense than you.
There are libertarians telling you that you are not a libertarian. That's fine if you aren't, just don't pretend to be one.
Don't tell me you are claiming to be a Libertarian now. the Guy that thinks Libertarians should hate Romney more than Obama.
to fucking Rich.
You do not have a single clue what you are talking about, my 6 Year old makes more sense than you.
He's an obamabot. He wants as many conservatives voting 3rd party as possible.
Don't tell me you are claiming to be a Libertarian now. the Guy that thinks Libertarians should hate Romney more than Obama.
to fucking Rich.
You do not have a single clue what you are talking about, my 6 Year old makes more sense than you.
You should have your 6 year old post, I'm sure they would make you look like a 3 year old with your stupidity.
Thanks for the Comic Relief man. You are so pathetically Brainwashed, and willfully Ignorant of the Real world, I can't help but Laugh.
Thanks for that.
Don't tell me you are claiming to be a Libertarian now. the Guy that thinks Libertarians should hate Romney more than Obama.
to fucking Rich.
You do not have a single clue what you are talking about, my 6 Year old makes more sense than you.
He's an obamabot. He wants as many conservatives voting 3rd party as possible.
Moron, no right winger would vote 3rd party period. They are owned by their right wing masters to be obedient sheep to the (R)